Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formato de Auditoria de Acciones Correctivas
Formato de Auditoria de Acciones Correctivas
7
Internal Process Audit Report Page 1 of 4
Process Goal and Objective (includes effectiveness and efficiency measures): Audits conducted, Management
review developed, CAPA developed.
Process Input(s):
Quality management system
Process Information
Quality manual
Procedures
Work instructions;
Process Output(s):
Completed documents
QA-F205a, QA-F205b
Departments Involved:
Document Control; Planning/Scheduling; Factory Stores; Factory MRB; Factory Quality; Corporate Quality;
Purchasing
Interactions with other Processes: Product Verification Process Site Document Control Centers; Quality
Planning Process; Customer Service; Planning & Master Scheduling; Purchase Process for Product and Out
Sourced Services; Purchase Product Verification Process FAI/IQA; Material Control Process, MRB Process
IATF 16949 – 5.1.1, 5.1.1.2, 5.1.2, 5.2, 7.1.3.1, 7.2, 7.2.3, 7.3, 8.7, 9.1.3, 9.2.2.1, 9.2.2.2, 9.2.2.3, 9.2.2.4, 9.3.3.1,
10.2, 10.2.3, 10.2.4
ISO 13485:2016 – 5.1, 5.2, 5.,3, 5.4, 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.6, 5.6.2, 5.6.3, 6.1, 6.2, 7.2.3, 8.2.2, 8.2.4, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.5.2,
8.5.3
Verify that the process being audited meets these requirements in Management System Manual MS-101:
ISO 9001:2015 + AS9100
6 Planning
7.1 Resources
7.1.1 General
7.1.2 People
7.3 Awareness
7.4 Communication
9.2 Internal Audit
9.3.2 Management review inputs
9.3.3 Management review outputs
10.3 Continual improvement
IATF 16949
5.1.1 General
5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness and efficiency
5.1.2 Customer focus
5.2 Policy
7.1.3.1 Plant, facility, and equipment planning
7.2 Competence
7.2.3 Internal auditor competency
7.3 Awareness
8.7 Control of nonconforming outputs
9.1.3 Analysis and evaluation
Process Procedures
ISO 13485:2016
5.1 Management commitment
5.2 Customer focus
5.3 Quality policy
5.4 Planning
5.4.1 Quality objectives
5.4.2 Quality management system planning
5.6 Management review
5.6.2 Review input
5.6.3 Review output
6.1 Provision of resources
6.2 Human resources
7.2.3 Communication
8.2.2 Complaint handling
8.2.4 Internal audit
8.3 Control of nonconforming product
8.4 Analysis of data
8.5 Improvement
8.5.2 Corrective action
8.5.3 Preventive action
Verify that the process being audited meets the requirements found in these procedures:
131653 Work Instruction Control Procedure
DRC-302NW Offsite Storage of Documents
Individuals Interviewed: Luis Mireles #69581 (ISO engineer), Daniel Gutierrez #64081 (ISO Coordinator), Nancy
Rivas # 44579 (ISO engineer), Carlos Ponce #1552 (ISO engineer), Luz Mota #68263 (ISO Engineer).
Other Process Documents Reviewed (drawings, work instructions, control plans, additional process procedures, etc.):
QA 205 Rev #AO, KTC-QA-F0193a Rev C, KTC-QA-0351 Rev A, KTC-QA-F205b Rev E, QA 242 Rev M, KTC-QA-
Audit Summary
0101 Rev H, Internal audit records, management review record, CAPA system (MQ1), QA-213 Rev. BF.
Strengths:
Excellent Teamwork
Organization
Commitment
Opportunities for Improvement (if assigned preventive action, list CAR #): None.
This process is effective because (for example, list process metrics being met):
The management review and the Corrective and preventive action process are effective because they were
completed accordance with what is was established in each procedure (MS-210 Rev. C, QA-213 Rev. BF), there is
evidence from the recent and last management review. Also, there were found all the audits being conducted
according with the audit schedule.
