William Empson
TYPES
of Ambiguitym1
Ait amie of the thied type, considera a erbl mater,
‘occurs when to ideas, whieh are connected only by being
both relevant in the eontext, can be given in one word simul
taneously. This is often done by reference to derivation; thus
Dalilah is
"That specious monster, ny secomplied snare,
‘The notes say: Speciows, “beautiful and deceitful"; monster,
“something unnatural and something striking shown as. sign of
lisater's accomplithed, ‘skilled inthe arts of blandishment and
successfil in undoing her husbane.” ‘The point here is the sharp
ness of distinction between the two meanings, of which the
reader is forced tobe aware; they are two pieces of information,
{90 pacts of the narrative; if ingenuity bad not used an accident,
they would have required two swords,
"The meanings of a pun of the third type may, of course, be
“connected” in this sense, that their being put into one word
produces an additional effect; thus here they are used to conee i=
trate feeling upon the single line in the speech, focussed in this
‘way to holdall Samson's hatred, when he expresses his grievances
against her, Indeed, i the pun ie producing no additional effect
ithas no funetion and is of no interest; and you may say that, in
50 far as an ambiguity is justified, it a moved upwards or down
‘wards on my scale out of the third type. If this were true, the
type would gain in theoretical importance but contain no ex
amples of interest to the reader of poetry. But I think itis not
true, because the matters complicated by questions of conscious
ness, ofthe direction of the readers attention, of the interaction
between separated parts of his mind, and ofthe means By which
8 pun can be justified to him. "To begin with, I should eal it an
smbiguity ofthis type when one js mainly conscious of the pun,
‘ot ofits consequences. ‘There may be an additional meaning,
fiven because two meanings have heen fted into one word,
Which takes effect only when the reader is attending, net to it,
but tothe fact that they have been fitted into one word, so that
SEVEN TYPES OF AMBIGUITY 103
‘one could call ta deduction from the fact that they have been
fitted into one word,
Ye, who appointed stand,
Do a you Haven charg, and rity touch
‘Win we propound, and fou ht al ay eae
(Paratie Lavi 565)
I's a biter and controlled mood of irony in which Sstan gives
this address to his gunners; 80 much above mere ingenuity that
the pans scem alonot like « generalisation, But here, 29 for
Breil pane ui pera, 6b pot into the sate of ind intended
you muse concentrate your attention on the ingenuity; on the
Dray the words are belig interpreted both by the gunner them
selves and by the angel rho have not yet heard of aillery; on
the fact that they are pons, want to insist thatthe question
not hereof ‘consciousnes” of a device as a whole, But of con-
oie of partir part of iy for ene rtet cot acaly fol
doubtful about antithess involving the idea of “unconscious?
Berio ete cit ee tteee eer we eee
Fietion ora product of definition, In literary mater it covers a
arety of antitheacs, a8 between tate and tnayaa, at eocing
for not seing the consequences ofa proposition; here T mean by
eee eee ato eee
to which iti ost natal to direct your attention. In this vense,
flea ox wide datiacion belreen the bey tiga conoeraed
ily oli the angi a the fon of cosines
ee eee tee tae freee
may be ecrifed; make it more obvious tothe reader, more
Perens oreri steep atl ae eect ere
pression of sensibility. Thus ite mort definite example are likely
steel eee eee ee
seventeenthcentury mystics who stress the conscious will, the
ightesnth-century stylists who stress rationality, clarity, and
Satire, and the harmless nineteenth-century punstes who stress
asec eels
‘A pun inay be justified tothe reader, eo long a its two parts
have not attong associations of their own and do not suggest
dierent modes of judgment, by saying two things, both of which
Iesroesteie eel wrested ee ety pill eects ele
‘wave which, though diferent, are seen at once t0 come t0 thex SEVEN TYPES OF AMBIGUITY
i a sort of formal satisfaction in such a connection between two
ideas even when they are merely both relevant and need not have
bbeen particularly connected. For one is accustomed to such
‘devices being used to connect things in an illuminating way, and
thereis at least the pleasure of expectation in secing the all even
syhien it is empty. “Much of the cult of ‘syle’ isa sort of prac-
tising in this way. But, indeed, one ean say more boldly that
Proust's belief, 28 a matter of novel-writing, is very convincing;
that the pleasure in style is continually to be explained by just
‘uch a releasing and knotted duality, where those who have been
wedded in the argument are bedded together in the phrase; that
fone must assume that m2 is more valuable than for any but the
‘most evasively mystical theory of value, ‘Those who adopt this
View are taking refuge in the mysterious idea of an organi, of|
all chings working together for good; we shell expect, from this
point of view, to find more important cases of ambiguity when
several ambiguities are put together, when they belong to my
next chapter, and representa etate of mind,
Wv
At intiuiy of she fourth type occurs wen two oF more
meanings of statement do ot agree among themecves but
combine to make cleat a more complicated sate of mind in the
author. Evidently thisisa vague enough definition which would
‘cover much ofthe third type, and almost everything in the types
which fllow; T shall only consider Here its diference from the
third ype.
