FAR EASTERN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF LAW 2s!Gemester, SY 2018-2019 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, LAW ON PUBLIC OFFICERS AND ELECTION LAWS Roentgen F, Bronce “The lave will never matke mex free: it is men who have got to make the law free.” + Henry David Thoreau ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ‘A. Definition and Scope; Historical Development Pangasinan Transportation Co, Inc. vs. PSC, GR. No. 47065 (1940) B. Nature of Administrative Agencies 1. The Structure of Government Sec. 2 (General Terms Defined), Introductory Provisions, Administrative Code of 1987 2. Doctrine of Separation of Powers ‘Angara vs, Electoral Commission, G.R. No, L-45081 (1936) ‘Macalintal vs. COMELEC, G.R. No, 187013 (200). Only the Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Puno, J ‘Sec. 12, Art. VIII, 1987 Constitution ‘Manila Electric Co, vs. Pasay Transportation Co., GR. No. 1-37878 (1932) ‘In Re; Rodolfo Manzano, A.M. No, 88-7-1861-RTC (1988) 3. Creation and Abolition of Administrative Agencies Republic v8. CA, GR. No, 90482 (1991) Eugenio vs, CSC, GR. No. 115863 (1995) Ople vs, Torres, 298 SCRA 141 (1998) Sec, 31 in relation to Secs. 21-23, Book Ill, Administrative Code Pichu os. Office of the Deputy Executive Secretary, 677 SCRA 408 (2012) Biraogo vs. The Philippine Truth Commission of 2010, 637 SCRA 78 (2010)C. Control of Administrative Action 1. By the President Secs. 1,17, Art. Vl, 1987 Constitution Secs. 1-7, 21-23, Book Ill, Administrative. Code Secs. 1, 38, Book IV, Administrative Code ‘Marcos vs. Manglapus, 17 SCRA 668 (1985) a. Control and Supervision Carpio vs, Executive Secretary, 206 SCRA 290 (1990) ‘Moran vs, Office of the President, G.R. No. 192957 (014) Ocampo vs, Enriquez, G.R. No. 225973 (2016) ‘Mondano vs, Siloosa, G.R. NO. 1-708 (1955) Phil, Gamefowol Commission vs, IAG, 146 SCRA 294 (1986) 'b. Doctrine of Qualified Political Agency Angeles vs. Gaite, G.R. No. 165276 (2009) 2. By the Legislative Deparment Secs, 21-22, Art. VI, 1987 Constitution ‘Macalintal vs. COMELEC, supra ABAKADA Guro os. Purisima, GR, No. 166715 (2008) 3. By the judicial Department Sec. 1, Article VIII, 1987 Constitution Ant. 7, Civil Code 4. By the Ombudsman Secs, 12-13, Article XI, 1987 Constitution D. Powers, Functions and Duties of Administrative Agencies 1. InGeneral (Catalans vs, Williams, 70 Phil. 726 (1940) ‘Matienzo vs, Abellera, 162.SCRA 1 (1988) a. Express and ImpliedVillegas 0s. Subido, 30 SCRA 498 (1969) Laguna Lake Development Authority vs. CA, 231 SCRA 292 (1994) b. Discretionary and Ministerial Secs. 6-10, RA 9485 Caro vs. Capulong, 222 SCRA 593 (1993) Luego vs. CSC, GR. No, L-69137 (1986) ¢. Errors in the Exercise of Powers Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. CTA, 234 SCRA 348 (1994) Vinzons-Chato vs. Forturte Tobacco, 525 SCRA 11 (2007) 2 Administrative Soriano vs, Laguardia, G.R. No. 164785 (2008) Cipriano vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 165983 (2004) 3. Investigatory Carifio vs. CHR, 204 SCRA 483 (1991) Depertment of Health vs. Cansposano, 457 SCRA 438 (2005) 4. Quasi-Legislative /Rule-Making a. InGeneral Edu vs. Erica 35 SCRA 481 (1970) Ople ws. Torres supra Smart Communications vs, NTC, 408 SCRA 768 (2008) ABAKADA Guro vs, Ermita, G.R. No. 168056 (2005). Only the part on Delegation of Legislative Powers D. Doctrine of Delegation of Legislative Power Pangasinan Tranportation, supra Eastern Shipping Lines vs. POEA, 166 SCRA 533 (1988) KMU