JINDALS CONSORTIUM In Association with MAV ASSOCIATES “ZY Soe CR Ref: JC/MAV/NDS/DCC/36798 Did.- 31/03/2020 To, Mls Dhar Construction Company, In JV with Shri Chanchal Paul, Maccabe Road, Demseiong, Shillong, Meghalaya-793001 E-mail:- decshg@gmail.com, donbokdee@gmail.com Subject: Comments & Observations for Reinforcement Drawings of CC Ret for the project. ing wall & Breast wall Project: Consultancy Services of Authority’s Engineer for Package-I:- “Improvement/ Widening to 2- Lane with Earthen Shoulders from Ranikor to Nongjri existing chainage from km 0.000 to km 31.700 (Design Length- 33.250 km) in the state of Meghalaya on EPC mode under - SARDP-NE” Dear Sir, We have reviewed the compliance of our comments & observations for Reinforcement Drawings of Retaining wall & Breast wall raised vide our office letter no. JC/MA V/NDS/DCC/36761 dtd 13/03/2020, submitted for the project vides your Email from Mr. Chandan Kumar Das at (05:38pm dtd.-17/03/2020. After reviewing the same, our Comments & Observations are attached herewith. Thanking you, for Authority’s Engineer o Mls Jindals Consortium. In Asso. with MAV Associates D/A- 1. Comments & Observations for Reinforcement Drawings of CC Retaining wall & Breast wall forthe project. Copy for kind information to— 1. The General Manager, NHIDCL,B.O. Shillong, 2. NHIDCL, SO- Mawkyrwat “Wead Office’ S CFG, Vikas Vihar, Ambala City, Haryana 134003, Emal: indals S@ameilcom Tel: 0171-2580013, 9806670918 Branch Ofice: #102, lock No. C2B, GolfLink Residency, Sector 188, Dwaka, New Deli-f 10075; dehi@jndalsconsortum.in; Tel-011 49036895, 9958739419, Scanned with CamScannerConsultancy Services for Design Reviewal of "Improvement/Widening to 2 lar DIA with Letter no. JCIMAVINDS/DCC/36798 _Dtd.- 31/03/2020 ith Earthen Shoulder from Ranikor to Nongjrl Existing Chainage from km 0+000 to km 31+700 (Design Length ~ 33.250 kms)". Revised Comments and Observations for Reinforcement drawing of Retaining Wall and Breast Wall are as follows: Active Earth Pressure acting point must be 2 | considered as 0.42H, as per IRC:6-2017 214.1 214.1.1 states that Active Pressure point of application is 0.3h for wet soil and as we have considered saturated wet soil for our design it remains valid S.No. Comment Compliance Status Load factors must be considered as per IRC: 2017 Table 8.1 1 | Equilibrium by Incorporated Closed considering causing and restoring factors as different. Please ensure calculations by considering by taking dry density of back fill and take earth pressure force acting at 0.42h from bottom. Sample calculations are show by considering 3m height of backfill. It shows that dry with As per IRC:6-2017 clause | 0.42h case gives more overturning moment compared to wet case. ka 0.33 gamma dry 18 kN/m3 gamma sat 20 kN/m3 Height of retaining backfill 3 m Moment at bottom 33.6798 kNm Dry case (0.33*18*3%2*0.5*3*0.42) Moment at bottom 29.7 kNm Wet case (0.33*20*3%3/6) Please check the revised design calculations: «In page 3 of 29 at check for tension chapter. + In page 4 of 29, tension is there at heel location. 11Page yr Scanned with CamScannerDIA with Letter no.- JCIMAVINDS/DCC/36798 Dtd-31/03/2020 Consultancy Services for Design Reviewal of "Improvement/Widening to 2 lane with Earthen Shoulder from Ranikor to Nongjri Existing Chainage from km 0+000 to km 31+700 (Design Length ~ 33.250 kms)". Comment ‘Compliance Status * In page 25 of 29, maximum allowable pressure also exceeded than allowable. Same checks to be done for other heights of wall same checks to be done. for Authority's Engineer i Jindals Consortium in asso. with MAV Associates 2Pace Scanned with CamScanner