You are on page 1of 8

Festival Management & Event Tourism, Vol. 3, pp. 175-182, 1996 1065-2701/96 $5.00 + .

00
Printed in the USA. All rights reserved. Copyright :.~1996 Cognizant Comm. Corp.

A MARKET SEGMENTATION OF FESTIVAL VISITORS:


UMBRIA JAZZ FESTIVAL IN ITALY

SANDRO FORMICA and MUZAFFER UYSAL I

Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and


State University, 351 Wallace Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0429

This study examines and profiles the existing market(s) of Umbria Jazz festival visitors in Italy. By
using a priori market segmentation, segments are characterized based on differentiating motiva-
tions, demographic, and event behavior characteristics. The study concludes with appropriate
marketing implications. It is hoped that the information generated from this study would comple-
ment and enhance the economic impact and general visitor data base that were generated by the
Chamber of Commerce of Perugia for Umbria Jazz Festival.

Market segmentation Demographic characteristics Umbria Jazz Festival

Effective marketing and management of festi- 1995; Perdue, 1985; Shoemaker, 1994; Uysal &
vals and events require an understanding of the McDonald, 1989; van Veen, Opedijk, & Verhal-
existing segments of the market. Increased compe- len, 1986). Although numerous methods of visitor
tition between visitor destinations and the high segmentation exist, including a posteriori or fac-
cost of promotion encourage marketing specialists tor-cluster segmentation, a priori segmentation or
and event organizers to identify the behavioral criterion segmentation, and recently neural net-
characteristics of visitors they intend to service. A work models (Mazanec, 1992), because of the
clearly defined market segment permits specifi- smallness and place dependency of events and fes-
cally directed promotional programs, improves es- tivals, the study suggests that a priori market seg-
timates of the size of a specialized market, and mentation can be less time consuming and particu-
encourages the development of event opportuni- larly effective for separating the event and festival
ties that appeal to the identified groups (Getz, market with less cost.
1990; McCleary, 1995). The assumption of this segmentation approach
The literature in tourism and hospitality is re- is that there is some knowledge about the nature
plete with studies that have used several segmenta- of the market place in advance (Smith, 1989). A
tion variables with different approaches (e.g., see priori segmentation requires the researcher to se-
Bonn, Furr, & Uysal, 1992; Calantone & Maza- lect or accept at the outset the basis for defining
nec, 1991; Cha, McCleary, & Uysal, 1995; Mc- the segment. In this study, segmentation is tied to
Queen & Miller, 1985; Oh, Uysal, & Weaver; the use of one objective variable, namely origin of

'Address correspondence to Muzaffer Uysal.

175
176 FORMICA AND UYSAL

visitors. The selection of this segmentation is cated in the central part of Italy and has a popula-
based on the visitation trends of the Umbria Jazz tion of approximately 125,000. Perugia and its re-
Festival. Although the festival's management has gion, Umbria, have a unique historical heritage.
had prior knowledge of the importance of visitors About 2500 years ago, Perugia was one of the 12
from outside of the Umbria region, including in- chief cities of the Etruscan Confederation. In 295
ternational visitors, they did not have much de- BC the Romans possessed the city, and at the fall
scriptive information about the nature of this mar- of the Roman Empire, Perugia was invaded re-
ket. Therefore, the researchers have reached the spectively by the Goths, Lombards, and Byzan-
conclusion that segmentation by origin of visitors tines. After the 15th Century, perugia and Umbria
would generate new information for the festival's became part of the Papal State until 1860, when
management. In addition, this type of segmenta- the Kingdom of Italy was constituted. Within its
tion provides the organization with the ability to medieval walls, Perugia still preserves the architec-
understand the behavior of visitors as a package. tural beauties of those civilizations. These beauties
A priori segmentation, contrary to a posteriori compose the natural and picturesque scenario of
segmentation, does not necessarily depend on a Umbria Jazz Festival.
multivariate method. Segments are already de-
fined and separated and subsequent description The Festival
with further concomitant variables can be ob-
tained with descriptive profile and conventional Umbria Jazz was started in 1973. All the con-
cross-tabulation (Mazanec, 1992). Therefore, a certs offered by the festival were free of charge
priori segmentation is particularly valuable when and Umbria Jazz was held in different cities and
market segments are known but their behaviors towns across the Umbria region. Due to the
need further examination and profiling with re- gratuity of its shows and the magnitude of Jazz
spect to selected descriptors. Understanding the musicians participating - Charles Mingus, Keith
nature and characteristics of visitor behavior Jarret, Miles Davis, and many others-tens of
based on a predetermined segmentation basis en- thousands of visitors coming from all parts of Eu-
ables festival and event organizers and marketing rope were attracted to Umbria Jazz (Associazione
professionals to design, enhance, and promote Umbria Jazz, 1995).
product features and services that are preferred One of the major strengths of Umbria Jazz Fes-
and valued by targeted segments. tival is the combination between the music and the
The purpose of this study was to examine and charming ambiance provided by the concert sites.
profile the existing markets of Umbria Jazz Festi- Medieval squares, Roman churches, and ancient
val visitors based on selected demographic and theaters represent the most picturesque and fasci-
event characteristics of visitors. More specifically, nating settings for Umbria Jazz Festival. How-
the study profiled and compared Umbria region ever, the lack of a coordinated development plan
visitors to out-of-Umbria region visitors. The pre- led Umbria Jazz Festival to a growth that was
determined segments are characterized based on both rapid and dramatic. Perugia's residents ex-
differentiating motivations, sociodemographic, pressed their resentment by marching through the
and event behavior characteristics. Finally, the streets of the city against the disproportionate
study concludes with marketing and management crowds of out-of-Umbria region visitors and the
implications. festival itself. The festival and its massive tourism
development impacted negatively on the commu-
Background of Umbria Jazz Festival nity and its residents, resulting in a disruptive so-
cial reaction. Indeed, the residents' intolerance for
Study Site
the dramatic impact of the event caused Umbria
Umbria Jazz Festival is staged annually from Jazz Festival to be suspended in 1978.
the second Friday of July for 10 days in Perugia, The Festival's organizations acknowledged that
the capital of the Umbria Region. Perugia is 10- a more robust local leadership and capital invest-
MARKET SEGMENT A TlON OF FESTIVAL VISITORS 177

