ny ss
A CRITICAL ANTHOLOGY
Pa eet L EL)
OL aU ttl
TEs
Pree CetDEVON W. CARBADO
PRIVILEGE
Te may be... that a damaging bias toward heterosocil or
heterosexst assumptions inheres unavokdably in the very
concept of gender... The ukimate definitional
base
st necessarily be tothe diacritical
fioatier between different genders, This gives heterosacial
and heterosexual relationships a conceptual privilege ofa
. Children will be aught in school, explicitly or implicitly about the
naturalness of heterosexuality (they will also be taught to internal-
ize the notion of white normativty).
Conversations on black liberation will always include conce
about heterosexual men,
. Heterosexvals can adopt children without being perceived as selfish
and without anyone questioning their motives:
Heterosexuals are not denied custody or visitation rights of their
children because they are heterosexuals.
Heterosexual men are welcomed as leaders of Boy Scout troops.
Hreterosexuals can visit their parents and family as who they are, and
take their spouses, partners, or dates with them to family functions.
. Heterosexuals can talk matter-of factly about their relationships
with their partners without people commenting that they are
“flaunting? their sexuality
Ablack heterosexual couple would be welcomed as members ofany
black church,
puivitece 205Heterosexual couples do not have to worry about whether kissing
each other in public or holding hands in public will render them
vulnerable to violence
Heterosexuals do not have to struggle with “coming out” or worry
about being “outed,
The parents of heterosexuals do not love them “in spite o
sexual orientation, and parents do not blame themselves for their
children’s heterosexuality
Hiterosexuality is affirmed in most religious traditions.
Heterosexuals can introduce their spouses to colleagues and. not
‘worry about whether the decision will have a detrimental impact on
their careers
A black het
black and being heterosexual
Het
at work without causing office gossip or hostility
sogexual male does not have to choose between being
osextals can prominently display their spouses’ photographs
(White) heterosexuals do not have to worry about “positively” rep
resenting heterosexuality.
Few will take pity on a heterosexual on hearing that she is straight,
or feel the need to say, “That's olay” (though itis not uncommon
fora black person to hear, “It’s ob
e that you're black” or “When we look at you, we don't see a
y that you're black” or “We don’
black person’
Male
‘pathology” of the black family
heterosexuality is not considered to be symptomatic of thi
Hiterosexuality is never mistaken as the only aspect of one’s life
cad as merely one more component of
bat is perceived inst
styl
one's personal identity.
er the impact their
(White) heterosexuals do not have to worry 0
nally on their children’s lives, particul
sexuality will hav
ait relates to theie social lives (though black families of all identit
configurations do have to worry about how race and racism will
affect their children’s well-being).
Heterosexuals do not have to worry about being “bashed” after
leaving a social event with other heterosexuals (though black peo
cially
ple of al sexual orientations do have to worry about bein
bashed” on any given day).
Every day is (white) “Heterosexual Pride Day:{ have argued that one of the ways to contest gender and sexual orientation
hierarchy is for heterosexual men to dail their social experiences on the
privileged side of gender and sexual orientation, In advancing this argument,
do not mean to suggest that the role of these men isto leg
worthy” and “self-interested” victim-centered accounts of discrimination.
There isa tendency on the part of dominant groups (e.g, males and hetero
sexuals) to discount the experiences of subordinate groups (e.g, straight
women, lesbians, and gays) unless those experiences are authenticated or
legitimized by a member of the dominant group. For example, itis one thing
forme, a black man, tosay [experi
.ced discrimination in a particular social
settings itis quite another for my white male colleague to say he witnessed
that discrimination, My telling of the story is suspect because 1 am black
(racially interested). My white colleague's telling of the story is not sus
pect because he is white (racially disinterest
The racial transparency
of whiteness—its “perspectivelessness"*’—renders my colleague's account
bj
TThe problem of racial status (in)credibility is quite real. Consider how
Comel We:
alludes to it inthe following anecdote about his inability to get a
cab in New York City
Aer the ninth taxi refinsed me, my blood began to boil. The tenth taxi
refused me and stopped for a kind, well-dressed, smiling female fellow
citizen of European descent. As she stepped in the cab, she said, “This is
really ridiculous, is it not2”
Ualy racial memories of the past flashed through my mind, Years
ago, while driving from New York to teach at Williams College, 1 was
stopped on fake charges of trafficking cocaine. When I told the police
officer I was 2 professor of religion, he replied, “Yeh, and I'm the Flying
Nan, Let’
go, nigger!” I was stopped three times in my fist ten days in
Princeton for driving too slowly on a residential street with a spe
of twenty fi
dlimit
e miles per hour, .. . Needless to say, these incidents are
dwarfed by those like Rodney King’s beating... . Yet the
like a merciless knife at my soul as I waited on that godforsake
Finally I decided to take the subway. I walked
ived late, an
had to catch my moral breath as 1 approached [my
sand whi
appointment with] the white male photographs female
1
|
1
|208
cover designer. ehose not to dwell on this everyday experience of black
New Yorkers. And we had a good time talking, posing, and taking
pictures.
Here West is connecting two problematic episodes. Mis racial representations
of these episodes reflect concerns about his racial credibility. His narrative
suggests that he is worried about how his readers will read him (js he a
trustworthy witness?) and thus read the events he describes (do they reflect
racism?). West understands that he is (ot, rather, will be constructed as) an
‘unreliable witness to his own racial victimization. ‘That is, be is fully aware
that as a black man his racial story (like his racial identity) is suspect. Thus,
disinterested” witness to legitimize and authenti
an be
he thetorically deploys a
rropean descent.” She
8” and “smiling” To the
cate his racial narrative—the woman “ol
trusted. She is white and respectable—“well-