Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ﺑﲔ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ
Abstract
In this paper we discuss the issue of lunation from Shari'a point of view. Can we
rely on calculations or should we be restricted to eyesight? In Sunna, we have
two confirmed Hadiths ( sayings of the prophet); one commanding us to
estimate, which means to make calculations, and the other commanding us to
complete the thirty days of the month if the seing of the new moon is not possible.
The later case were followed in the early ages of Islam for two reasons; first ,
the calculations were not accurate, and second, the Muslim Nation, during that
period of time, were nearly illiterate in this area.
2
ﺑﺴﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﺃﲨﻌﲔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﻌﻬﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺴـﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ
ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ :
ﻓﻴﻌﺎﰿ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﻳـﺔ
ﻭﲞﺎﺻﺔ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻭﺷﻮﺍﻝ ،ﻓﻼ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻳﺘﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧـﺘﻼﻑ ،
ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻤﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ؟ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﻣﻨﻪ ؟ .
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﻧﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻـﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻓﻠﻜﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻭﻣﻮﻗﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ .
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﻟﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣـﻦ
ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻩ ﻭﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻪ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴـﺔ ،
ﺖ ﲡﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺐ ﻛﺎﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﳊﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﲑﺍﻥ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ،ﻓﻜﻨ َ
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ) ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺘﻬﺪ ( ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﻭﻫﻮ ) ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺎﺕ ( ،ﻭﻛﺎﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻴﺲ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺸﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺪﺭﱢﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺐ ،ﻭﻛﺜﲑ ﻏﲑﳘﺎ .
ﰒ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﻋﺼﻮﺭ ﺗﻘﻄﻌﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺕ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼـﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻗـﻊ ﻛـﻞ
ﲣﺼﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺣﱴ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻔـﺎﻫﻢ ﺑـﲔ
ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﺻﻌﺒﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻓﺘﻌﻠﺖ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴـﺔ
ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪﺍ ﻭﳏﺎﻛﺎﺓ ﳌﺎ ﺣﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺃﻭﺭﻭﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﳍﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﺖ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﳓﻄﺎﻃﻬﺎ .
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺩﻧـﺎ
ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﻭﻳﺄﰐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻃﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻴـﺪ
ﻟﻸﻣﺔ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﲤﺎﺳﻜﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﰲ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻼﻗﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺠﻤﺎﺕ ﺷﺮﺳﺔ ﰲ ﻛـﻞ ﳎـﺎﻻﺕ
ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ.
ﻭﺳﺄﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﻭﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻲ ،ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﳋـﻮﺽ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧـﺐ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﲝﺜﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺒﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻌﻼ ﲝﻮﺙ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺜﺎ .
ﻭﺍﷲ ﺍﳌﻮﻓﻖ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺍﻻﺗﻜﺎﻝ .
3
ﲟﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ؟
ﻻﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﺎﻹﲤﺎﻡ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻐﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻛﻤـﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺘﺒﻌﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻞ
ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ؟ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺭﺃﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭﺍﻥ :
ﺃﻭﳍﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻻ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺜﺎ .
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺑـﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﻭﻥ
ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺇﻻ ﻗﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩﻭﻥ ﺟﻴﻼ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺟﻴﻞ .
1ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ،ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ،ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ، 1913ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﺔ .
ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻓﺆﺍﺩ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ . 1080
2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﻘﻼﱐ ،ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺸﺮﺡ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ، 127/4ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻓﺆﺍﺩ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻭﳏﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ 1379 ،ﻫـ .
3ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ،ﺟﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺒﺎﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ، 185/3ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻔـﺎﻥ ،ﺍﳋـﱪ ،ﺍﻟﺴـﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ
1996ﻡ .
4
ﻓﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﺍﳊﺮﺝ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﻬﻰ ،ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻣـﺔ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺃﻣﺔ ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﲞﺎﺻﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻬﻧـﻲ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﲢﺮﱘ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺑﻌﺎﻣﺔ -ﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺎﺕ -ﻭﲢﺮﱘ
ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﲞﺎﺻﺔ -ﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ – ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺃﺣﺪ .
ﺑﻞ ﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻓﻬﻤﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﲢﺮﱘ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﺃﻳﻀـﺎ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ) ﻻ ﻧﻜﺘﺐ ( ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻌـﺎﺭﺽ ﻣـﻊ ﻛـﻞ ﺍﻵﻳـﺎﺕ
ﻭﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺄﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﲟﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﻞ .
ﺻﻠﱠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﹶﻠْﻴ ِﻪ َﻭ َﺳﻠﱠ َﻢ ﻗﹶــﺎ ﹶﻝ ) ﺻُـﻮﻣُﻮﺍ
.2ﻭﲝﺪﻳﺚ ﹶﺃﺑِﻲ ﻫُ َﺮْﻳ َﺮ ﹶﺓ َﺭﺿِﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﻨْﻪ ﹶﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﱠﻨِﺒ ﱠﻲ َ
ِﻟﺮُ ْﺅَﻳِﺘ ِﻪ َﻭﹶﺃ ﹾﻓ ِﻄﺮُﻭﺍ ِﻟﺮُ ْﺅَﻳِﺘ ِﻪ ( . 4
ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺭﺗﺐ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﺗﻌﺒﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ .
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﺎ ﻟﺜﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌﺘﱪﻭﻫﺎ ﻭﺳـﻴﻠﺔ
ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺮﺟﻮﺡ ﻷﻣﻮﺭ :
ﺃﻭﳍﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﺎﻹﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﻢ ﺑﻨﺺ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺳﺘﺄﰐ
ﰲ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻁ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﴰـﺲ ﺍﻟﻴـﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﲔ ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﺗﻔﺎﻕ ،ﻷﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻌﱪﺓ ﺇﺫﻥ
ﺑﺘﻴﻘﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﳛﻞ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻏﻤﺎﻡ . 5
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﻢ ﱂ ﻳﻄﺒﻘﻮﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻛﺤﺪﻳﺚ ) ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﺃﻗﺒـﻞ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻓﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﻢ ( ، 6ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺯﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻳﺼﻮﻣﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﻔﻄـﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻧﻜﲑ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﺍﻗﺒﻮﻥ ﻃﻠﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ﻭﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﲔ ﻛﻤـﺎ
4ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ، 1081ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻛﺘـﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ . 1909
5ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ،ﺗﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ، 208/1ﺑﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺣﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺳﻲ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳉﻴﻞ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ ،
ﻁ 1ﺳﻨﺔ 1992ﻡ .
6ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ، 1941ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ . 1101
5
ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺯﻣﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫـﻞ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﻭﻥ
ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻠﺔ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﱂ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺷﺮﻃﺎ ﻟﻺﻓﻄﺎﺭ ؟ .
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺧﺮﺝ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ، 7ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺘﺎﺣﺎ ﻟﻸﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌـﻲ ،
ﺑﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻘﻖ ﻏﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ .
.3ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻬﻧﺎﻧﺎ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓ َﻌ ْﻦ َﺯْﻳ ِﺪ ْﺑ ِﻦ ﺧَﺎِﻟ ٍﺪ َﺭﺿِـﻲ
ﻕ ﺍﻟﻠﱠ ِﻪ
ﺻﻠﱠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﹶﻠْﻴ ِﻪ َﻭ َﺳﻠﱠ َﻢ ) َﻣ ْﻦ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ُﻣ ِﻄ ْﺮﻧَﺎ ِﺑ َﺮ ْﺣ َﻤ ِﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱠ ِﻪ َﻭِﺑ ِﺮ ْﺯ ِ
ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﻨْﻪ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ﻗﺎﻝ َﺭﺳُﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﱠ ِﻪ َ
ﺠ ِﻢ ﹶﻛﺬﹶﺍ ﹶﻓﻬُ َﻮ ﻣُـ ْﺆ ِﻣﻦٌ
ﺐ َﻭﹶﺃﻣﱠﺎ َﻣ ْﻦ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ُﻣ ِﻄ ْﺮﻧَﺎ ِﺑَﻨ ْ
ﻀ ِﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﱠ ِﻪ ﹶﻓﻬُ َﻮ ُﻣ ْﺆ ِﻣ ٌﻦ ﺑِﻲ ﻛﹶﺎِﻓ ٌﺮ ﺑِﺎﹾﻟ ﹶﻜ ْﻮ ﹶﻛ ِ
َﻭِﺑ ﹶﻔ ْ
ﺐ ﻛﹶﺎ ِﻓﺮٌ ﺑِﻲ ( . 8
ﺑِﺎﹾﻟ ﹶﻜ ْﻮ ﹶﻛ ِ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺰﻳﺰﺓ :ﻓﻘﺪ ﻬﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺣﺪﺱ ﻭﲣﻤﲔ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻭﻻ ﻇﻦ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﻀﺎﻕ . 9
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺠـﻮﻡ ﻭﻻ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻩ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻬﻧﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ
ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻠﻨﺠﻮﻡ ﺗﺄﺛﲑﺍ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺩ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺟﻪ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﻟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ .
.4ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻇﲏ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺰﻳﺰﺓ ﺍﻵﻧﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟـﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻇﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻭﱘ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ .
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠـﻚ
ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﱪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺣﱴ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ ﰲ ﻧﻄﺎﻕ ﻏﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ،ﰒ
ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺄﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻻﺣﻘﺎ .
6
.5ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻔﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﲟﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻄﻴﻘﻮﻥ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ :ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻭﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ -ﺃﻱ ﲝﺪﻳﺚ ﻓﺎﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ -ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻨﺠﻤﲔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻟﻮ ﻛﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ . 10
ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺰﻳﺰﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺑﻠـﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ
ﻗﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺺ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ .
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻀﻰ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺻﻼﺕ ﺑﻄﻴﺌﺔ ،ﻭﱂ
ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﻨﻘﻞ ﺧﱪ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺎﻛﻦ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺳﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﻹﺫﺍﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻠﻔﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﳍﺎﺗﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺎﻛﺲ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﻘﺔ ،ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﺔ ،
ﻓﻴﻜﻔﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺼﺼﲔ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﻠﻪ ﳛـﺪﺩﻭﻥ
ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻭﻳﺒﻠﻐﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺩﻗﺎﺋﻖ .
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺃﺻﻼ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀـﻬﺎ
ﻳﺼﻒ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﺎ .
7
ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻬﺑﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻠﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻗﺪ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻮﻡ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻳـﺎﻡ ﺷـﻬﺮ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻣﱴ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﰒ ﺍﻹﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺧﲑ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻞ ﻟﺒﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ،ﻭﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ .
ﺻﻠﱠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﹶﻠْﻴ ِﻪ َﻭ َﺳﻠﱠ َﻢ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ) ِﺇﻧﱠﺎ ﹸﺃﻣﱠـﺔﹲ
ﺙ َﻋ ِﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨِﺒ ﱢﻲ َ
ﺤﺪﱢ ﹸ
.3ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ َﺭﺿِﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﻨْﻬﻤَﺎ ُﻳ َ
ﺤﺴُﺐُ ﺍﻟﺸﱠ ْﻬ ُﺮ َﻫ ﹶﻜﺬﹶﺍ َﻭ َﻫ ﹶﻜﺬﹶﺍ َﻭ َﻫ ﹶﻜﺬﹶﺍ َﻭ َﻋ ﹶﻘ َﺪ ﺍﹾﻟِﺈْﺑﻬَﺎ َﻡ ﻓِﻲ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎِﻟﹶﺜ ِﺔ ﻭَﺍﻟﺸﱠـ ْﻬ ُﺮ
ﹸﺃ ﱢﻣﱠﻴﺔﹲ ﻟﹶﺎ َﻧ ﹾﻜﺘُﺐُ َﻭﻟﹶﺎ َﻧ ْ
ﲔ ( . 13
َﻫ ﹶﻜﺬﹶﺍ َﻭ َﻫ ﹶﻜﺬﹶﺍ َﻭ َﻫ ﹶﻜﺬﹶﺍ َﻳ ْﻌﻨِﻲ َﺗﻤَﺎ َﻡ ﹶﺛﻠﹶﺎِﺛ َ
ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳊﺴـﺎﺏ ،
ﻭﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﻴﺴﺮ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﻘﺪ ﰎ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻮﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺃﻣﻴﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻜﺘﺐ ﻭﻻ ﲢﺴﺐ ؟ ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻠـﺔ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒـﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻢ ﳍﺎ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻝ ﻳﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﻭﻋﺪﻣﺎ
،ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻴﺴﺮ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻧﻠﺠﺄ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻞ ؟ . 14
ﺻﻠﱠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﹶﻠْﻴ ِﻪ َﻭ َﺳﻠﱠ َﻢ َﻳﻘﹸﻮ ﹸﻝ
.4ﻭﲝﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋُ َﻤ َﺮ َﺭﺿِﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﻨْﻬﻤَﺎ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ َﺳ ِﻤ ْﻌﺖُ َﺭﺳُﻮ ﹶﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َ
) ِﺇﺫﹶﺍ َﺭﹶﺃْﻳُﺘﻤُﻮ ُﻩ ﹶﻓﺼُﻮﻣُﻮﺍ َﻭِﺇﺫﹶﺍ َﺭﹶﺃْﻳُﺘﻤُﻮ ُﻩ ﹶﻓﹶﺄ ﹾﻓ ِﻄﺮُﻭﺍ ﹶﻓِﺈ ﹾﻥ ﹸﻏ ﱠﻢ َﻋ ﹶﻠ ْﻴ ﹸﻜ ْﻢ ﻓﹶﺎ ﹾﻗ ُﺪﺭُﻭﺍ ﹶﻟﻪُ ( .15
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ : 16
ﺃﻭﳍﺎ :ﻗﺪﺭﻭﻩ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﺎﺏ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﺟﻌﻠﻮﻩ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻗﺪﺭﻭﻩ ﲝﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺯﻝ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪﻭﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺞ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ .
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ﺛﻼﺛﲔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ .
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺭﻯ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ :
13ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ، 1913ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ . 1080
14ﺷﺎﻛﺮ ،ﺃﲪﺪ ،ﺃﻭﺍﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ .
15ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ، 1900ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ . 1080
16ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ،ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺎﺝ ، 189/7ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ،ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ، 124/4ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ،ﺗﻨﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﻟـﻚ ﺷـﺮﺡ
ﻣﻮﻃﺄ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ، 211ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ،ﻣﺼﺮ 1969 ،ﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ،ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺒﺎﺝ . 185/3
8
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻛﻤﻌﲎ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻣﻜﺚ ﺍﻟﺪﺟﺎﻝ ﻭﺃﻧـﻪ
ﳝﻜﺚ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻛﺴﻨﺔ ) ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺴﻨﺔ ﺃﺗﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺻﻼﺓ ﻳﻮﻡ ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﻻ ﺍﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻩ ( ، 17ﻓﻼ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻫﻨﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺻﻼﺓ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﺼﻠﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺳﻨﺔ .
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﺒﲔ ﱄ ﺑﻌﺪ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺭﺳﻢ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻧﻴﺪ ﻭﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ :ﺍﺗﻔﻖ
ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﺎﱂ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ) ﻓﺎﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ( ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﻃﺄ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺔ ﻭﺃﲪـﺪ ،
ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺳﺎﻧﻴﺪﻫﻢ ﳑﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﺻﺢ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻧﻴﺪ .
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ) ﺍﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺛﻼﺛﲔ ( ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ﻋﻦ ﻧﺎﻓﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤـﺮ ،
ﻓﺮﻭﻯ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﻢ ) ﻓﺎﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ( ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻟﻔﻈﺔ ﺛﻼﺛﲔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻣﺴـﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﻃـﺄ
ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻣﻲ ﻭﺃﲪﺪ ،ﻭﻋﺪﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ،ﻭﱂ ﺗﺮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ) ﻓﺎﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ
ﺛﻼﺛﲔ ( ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺛﻼﺙ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻧﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﰊ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ .
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ) ﻓﺎﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ( ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻦ
ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺿﺒﻄﻬﻢ .
.5ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻇﻨﻴﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻗﻄﻌﻴـﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺮﻛـﺔ
ﺍﻷﺟﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﴰﺲ ﻭﻗﻤﺮ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﻤﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ،ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ
18
ﺃﻱ ﲝﺴﺎﺏ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺟﺪﺍ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺻـﻴﻐﺔ } ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﲝﺴﺒﺎﻥ {
ﺍﳌﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ .
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ } ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﻧﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺣﱴ ﻋﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﺮﺟﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ،ﻻ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﳍﺎ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﻭﻛﻞ ﰲ ﻓﻠﻚ ﻳﺴﺒﺤﻮﻥ { . 19
17ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﱳ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ، 2937 ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ، ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﱳ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊـﺪﻳﺚ 2240
ﺑﺘﺮﻗﻴﻢ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺷﺎﻛﺮ ،ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻢ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ 4321 ،ﺑﺘﺮﻗﻴﻢ ﳏﻴﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ .
18ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ . 5
19ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﻳﺲ . 40- 39
9
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺑﺪﺃﺕ ﳏﺎﻭﻻﺕ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﻨـﺬ ﺯﻣـﻦ
ﺳﺤﻴﻖ ،ﻭﺑﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﳛﻘﻘﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺁﻻﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎﻬﺗﻢ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﻇﻨﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎﻬﺗﻢ ﺣﱴ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺔ ،ﻭﺣﱴ
ﺃﺻﺒﺤﻮﺍ ﳛﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﻱ ﺑﺄﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻟـﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﲨﻴﻌـﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﻱ ﻫﻮ 29 :ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻭ 12ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻭ 44ﺩﻗﻴﻘـﺔ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘـﺎﻥ
ﻭ %87ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻓﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻴﺔ ﻇﻨﻴﺔ ! .
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﻭﻻﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﳌﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻫـﻲ
ﺍﻵﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻨﺔ ﻭﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺔ ﻟﻌﺸﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﻣﺔ ، 20ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺑـﺮﺍﻣﺞ
ﺍﳊﺎﺳﻮﺏ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺘﺮﻧﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳـﺪﻝ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻐﲑ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺘﺒﺪﻝ .
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻭﱘ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺳﺒﺒﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺼﺼـﲔ ،
ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻭﱘ ﻻ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺼﺼﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌـﺾ
ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻣﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻭﺟﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﻗﺪﳝﺔ ﻣﻀﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻬـﺎ
ﺃﺧﻄﺎﺀ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﺪﺭﺱ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻣﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻭﺳـﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻡ ﲣﻠﻂ -ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ -ﻭﺗﺼﻔﻬﻢ ﺃﻬﻧﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﻦ ﳜﻠﻂ ﺑـﲔ
ﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﱯ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﲞﺎﺻﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺍﳌﺨﺘﱪﺍﺕ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ .
ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﻮﻑ ﻭﺍﳋﺴﻮﻑ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺭﻏـﻢ ﺃﻬﻧـﺎ
ﺃﺻﻌﺐ ﺑﻌﺸﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻗﺒـﻞ
ﻋﺸﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻞ ﻣﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ ﻣﻮﺍﻋﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﻮﻑ ﻭﺍﳋﺴـﻮﻑ ﺑـﺎﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴـﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘـﺔ ،
ﻭﳛﺪﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻛﻦ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻛﻢ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻞ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﺎ ﺃﻡ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻛـﻞ
20ﺻﺪﺭﺕ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺘﺐ ﲢﺘﻮﻱ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ :ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻲ ﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳـﺰ
ﳎﺎﻫﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺣﻨﲔ -ﻋﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺡ -ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ ،ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻟﻠـﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺷﻴﻜﻮ ﻋﻤﻴﺪ ﻭﻣﺆﺳﺲ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﲜﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻗﺴﻨﻄﻴﻨﺔ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ 1989ﻡ .
10
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﺪﻗﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺘﺎﺑﻌﻮﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ، 21ﻓﺈﱃ ﻣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﲡﺎﻫﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟ ﻭﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﺘﻢ
ﲡﺎﻫﻠﻪ؟ ﻭﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻊ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜـﺔ؟
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭﻗﻌﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﻴﺴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻭﺭﻭﺑﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ،ﳑـﺎ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺇﱃ ﻓﺼـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ،ﻭﳌﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ -ﻭﻫﻮ ﺩﻳـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ -ﱂ ﻳﻨﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﲞﺎﺻﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴـﻪ ،
ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ .
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﲔ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻘﲔ ﲝﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﻢ ) ﻓﺈﻥ ﻏﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻓﺄﻛﻤﻠﻮﺍ ( ﻭ) ﻓﺈﻥ
ﻏﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻓﺎﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ( ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻞ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﲔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻄﺒـﻖ ﻛـﻞ
ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻇﻨﻴﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺃﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻝ
ﻓﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻛﻤﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓـﺈﻥ
22
ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺞ
ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﳍﺠﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ) ﻓﺎﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ (
ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﳌﻦ ﺧﺼﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ .23
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻳﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﳊﺴـﺎﺏ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺭﺟﺢ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﻴﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ
ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺎ .
21ﺍﻟﻌﺠﲑﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺻﺎﱀ ،ﻛﻴﻒ ﳓﺴﺐ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﻮﻑ ﻭﺍﳋﺴﻮﻑ ،ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳـﺖ ﻟﻠﺘﻘـﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ 1980ﻡ .
22ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ ،ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﺮﻉ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸـﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺣﱴ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺰﱐ ﺣﱴ ﻟﻘﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ،
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺪﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﲦﺎﺋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘـﻪ ،ﻋـﺎﺵ ﺳـﺒﻌﺎ
ﻭﲬﺴﲔ ﺳﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 306ﻫـ .ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺗﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ،ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ، 39 - 21/3 ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ ﺷﻬﺒﻪ ،ﺃﲪـﺪ ﺑـﻦ ﳏﻤـﺪ ،
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ، 89/1ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ 1987 ،ﻡ .
23ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ،ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ، 124/4ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ﺗﻨﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﻟﻚ . 211
11
ﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻟﻺﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﺃﻡ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ؟ :
ﻓﺮﱠﻕ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺑﲔ ﺣﺎﻟﱵ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻻ ﻧﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ
ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻹﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﻢ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎ ﻟﻸﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺩ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺷﻬﺪﻭﺍ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ .
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﻴﺎ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﺪﺃﺕ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﲣﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﻴﺘـﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺑﺪﺃﺕ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ
-ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ -ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﻲ ﺍﻟـﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺴـﺒﻜﻲ 24ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻒ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﺠﺮﻱ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳـﺪﻝ
ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ … ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﹸﺧﱪﻧﺎ ﺑﻪ ﲞﱪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳑﻦ ﳛﺘﻤـﻞ ﺧـﱪﻩ
ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻂ ..ﱂ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﳋـﱪ ﻇﻨﻴـﺎﻥ ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺷﻬﺪﺕ ﺑﻪ
ﳑﻜﻨﺎ ﺣﺴﺎ ﻭﻋﻘﻼ ﻭﺷﺮﻋﺎ ..ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﻻ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻼﺕ .25
ﻭﱂ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ -ﻟـﺪﺧﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ -ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻹﻣﻜﺎﻥ ،ﻭﳎﺮﺩ ﺍﻹﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻻ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ..ﻭﺍﻟﻔـﺮﻕ
ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺃﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻂ ﻗﺪ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺃﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ
ﺃﻭ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ . 26ﻓﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﺧﺬﻩ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻩ
-ﺃﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ -ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ،ﺃﻭ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻇﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﺭﲪﻪ
ﺍﷲ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻـﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﺴـﺎﺏ
ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ .
24ﻫﻮ ﺗﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ،ﻭﻟﺪ ﺳﻨﺔ 727ﻫـ ،ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ،ﻭﺗﻮﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺣـﱴ
ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺋﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺎﻡ ﻓﺄﺻﺒﺢ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻣﺘُﺤﻦ ﻭﺃﹸﺫﻱ ﻭﺳﺠﻦ ﻭﺻﱪ ،ﻟـﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘـﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﳐﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ﻭﺍﳌﻨـﻬﺎﺝ ﻟﻠﺒﻴﻀـﺎﻭﻱ ،ﺗـﻮﰲ
ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺎﻋﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﺔ 771ﻫـ ،ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ ﺷﻬﺒﻪ ،ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ . 104/3
25ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ . 209/1
26ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ . 208 /1
12
ﻭﳑﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻏﻲ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻷﺯﻫﺮ ، 27ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠـﻲ
ﺍﻟﻄﻨﻄﺎﻭﻱ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺮﲟﺎ
ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺬﺏ … ﻭﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﲝﺪﻳﺚ ) ﺻﻮﻣﻮﺍ
ﻟﺮﺅﻳﺘﻪ ( ﻭﺑﲔ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺄﻝ ﺃﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﻫﻞ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﺮﻯ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ؟ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﲢﺮﻳﻨﺎ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ … ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻜـﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳُـﺮﻯ ﺭﺩﺩﻧـﺎ
ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺩ … ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ … ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻜﺮ ﰲ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻗﻼﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻤﻮﺍ
ﻓﻴﻪ . 28
ﻭﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﳑﻦ ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺧﱪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻃﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﺎﺟﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟـﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺼـﺮ
ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻣـﻦ
ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ،ﻭﺭﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻓﻀﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ .
ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻓﺾ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺒـﻞ
ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﻻﺩﺗﻪ ﺑﻴﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ .
ﻭﻣﻴﺰﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ :
.1ﺃﻧﻪ ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻳﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﲔ .
.2ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ .
.3ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﺎﰿ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻴﺸﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ،ﻓﺎﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺼـﺮﻧﺎ
ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻟﻐﻴﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﺸـﻜﻠﺔ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻜﺮﺭ ﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﻻﺩﺗﻪ .
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺩﻗﻘﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﱂ ﳒﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻳﺪﻩ ﻻ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﱂ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ،ﻭﲞﺎﺻﺔ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ) ﻓﺈﻥ
13
ﻏﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻓﺎﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ( ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ،
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻓﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺩﻗﺔ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﻗﻄﻌﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﲔ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ،ﻭﺣﺴﺎﺏ
ﻧﻔﻲ ﺩﺧﻮﻟﻪ .
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﺴﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ :
.1ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺘﻴﺴﺮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﻓﺠﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻮﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺤﺴُﺐُ (.
ﺭﺋﻲ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺑﺪﻳﻼ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ) ِﺇﻧﱠﺎ ﹸﺃ ﱠﻣ ﹲﺔ ﹸﺃﻣﱢﻴﱠ ﹲﺔ ﻟﹶﺎ َﻧ ﹾﻜﺘُﺐُ ﻭَﻻ َﻧ ْ
.2ﻭﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻇﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﻛﻤـﺎﻝ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤـﺎ ﺍﳊﺴـﺎﺏ ﰲ
ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ،ﻭﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﻨﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺑﺄﻗﻮﻯ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ .
.3ﻭﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎ ﳊﺪﻳﺚ ) ﻓﺈﻥ ﻏﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻓﺎﻗﺪﺭﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ( .
ﻭﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻓﻬﻤﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻧﻜﻮﻥ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻭﱂ ﻬﻧﻤﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻬﺑـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﻑ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ، 29ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ ﺑﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺞ ﻣـﻦ ﻛﺒـﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﳍﺠﺮﻱ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺘﻴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻮﺭﻱ ، 30ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺴـﺎﺏ
ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺎ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻌﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ) ﻓﺄﻛﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ ﺛﻼﺛﲔ ( ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﺮﺩ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﲜﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺑﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﻝ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺬﺍﺭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ
29ﻣﻄﺮﻑ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﲑ ،ﺛﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ،ﻭﻟﺪ ﰲ ﻋﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ ،ﻟـﻪ
ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺐ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻭﻭﺭﻉ ﻭﻋﻘﻞ ﻭﺃﺩﺏ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟـﺪﻳﻦ ،
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ،ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﻋﻤﺎﺭ ﻭﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻮﰲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺳﻨﺔ 87ﻫـ ،ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ،ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ،ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ، 141/7ﺩﺍﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ،ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ
،ﺍﻹﺻﺎﺑﺔ ﰲ ﲤﻴﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ، 260/6ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳉﻴﻞ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ 1992 ،ﻡ .
30ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ،ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ، 124/4 ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺘﻴﺒﺔ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻟﺪ ﺳـﻨﺔ 213ﻫــ ﻭﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﺷﺘﻐﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺲ ،ﻭﺍﻋﺘﱪ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺣﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺤﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻼﺣﺪﺓ ،
ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻔﺎﺕ :ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﻋﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 276ﻫـ ،ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﺍﻷﺳﻌﺮﺩﻱ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ 1985 ،ﻡ .
14
ﳌﺎ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ﺑﺈﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺛﻼﺛﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻓﻬﻤﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻃﻠﻮﻉ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻭﺇﻣﻜـﺎﻥ
ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ،ﻭﳘﺎ ﺣﺎﺻﻼﻥ ﺑﺎﳍﻼﻝ ﰲ ﻟﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﲔ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﺕ . 31
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ :ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻏﻢ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ
ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﳍﻼﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﺤﺎﺏ . 32
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺷﺎﻛﺮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓـﺈﺫﺍ ﺧﺮﺟـﺖ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻣﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﺗﻜﺘﺐ ﻭﲢﺴﺐ … ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺟﻌﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﲔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑـﺖ ،ﻭﺃﻥ
ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻭﺍ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻫﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ . 33
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻗﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺒﲎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ﰲ ﻣﻜـﺔ
ﺍﳌﻜﺮﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﱂ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﺍﺕ . 34
ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ
ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺷﺮﻋﺖ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ
ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﺃﺩﱏ ﳌﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻚ ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ -ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ -ﻻ ﺗﺮﻓﺾ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﺃﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻭﺃﻛﻤﻞ ﻭﺃﻭﰱ ﺑﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ .35
ﶈﺔ ﻓﻠﻜﻴﺔ
ﻳﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺇﻫﻠﻴﻠﺠﻲ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺘﺮﺏ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﰲ ﺍﳊﻀﻴﺾ ،ﻭﻳﺒﺘﻌﺪ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭﺝ ،ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺏ ﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﺳﺮﻋﺘﻪ ﻟـﺌﻼ
ﻳﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﻳﺼﻄﺪﻡ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﻌﺪ ﻗﻠﺖ ﺳﺮﻋﺘﻪ ﻟﻜﻴﻼ ﻳﻨﻔﻠﺖ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺑﻴـﺔ
15
ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺭﻩ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻢ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻨﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺍﷲ -ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺗﻌـﺎﱃ -ﺑﺒـﺎﻟﻎ
ﺣﻜﻤﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺒﻠﺮ .
ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺗﺪﻭﺭ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺇﻫﻠﻴﻠﺠﻲ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻘـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺴـﻪ ،
ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﰲ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﳍﺎ ﰲ 6/21ﻭﰲ 12/21ﻣﻦ
ﻛﻞ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﰲ ﺃﻗﺼﻰ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﳍﺎ ﰲ 3/21ﻭﰲ .9/23
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻂ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺳُﻤﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ :
ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﳌﻀﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸـﻤﺲ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺍﺟـﻪ
ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ،ﻓﻼ ﲤﻜﻦ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ :ﺍﶈﺎﻕ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻻﳕﺤﺎﻕ ﺃﻱ :ﺍﻧﻌﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺃﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ . 36
ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﲟﻌﺪﻝ ﻛﻞ 29 :ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻭ 12ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻭ 44ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ%87
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ، 37ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﻱ ،ﺃﻱ ﺇﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﻱ ﻫـﻮ :
29,53ﻳﻮﻣﺎ . 38
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ 29ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻱ
ﺷﻬﺮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﺍﺕ – ﻟﺴﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ -ﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﻮﻣـﺎ ،ﻷﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺳـﻂ
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﻱ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻭﻧﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺛﻼﺛﲔ
ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ، %53ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ، %47ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴـﺒﺐ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﺑﺈﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻏﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻷﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻷﺷﻬﺮ ﺛﻼﺛﻮﻥ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ .
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻢ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻟﻌﺸﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﻠﻦ ﻭﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻳﻌﺮﻓـﻪ
39
. ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ
36ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺩ ،ﺃﻧﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﲏ ،ﺍﳉﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻴﺔ ﺹ ، 150ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﺮﻳﺦ ،ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ 1983ﻡ .
37ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﳎﺎﻫﺪ ،ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻲ . 47 ،
38ﺍﻟﻌﺠﲑﻱ ،ﻛﻴﻒ ﳓﺴﺐ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﻮﻑ ﻭﺍﳋﺴﻮﻑ . 17
39ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﳎﺎﻫﺪ ،ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻲ . 213 - 76
16
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻈﺔ ﺫﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻱ ﻻ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻟﻊ ،
ﻭﻣﻮﻋﺪﻩ -ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ -ﺃﻣﺮ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﻻ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺼﺼﻮﻥ .
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺪﺙ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ -ﺑﺘﻮﻗﻴﺖ ﺟﺮﻧﻴﺘﺶ -ﻓﻴﻌﺪ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺑﺪﺍﻳـﺔ
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻓﻠﻜﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺎ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ،
ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﺃﻭ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺅﻳﺘـﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ .
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺪﺙ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﻐﻴﺐ ﻣﻊ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﳌﻀﻲﺀ ﻟﻠﻘﻤﺮ ﺑﺄﻛﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑـﻞ
ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﳌﻈﻠﻢ .
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺪﺙ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺑﻌﺪﺓ ﺳﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻳﻐﻴـﺐ ﺑﻌـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺑﻮﻗﺖ ﻗﺼﲑ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻹﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣـﻦ
ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﺍﳘﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻗﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ .
ﻭﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺣﻮﺍﱄ 48ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻳـﻮﻡ ،
ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ – ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﺍﳘﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ -ﲟﻌﺪﻝ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺘﲔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ
ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﰎ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﲞﻤﺲ ﺳﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻤـﺮ ﺳـﻴﻐﻴﺐ ﺑﻌـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺑﻌﺸﺮ ﺩﻗﺎﺋﻖ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﻲ ، 40ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺭﺅﻳـﺔ
ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :
ﺃﻭﳍﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻟﻠﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻣﻌﺎ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻀﻲﺀ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻤـﺮ
ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﳌﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﺇﻻ ﺣﻮﺍﱄ ﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺳـﺒﻌﲔ
ﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﺑﺪﺭﺍ .
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ ﰲ ﳎﺎﳍـﺎ
ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻱ ،ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺷﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻓﻖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﺏ ﺑﻌﺪﺓ ﺩﻗﺎﺋﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺿـﻮﺀ
ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ .
40ﺳﻌﺪ ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ ،ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ، 167ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺡ ،ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ ،ﻁ 1978 ، 3ﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺩ ،ﺍﳉﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎ
ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻴﺔ . 147
17
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺇﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺄﺧﺮ ﻏﻴﺎﺑﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﲟﺎ ﻻ
ﻳﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ) ( 29ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ، 41ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻣﻀﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﺣـﻮﺍﱄ ) (15
ﲬﺲ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﻲ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﰲ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻣـﺎ ﺗﻜـﻮﻥ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺃﻗﺼﻰ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﳍﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻀﻴﺾ ،ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺃﻗﺼﻰ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ
ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﺮﻯ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺣﻮﺍﱄ 12ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ
ﰲ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﳍﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻛـﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭﺝ ،ﺃﻱ
ﰲ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﱄ 18ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ .
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ -
ﳌﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ -ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺻﺪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺮﺍﻗﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ
ﰲ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺃﳓﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﲞﺎﺻﺔ -ﻟﻸﺳﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ -ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺯﻣـﻦ
ﺃﻣﻜﻨﺖ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺠﻞ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺛﺒـﺖ ﺃﻥ
ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻢ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﺴﺠﻞ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﻠـﻎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻢ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﻻ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ .
ﻭﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﺏ -ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺘـﱪﺓ ﺷـﺮﻋﺎ -ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺋـﻲ
ﺻﺒﺎﺣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻃﻠﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺗﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﱂ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻤـﺮ
ﻻﺯﺍﻝ -ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳُﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ -ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ 12
ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ -ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﰲ ﺃﻗﺼﻰ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﳍﻤﺎ -ﺣﱴ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ
،ﻭﺇﱃ 12ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻭﻫـﻮ
24ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﻃﻠﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺸـﻤﺲ ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺣﱴ ﰲ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻬﻧﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ .
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﻩ
ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﺳﻴﻐﻴﺐ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻐﺮﻩ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺳﻄﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺸـﻤﺲ ،
ﻭﺣﱴ ﻟﻮ ﺭﺋﻲ -ﻓﺮﺿﺎ -ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ
،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻻ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻓﻠﻜﻴﺎ .
18
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳُﺮﻯ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺭ
ﰲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺩﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻠﻴﺘﻨﺒﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ . 42
42ﺍﳌﺪﺍﻭﻻﺕ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺆﲤﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺷﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤـﺆﲤﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜـﻲ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻘﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻧﻴﺔ ﺳﻨﺔ 1992ﻡ ،ﻭﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﳌﺆﲤﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﻌﻘـﺪ ﰲ
ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻧﻴﺔ ﺳﻨﺔ ، 94ﻭﺷﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﰲ ﻣﺆﲤﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﰲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﻑ ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻧﻴﺔ ﺳﻨﺔ . 95
19
ﺇﻥ ﻟﻠﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻳﻌﺎﱐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻣﻊ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺷﻮﺍﻝ ،ﻭﺗﺘﺮﻛﺰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋـﺎﺩﺓ
ﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺩ ،ﻭﺗﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻇﻨﻴﺔ ﲢﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ
،ﻭﲢﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻮ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻊ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻳﻘﻊ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﲞﱪﻫﻢ . 43
20
ﻭﳌﺎ ﺷﻬﺪﻭﺍ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻀﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻴﲔ ﻭﺳﺌﻠﻮﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﳍـﻼﻝ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻭﻩ ،ﻭﻋﻦ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﲡﺎﻫﻪ ﻭﻣﻜﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻭﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﻫـﺮﺓ ،
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺗﻜﺒﲑ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﲬﺲ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻣﺮﺓ . 44
.4ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺭ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺱ ﻳﻈـﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺧﱪﺓ ،ﻭﺗﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺋﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻳﻈﻨﻮﻥ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻗﻰ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﻚ ،ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻬﺪ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘـﻮﻝ
ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺳﺌﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﺃﻯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺇﻧﻪ ﺭﺁﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ،ﻭﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﺄﻧـﻪ ﺭﺁﻩ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻭﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﺍﻗﺐ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺎﺋﺒﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﻓﻖ ﰒ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﰒ ﻳﻐﻴﺐ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﺣﺎﻭﻟﺖ ﺇﻓﻬﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻄﺄﻩ ﺃﺻﺮ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ
ﺇﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ !!! .
ﻭﻳﻈﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺑﺪﻗﺔ ﲟﺠﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻱ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻣـﻦ ﺃﻳـﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ،ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﻮﻋﺪ ﻭﻻﺩﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﱰﻟﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﺃﺩﻧﺎﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻋﺪ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﻦ ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﻔـﻞ ﺍﻟﺼـﻐﲑ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻤﺮﻩ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﳎﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﻻﺩﺗﻪ .
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺃﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻌـﺪ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌـﺔ ﳍـﻼﱄ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻭﺷﻮﺍﻝ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﻤﺲ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ %30ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳊﺎﻻﺕ .
21
ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻴﲔ -ﻭﺭﺋﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﻮﻑ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺩﻭﻝ ،ﻓﺪﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻼ ﺃﺩﱏ ﺷﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴـﺒﺖ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ .
ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ -ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ -ﻣﻦ ﺷﻬﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﴰﺲ ﻳﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺭﺃﻯ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺭﻣﻀـﺎﻥ
ﻟﻴﻠﺘﻪ ،ﺃﻱ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ،ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻬﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺭﺃﻯ ﻫـﻼﻝ
ﺷﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﻗﺒﻠﺖ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺗﻪ ،ﻭﰎ ﺇﻋﻼﻥ ﻋﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮ ،ﰒ ﺻﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ -ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ -ﺑﻘﻀﺎﺀ
ﻳﻮﻡ ،ﻷﻥ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ . 45
.2ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺭﻏﻢ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻏﻴﻮﻡ ﲤﻨﻊ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭﺅﻳـﺔ
ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﻟﻴﻠﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴـﻬﻮﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻻ
ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲝﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻓﻖ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺰ ﻧﻈﺮ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﻫـﻼﻝ
ﺷﻬﺮ ﺫﻱ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ ﻟﻠﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨـﻪ ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺟﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﰎ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻮﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﳊﺪﻭﺙ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺫﻱ
ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﺍﺕ ،ﻭﻷﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ،ﲞﻼﻑ ﺷـﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﻣﻀـﺎﻥ
ﻭﺷﻮﺍﻝ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻟﺘﺄﺧﲑ ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ .
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﳎﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﶈﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﻟﺸـﺮﻋﻴﺔ
ﰲ ﻗﻄﺮ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺇﻧﻜﻢ ﻗﺒﻠﺘﻢ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ ،ﻭﳓﻦ ﱂ ﻧﺮﻩ ﰲ ﻗﻄﺮ ﻻ ﻳﻮﻡ
ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺎﺀ ،ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﻓﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟـﺮﺩ ﺃﻧـﻪ ﻻ ﺗﺸـﺘﺮﻁ
ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻜﻢ ﻟﻠﻬﻼﻝ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻷﺧﱪﻧﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ . 46
.3ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺪﺙ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﻛﺴﻨﺔ 1409ﻫـ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺻﺎﻣﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ ﻭﻗﻄﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﻳﻦ
ﻭﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﳋﻤﻴﺲ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺻﺎﻣﺖ ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ ﻭﻣﺼـﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌـﺮﺍﻕ
22
ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﻐﺮﺏ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺻﺎﻣﺖ ﺑﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳍﻨﺪ ﻭﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻋُﻤـﺎﻥ ﻳـﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺖ .47
.4ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ،ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ .
ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ
ﳌﻌﺎﳉﺔ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻁ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻁ :
.1ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻋﺪﻻ ﺃﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎ ﻋﺎﻗﻼ ﺗﻘﻴﺎ ﺫﺍ ﻣﺮﻭﺀﺓ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻛﺬﺑﻪ.
.2ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺒﻄﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺳﺆﺍﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻣـﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﺃﻯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ،ﻭﻋﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ،ﻭﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻭﺫﻟـﻚ ﻟﻀـﻤﺎﻥ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﻗﻮﻋﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ .
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﰊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺸـﺎﻫﺪ ﲟﺠـﺮﺩ
ﺱ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ﺟَﺎ َﺀ
ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ﻭﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﻻ ﺿﺎﺑﻄﺎ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻧﺼﻪ َ :ﻋ ْﻦ ِﻋ ﹾﻜ ِﺮ َﻣ ﹶﺔ َﻋ ِﻦ ﺍْﺑ ِﻦ َﻋﺒﱠﺎ ٍ
ﺸ َﻬﺪُ ﹶﺃ ﹾﻥ ﻟﹶﺎ ِﺇﹶﻟ َﻪ ِﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺍﻟ ﱠﻠ ُﻪ
ﺻﻠﱠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﹶﻠْﻴ ِﻪ َﻭ َﺳﻠﱠ َﻢ ﹶﻓﻘﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ِﺇﻧﱢﻲ َﺭﹶﺃْﻳﺖُ ﺍﹾﻟ ِﻬﻠﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ﹶﺃَﺗ ْ
ﹶﺃ ْﻋﺮَﺍِﺑﻲﱞ ِﺇﻟﹶﻰ ﺍﻟﱠﻨِﺒ ﱢﻲ َ
ﺱ ﹶﺃ ﹾﻥ َﻳﺼُﻮﻣُﻮﺍ ﹶﻏﺪًﺍ .