ment were needed to manage such an international based on motivations, sociodemographic and
event (Associazione Umbria Jazz, 1995). Umbria event behavior characteristics.
Jazz Festival started again in 1982, strengthened
by a solid organization and a rigorous action plan. Data Collection and Analysis
The financial structure was, and still is, repre-
sented as follows: one-third of the expenditures Survey
is paid by governmental institutions, one-third by An on-site intercept procedure was used in the
private sponsors, and one-third is generated by festival area during the month of July, 1995. Visi-
ticket revenues. From the organizational view- tors were approached while entering the sites
point, the following changes were implemented: where the concerts were staged, or close to the
(1) it was no longer an itinerant festival, and (2) areas where free concerts were about to begin or
all concerts were staged in Perugia. Today, only end. If visitors agreed voluntarily to participate,
the opening, closing, and minor concerts are free a two-page questionnaire written in English was
of charge, and all other concerts require a pur- given. [Because a large number of visitors origi-
chased ticket. The ticket policy helped to select the nated from outside the country and to avoid trans-
visitors, thus not attracting people who generated lation problems regarding the content of the sur-
residents' resentment against the festival. With the vey instrument, the English language was selected
new formula, concerts are offered throughout the as the most appropriate means of communcation
day; they start at midday and end at 2 or 3 o'clock with visitors. However, researchers with language
in the morning. Generally, afternoon concerts are skills were available on site to assist respondents
offered outdoors in small ancient squares or scenic (for more information on language and cross-
parks and evening concerts are offered in theaters, cultural skills, see Dimanche, 1994).] The ques-
until midnight when concerts are featured inside tionnaire format was selected to avoid interviewer
jazz clubs. Several marching bands also perform bias; however, assistance was provided to respon-
jazz music along the ancient streets of the city. dents by the researchers with language skills who
The new formula elaborated by the Umbria Jazz were available on site. To acquire a representative
organization was revealed to be a successful blend sample of the visitors, questionnaires were distrib-
between the community interests and needs. In uted throughout the festival period. Afternoon,
fact, the massive number of event goers are now evening, and night concerts were equally consid-
well distributed and entertained in outdoor as well ered for data collection. A sample of 313 usable
as indoor sites. The residents are integrated with questionnaires was generated.
the tourist visitors and proudly participate and The questionnaire included a section on moti-
sustain the Festival. vations to attend the festival. The motivation scale
According to a study developed by the Cham- is adopted from an earlier study that was reported
ber of Commerce for Umbria Jazz and other ma- by Uysal, Gahan, & Martin (1993). Event-related
jor festivals held in the Umbria region in 1993, up questions such as satisfaction with the festival and
to 200,000 visitors attend the festival every year. number of festival visits were also included. Fi-
These visitors account for an overall number of nally, demographic information was obtained to
1,200,000 bed nights. The total revenues from the better characterize and profile the festival visitor
tickets amounted to a modest $400,000, but the market.
study has determined that for every U.S. dollar
invested in Umbria Jazz Festival, 3.10 dollars are
Analysis
generated (CENSIS, 1994).
In contrast to the study led by the Chamber of Analysis consisted of three steps. First, two
Commerce of Perugia, the present study aimed to groups of visitors - out-of-the-region visitors (n
profile and examine the two market segments- = 236; 75.4070) and Umbria region visitors (n =
Umbria region and out-of-Umbria region visitors. 77; 24.6070) were formed as market segments. Sec-
The predetermined segments are characterized ond, the 23 motivations statements were factor
178 FORMICA AND UYSAL