Revision History
Rev Description Approval Approval Date
A Create form per RFEC # 106641 Gary Kougl L. Bostwick 6/28/11
B Added effectiveness and efficiency measure to process goal per RFEC # 106917 Gary Kougl L. Bostwick 7/19/11
C Added Shift(s) in Audit Information Section per RFEC #228849 B. Jefferson L. Bostwick 11/10/14
D Update document number and change the QA185 to the MS-101 per RFEC #245411 C. Ellis L. Bostwick 4/3/2017
E Update to reverse the effectiveness level ratings per RFEC# 248624 C. Ellis D. Knaggs 9/13/17
Have follow-up actions from previous management reviews been Yes, this information is putted into the Management reviewed
reviewed with the VP of Quality during regular scheduled staff A (Site)
o
meetings? Q
k
S
Have corrective actions been issued as needed for QMS elements o A The root cause and long term solutions are reviewed by
reviewed by the VP of Quality during regular scheduled staff meetings? k Q corporate to ensure the actions are adequate as needed
Is the management review recorded? o S
A Yes, the management review is recorded in a binder.
*Check during the audit. k Q
6.1 Provision Of Resources (MD), 7.1 Resources (QMS) S
Have resources been provided to maintain an effective CAPA process? Yes, SW have the ISO team to keep and follow the CAPA
A
o Process and Nancy Rivas is the owner of this activity also the
Q
k owner of the process assigned have the responsibility to
S
implement the actions
6.2 Human Resources (MD)
Based on their education, training and skills are personnel responsible We check this with Yammel (Human resources manager) and
for the CAPA process competent to perform work affecting the A she told us that every candidate need to fill the job description in
o
conformity of product to requirements? Q order to get the job.
k
S
6.2 Human Resources (MD), 7.2 Competence (IATF), 7.3 Awareness (IATF)
Have personnel responsible for answering corrective and preventive A Yes, we checked Nancy Rivas training and we found evidence of
o
actions been adequately trained? Q her training
k
S
Have personnel responsible for the evaluating the effectiveness of o A Yes, all the personnel that evaluates effectiveness has training to
corrective and preventive actions been adequately trained? k Q ensure effectiveness
S
Are personnel aware of the importance of their activities in the CAPA A Yes, all the personnel know the importance and consequences if
process? o not answer correctly
Q
k
S
Are records maintained for all personnel involved in the CAPA process? A Yes, all records are saved in MQ1 System
o
Q k
S
8.3 Control of Nonconforming Product (MD), 8.7 Control of Nonconforming Outputs (IATF)
Are corrective and preventive actions issued for the elimination of Yes, used the methodogies of 5 whys and a long term solution is
detected process non conformances? A implemented
o
Q
k
S
Are corrective and preventive actions issued for the elimination of A Yes, a root cause analysis is conducted and a long term solution
detected product nonconformances? o is implemented
Q
k
S
Do corrective actions for nonconforming product include product re- A Yes, all the product is certificated to ensure the quality
verification to demonstrate conformity to requirements? o
Q
k
S
Do corrective actions for medical devices include documented A Yes this information is part of the DHR
o
concessions or an approved documented rework process as part of the Q
k
containment? S
8.4 Analysis of Data (MD), 9.1.3 Analysis and evaluation (IATF)
Are corrective and preventive actions issued based on customer A Yes, according to QA-213 Rev. BF Section 4.5 Customer
o
feedback, conformity to product requirements and process trends? Q corrective actions
k
S
Are records of data analysis maintained for AQS products and have Yes, all CPR’s are keep into MQ1 System and if not meet the
corrective actions been issued when data does not meet expectations? A expectations are rejected and created a RFI to continue the
o
Q process, based on QA-213 Rev. BF Section 4.5.2
k
S
8.5.2 Corrective Action (MD) , 10.2 Nonconformity and Corrective Action (IATF)
Are corrective actions issued to eliminate nonconformances and prevent A Yes, a root cause analysis is conducted and a long term solution
o
them from recurring? Q is implemented
k
S
Are these corrective actions appropriate to the effects of the o A Yes, the actions are reviewed by approvers who ensure that the
nonconformances? k Q actions are according with the issue.