ts. Garcia, 239 SCRA 386 (1994) . Requisites and Limits of Permissible Delegation Cercantes vs, Auditor General, 91 Phil. 359 (1952) Pelaez vs, Auuitor General, G.R. No. L-23825 (1965)Baliwena vs. Secretary, G.R. No. 114283 (1960) BOC Employees vs. Teves, G.R. No. 181704 (2011) Eastern Shipping, supra Tatad vs. Secretary, 284 SCRA 330 (1997) US os. Ang Tang Ho, GR. No. 17122(1922) Ynot 0s. JAC, G.R. No, 74457 (1987) 4. Kinds of Rules Sec. 2(2)3), Book VH, Administrative Code Abakada Guro vs, Ermita, supra Eastern Shipping Lines, supra People ws, Maceren, 79 SCRA 450 (197) Peraltavs, CSC, GR. No. 95832 (1992) ASTEC 0. ERC, GR. No. 192117 (2012) Board of Trusts os. Velasco, 641 SCRA 372 (2011) Republic vs. Drugmakers Laboratories, G-R. 190837 (2014) SM Land, Inc. 2s. Bases Conversion, G.R. No. 208655 (2018) De Jesus vs. COA, G.R. No, 109023 (1988) ce. Requisites and Limits of Rule-Making, Sec. 2(4), Book VII, Administrative Code ‘Cominissioner of Customs vs. Hypermix, 664SCRA 666 (2012) DOH os. Philip Morris, GR. No. 202943 (2015) “Tatad, supra £. Administrative Procedure in Rule-Making Sees. 1, 2(1),3-7, 9, Book VII, Administrative Code Hypermis, supra Phil. Communications Satelite os. Alcuaz, 180 SCRA 218 (1988). Include the Separate Opinion of Gutierrez, J. (GMA Network 0s. COMELEC, G.R.No. 205357 (2014) NEA os. Gonzaga, GIR. No. 158761 (2007) ASTEC 0s. ERC, supra People vs. Que Po Lay, 94 Phil. 640 (1954) Cawad vs. Abad, G.R. No. 207145 (2015), Include the Separate Opinion of Leonen, EnforcementPeralta vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 141966 (2005) Diocese of Bacolod ws. COMELEC, G.R. No.205728 (2015) 5. Quasi-Judicial/ Adjudicatory a. InGeneral Secs, 2(5)(9)10), 9(3), Book VII, Administrative Code Santiago vs, Bautista, 32 SCRA 188 (1970) Subido vs. CA, G.R. No. 216914 (2016) Lupangeo vs, CA, 160 SCRA 848 (1988) CIR ws, CA, 261 SCRA 236 (1986). Inckude the Separate Opinions of Bellosillo and Hermosisima, J). Phil, Communications Satelite, supra Satiado vs. Court of Appeals, 356 SCRA 456 (2001) SEC 0s, Universal Righifield, G.R. No. 181381 (2015) Diocese of Bacolod vs. COMELEC, supra b. Incidental Powers Secs. 13, 17, Book VII, Administrative Code DOH vs. Camposano, supra Evangelista vs. Jarencia, 69 SCRA 99 (1975) (Qua Che Gan vs. Deportation Board, 9 SCRA 27 (1963) Harvey vs. Defensor-Santiago, 162 SCRA 840 (1988) Salazar vs. Achacoso, 183 SCRA 145 (1990) Public Hearing vs. SM Prime Holdings, 631 SCRA 73 (2010) c. Administrative Procedure in Adjudication of Cases Sec. 16, Art. I, 1987 Constitution Secs. 2 (6), 10-17, Book VI, Administrative Code i, Administrative Due Process Art. 704, Civil Code Secs. 50-51, Book V, Administrative Code ‘Ang Tibay os, CIR, 69 Phil, 635 (1950) ‘Air Manila, Inc. vs, Balathat, G.R. No. L-29064 (1971) UP Board of Regents vs. CA, 313 SCRA 404 (1999) Go vs, Colegio de San Juan, G.R, No. 169391 (2012) ‘Aaazar vs, Jorolan, G.R. No. 177878 (2010) Ganappao vs. CSC, 649 SCRA 594 (2011) ‘Nacion vs. COA, G.R. No. 204757 (2015) Lumsiqued vs, Exenea, G.R. No, 117565 (1997) Ombudsman vs. Reyes, G.R. No, 170512 (2011)Polbution Board vs. CA, 195 SCRA 112 (1991) ‘Anmerican Tobacco vs. Dirof Patents, 67 SCRA 287 (1975) DOH vs. Camposano, supra Solid Homes vs. Laserna, G.R. No. 166051 (2008) ii, Judgment Realty Exchange vs. Sending, 233 SCRA 665 (1994)Marcelo vs. Bungubung, GR. No. 175201 (2008) Santos-Concio vs. DO], G-R. No. 175057 (2008) iii, Administrative Appeal and Review Sec. 19, Book VIL, Administrative Code Rivera os. CSC, 240 SCRA 43 (1995) Solid Homes vs. Laserna, supra Angeles 0s. Gaite, supra E, Judicial Review of Administrative Action Sec. 1, Art. VIll, 1987 Constitution Secs. 23, 25, Book Vil, Administrative Code 1. Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction or Preliminary /Prior Resort Smart Communications, supra Republic vs. Lacup, 517 SCRA 255 (2007) Pimentel vs. Senate Committee, G.R. No, 187714 (2011) 2 Doctrine of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies PAAT 28. CA, 256SCRA 167 (1997) Obiascn vs. Basalotte, 613 SCRA 110 (2010) Republic vs. 0.G. Holdings, G.R. No, 189290 (2017) Aala vs, Uy. GR. No, 202781 (2017) Regine vs, Pangasinan Colleges, G.R. No. 156109 (2004) [Neaareno vs. CA, 267 SCRA 589 (1996) Pascual vs, Prov. Board, 106 Phil. 446 (1959) Maglalang 0s. PAGCOR, G.R. No. 190566 (2013) ‘Mateo vs. DAR, G.R. No. 213237 (2017) Diocese of Bacolod vs. COMELEC, supra Ocampo vs, Enriquez supra 3. Modes of Judicial Review Reyna vs. COA, G.R. No. 157219 2011) ‘Remolona vs. CSC, G.R. No. 137473 (2001) Ombudsman vs. Reyes, supra a. Appeals from Quasi-Judicial Agencies to the Court of Appeals (Rule 43)Board of Commissioners vs. Judge de la Rosa, 197 SCRA 853 (1991) b. Appeal by Certiorari to the Supreme Court (Rule 45) ‘c. Provisional Remedies (Rules 57-60) Pat, supra 4. Special Civil Actions i. Declaratory Relief (Rule 63) Hyperntix, supra fi, Review of Judgments/Final Orders of COMELEC/COA (Rule 64) Cruz 0s. Gangam, 395 SCRA 711(2003) fii, Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus (Rule 65) Simon vs. CHR, 229 SCRA 117 (1994) MMDA 0, Concerned Res, G.R. No. 171947 (2008) €. Special Writs Lucien Tram Van Nghia vs. Lioag, 175SCRA 318 (1989) Lozada vs. Pres. Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. Nos, 184575.80 (2012) Gamboa vs. Chan, G.R. No. 193636 (2012) F, Judicial Enforcement of Administrative Action GSIS vs, CSC, 202 SCRA 799 (1991) -MMDA cs. Concerned Residents, supra, and the subsequent Resokution (2011) Yomael vs. Deputy Executive Secretary, 190 SCRA 673 (19) LAW ON PUBLIC OFFICERS A. The Public Office ‘Sec. 1, Art. XI, 1987 Constitution Fernandez vs. Sto.Tomas, G.R. No, 116418 (1995) Laurel vs, Desierto, 381 SCRA 48 (2002) Re: Request of CI Panganiban, A.M. No. 10-9-15-SC (2013) Cornejo ‘vs. Gabriel, 41 Phil. 188 (1920) ‘Mathay vs. CA, 320 SCRA 703 (1999) Morfe os. Mautuc, 225CRA 424 (1968) Segovia vs, Noel, 47 Phil. 543 (1925)B, The Public Officer 1. Distinctions Art, 203, Revised Penal Code Sec. 2 (b), RA 3019 Sec. 2 (14), (15), Introductory Provisions, Administrative Code Laurel vs. Desierto, supra Gonzales vs. Hechanova, 9 SCRA 230 (1964) 2 De jureand De Facto Officers : “Lunas. Rodrigues, G-R. No. L12647 (1917) Torres es. Ribo. 81 Pil. 44 (1948) Monroy 08, CA, 20SCRA 620 (1967) ‘Malatuan vs. COMELEC, 254 SCRA 397 (1996) Flores vs. Drilon, G.R, No. 104742 (1983) Menzon vs. Peilla, 197 SCRA 251 (1991) CSCos. Unda, GR. No. 213237 (2017) C. Bligibility, Qualifications and Disqualifications of Public Officers 1, Bligibility and Qualifications Secs. 3, 6, Art. VI, 1987 Constitution Sec. 2, Ark. Vif, 1987 Constitution Sec. 5 (3 sentence), Art. HI, 1987 Constitution Sec. 21 (7), Title |, Book V, Administrative Code RA 9225, Secs, 5(2)(3)5) CSC MC No. 23, 2016 Gaspar 0s. CA, 190SCRA 774 (1990) ‘Maquera vs, Borra, 15 SCRA 7 (1965) Aguila vs. Genato, G.R. No. L-55151 (1981) Lecurez os. Sandigantayen, 305 SCRA 396 (1999) 2. Disquakifications a, General Disqualifications Sec. 7, Art. IX-B, 1987 Constitution Sec. 54 (3), Book V, Administrative Code Flores vs. Drilon, supra Public interest Center vs. Elma, 494 SCRA 53 (2006) b. Specific Disqualifications Sec. 13, Art. VI, 1987 Constitution Sec. 13, Art. VII, 1987 ConstitutionSec. 