analyzed using a varimax rotation procedure, and Table 1 provides factor groupings of motivations
reliability coefficients for delineated factors were with associated statistics. The factors were labeled
obtained. In the final step, the segments were ex- as: (1) Excitement & Thrills; (2) Socialization; (3)
amined and profiled with respect to delineated Entertainment; (4) Event Novelty; (5) Family To-
motivation factor groupings, and selected event getherness. Labeling factors were based on the ap-
and visitor characteristics. The study used chi- propriateness of the individual items under each
square tests of homogeneity of proportions for factor grouping and judgmental evaluation of the
categorical variables and I-tests for continuous factors consistent with the literature (Mohr, Back-
variable to examine whether differences existed man, Gahan, & Backman 1993; Uysal et al., 1993).
between the two segments. Combined these five factor groupings accounted
for almost 550/0of the motivation variance. The
Results delineated motivational factor groupings had ei-
genvalues of 1.19 or higher and relatively high re-
Factor analysis of the 23 motivation items re- liability coefficients ranging from 0.64 (Family
sulted in five factor groupings. One item with less Togetherness) to 0.77 (Excitement & Thrills).
than 0.40 loading was removed from the study. Moreover, more than half of the 22 motivation

Table I
Factor Analysis of Festival Motivations: Umbria Jazz Festival

Factor Variance Reliability


Motivation Items Loading Eigenvalue Explained Coef.

Excitement & Thrills 6.14 27.9 0.7785


Because I had heard about the festival and it sounded like fun 0.6638
Because 1 enjoy special events 0.6723
Because it is stimulating and exciting 0.6689
To experience new and different things 0.5362
Because 1 thought the entire group would enjoy 0.5203
For a change of pace from everyday life 0.5093
Because 1 was curious 0.4937
Socialization 1.93 8.8 0.7836
So 1 could experience it with my companions· 0.4522
For a chance to be with people who are enjoying themselves 0.7764
To be with people who enjoy the same things 0.7486
So 1 could be with my friends 0.6966
Because 1 enjoy a festival crowd 0.5848
Because it is a great opportunity to meet people from all over the
world 0.4523
Enlerlainmenl 1.45 6.6 0.7036
Because it is a good opportunity to visit the area 0.7899
To enjoy listening the music I like in historical sites 0.6874
To enjoy the unique atmosphere 0.5777
To enjoy the night life 0.5558
Event NoveUy 1.28 5.8 0.6588
Because 1 like shows, ballets, concerts, and theater plays of the
best quality 0.7451
Because Umbria Jazz Festival is unique 0.6778
To see the entertainment 0.5359
Family Togetherness 1.19 5.4 0.6430
To help to bring the family together more 0.8499
To observe the other people attending the festival 0.7623
Total variance explained 54.6

Respondents utilized a five-point likert type scale to rate the importance of motivation items: 1 = not at all important to 5 = very
important.
·The motivational item "So 1 could experience it with my companions" is also loaded on Excitement & Thrills factor grouping with a factor
loading of 0.4721. However, it is kept in Socialization because it appears more appropriate in that factor grouping.
MARKET SEGMENT AnON OF FESTIVAL VISITORS 179

Table 2
Motivational Differences Between the Two Visitor Segments

Out-oF- Umbria
Region Region
Motivational Factors Visitors Visitors t-Test Value SigniFicance

Excitement & Thrills 3.23 3.27 -0.390 0.700


Socialization 3.06 3.36 -2.91 0.004
Entertainment 3.75 3.54 2.]4 0.035
Event Novelty 3.86 3.87 -0.]60 0.875
Family Togetherness 2.28 2.42 -1.05 0.295

items had 0.60 or higher factor loading, implying visitor and Umbria region vIsitor segments with
a reasonably high correlation between the deline- respect to two factor groupings: Socialization and
ated factor groupings and their individual items. Entertainment. The Umbria region visitors placed
Table 2 provides the results of the (-tests of significantly more importance on Socialization
the five delineated motivation factor groupings by factor with a mean score of 3.36, and out-of-the-
market segments. The study reveals that signifi- region visitors, on the other hand, placed signifi-
cant differences exist between out-of-the-region cantly more importance on Entertainment factor

Table 3
Demographic Characteristics of Visitor Segments

Umbria
Out-oF-Region Region
Visitors Visitors
Variable (n = 236) (n = 77) Chi-Square Test SigniFicance