S
Does the documented procedure adequately define the requirements for Yes, Procedure QA-213 Rev. BF establishes the corporate
the corrective action process? guidelines for the Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA)
A Program and establishes a system for the consistent
o
Q identification, correction, prevention, oversight, and review of
k
S quality discrepancies as
they affect materials, products, processes, and quality systems.
Is there evidence that problem solving techniques have been used to A Yes, all CPR’s (sample) have loaded the 5 Why’s or 3X5 Why’s
o
identify root causes and long term solutions in corrective actions? Q loaded as common methodologies used but more than one tool
k
S may be used (see QA-213 Rev. BF Section 4.4.1.5)
10.2.4 Error-Proofing (IATF)
Is there evidence that error-proofing methodologies are being utilized in Yes, all CPR’s into MQ1 is used checklist to assure the error
the corrective action process? A proofing before to send to approvals, also QA-213 Rev. BF
o
Q section 4.4.1.10 require these actions
k
S
9.2.2 Internal audit (QMS); 8.2.4 Internal audit (MD); 9.2.2 Internal audit (AS)
Has the organization: O A The complete plan of internal audits is in the document KTC-QA-
K Q
S
F0193a, Rev. C, clearly describes every standard, plant and
a) Planned, established, implemented and maintained an audit auditor in charge of every audit, the results of the audits are sent
programme, including the frequency, methods, responsibilities, planning by email to each plant manager, describing findings,
requirements and reporting which takes into consideration the observations and corrective actions if they were found during the
importance of processes concerned, changes affecting the organization, audit.
and the results of previous audits?
b) Defined the audit criteria and scope for each audit? A b) Yes, each scope is defined in the document KTC-QA-F0193a
O
Q
K
S
Rev. C
c) Selected auditors and conducted audits to ensure objectivity and c) Yes, the auditors tell us that they would not audit a person in a
impartiality of the audit process? plant and that the person who is in charge of that process.
d) Ensured that the results of audits are reported to relevant d) Yes, the closing meetings that are carried out in each plant,
management? where they explain everything or that was seen during the audit
and if there was any corrective action.
e) Taken appropriate correction and corrective actions without undue e) Yes, corrective actions are creating on time, but it is the CAPA
delay? system that manages it and ends completely, reference to the
document QA 205, clause 4.8.
f) Retained documented information as evidence of the implementation f) Yes, they retain documented information according with the
of the audit programme and the audit results? document DRC-204.
Does the process include the development and implementation of an A Yes, have it implemented in document QA-205 Rev. AO, clause
O
internal audit programme? Q 4.3
K
S
Has the internal audit programme cover all quality management system? Yes, in the procedure QA-205, Rev. #AO, clause 4.3.1 says:
Is the audit programme prioritized based upon risk, performance trends, “audit schedules shall be planned taking into consideration the
and criticality of the process? importance/criticality of the processes being audited, risk, internal
and external performance trends, results of the previous audits,
and directives from the management reviews”.
Is the organization including software development capability In the KTC system does not apply the software development
assessments in the programme? capability assessments.
Does the frequency audits is reviewed and adjusted based on Yes, this is explaineds in the procedure QA-205, Rev. #AO, 4.3
occurrence of process changes, internal and external nonconformities, Develop Audit Schedule.
and customer complaints?
Does the organization use customer-specific required approaches for The customer-specific are made depending on the process, and
process audits? verified in floor, but there is not established process yet.
Does the organization have a documented process risk analysis, control Yes, the information is placed on the documents QA-242 Rev. M
plan, and associated documents? and KTC-QA-0101, Rev. H.
Does the organization maintain a list of qualified internal auditors? The list of this qualified internal auditors are in the document
KTC-QA-0401, Rev C.