12, Art. VI, 1987 Constitution Sec. 2, Art, IX-A, 1987 Constitution Sec. 1, Art. XB, 1987 Constitution Sec. 1, Art, IX-C, 1987 Constitution Sec. 1, Art. IX-D, 1987 Constitution In Re Rodolfo Marczano, supra Abeto vs. Garceza, 251 SCRA 539 (1995) Public Interest Center vs. Elma, supra D. Commencement of Official Relations 1 By Appointment Secs. 2@),6, Art IX-B, 1987 Constitution Sec, 54(1)2), Book V, Administrative Code ‘See. 94, Local Government Code (LGC) Corpuc vs. CA, 285 SCRA 23 (1998) Obiasca vs. Basalotte, supra Luego vs. CSC, 143 SCRA 327 (1986) Laurel vs. CSC, 208 SCRA 195 (1991) a, Classification i. Permanent or Temporary De Castro vs. Carlos, G.R. No-194994 (2013) Province of Camarines Sur ws. CA, 246 SCRA 281 (1995) Roymualdez II. CSC, 197 SCRA 168 (1991) Sevilla vs. CA, 209 SCRA 637(1992) ii, Regular or Ad Interim Sec. 16, Art. VIl 1987 Constitution Pace o, Secretary of Com. On Apps, GR. No, L-25895 (1971) PLM 0s, IAC, 140 SCRA 22 (1985) b. Appointments by the President Sec. 15, Att. VII, 1987 Constitution In Re; Valenzuela, A.M, No, 98-5-01 (1998) JBC vs, De Castro, G.R. No. 191002 2010) Velicaria-Garafl vs.OP, G.R, No, 203372 (2015) ©. Appointments to the Civil Service Sec. 2(1), Art. IX-B, 1987 Constitutioni. Career Service Sec. 7, Title I, Book V, Administrative Code il. Career Executive Service CSC. CA, G.R. No, 185766 (2010) PEZA os, Mercado, G.R. No, 172144 (2010) iii, Non-career Sec. 9, Title Book V, Administrative Code iv, Requisites ‘Camarines Norte vs. Gonzales, G.R. No. 185740 (2013) v. Remedies to Question Title Rule 66, esp. Secs. 1,5,7, 10,11, Rules of Court Mantala vs. Saloador, G.R. No, 101646 (1992) Torrosa vs. Singson, 232 SCRA 553 (1994) Bongbong vs. Parado, 57 SCRA 623 (1974) Romualdez vs. CSC, 225 SCRA 285 (1993) ‘opacio vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 179895 (2008) ‘Mendoza vs. Allas, 302SCRA 623 (1999) Republic vs. Sereno, GR. No, 237428 (2018). Include all Separate Opinions 2. By Election E, Rights and Duties of Public Officers 1. Rights a. Right to Office Sec. 20), Art. X-B, 1987 Constitution Camarines Norte vs, Gonzales, supra CSC os, Magnaye, G.R. No. 183337 (2010) Baybay Water District vs. COA, 374 SCRA 482 (2002) Pollo vs, David, GR. No, 181881 (2011) b. Pecuniary Rights Secs. 5,8, Art, IX-B, 1987 Constitution Sec. 1, PD 85 Secs. 8-10, RA 10149 10Baybay Water District vs. COA, supra De jesus vs. COA, supra DBM ws. Leones, G.R. No. 169726 (2010) Domingo 0s. COA, G.R. No. 112371 (1998) Cruz: 0s. Gengan, supra Right to Different and Applicable Leaves a. Right to Self-Organization See. 8, Art Ill, 1987 Constitution Sec. 3 (2 pa.), Art, XII, 1987 Constitution Sec. 26), Art. D-B, 1987 Constitution 98S vs. CA, GR. No. $5279 (1989) 2 Duties Sec. 1, 17-18, Art. X1,1987 Constitution Sec. 4, Art. X-B, 1987 Constitution Secs. 4,5,89, RA 6713, Sec.7, RA 3019 Secs. 6-10, RA 9485 Alcanera 0s Pallanan, A.M. No, 12-3069 (2014) Marquez vs. Ovejera, A.M. No. P-11-2908 (2014) Rabe os, Flores, 272SCRA 415 (1997) PAGC vs, Pleyto, G.R. No. 176058 (2011) 3. Prohibitions i, Additional, Double, Indirect Compensation. Sec. 8 Art. DCB, 1987 Constitution Sec. 56, Book V, EO 202 PEZA vs. COA, G.R. No, 189767 (2012) Posadas 0s. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 168951 (he Decision, 2013) Santos vs. CA, G.R. No. 139792 (2000) ii, Hlectioneering or Partisan Political Campaign/ Activity Sec. 2(4), Art. XB, 1987 Constitution Sec. 5 (3), Art. XVI, 1987 Constitution Sec. 55, Book V, Administrative Code People ws. De Venecia , GR. No. L-20808 (1965) iii, Granting of Financial Accommodations to Certain Public Officers Sec. 16, Art. XI, 1987 Constitution uaiv. Nepotism Secs. 59, Book V, Administrative Code Sec. 79, LGC Deinulgado vs. CSC, 237 SCRA 184 (1994) ‘CSC ws. Cortes, G.R. No, 200103 (2014) CSC os, Dacoycoy, 306 SCRA 425 (1999) . Prohibition on Detail or Reassignment During the Campaign Period Sec. 58, Book V, Administrative Code People vs. Reyes, G.R, No. 115022 (1995) vi Prohibition on Intervention of Relatives Sec. 5,RA 3019 vii Prohibition on Members of Congress Sec. 6, RA 3019 viii, Conflict-of- Interest Situations See.7, RA 6713 Liabilities Secs. 38- 39, Book I, Administrative Code Arts. 27, 82, 4, Civil Code ‘Title VII, Revised Penal Code Sec. 24, LGC Secs. 1-2, 11, RA 1379 Secs. 8.9, RA 3019 Sec. 11, RA 6713 Biaguera vs. Alcala, G.R. No. 109406 (1998) [MINS us. COA, G.R. No. 195105 (2017) Vinzons-Chato vs, Fortune, supra Carpio-Morales us, CA, G.R. Nos. 217126-27 (2015) a. Threefold Liability Rule Fajardo os. Ombudsman, G-R. No. 173268 (2012) OCA vs. Enriquez, 218 SCRA 10993) Jorolan vs. Acuzar, GR. No. 177878 (2010) Tecson vs. Sandiganbayan, 318 SCRA 80 (1959) Ocarapo vs. Ombudsman, GR. No. 114683 (2000) 2OCA ws, Macusi, AM, No. P-13-3105 (2013) Larin 2s, Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 112745 (1997) ‘Cojuangeo vs. CA, 309. SCRA 602 (1999) b. Command Responsibility Rubrico vs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. No. 183871 (2010) Rodriguez vs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. No. 191805 (2011) Balao vs. Gloria Macrpagal-Arroyo, G.R. No 186050 (2011) F, Personnel Actions Sec. 26, Book V, Administrative Code Promotion Transfer ‘Secondment, Detail Reassignment Reinstatement Reemployment Noaveene Espafal vs. CSC, GR, No. 85479 (1992) G, Disciplinary Actions on Public Officers Sec. 23), Art, IB, 1987 Constitution Secs. 46 (b), 50-52, Book V, Administrative Code Balasbas vs, Manayao, G.R. No. 190524 (2014) Villanueva vs. CA, G.R. No. 167726 (2006) Floria vs, Sunga, A.M, No. CA-O1-10-P (2001) Teves vs Feliciano, A.M. No.P-12-3089 (2013) Gupilan-A guitar vs, Ombudsman, G.R. No. 197307 (2014) 1H, Termination of Official Relationship 1. Death or Permanent Disability 2. Abolition of Office Sec. 31 in relation to Secs. 21-23, Book III, Administrative Code Bautista vs. CSC, G.R. No. 185215 (2010) Buklod ng Kawaning EIB vs. Exec. Secretary, G.R_ Nos, 142891-02 (2001) 3. Expiration of Term or Tenure Att. 237, Revised Penal Code Astraguillo os. Man glapus, 190 SCRA 280 (1990) BAchocoso vs. Macaraig, 195 SCRA 235 (1991) Lecaroz vs. Sandiganbayan, supra 4, Retirement In Re: Gregorio Pineda, 187 SCRA 469 (1990) CSC os, Plilia Water District, G.R. No. 190147 (2013) 5. Resignation Sec. 82, LGC Sec. 66, Omnibus Hlection Code (OEC) Ortiz vs. COMELEC, 162 SCRA $12 (1988) Goilantes vs. CA, G.R. No. 169604 (2007) Joson vs. Naria, 187 SCRA 453 (1990) Gamboa vs. CA, G.R. No. L-38068 (1981) Quinto vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 189698 (2010) Estrada os. Arroyo, 353 SCRA 452 (2001) OCA 0s. Amor, A.M. No, RTI-08-2140 (2014) 6. Abandonment of Office See. 11, OFC Municipality of San Andres vs. CA, G.R. No. 118883 (1998) Canonizado vs. Aguirre, 351 SCRA 359 (2001) Quezon vs. Borromic, 149 SCRA 205 (1987) In Re: AWOL of Darlene jacoba, A.M No. 98-8-246-RTC (1999) Philippine Cocomut Authority 0s. Garrido, G.R, No. 135008 (2002) Adiong vs. CA, G.R. No. 136480 (2001) 7. Acceptance of incompatible Office Public Interest Center vs. Elma, supra 8. Recall Secs, 69-74, as amended, LGC Angobung vs, COMELEC, 269 SCRA 254 (1997) 9. Criminal Conviction Garcia vs. COA, 226 SCRA 356 (1993) 10. Impeachment Secs. 23, Art. XI, 1987 Constitution 11. Prescription of Right to Office 4Sec. 11, Rule 66, Rules of Court ‘Tumut os. Egay, 82 Phil. 828 (1949) Republic vs. Sereno, supra 12. Removal through Quo Warranto Republic ws. Sereno, supra 13, Dismissal as Penalty of a Disciplinary Action CSC vs. Clave, G.R. No, 194665 (2012) Fernandez. vs. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 193983 (2012) OCA vs. Ampong, AM. No, P-13-3132 (2014) Lagoc vs. Malaga, G.R. No. 184785, (2014) Gloria vs. CA, G.R. No. 131012 (1999) CSC us. Magnaye, G.R. No, 183337 (2010) 1. Judicial Review of Cases Involving Public Officers Sec. 2, RA 10660 ‘Maglalang vs. PAGCOR, supra CSC os. Ducoycoy, supra i ‘Montoya vs. Police Director, G.R. No, 180146 (2008) I, ELECTION Laws A. General Principles 1. Suffrage ‘Art. V, 1987 Constitution ‘Sees, 24, Art. XVIL, 1987 Constitution, Cf Sec. 4, OBC Sec. 4, RA 9189 Hontiveros vs. Altavas, L-8606 (1913) ‘Moya vs. Del Fierro, G.R, No. 1-46863 (1939) ‘Nicolas-Lemis vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 162759 (2006) 2. Kinds and Manners of Election Sec. 3, RA.6735 Sec. 69, RA 7160 Sec. 2 (1), RA 8436 Sec. 2(1), RA 9369 (CenPEG vs. COMELEC, G. No. 189546 (2010) 153. Blection Period Sec. 9, Art, IX-C, 1987 Constitution See. 5, RA 7166 B. ‘The Commissfon on Elections 1. Composition Sec. 1, Art. XC, 1987 Constitution Cayetano 0s, Monsod, GR. No. 100113 (1991) Brillantes us. Yorac, G.R. No. 98867 (1990) 2. Powers and Functions Secs. 2, 4,5, Art. IX-C, 1987 Constitution Secs. 52, 57, OEC as amended by Sec. 41, RA 9369 Sec. 265, OBC as amended by Sec. 43, RA 9369 Sec, 6, RA 9369 Secs. 2-3, Subtitle C, Title , Book V, EO 292 Sec, 4, RA 7166 Francisco vs. COMELEC, G.R, No, 250249 2018) GMA Network vs. COMELEC, supra Dumarpa vs, COMELEC, G.R. No. 192249 (2013) Gallardo vs, Tabamo, 218 SCRA 253 (1994) Lokin vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 193808 (2012) Cagas vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 209185 (2013) Tam vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 112083 (1994) Brillantes vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 168193 (2004) ‘Akbys Youth 0s. COMELEC, G.R. No. 147066 (2001) ‘Tanada vs. COMELEC, G.R. No, 207199 (2013) of Reyes vs, COMELEC, GR. No. 207624 (2013) oe 0s. COMELEC, GR. No, 221697 (2016) 3. En Bancand Division Cases Sec. 7, Art. IX-A, 1987 Constitution Sec. 3, Art. IX-C, 1987 Constitution Sarmiento ¥s. COMELEC, 212 SCRA 307 (1992) Ibrahim vs, COMELEC, G.R. No. 192289 (2013) Soller vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 139853 (2000) Bayan vs. COMELEC, G.R. No, 153945, 2003) ‘ABS-CBN vs, COMELEC, GR. No. 133486 (2000) Secitta vs, COMELEC, G.R. No. 202833 (2013) Legaspi vs. COMELEG, G.R. No. 216572 (2016) Diocese of Bacolod vs. COMELEC, supra Filipinas Engincering 0s, Ferrer, 135 SCRA 25 (1985) C. The Voters 161. Qualification Sec. 1, Art. V, 1987 Constitution 2. Registration Secs. 3 (a), 89, 11-15 18, RA 8189 Sec. 261 (@NK)(PHYNAA.1), OBC Sec. 2(b) and (c) in relation to Sec. 6, RA 10366 Secs. 3-8, RA 