One is conscious ofthe mont important aspect of a thing, not
‘the most complicated; the subsidiary complexities, once they
have been understood, merely leave an impression in the sind
that they were to such-and-such an effect and they are within
reach if you wish to examine them. put into the third type
cases where one was intended to be mainly conscious ofa yetbal
subtlety; in the fourth type the subtlety may be as great, the
ct, the minture of mades of judgment as puzzling,
but they are notin the main foeus of consciousneas because the
stress ofthe situation absorbs them, and they are fle o be natura
under the cicumstances, OF course, ‘diferent readers apply
their consciousness in different ways, and alin which taken alone
‘would be ofthe thied type may become ofthe fourth type in its
setting; but the distinction, I think, is usualy clear.
never aw tat you did painting ned,
‘And therefore to yous ft o pain et,
ound (or thought found) you dd exec,
hs trea tener of a aa
‘And therefore ave I leptin your teport,
‘hae you sours beng outa well ig show,
How farmodern qu doth come too shor,
Speaking of wort, wn won in you doth grow,
i slenee Yor my in you di impute,
Which shall be moat my glory being dim,
For | impair not beauty being mut
‘When ers wold vt Heys rng tom,
‘Than both your Poew ean in prise devise
(Somer, bt,
Shakespeare isthe writer upon whom ingenuity has most often
been misapplied; and if his eyntx appears ambiguous, it may he164 SEVEN TYPES oF amorcurry
ye wing adr aie, tnd cece
NN at ry ome yrtes era et
chores ed
fees sgh be eae, wheres rac
ci tenarerren oan med
BE crcty rnin ae
mci
Beth oud nostra
ny the ines vey moth anh nebo a
that I remember thems probably ie was esesny be Woe
Wort ose i he nto sues be
Eee A crete ty catueny ec
Potion elena amare
Tote sn, tot cnc se ine whee esc
Bot pens Gls ectaris carter ut hace
be ued to cnc po of hllng metlctenie i
thane pe tn cupoty of he Sle sft
inore ful oncfmuddle Tn proedia ny at coe
v
ambiguity ofthe Sith ype oonura when the author
AX overng is enn th at of ring mt Kolding ali
hia mind atone, so that, for insance there ie «sil which
teptient nothing exact, bu ls Hlfway between to ig
hen he author movitg fom one the other Shakespeare
clyde
ur Now dpm
“Like Rate that avy downs tet proper Bane
[ry on and mene drake we di
Bien for Mesure, 3.38)
[Evidently the fics iden was that lust itself yas the poison; but
the word proper, introduced as meaning ‘suitable for rats’ bu
also having an irelevant suggestion of ‘vight and natural,’ and
move exact memory of those (novadaye phosphorus) poisons
which are designed to prevent rats from dying in the wainsco,
produced the grander and less usual image, in which the eating
Of the poison corresponds to the Fall of Man, and it is drinking
‘water, healthful and natural human function, which tis intoler-
‘ble toavoid, and which brings death. By reflection, then, proper
‘bone becomes ambiguous, since it now water as well as poton,
"Ford is fond of the same device, posibly from imitation:
Grovaysi. Now, now, work serous thoughts on baneful plots;
‘Beall man, mysovis et aot the curse
OF old presetipdan end from me che gall
(Of courage, which envlls a glorious death:
TF Tmuse tater like «well-grown oak,
Some undershrubs shall n my weighty fll
ecrushed to oplits; wih me they all shal perish,
(Tis Pity, vi end.)
