You are on page 1of 1

ESTATE OF DECEASED PERSON ADMINISTRATOR CANNOT SUE OR ACTION BEFORE GRANT OF PROBATE

BE SUED BEFORE LOA EXTRACTED EXTRACTED

• Section 8(1) CLA


• Section 8(3) CLA - “action is taken
• Ingall v Moran • Basically executor can commence a suit
after 6months after the deceased’s
Plaintiff issued a writ tapi LoA not taken out without extract grant of probate
personal rep taken out
representation”
• P Govindasamy Pillay v Lok Seng Chai Reason :
Contoh kalau probate, action boleh
within 6 months after executor dapat No grant extracted = no representative capacity = no
locus standi Meyappa Chetty v Subramaniam Chetty: An
grant of probate. Kalau intestate,
executor derives his title and authority from
action can be taken within 6 months
• Ruhani Mohiat v Abdul Karim the will of his testator and not from any
after administrator extract letter of
Held: The plaintiffs had the capacity to sue as the grant of probate.
administration
deceased’s administrators as the letters of
administration, despite not having been extracted, • However, an executor cannot be sued before
• Airey v Airey
had already been granted before the filing of the suit. the grant of probate is extracted.
The act of the defendant in
extracting the letters of
• Al Rashidy Kassim & Ors v Rosman Roslan (2007) Mohamidu Mohideen Hadjiar v Pitchey: it
administration revived the claim,
Fed Court : if there are special circumstances, the was held that a creditor cannot sue executor
thus resulting in the plaintiff’s claim
administrator will have locus to proceed with the legal unless he had obtained grant of probate
to not be statute-barred where it was
made within the six months proceeding without extract LoA
permitted
Facts : the action instituted by beneficiaries of the
• Lee Lee Cheng v Seow Peng Kwang estate untuk dapatkan tanah from the respondent
The proceedings taken after the whom they alleged had fraudulently transferred the
expiration of the period of 6m land to himself. Other issues/situations
prescribed. The respondent
contended that the action was barred Def oso dah masuk dlm tanah tu and damaged the
• Person who intermeddles with
where the six-month period had fruit trees & demolished building on the land. And the
deceased’s assets indirectly becomes an
expired, while the appellant applied land will be sold to third party. There’s a possibility the
executor or administrator of deceased’s
to have the six-month period land may be lost forever
estate
enlarged. Held: The court has no
power to extend the period of time Issue : adakah beneficiaries ni semua, without first
extract/obtain LoA have a locus standi to commence • Writ issued in the name of deceased
prescribed and thus, the appellant's plaintiff/defendant - The writ will be set
alleged cause of action was barred. the action in order to protect and regain the land
which has been fraudulently obtained by an outsider aside.

Held : court in the view that appellants (beneficiaries) • Plaintiff dies in the course of
do have locus standi to commence proceeding in proceedings
order to protect and preserve the asset of the estate
• Action against deceased’s estate where
no grant has been extracted – official
administrator cannot be sued

You might also like