A
O
Are quality management system auditors, manufacturing process K
Q
auditors, and product auditors all able to demonstrate the following S
minimum competencies:
E) understanding how to plan, conduct, report, and close out audit Yes, the complete work of an audit is carried out following the
findings. document #QA-205, Rev #AO
Do manufacturing process auditors demonstrate techincal O A During the internal audit we asked to Luis Mireles #69581 (ISO
K Q
understanding of the relevant manufacturing process to be audited, S
Engineer) she showed us exams, trainings and certificates about
including process risk analysis and control plan? core tools requirements and IATF Standard.
Do product auditors demonstrate competence in understanding product Yes, the auditors demonstrate competence by having training
requirements and use of relevant measuring and test equipment to verify and exams done with reference to core tools, ISO 9001 and IATF
product conformity? A
O 16949 standard.
Q
K
S
Where training is provided to achieve competency, is documented Yes, all this evidence can be found in the record of each auditor
information retained to demonstrate the trainer's competency with the that retains the training department.
above requirements?
The quality management system auditors are responsible of
Is maintenance of and improvement in internal auditor competence
check any changes of documentation in the system by e-mail and
demonstrated through: f) executing a minimum number of audits per
the MQ1 system, to ensure each document is with the latest
year, as defined by the organization; and g) maintaining knowledge of
relevant requirements based on internal changes and external changes? revision. If any document update is submitted, it’s sent by email
to all interested parties.
5.1 - How are statutory and regulatory requirements communicated to O A All the regulatory requirements are communicated according
the organization? How is it documented? K Q to each product.
S
5.1.1 - What are the Quality, Environmental and Sustainability policies? O A The quality policy is controlled through Management
Are they controlled? K Q Systems Policy Manual MS-101 Rev. BA, and the
S Environmental policy is according with the Environmental,
Health and Safety Policy Manual EHS-101 Rev. L .
agement system measured?
5.1.1 - How are the results of management review communicated to the O A Each manager has the responsibility to communicate the
organization? K Q results of the management review to his work team.
S
5.1.1 - How do Executive and Management Teams determine if O A The managers staff determine the resources needed through
resources are available and adequate? K Q a meeting.
S
5.1.1.2 - How do Executive and Management Teams ensure that O A Through the meet of quality objectives.
product realization and support processes are effective and efficient? K Q
S
5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness and efficiency O A The effectiveness and efficiency is reviewed through internal
K Q audits, also with the achievement of objectives.
S
5.1.2 - How is product conformity and on-time delivery measured? How O A Through action plans and all these topics are inputs of the
are other customer requirements measured? How are actions taken K Q Management review as metrics
when goals are not met? S
5.1.2 - How does Key Tronic focus on enhancing customer satisfaction? O A This activity is by Corporative, through Score Cards
K Q
S
5.3 - Does the quality policy include a commitment to comply with O A Yes, the quality policy included all these topic
requirements and continually improve the Management System K Q
effectiveness? S
5.3 - Is there an established process to review the quality policy for O A Is reviewed by Managers and Top Management as inputs in
continuing suitability? K Q Management Review – Corporative is responsible to ensure
S this topic according with the procedure Management
Systems Policy Manual MS-101 Rev. BA
5.4 Planning, 5.4.1, Quality Objectives, 5.4.2 Quality management system planning (MD), 6 Planning (QMS)
6.1.1 - Who is responsible to ensure that Key Tronic’s Quality Objectives O A Corporative has the responsibility to established quality
are established at relevant functions and levels? K Q objectives.
S
5.4 - What are the quality objectives for the management system and O A The objectives are Productivity, Quality, Cost, and they are
how are they measured, monitored, and communicated? Are these K Q continually monitored to take actions
objectives documented? S
5.4.1 - What planning is involved in order to achieve the Quality O A Strategic Planning y and developed actions plans
Objectives? K Q
S
5.4.2 - How does Executive Management ensure the integrity of the O A Changes are identified by top management, regarding
Management System when changes are planned and implemented? K Q adequate resources and risk mitigation
S
6.1 Provision of resources (MD), 7.1.1 General (QMS), 7.1.2 People (QMS), 7.1.3.1 Plant, facility and equipment planning
(IATF)
7.1.1, 7.1.2 - Does leadership ensure that the appropriate resources are O A Yes, top management provide the necessary resources to
available to support the implementation and maintenance of the QMS? K Q the quality management system.