Gallis first used as ‘sprit to resent insults’ the bitterness which
isa proper part of the complete man. (IWe have gals: Othello
1. i 93) By the next line galls have suggested oak-galls (the
1 Thi ot est ambiguus in the see tat te eda purl y
tut eben etn re wuld Usha
ceglen ta Tera ste of eat inthe suthor.T could clam thi
nfo chee por epee went, sd! ne
{be books showing ch los oder,vw
Ai ambieuity of the sisth type occurs when a statement says
nothing, by tautology, by eontradiction, or by irelevane
Statements; so that the reader is forced to invent statement of
‘is own and they are liable to conflict with one another. We have
already considered examples of ontradiction which yield a deet
‘meaning, and these might be regarded asin thiselass; thus Mose,
according to the Authorised Version, told the Lord that “Tho
hast not delivered thy people at al’ but ‘Delivering thou hast not
delivered” isthe more direct translation inthe margin, “Though
you atid you would," or ‘No doubt from your pint of view you
Aare delivering us all the time, but it does not seem much to ye?
or ‘I do not presume to sty you are nt delivering your peopl,
bbut I find myself puzzled and unable to say that you are? Tk
Hebrew this, presumably, is polite idiom, and eannotfeisy be
Pit into the sith type because its meaning is not im any docbt,
‘the device is ina sense real and active, but it s not conceived
A contradiction,
Contradictions ofthe same kind, however, when they are used
4s jokes, fll more definitely into this type, bocaise the reader is
meant to be conscious of them a8 such, ‘The paragraph which
Aescrbes the appearance of Zuleika Dobson isa pretty example,
2aleika was not stetly heasiful
‘Do not suppose that she was nything 0 commonplace; donot
suppose that you cn eal imagine what che wns ike eae
as not, probably, the rather outof-the-way type thae You ane
ically admire in this way (or rather, inthe ambit ot who
thi i parody) jealousy is pacted, imagination inset ee sat
nothing ha een sid (whats this ett ype of benny. anor
hich can be used aginst the author afterward,
Hr yer were a wife lag, andthe lashes lange than they
need has hos
Not knowing how large the trifle may be, the reader has no means
of ing certin whether he would be charmed or appalled. "but
‘me, from an academic point of view, this face is all wrong; To
6
SEVEN TYPES OF AMBIGUITY yyy
fet mind me, boys; don't let me spol your fun.’ Ter brow
NaS nat dicreditable; her hait, we are positively tld, was
*T must say I find something very excessive about all th
ou, of course, would have been impressed.’
‘The mouth was a mere replica of Cupid's bow.
‘Heis becoming petulant; after nt strictly Beautiflitis no kinds
ets to construct her out of familiar models. the fleshy ony
lreatre ba the same face as every one ele, only ivce vo much
‘fit, Tho eulogy now rises out of apparent understatement ity
“yarm but ambiguous praise:
| -piioappe-tte, no val of peaches, ad ot beea robbed, nor any
“Tytlanroscgaden faethe lo of Ae Dobom's ches ft
‘eck vas intation-narble. Her hands and fet were af vy sy
‘roportons, She ind no waist to spe of
‘The negatives inthe fist sentence throw a prim pattern over jt
lush fullness, froe one to think “no, the tree had not? and ve
it) a8 « doubt in the background, exactly the opposite meaning,
ts by en Traian or vulgar-English double negative. "In the
Second, of course, her neck eould only imitate marble; but was it
imitating imitation-marble} the doubt reminds us ofthe wppalling
Possibilities im imitating many perfectly genuine marbles, and
Berhaps ofthe fnitation-marbleenitonment of her carl styles,
And then, since mean may be medium, small or without quality;
ce wast i at once flesh and the absence of flesh; we ate let
‘in doube whether the las two sentenors mean that her beauty at
tmigue and did not depend on the conventional deta, os that
‘hese parts of her body were in fact, not good enough tobe worth
‘mentioning, ot that they were intensely and fashionably snl
‘This contradiction as to the apparent subject ofthe statement
seems very complete; it is not obvious what we are meant to
believe at the end of t. Butt cannot be sid to representa con,
Aliet in the author's mind; the contradiction removes the reades
fiom the apparent subject to the real one, andthe chief" meaning”
‘of the paragraph, apart from the eiticism in ts parody, is"pleme
helieve in my story; we have got to take it sulicientlysertovly
tokeepit going.” Lhope Inced not apologise, after thiscranple
for including Mr. Beerbohm among the poets.
