PACKAGE

CEPHALOMETRICS

Landmark Errors on Posteroanterior Cephalograms Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2016;

(150): 324-331
Predictors of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea-Hypopnea Severity and J Oral Rehab 2016; (43): 649-655
Oral Appliance Therapy Efficacy by Using Lateral Cephalometric
Analysis
Reconsidering “The Inappropriateness of Conventional Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2016;
Cephalometrics” (149): 784-797
Reliability and Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional J Appl Oral Sci 2015; 23(2): 112-119
Cephalometric Landmarks Using CBCT: A Systematic Review
Correlation of Maxillary Anterior Tooth Width and Outer General Dentistry 2015; July/August: 39-
Intercanthal Distance 42
Newly Defined Landmarks for a Three-Dimensionally Based Angle Orthod 2015; (85): 3-10
Cephalometric Analysis: A Retrospective Cone-Beam Computed
Tomography Scan Review
Experimental and Clinical Assessment of Three-Dimensional J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 2014; (42):
Cephalometry: A Systematic Review 1795-1801
Reliability of Anatomic Structures as Landmarks in Three- Angle Orthod 2014; 84 (5): 762-772
Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis Using CBCT
A Reflection on Radiographic Cephalometry: the Evaluation of J Orthod 2014; (41): 208-217
Sagittal Discrepancy
Validity of 2D Lateral Cephalometry in Orthodontics: A Systematic Prog Orthod 2013; (14): 31
Review
Comparison of Landmark Identification and Linear and Angular Int J Computerized Dent 2013; (16): 241-
Measurements in Conventional and Digital Cephalometry 254
Measurements from Conventional, Digital and CT-Derived Aust Orthod J 2012; 28 (2): 232-239
Cephalograms: A Comparative Study
An Evaluation of the Pi Analysis in the Assessment of J Orthod 2012; (39): 262-269
Anteroposterior Jaw Relationship
The Reliability and Reproducibility of Cephalometric Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; (41): 11-17
Measurements: A Comparison of Conventional and Digital
Methods
Dentofacial Changes in Adults: A Longitudinal Cephalometric J Orofac Orthop 2012; (73):277-288
Study in 22-33 and 33-43 Year Olds
Utility of Thyroid Collars In Cephalometric Radiography Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; (40): 471-
475
Measurements on 3D Models of Human Skulls Derived From Two Clin Oral Invest 2011; (15): 721-727
Different Cone Beam CT Scanners
A Comparison of Cephalometric Measurements: A Picture Eur J Orthod 2011; (33): 350-353
Archiving and Communication System Versus the Hand-Tracing
Method – A Preliminary Study
1
Last Updated: 18 November 2016
PACKAGE
CEPHALOMETRICS

A New Concept for the Cephalometric Evaluation of Craniofacial Eur J Orthod 2010; (32): 645-654
Patterns (Multiharmony)
Accuracy and Landmark Error Calculation Using Cone-Beam Angle Orthod 2010 80(2): 286-294
Computed Tomography–Generated Cephalograms
Sensitivity Analysis for Plane Orientation in Three-Dimensional Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010 (39): 400-
Cephalometric Analysis Based on Superimposition of Serial Cone 408
Beam Computed Tomography
Improved Lateral Cephalometric Superimposition Using an Angle Orthodont 2010 (80): 474-479
Automated Image Fitting Technique
Reliability of Traditional Cephalometric Landmarks as Seen in Angle Orthod 2009 79(6): 1047-1056
Three-Dimensional Analysis in Maxillary Expansion Treatments
Automated Cephalometry: System Performance Reliability Using Angle Orthod 2009 (79): 1037-1046
Landmark-Dependent Criteria
A Simple Method of Assessing Anteroposterior Skeletal Pattern J Clin Orthod 2009 43(7):449-452
from a Lateral Cephalogram
Comparison of Hand-Traced and Computer-Based Cephalometric Angle Orthod 2009 79(3): 428-435
Superimpositions
Comparison of Cephalometric Measurements with Digital Versus Eur J Orthod 2009 (31): 241-246
Conventional Cephalometric Analysis
The Influence of Cephalometrics on Orthodontic Treatment Eur J Orthodont 2008 (30): 630-635
Planning
Reliability of Landmark Identification on Monitor-Displayed Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008 (133)
Lateral Cephalometric Images 790e1-790e6
Soft-Tissue Cephalometric Norms in a South Indian Ethnic Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008 (133)
Population 876-881
Comparison of Hand-Traced and Computerized Cephalograms: Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008 (133)
Landmark Identification, Measurement, and Superimposition 556-564
Accuracy
Cephalometric Evaluation of Long-Term Craniofacial Development Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008 (37) 123-
in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Treated with Delayed 130
Hard Palate Closure
Landmark Identification Error in Posteroanterior Cephalometric Angle Orthod 2008 78(4) 761-765
Radiography
Automatic Cephalometric Analysis Angle Orthod 2008 78(1) 145-151
A Vertical Cephalometric Analysis World J Orthod 2007 (8) 397-404
Validity and Reliability of Ear Landmarks as Reference Points for World J Orthod 2007 (8) 122-128
Cephalometric Analysis
A Practical Method for Determining Pubertal Growth Spurt Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006 (130)
e1-131.e6