10367 Akbayen-Youth vs. COMELEC, supra Kabataan 0s, COMELEC, G.R. No. 189868 (2009) 3. Absentee Voting, Sec. 12, RA 7166 Secs. 3), 46, 11, RA 9189, as amended by RA 10550 Sec. 2, RA 10880 4. Deactivation, Reactivation and Cancellation of Registration Secs. 27-29, RA 8189 5. Inclusion and Exclusion Proceedings Sec. 33-35, 37, RA 8189 6 Annulment of Book of Voters Sec. 39, RA 8189 Candidacies See. 79 (@), OFC Sec. 4, RA 79 1. The Candidate Penera vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 181613 (Resolution, 2008). Include Dissenting ‘Opinions of Chico-Nazario and Abad, Js. Gator as. COMELEC, 95 SCRA 431 (1980) 2 Qualifications See. 39,LGC Jalosjos vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 191970 (2012) ‘Marcos vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 119976 (1995) JS us. DDB, G.R. No. 157870 (2008) v73, Disqualifications to be Candidates Sec. 12, OBC See. 40, LGC -Muquiting vs. COMELEC, GR. No, 195649 (2013) ‘Ta vs, Crsclogo, G.R. No. 193998 (2027) Latasa vs. COMELEC, G.R.No. 154829 (2008) Alldoving ws. COMELEC, GR. No. 184836 (2009) Albania 0s. COMELEC, GR. No. 226792 (2017) Villaber es, COMELEC, G.R. No. 148326 (2001) Rodriguez vs. COMELEG, G.R. No. 120099 (1996) Jalosjs vs. COMELEC G.R. No.193237 (2012) 4. Certificate of Candidacy (COC) Secs. 73-74, 76, OC Sec. 13, RA 9269 Sec.7, RA 7166 Cipriano vs. COMELEG, supra ‘Conguilla 08. COMELEC, G.R. No. 139801 (2000) Loreto-Go vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 147741 (2001) ‘Amora vs, COMELEC, G.R. No. 192280 (2011) 5. Bifect of Filing of COC (Quinto vs. COMELEC, supra 6. Disqualifications of Candidates a. Disqualification Secs, 68, 72, OBC Sec, 6, RA 6645, Gonsalex vs. COMELEC, G.R, No. 192856 (2011) Francisco vs. COMELEC, Alla vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 163902 (2004) 1b. Denial of Due Course/ Cancellation of Certificate of Candidacy ‘Secs. 78 in relation to See. 74, 69, OBC Secs. 5,7, RA 6646 Gonzalez vs. COMELEC, supra Haapudini vs, COMELEC, G.R. No, 207900 (2014) Villafuerte vs, COMELEC, G.R. No. 206698 (2014) Fermin vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 179685 (2008) Tagolino ws. HRET aad Lucy Torres-Goreez, G.R. No. 202202 (2013) 18Pamatong v3. COMELEC, G.R. No. 161872 (2004) ‘Timbol vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 206004 (2015) Jurilla vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 81192 (1998) ‘Martinez vs. HRET, G.R. No, 189034 (2010) Dela Cruz ts. COMELEC, G.R, No. 192221 (2012) The Second-Placer Rule ‘Maquiling 0s. COMELEC, supra 7. Substitution See. 77, OBC Sec. 12, RA 8436 Sec. 12, RA 9006 Miranda vs, Abaye, G.R. No. 136351 (1999) ‘Talaga vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 196804 (2012) E, Political Parties Secs. 265), 6-8, Art. IX-C, 1987 Constitution Secs. 3,6, RA 7941 ‘Atienza 0s. COMELEC, GR. No. 188920 (2010) ‘Ang Bagong Bayan vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 147589 (2001) BANAT os, COMELEC, GR. No. 179271 (2009) ‘tong Paglaum vs. COMELEC, G.R. No, 205766 (2013) ‘Ang Lailad 23. COMELEC, GR. No. 190582 (2010) Lokin vs, COMELEC, G.R. No. 179431-32 (2010) F. Election Finance and Propaganda ‘Sec. 9, Art, IX-C, 1987 Constitution Secs, 79 (b), 80, 94-99, 102-104, 261 (g) (h)(m) (v) (w)(x), OBC Secs, 6, 13-14, RA 7166 Secs. 3.5, RA 9006 COA Circular 2013-004 January 2013) Garcia vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 170256 (2010) Hjrcito vs. COMELEC, G.R. No, 212398 (2014) Diocese of Bacolod vs. COMELEC, supra