In cases where internal sources can’t fully support the QMS are external S
providers contracted?
6.1 - Are adequate resources available to ensure customer and O A Yes, top management provide the necessary resources to
regulatory requirements are met? K Q met customer requirements.
S
7.1.3.1 - What kind of methods does the organization has implemented O A This function is performed and covered by HQ during the
to evaluate the manufacturing feasibility for new product or operations? K Q corporate management review.
Are the assessments and manufacturing feasibility include in the S
management review
7.2.3 - How are customer and regulatory requirements promoted O A Planning, closed loop process, resource allocation and
throughout the organization? K Q Management review for effectiveness.
S
5.6, 9.3, 9.3.1.1, 9.3.2.1 Management review inputs (MD), (QMS), (IATF)
Are all action items from the previous management review closed? If O A Yes, this information was described in “Follow-up actions
not are they on time for completion? K Q from previous management reviews” section in the
S Management Review Meetings 2018.
Are resources evaluated for adequacy? If it is determined that resources O A Yes, close loop process.
are not adequate were actions taken or planned to bring in or source out K Q
these resources? S
Is the effectiveness on actions taken to address risks and opportunities O A Measures taken during closed loop process as well as risk
adequate? K Q mitigation efforts to determine adequacy.
S
Are opportunities for improvement identified? Are actions identified to O A Yes, in the management review records there were found a
address these opportunities? K Q section with the improvement actions required.
S
Is the management review conduct at least once a year? O A Yes, during the audit Daniel Gutierrez (ISO coordinator)
K Q showed us the 2018 Management Review records.
S
Can you show me the latest management review? O A Yes, there were found evidence of the management at
K Q September 2018.
*Note: Review the requirements on the clause 9.3.2.1 has been meet with the S
management review.
5.6.3 - Does the organization review the decisions and actions taken O A Yes, during the audit Daniel Gutierrez (ISO coordinator)
and keep records of these? K Q showed us the record of Management Review meeting 2018
Can you show me the record of last review output S developed on September.
8.2.4 Internal audit (MD), 9.2 Internal Audit (QMS), 7.2.3 Internal auditor competency (IATF)
8.2.4 - Senior management, during management reviews, shall evaluate O A Yes, this information was described in “Results audits”
the effectiveness and efficiency of the internal auditing process. Please K Q section.
provide evidence of management reviews where the internal auditing S
process was reviewed for effectiveness and efficiency.
7.2.3 - Are auditor competency requirements established? O A Yes, this information is established in the procedure QA-205
K Q Internal Management System Audit Rev. AO “4.4 Auditor
S Competency”
9.2 - Internal audit results are reviewed with the audited departments at O A Yes, they review the results of the audit with the audited
the completion of the audit, how is the department review documented? K Q department through a closing meeting, and they send an
S internal audit report where is described all the issues.
9.2 - Are internal audit results reported to management? In what format O A Yes the internal audit results are reported through the format
are these results communicated? K Q Internal audit report QA-F205b
S
Are complaints handled and managed in a timely manner? O A Everything is responded to within 24 hours or less by QA
K Q Corp, MQ1 CAPA system root cause and corrective action.
S
When complaint product is returned for evaluation, what is the process O A When complaint product is returned a person assigned
to ensure the product is not co-mingled with acceptable product? K Q evaluate the complaint product through the RMA process.
S
When a customer complains what is the process to contain the same or O A Corporate customer complaint handling QA-259 Rev. I
similar product located at Key Tronic? K Q
S
10.3 - What is the process for determining continual improvement O A QA-253 Rev. L. evidence seen at highest level, Management
projects based on data provided to management review. How are these K Q review records sampled.
projects disseminated and how are they tracked to ensure project S
completion?