shall consider what may reasonably be called two ambiguitiesvir
example of the seveoth typeof ambiguity, oa ay
TA sttse as ye of soc tithe esti
fan be conceived, oct wen the to meanings of the wor
tio vauce of the ambiguity, are the two crponts ani
Abie bythe contexts tht te wt eect to show fue
tena vision nthe wits mind. You might hin that uch
8 case could never occur and iit oseured, cold at be pty
butasamttrof fits inane sens or apother, ey toque
and ade of many degices "One might aay cgi ®t
lope aspect of thi sre, that he dea of “opps! i com
arativelylte busin invention, admit of gent variety
Interpretation (having een inteduced wherever thre wast
inellecual dificult), and corsaponds to nothing in te rll
or hati nary forall es of that wor
ii poetry ie words in pimiive languages and lk, say. the
Tatin aly, igh deg the Eaglh lower nen
site a pai of epposites without any overt ambiguity that in
fuch pale you are only sting, fr fnstance, a se, whic
Iight be extended between any evo pints though no re pots
fri hencis apa an tha nearing fo ete
Aceurey one might ny pe ent. white and means very lack
Shade of pe.” Or one might ami that Ue eteron se
type becomes psychological rather than lope in that the ero
print ofthe defiition has become the eno context athe
{otal aude wo tht contex of tein
‘Acontradtion of this kind may be meanings, butean never
bea Blank; it has tat stated the sujet which under
cussion, and has given «sor of tensity tot such a one de
ina gridiron pattern in architecture because it gives promioence
neither f0 the horzotls nor tothe vertical and in a eheck
pater Becaue nether elou is the ground on which theater
BS placed; ts at oneean indecision and structure, ks the
symbol ofthe Crus, Ori may convey an imprenon of eons
8 ornamentation sich asthe Stamina oad, fate
carlest surviving civilised designs, by putting two beasts in
exactly symmetrical attitudes of violence, as in supporting =
SEVEN TYPES OF AMBIGUITY 9
80 that whatever tendencies 10 action are ars
alarmed spectator, however he imagines the victim othe
tohave been placed, there is just the sume claim on bit
ive attention, with « easeuring impossbiliey, being male
‘other sie, and he is dravm taut between the two sim
into the stasis of appreciation. You might reat it !0
diflerence of sound heard by the two ears, which decides
re the sound is coming from, or to the stereoscopic cont
that imply a dimension.”
Joposites, agin, are an important clement in the Freuiits
lysis of dreams; and itis evident that the Freudian termi~
particularly the word “condensation,” gould be employed
profit for the understanding of poetry, Now a Freudian
ite at lest marks dissatisfaction; the notion of what
it involves the idca that you have not got it, and this sein
wolves the ‘opposite defined by your context, which is what
Ihave and cannotavold. In moze serious eases, causing wide®
tional ceverheration, auch as are likely to be relleced {9
sage, in poetry, or in dreams, it marks a centre of eonfits
fe notion of what you want involves the notion that you must
take it, and this again involves the ‘opposite defined by your
that you want something different in another part of
ir mind, OF course, conflict need not he expressed overtly
‘contradiction, but itis likely that those theories of aesthetics
“which regard poetry a8 the resolution of a conflict will find tit
illustrations chiefly in the limited field covered by the seventh
type a
"The study of Hebrew, by the way, and the existence of English
‘ibles with alternatives in the margin, may have had inlvens>
‘on the capacity of English for ambiguity; Donne, Herbert,
Jonson, and Crashaw, for instance, were Hebrew scholars, an
the flowering of poctry a the end of the sixteenth century core
sponded with the first thorough permeation of the English
Tanguage by the tranelated texte. This ia of interest because
ap ey tei im he rnin mt wh om at
SlP%ety bewvy on the receiving eid. One could of cae, leo erode
Bia pectic pusning shou the react of eotreane
‘Sian wine mer ta realy lg nn eat
Spode tn Brut dnreey tree mone San ene
Tanabe tert me sendy