Pilar‘vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 115245 (1995) Penera, supra G. Board of Hlection Inspectors (BED and Watchers Secs. 3,26,RA 9369 Secs. 168-169, 179, 199-202, 5, OBC Sec. 26, RA 7166 19Ballots Sec. 2G), 13, RA. 9569 Casting and Counting of Votes Sec. 15,18, RA 9369 (CenPEG vs, COMELEG, supra Appreciation of Ballots (Manual Elections) Sevilla vs, COMELEC, G.R. No. 227797 (2018) Postponement of Election Sec. 5, OBC Sec. 4, RA 7166 Basher vs. COMELEC, 330SCRA 736 (2000) (Catvasa 0s. COMELEC, 383 SCRA 787 (2002) Failure of Elections See. 6, OBC Sec. 4, RA 7166 ‘Dumarpa vs. COMELEC, supra Carlos 0s. Angeles, 346 SCRA 571 (2000) Batabor vs. COMELEC, 4344 SCRA 63 (2004) Sarda vs. COMELEC, 224 SCRA 344 (1993) ‘Mitmug vs. COMELEC, G.RNo. 106270 (1994) ‘Mutilan vs. COMELEC, 520 SCRA 152 (2007) . Special Election Secs. 1-2, RA 6645 Tolentino vs. COMELEC, 420 SCRA 438 (2004) Canvassing and Proclamation 1. Canvassing, Secs. 34, Art. VII, 1987 Constitution Sec. 20, RA 6616 Secs, 233-285, 238, 240, OEC Secs. 5, 20-23, 37, 39, RA 9369 Librados vs. Casar, 234 SCRA 13 (1994) Ufo vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 150111 (2002) Pimentel vs. COMELEC, 140 SCRA 126 (1985) 20Lorenzo ws. COMELEC, G.R. No. 138371 (2003) ‘Quilata vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 87276 (1990) Sema va, COMELEC, GR,No. 134163 (2000) Belac vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 149802 (2001) Tugade vs. COMELEC, 57 SCRA 325 (2007) Ocampo 0s. COMELEC, G.R.No. 136282 (2000) Siguiar vs, COMELEC, GR, No. 135627 (1999) 2. Pre-Proclamation Controversy Secs. 241-243, OEC Secs. 16-20, RA 7166, Sec, 38, RA. 9069 Lagumbay vs. COMELEG, G.R. No, 1-25444 (1966) Suitur 0s. COMELEC, G'R. No. 181868, (2008) Pimentel vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 178413 (2008) Sarudoval vs. COMELEC, G.R.No. 133842 (2000) Villegas vs. COMELEC, GR. No, L-52463 (1980) Baterina vs, COMELEC, G.R. No. 95347 (1992) “Laodentio vs, COMELEC, G.R. No. 122391 (1997) Gustio vs. Red, A.M. No, MT-00-1250 (2001) . Blection Contest 1. Flection Protest Rosa vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 168253 (2007) Abayon vs, RET, GR. No, 222236 (2016) Violago vs. COMELEC, G.R. No.194133 (2011) De Castro vs. COMELEC, 267 SCRA 806 (1997) ‘Maliksi vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 203302 (2013) Abundo vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 201716 (2013) Legarda vs. De Castro, PET Case No. 003 (2008) 2 Quo Warranto Sec. 253, 8C. Luison ws. Garcia, L-10981 (1958) Codilia vs. De Venecia, G-R. No. 150605 (2002) 3. Jurisdiction ‘Alvarez vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 142527 (2001) Relampagos vs. Cuanba, 283 SCRA 650 (1985) Nollen 0s. COMELEC, G.R. No, 187635 (2010) Abayon ws. HRET, supra Lazatin os. HRET, 168 SCRA 39) (1988) Arroyo 0s. HRET, 246 SCRA 364 (1995) Reyes vs. COMELEC, supra aP, Election Offenses Sec. 2(6) Art, IX-C, 1987 Constitution Secs. 261-263, 267-269, OBC Sec. 2, RA 7890 Secs. 31-32, RA 7166 Sec. 27, RA 6646 Sec. 45, RA 8189 Sec. 5, RA 8285 ‘Sec. 13, RA 9006 Secs. 28, 31-32, 35, 42, RA 9369 Arroyo vs. DO], G. R, No. 199082 (2013) ‘Pimentel vs, COMELEG, G.R. No. 126394 (1998) Domalanta vs. COMELEC, GR. No. 125586 (2000) People vs. Reyes, supra Regalado vs. CA, G.R. No. 115962 (2000) ‘Margarejo vs. Escoses, GIR. No. 137250 (2001) ‘Guzman 0s. COMELEC, GR. No. 182380 (2009) GRADING SYSTEM. 20% = Recitation | 20% = Reflection Paper 30% = Midterm Examination 2