2
Last Updated: 18 November 2016
PACKAGE
CEPHALOMETRICS

Development of Imaging Selection Criteria and Procedures Should Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006 (130)
Precede Cephalometric Assessment with Cone-Beam Computed 257-265
Tomography
Assessment of Anterior Face Height in a Native African Sample Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006 (130)
196-201
Development of Cephalometric Norms Using a Unified Facial and Angle Orthod 2006 76(4) 612-618
Dental Approach
Validity and Reliability of a New Edge-Based Compterized Method Angle Orthod 2006 76(4) 619-624
for Identification of Cephalometric Landmarks
The Accuracy of Cephalometric Tracing Superimposition J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006 64(2) 194-
202
A Cephalometric Comparison of Skulls From the Fourteenth, Br Dent J 2006 (200) 33-37
Sixteenth and Twentieth Centuries
Submentovertex Cephalometric Norms in Turkish Adults Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005 (128)
724-730
Accuracy of Linear Temporomandibular Joint Measurements with Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005 (128)
Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Cephalometric 803-811
Radiography
Can Cephalometric Indices and Subjective Evaluation Be Angle Orthod 2005 75(4) 651-655
Consistent for Facial Asymmetry?
A Comparative Study on Methods of Measuring Mesiodistal Tooth Eur J Paediatr Dent 2005 (2) 97-103
Diameters for Interceptive Orthodontic Space Analysis
Roentgen-Cephalometric Standards for a Swedish Population. A Eur J Orthod 2005 (27) 370-389
Longitudinal Study Between the Ages of 5 and 31 Years
The Cutting Edge: Comparative Study of Manual and J Clin Orthod 2004 38(5) 293-296
Computerized Cephalometric Analyses
Enhanced Speed and Precision of Measurement in a Computer- Angle Orthod 2004 (74) 501-507
Assisted Digital Cephalometric Analysis System
Evaluation of Three Devices Used for Measuring Mouth Opening Dent Update 2004 (31) 346-350
Frontal Cephalometrics: Practical Applications, Part I World J Orthod 2003 (4) 297-316
Assessment of Facial Asymmetries from Posteroanterior Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003 (123)
Cephalograms: Validity of Reference Lines 512-520
Cephalometric Evaluation and Measurement of the Upper Airway Semin Orthod 2004 (10) 3-15
Morphometrics for Cephalometric Diagnosis Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2004
(125) 571-581
The Effects of Differences in Landmark Identification on the Angle Orthod 2004 (74) 155-161
Cephalometric Measurements in Traditional versus Digitized
Cephalometry

3
Last Updated: 18 November 2016
PACKAGE
CEPHALOMETRICS

Growth and Treatment Changes Distal to the Mandibular First Angle Orthod 2004 (74) 367-74
Molar: A Lateral Cephalometric Study
The Displacement of Craniofacial Reference Landmarks During Angle Orthod 2003 (73) 374-380
Puberty: A Comparison of Three Superimposition Methods
Size and Shape Measurement in Contemporary Cephalometrics Eur J Orthod 2003 (25) 231-242
Anomolies of the Odontoid Process Discovered as Incidental Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003 (124)
Findings on Cephalometric Radiographs 184-189
Cepahlometric Analysis with Digital Storage Phosphor Images: Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003 (124)
Extreme Low-Exposure Images with and Without Postprocessing 190-197
Noise Reduction
Cephalometric Norms for the Chinese: a Compilation of Existing Austr Orthod J 2002 18(1) 19-26
Data
Regional Size Differences in Four Commonly Used Cephalometric Orthod Craniofac Res 2002 (5) 51-58
Atlases: the Ann Arbor, Cleveland (Bolton), London (UK), and
Philadelphia Atlases Compared
Evaluation of the Utility of Cephalometric Parameters in J Oral Rehab 2001; 28: 234-238
Constructing Complete Denture. Part I: Placement of Posterior
Teeth
An Evaluation of Active Shape Models for the Automatic Eur J Orthodont 2000 22 499-508
Identification of Cephalometric Landmarks
Validity of Identification of Gonion and Antegonion in Frontal Ang Orthod 2000; 70 (2): 157-164
Cephalograms
Tetragon: A Visual Cephalometric Analysis JCO 2000; 34 (6): 353-360
Electropalatographic and cephalometric assessment of Aust Orthodont J 2000 16 (1) 23-33
myofunctional therapy in open-bite subjects
An inference modelling of human visual judgment of sagittal jaw- Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000
base relationships based on cephalometry: Part I 117 140-7
An inference modelling of human visual judgment of sagittal jaw- Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000
base relationships based on cephalometry: Part II 117 303-11

4
Last Updated: 18 November 2016