Professional Documents
Culture Documents
cn
This is all the evidence that the Indo-Iranians have to say that the Alans were Indo-Iranians:
The Ossetians live today where the Alanians lived in the Middle
Ages (the black line in the map is the border inside which the
Sarmatian Alans lived (Yentsai Alliance, UNESCO).
In 1949, V. I. Abaev1) decreed that, in the Ossetic language, the
basic lexicon is Indo-Iranian and the systems of declination and
postpositions are agglutinative. After that, the Indo-Germanists,
inferred that the Scythians, Sarmatians, and the Saka all spoke
Indo-Iranian. The language spoken in 1949 by the Ossetians can
in no way be used as evidence that all the “Nomads”, 2 millennia
earlier, had that same Indo-Iranian lexicon! An agglutinative
language cannot be Indo-European, regardless of its lexicon:
lexicon is easily changed or contaminated, word by word, with
time; but changing the structure of a language requires a sudden
entire language replacement, which did not occur!
Shame on you! …and do not call them nomads: the Arya were
the nomads: Ossetian Alania survived, as a Hungarian
settlement, in the same place, from the 1st c. BC to the 12th c.
AD! (Page 82).
1) “Ossetian language and folklore”, V. I. Abaev. Lamberg-
Karlovsky, Oxford University, maintains that “there is no evidence for the Scytho-Iranian theory of Abaev”. The archaeology of the
Sarmatians and the genetics of Prokhorovka, too, are against it.
The archaeological evidence that the Alans were Hungarians is on pages 82-84 and in the book “Аланский всадник. Сокровища
князей I-XII веков”, Т. А. Габуев, or see The Hungarian Alanian archaeology of the Huns.
The Enciclopedia Iranica is not aware of the history of the Alans before their arrival in Caucasus. This part of their history, in Central Asia,
has been reconstructed by the UNESCO and the map on the left shows where they lived in Centrala Asia: the 2 black bordered areas
together made the Yentsay alliance, in the early Christian Era.