You are on page 1of 1

Vulnerability Assessment

Ingredient Group: Enzymes Location:

Likelihood of Occurrence Summary of Evidence Collected by Site Likelihood of Occurrence

Very likely/
Historic incidents Radiological exposure 2011 Very Unlikely Unlikely Fairly likely Likely
certain

Very likely/
Emerging concerns (recent news or events) None certain

some emerging tax issues but not directly related to import/export


Economic factors/price fluctuations Likely

Likelihood of Detection
Japan is in an earthquake prone region. This is one of the biggest factors when
assessing risk associated with raw materials and supply chain coming from
Japan. Not only can earthquakes destroy infrastructure and manufacturing
Geographic origins/length and complexity of the capability but an earthquake was the cause of the tsunami that lead to the
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011. Due to nuclear disaster, radiation is Fairly likely
supply chain
a concern

Because these enzymes are primarily produced by bacterial fermentation most


of the raw materials are grown but there may be some limitation to trace
Ease of access to raw materials (e.g. long or elements used as growth factors, especially those coming from China. See WTO
convoluted supply chains that allow multiple points of lawsuit brought by US, EU, and Japan against China in 2012 for limiting supply of Unlikely
entry for fraudulent material rare earth minerals - mostly for other industries but feasible here.

very unlikely

Availability (a.g.seasonality/harvest variability) Availability does not seem to be affected by seasonal variation.
Availability or adulterants Adulteration is not likely. Performance based.
highly regulated. Use the arrows to indicate where the risk falls in the quadratic model.
Complexity an cost of committing the fraud
Site Conclusion for likelihood of occurrence: Unlikely
Likelihood of Detection Summary of Evidence Collected by Site
Geographic origin risk of supply and radiolgical risk if another nuclear disaster
Length and complexity of the supply chain Broker is used for this purchase
Physical form (e.g. whole items, chopped, minced,
powdered or liquid) liquid or dry
Existing controls (e.g. supply chain audits) COA for performance, audits
Routine product testing (consider both the types of
test used i.e. how likely they are to detect any
testing completed annually.
adulterated materials, and the frequency at which the
tests are completed).

Ease of access to the raw materials (e.g. broken


tamper-proof seals are clear evidence of the attempt Tamper evident seals broken only by receiving
to access)
Relevant audits (i.e. those which consider level audits
adulteration, traceability, mass balance testing, etc.)
Site Conclusion for likelihood of detection: Fairly likely

You might also like