ﺤ ﱠﻤﺪًﺍ َﺭﺳُﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﻟ ﱠﻠ ِﻪ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ َﻧ َﻌ ْﻢ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ﻳَﺎ ِﺑﻠﹶﺎ ﹸﻝ ﹶﺃ ﱢﺫ ﹾﻥ ﻓِﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎ ِ
ﺸ َﻬﺪُ ﹶﺃ ﱠﻥ ُﻣ َ
ﹶﺃَﺗ ْ
ﻑ َﻭ َﺭﻭَﻯ ُﺳ ﹾﻔﻴَﺎ ﹸﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﺜ ْﻮ ِﺭﻱﱡ ﺱ ﻓِﻴ ِﻪ ﺍ ْﺧِﺘﻠﹶﺎ ٌ ﺚ ﺍْﺑ ِﻦ َﻋﺒﱠﺎ ٍ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ﺃﹶﺑﻮ ﻋِﻴﺴَﻰ ) ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ( َﺣﺪِﻳ ﹸ
ﺏ ِﺳﻤَﺎ ٍﻙ ﺻﺤَﺎ ِ ﺻﻠﱠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﹶﻠْﻴ ِﻪ َﻭ َﺳﻠﱠ َﻢ ُﻣ ْﺮ َﺳﻠﹰﺎ َﻭﹶﺃ ﹾﻛﹶﺜﺮُ ﹶﺃ ْ
َﻭ ﹶﻏْﻴﺮُﻩُ َﻋ ْﻦ ِﺳﻤَﺎ ٍﻙ َﻋ ْﻦ ِﻋ ﹾﻜ ِﺮ َﻣ ﹶﺔ َﻋ ِﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨِﺒ ﱢﻲ َ
ﺻﻠﱠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﹶﻠْﻴ ِﻪ َﻭ َﺳﻠﱠ َﻢ ُﻣ ْﺮ َﺳﻠﹰﺎ . 48
َﺭ َﻭﻭْﺍ َﻋ ْﻦ ِﺳﻤَﺎ ٍﻙ َﻋ ْﻦ ِﻋ ﹾﻜ ِﺮ َﻣ ﹶﺔ َﻋ ِﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨِﺒ ﱢﻲ َ
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻷﻣﻮﺭ:
ﺃﻭﳍﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﺮﺳﻞ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺮﺩﻭﺩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ،ﻭﱂ ﺗﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﺳﻞ ﺑﺸﺮﻭﻁ .
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻁ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﳎﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ
ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺍﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ .
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﲰﺎﻙ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻜﺮﻣﺔ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺑﺔ .
23
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻹﲤﺎﻡ :
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﲤﺎﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻣﺴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻘـﺪﱘ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ -ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ -ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴـﺪﺓ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻷﻭﺍﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﳍﻢ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ .
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﲤﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻧﺴﺒﻴﺎ ،ﻟﺼﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻮ ،ﻭﺧـﱪﺓ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ .
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻹﲤﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ،ﻓﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ ﺍﳉـﻮ
ﻏﺎﺋﻤﺎ ﺻﻴﻔﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺘﺎﺀ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺗُﺮﻯ ،ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﲤﻜﻦ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﻓﻖ ؟ ﻭﻫﻢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻫﻲ :
.1ﺇﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻜﺮﺭ ،ﻭﺳﻴﻀﻄﺮﻭﻥ ﻹﲤﺎﻡ ﻋـﺪﺓ
ﺷﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻴﺔ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺳﻴﺠﻌﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻳﺘﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺷﻬﺮﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺑﻌـﺾ
ﺍﳊﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ .
.2ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻭﺍ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻟﻊ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴـﻪ ،ﻭﻻ
ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﺮﺩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺇﻻ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻛﺮﻳﺐ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻮﻡ ﻛﻞ ﺑﻠﺪ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻊ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﺑﻪ .
.3ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻭﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺃﺧﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ )ِﺇﺫﹶﺍ َﺭﹶﺃْﻳﺘُﻤُـﻮﻩُ ﹶﻓﺼُـﻮﻣُﻮﺍ َﻭِﺇﺫﹶﺍ
َﺭﹶﺃْﻳُﺘﻤُﻮ ُﻩ ﹶﻓﹶﺄ ﹾﻓ ِﻄﺮُﻭﺍ ﹶﻓِﺈ ﹾﻥ ﹸﻏﻢﱠ َﻋﹶﻠْﻴ ﹸﻜ ْﻢ ﻓﹶﺎ ﹾﻗ ُﺪﺭُﻭﺍ ﹶﻟﻪُ ( .
ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻧﻌﻤﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳒﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺑﻞ
ﺇﻧﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﳘﻬﺎ :
.1ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻬﻲ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺷـﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮﻳـﺔ ﻭﲞﺎﺻـﺔ
ﻟﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻭﺷﻮﺍﻝ .
24
ُ .2ﻳ َﻤﻜﱢﻨﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺗﻘﻮﱘ ﻫﺠﺮﻱ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﻭﻳﻨﻈﻢ
ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺗﻘﻮﱘ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﳛﺪﺩ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭﻛﻞ ﺳـﻨﺔ ﻭﻬﻧﺎﻳﺘـﻬﻤﺎ ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺘﻨﺘﻈﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﻋﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺷﺆﻭﻬﻧﻢ ،ﻛﺎﻟﺘﻘﺎﻭﱘ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻜﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺎﺕ
،ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻈﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﻋﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ .
ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﺍﳌﻴﻼﺩﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴـﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻘـﻮﱘ
ﺍﳍﺠﺮﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﺍﳌﻴﻼﺩﻱ ﻣﻨﻀﺒﻂ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺗﻘﻮﱘ ﻫﺠﺮﻱ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﻭﳓـﻦ
ﻧﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ .
.3ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ُﻳ َﻤﻜﱢﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺸﻬﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍـﻼﻝ ،
ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﳑﻜﻨﺔ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻠﺔ ﺭﺩﻫﺎ .
ﻳﻨﻬﻲ ﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺫﺑﲔ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺩﻭﺍﻓﻌﻬﻢ .
.4ﳛﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻟﻊ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﱂ ﲢﻞ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ .
.5ﻳﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺇﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻨﻌﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ .
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻟﻊ
ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻛﻤﺎ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻧﻈﺮﺍ ﻟﻜﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳُﺮﻯ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻻ
ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ .
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻞ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﺛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ؟ ﺃﻱ ﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﻄﻠـﻮﺏ ﺷـﺮﻋﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺼﻮﻡ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺘﻬﻢ ،ﺃﻡ ﻳﺼﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﰲ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ؟ .
ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺃﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﻟﻦ ﺃﻧﺎﻗﺸﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ،ﺑﻞ ﺳﺄﻋﺮﺽ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺘﲔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻴﺔ .
ﺐ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﻴﺔ ﱂ ﻳﺮﺩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺇﻻ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻛﹸ َﺮْﻳ ٍ
ﻀ ِﻞ َﺑ َﻌﹶﺜْﺘﻪُ ِﺇﻟﹶﻰ ُﻣﻌَﺎ ِﻭَﻳ ﹶﺔ ﺑِﺎﻟﺸﱠﺎ ِﻡ ﻗﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ﹶﻓ ﹶﻘ ِﺪ ْﻣﺖُ ﺍﻟﺸﱠﺎ َﻡ ،ﻭَﺍ ْﺳﺘُ ِﻬﻞﱠ َﻋﹶﻠ ﱠﻲ َﺭ َﻣﻀَﺎ ﹸﻥ َﻭﹶﺃﻧَـﺎ ) ﹶﺃﻥﱠ ﹸﺃﻡﱠ ﺍﹾﻟ ﹶﻔ ْ
ﺴﹶﺄﹶﻟﻨِﻲ َﻋْﺒﺪُ ﺍﻟﻠﱠ ِﻪ ْﺑ ُﻦ
ﺸ ْﻬ ِﺮ ﹶﻓ َ
ﺑِﺎﻟﺸﱠﺎ ِﻡ ﹶﻓ َﺮﹶﺃْﻳﺖُ ﺍﹾﻟ ِﻬﻠﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ﹶﻟْﻴﹶﻠ ﹶﺔ ﺍﹾﻟﺠُﻤُ َﻌ ِﺔ ،ﹸﺛﻢﱠ ﹶﻗ ِﺪ ْﻣﺖُ ﺍﹾﻟ َﻤﺪِﻳَﻨ ﹶﺔ ﻓِﻲ ﺁ ِﺧ ِﺮ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺱ َﺭﺿِﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋﻨْﻬﻤَﺎ ﹸﺛﻢﱠ ﹶﺫ ﹶﻛ َﺮ ﺍﹾﻟ ِﻬﻠﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ﹶﻓﻘﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ َ :ﻣﺘَﻰ َﺭﹶﺃْﻳﺘُﻢُ ﺍﹾﻟ ِﻬﻠﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ ؟ ﹶﻓﻘﹸ ﹾﻠﺖُ َ :ﺭﹶﺃْﻳﻨَـﺎﻩُ ﹶﻟْﻴﻠﹶـ ﹶﺔ َﻋﺒﱠﺎ ٍ
25
ﺱ َﻭﺻَﺎﻣُﻮﺍ َﻭﺻَﺎ َﻡ ُﻣﻌَﺎ ِﻭَﻳﺔﹸ ﹶﻓﻘﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ :ﹶﻟ ِﻜﻨﱠﺎ
ﺖ َﺭﹶﺃْﻳَﺘﻪُ ؟ ﹶﻓﻘﹸ ﹾﻠﺖُ َ :ﻧ َﻌ ْﻢ َﻭﺭَﺁ ُﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎ ُ
ﺍﹾﻟﺠُﻤُ َﻌ ِﺔ :ﹶﻓﻘﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ :ﹶﺃْﻧ َ
ﲔ ﹶﺃ ْﻭ َﻧﺮَﺍ ُﻩ ﹶﻓﻘﹸ ﹾﻠﺖُ :ﹶﺃﻭَﻻ َﺗ ﹾﻜَﺘﻔِﻲ ِﺑ ُﺮ ْﺅﻳَـ ِﺔ
ﺖ ﹶﻓﻠﹶﺎ َﻧﺰَﺍ ﹸﻝ َﻧﺼُﻮ ُﻡ َﺣﺘﱠﻰ ﻧُ ﹾﻜ ِﻤ ﹶﻞ ﹶﺛﻠﹶﺎِﺛ َ
ﺴْﺒ ِ
َﺭﹶﺃْﻳﻨَﺎ ُﻩ ﹶﻟْﻴﹶﻠ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺻﻠﱠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ َﻋ ﹶﻠ ْﻴ ِﻪ َﻭ َﺳ ﱠﻠ َﻢ ( . 49
ﺻﻴَﺎ ِﻣ ِﻪ ؟ ﹶﻓﻘﹶﺎ ﹶﻝ :ﻟﹶﺎ َﻫ ﹶﻜﺬﹶﺍ ﹶﺃ َﻣ َﺮﻧَﺎ َﺭﺳُﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﻟ ﱠﻠ ِﻪ َ
ُﻣﻌَﺎ ِﻭَﻳ ﹶﺔ َﻭ ِ
ﻓﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ :ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮﻧﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻮﻉ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴـﻪ ﺇﻻ
ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺃﻳﲔ :
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻮﻡ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺘﻬﻢ ،ﺃﺧﺬﺍ ﲝﺪﻳﺚ ﻛﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻄﺒﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺼﻠﻲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ .
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻔﻘﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ
ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻧﺺ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ .
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ :ﻫﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﻮﻥ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ :ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲰﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﻬﺗﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻼﻡ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﻬﺗـﺎ ﰲ
ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﰲ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ .
ﻭﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺺ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟـﱵ
ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺑﻼ ﺃﺩﱏ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲟﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ﻻ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ،ﻛﻤـﺎ
ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ .
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﻼﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻠﺒﻼﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻊ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺃﻭﱃ .
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﰲ ﺑﻠﺪ ﻳـﺪﻝ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺮﻭﻬﺑﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺷﺮﻕ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻂ ،
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﱂ ﺗﻐﺐ ﺑﻌﺪ .
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺛﺒﺖ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺛﺒﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻋـﱪﺓ ﺑـﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻟﻊ . 50
26
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻈﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ،
ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺼﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﰲ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭﺋﻲ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻳﻮﻡ
ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻛﻠﻪ .
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﻌﻤﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻟﻮﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ :
.1ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻣﻊ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻛﺮﻳﺐ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻱ ﻧﺺ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ .
.2ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﻣﺮﺍ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﻮﻧﻴﺎ .
ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺷﺒﻪ ﻛﺮﻭﻳﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﻛﻞ ﳊﻈﺔ ﺗﻄﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺗﻐﻴﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺰﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﳊﻈﺔ ﻗﺴﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻬﻧﺎﺭ،
ﺃﻱ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ؟ ﻫﻞ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺔ ﺍﳌﻜﺮﻣـﺔ ؟ ﺃﻡ
ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﰲ ﻏﺮﻳﻨﺘﺶ ﺃﻱ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻭﻩ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺻﻔﺮ ؟ ﺃﻡ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ ؟ ﺃﻡ
ﺃﻳﻦ ؟ .
ﺇﻥ ﺍﳉﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﲔ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻠﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﲞﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ ﻫـﻮ
ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺧﻂ ﻭﳘﻲ ﻣﺘﻌﺮﺝ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻭﻩ ﺧﻂ
ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ، 180ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻈﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻄﻠﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻂ ﺍﻟﻮﳘﻲ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻕ ﺷﺮﻭﻕ ﴰﺲ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﰊ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻂ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺮﻭﻕ ﴰـﺲ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻂ ﺍﻟﻮﳘﻲ ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﻣﻨـﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻐـﲑ
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ .
.3ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﲔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻟﻴﻼ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ
ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﳐﺎﻟﻒ ﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ،ﻓﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳊﻈـﺔ ﻏـﺮﻭﺏ
ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ .
ﻭﻟﻜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻨﺎﺹ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﲝﺪﻳﺚ ﻛﺮﻳﺐ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸـﻬﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺛﺒـﺖ ﰲ
ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻛﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌـﺔ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﺔ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺷﺮﻗﺎ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻴﻪ .
ﻭﲟﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ﰲ ﳊﻈﺔ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻟﻴﻼ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﺏ ﻻ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑـﻞ
27
ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﺧـﻼﻝ ﺃﺭﺑـﻊ
ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﻣﻮﺍ ﻭﺃﻓﻄﺮﻭﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳉﻐﺮﺍﰲ .
ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
.1ﱂ ﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ،ﺑﻞ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ .
.2ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻝ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﺪﻓﺎ ﻭﻏﺎﻳﺔ .
.3ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻬﻧﻰ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ .
.4ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻇﻨﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺯﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺎ .
.5ﻻ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻻ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻤﻴـﺎ،
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺎﺭﺿـﺔ
ﻣﻌﻪ .
.6ﻻ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻴﺔ .
.7ﻻ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻋﺪﻻ ﺿﺎﺑﻄﺎ .
.8ﻟﻠﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﻟﻺﲤﺎﻡ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﳒﺪ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻋـﺪﺩﺍ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ .
.9ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻟﻊ .
.10ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ .
.11ﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻘﻌﺔ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺑﻘﻌﺔ ﺗﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﻘﻊ ﻏﺮﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻬﺑﺬﺍ
ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ .
ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ
28