Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brandon Hina
In lesson 9 of our class, we covered forests and evaluated how the world has been using
the resource. Many countries are cutting down their forests, in order to clear land and increase
production of timber products. In the article, Poor nations’ economies grow with rising
deforestation, Baraka Rateng highlights the link between economic growth and deforestation.
Poor nations are experiencing economic growth with deforestation but wealthier countries aren’t
experiencing those same rates. Rateng explains that increases in deforestation will continue to
countries (Rateng, 2017). These countries are experiencing so much income from their forests
that they can’t afford to stop cutting them down. However, increases in deforestation results in so
One of the biggest external costs is the extinction of species. Dianne Dotson describes
how deforestation effects mammals, in Animals Losing Their Homes in The Rainforest. Many
mammals are being restricted to fragmented habitats in rainforests. Tree species specifically, find
themselves homeless and cannot adapt to treeless environments (Dotson, 2019). In this project, I
will asses some of the nations with the most severe deforestation problems. The data is
interactive on al visualizations in the dashboard. Data on forests net change area rate is provided
by the UN Food and Agricultural Organization for 2005, 2010, and 2015. Data on GDP history is
provided by World Development Indicators for every country in 2005, 2010, and 2015. Data on
endangered mammals is provided by the United Nations Environmental Program in their 2018
report.
!2
My first visualization is my custom legend. The legend is essential in describing the data
in all of my other visualizations. There are 10 countries present in my legend, each acquiring a
different color that will be consistent throughout the rest of the project. These countries had the
lowest net change area rate of forests in 2015. Negative net change rates indicate a country is
cutting more forest area then they are growing, in terms of acres. The countries are presented in
descending order. Togo, located at the top, has the lowest net change rate at -8.113. Myanmar,
located at the bottom, has the highest net change rate, of the 10 countries, at -1.782.
The next visualization in a bump chart of these 10 countries. It follows the same order as
the legend. It shows how each country has ranked throughout the years, compared to the rest of
the countries. Togo is ranked first, while Myanmar is ranked tenth. Each country has held a
similar rank throughout the three years, with the exception of Chad. This shows that these
countries are consistently cutting down their forests each year with no sign of change. They are
maintaining their top spots as the lowest net changers in the world. From 2005 to 2010, and 2010
to 2015, every countries net change area rate got more negative.
My third visualization is a bar chart that plots the 10 countries’ Gross Domestic Product
in 2005, 2010, 2015. I provided the global mean GDP in all three years, to show how far off each
country is from the rest of the world. To calculate mean GDP, I took the global GDP in each year
and divided it by the number of countries in the world (195). Every country is below the mean,
except for Nigeria in 2010 and 2015. This shows that the countries with the biggest deforestation
problems are usually poor and developing. It’s also important to notice that every country
experienced continual growth in GDP from 2005 to 2015. This proves that Rateng was correct in
his conclusion that poor countries experience high levels of economic growth from deforestation.
!3
GDP isn’t the best measure of economic well-being but it provides a nice baseline.
mammals in each of the countries. The bigger the bubble of each country, the more endangered
mammals they have. There is a constant trend that the lower the net change rate, the more
endangered mammals a country has. Uganda and Nigeria are two of three countries with the
lowest net change area rates and they have 31 endangered mammals. Zimbabwe and Paraguay
have two of the three highest net change area rates and they have 10 endangered mammals. Togo
and Myanmar are considered outliers and should be ignored when determining the meaning of
this chart. Togo has a small number of endangered mammals (13) because it is such a small
country. Myanmar has such a high number of endangered mammals (49) because the tropical
rainforest in Southeast Asia is unique, compared to the rainforest in Africa and South America.
The data in this project, represents topics we have discussed in class and have read about
forests. Cutting down trees destroys the most biologically active habitats in rainforests. The life
of these species is unique to that region and is unmatched anywhere else on the planet.
Deforestation causes extinction so that’s why it was important to analyze the amount of
endangered mammals in each country. Endangered Economies suggests we should stray away
from the measurement GDP, when calculating a countries economic well being. GDP measures
the depletion of natural resources as income for a country. However, Endangered Economies
argues that the depletion of natural capital is hurting the country and should be measured as a
loss (Heal, 2017, p. 165). Each of the 10 countries GDP grew from 2005 to 2015. Sure countries
are making profits off their timber, but what happens when all of their forests are gone?
!4
References
Dotson, J. D. (2019, March 2). Animals Found in the Tropical Evergreen Forest. Retrieved April
forest-7388926.html
Heal, G. M. (2017). Endangered economies: how the neglect of nature threatens our prosperity.
Rateng, B. (n.d.). Poor nations' economies grow with rising deforestation. Retrieved April 20,
economies-grow-rising-deforestation.html
United Nations Statistics Division (2015). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (2018).
end=2018&name_desc=false&start=2018&view=map
World Bank – World Development Indicators (2017). World Bank national accounts data, and
catalog/world-development-indicators
!5
!6