Gender 4.02 0.044


Male 79.5 20.5
Female 68.6 31.4
Marital Status 0.012 0.920
Single 77.1 22.9
Married 75.4 24.6
Age 8.64 0.01
18-29 years 74.1 25.9
30-39 years 83.2 16.8
40 and over 58.8 41.2
Education 0.507 0.77
High school and less 74.6 25.4
Associate degree 80.8 19.2
College or more 76.0 24.0
Income 3.04 0.21
Less than $20,000 73.3 26.7
$20,000-29,999 81.1 18.9
$30,000 or more 84.8 15.2
Occupation 20.06 0.00
ProFessional 83.3 16.7
Manager/owner 99.9 0.1
Skilled worker 76.8 23.2
Student 66.7 33.3
Other 68.5 31.5
Party Group 0.29 0.86
Family 75.0 25.0
Friends 77.8 22.2
Couples/groups 80.0 20.0
180 FORMICA AND UYSAL

Table 4
Event Characteristics of Visitor Segments

Umbria
Out-oF-Region Region
Visitors Visitors
Variable (n == 236) (n == 77) Statistical Test Significance

Umbria Jazz attended beFore x' == 24.46 0.00


Yes 66.1 33.9
No 91.2 8.8

Number of people in the group 3.24 2.93 { == 1.06 0.28

Other Festival attended beFore X' == 2.73 0.07


Yes 80.7 19.3
No 72.0 28.0

Satisfaction level 3.64 3.63 { == 0.04 0.97

SatisFaction is measured on a five-point Likert type scale: I == poor to 5 == excellent.

with a mean score of 3.75. However, the nature of shows that visitors attend this and other festivals
the event itself appears to be the most important with some regularity.
motivation for attending the Jazz festival, with a Part of the survey instrument had an exclusive
mean score of 3.86 for out-of-the-region visitors section for out-of-the-region visitors regarding
and 3.87 for the Umbria region visitors, respec- lodging selection and number of days spent in the
tively, followed by Entertainment motivation. region. Table 5 shows lodging types and number
Overall, Family Togetherness factor as a reason of days spent in the region for this segment. Over
for attending the festival was not ranked high by 44070 of the visitors stayed in hotels, followed by
either visitor segment. campground with almost 15070 as forms of lodg-
The study also reveals that there are some de- ing. Descriptive analysis of the study revealed that
mographic differences between the two groups. 20070 of the visitors in this segment did not stay
For example, out-of-the-region visitors mostly overnight (day visitors) in the region. The average
consist of younger (under age of 30 years) and number of days spent without the outliers is al-
male visitors, whereas the Umbria region visitors most 5 days. The most frequently mentioned
include more females and individuals over the age length of stay consisted of 3 days. However, the
of 40 years (see Table 3). The Umbria region visi- median length of stay was around 3.5 days.
tors also include more skilled workers, farmers,
and homemakers when compared to out-of-the-
region visitor occupations. With the exception of
gender, age, and occupation, no statistically sig-
nificant differences existed between the groups Table 5
with regard to marital status, education, income, Event Characteristics of Out-of-Region Visitor Segment
and party group. Event Variable N Irfo
Table 4 presents the selected event characteris-
tics of the segments. There were no statistically Lodging type
Hotels 107 44.53
significant differences in the level of overall festi- Friends & Families 24 10.21
val satisfaction and the number of people in the Campground 35 14.89
traveling group between the segments. Two seg- Other lodging 22 9.36
Day visitors 47 20.0
ments rated the level of the Jazz festival satisfac- Number of days spent
tion almost identical with a relatively high mean Mean 4.95
score (3.64 for out-of-the-region visitors and 3.63 Mode 3.00
Median 3.50
for the Umbria region visitor). The table also
MARKET SEGMENTATION OF FESTIVAL VISITORS 181

Table 6 segments. This research revealed information about


Summary Profiles of the Segments the segment groups that can aid Umbria Festival
Out-of-region visitors • Place more importance on Enter- managers and organizers to better target their
(75.4070 of the market) tainment markets and promote the event and gain support
• Emphasize Event Novelty from the locals.
• Mostly consist of younger visitors
(under 30 years old) Literature on attendance motivations to local
• Mostly consist of professional, festivals has consistently reported family together-
managers and owners as occupa-
ness, socialization, excitement and thrills, and es-
tion
• Spend around 5 days in the region cape as the most critical factors in visiting a festi-
• Most likely to use hotels val (Mohr at aI., 1993; Ralston & Crompton,
• Attend events and festivals with 1988; Uysal et aI., 1993). Conversely, in the pres-
some regularity
• Consist of more male visitors ent study the major motive appears to be the festi-
Umbria region visitors • Place more importance on Social- val novelty itself. A summary profile of the seg-
(24.6% of the market) ization
ments' description reveals that the major draw to
• Emphasize Event Novelty
• Mostly consist of older visitors (40 the event is the event itself. Entertainment as moti-
and over) vation factor for attending the festival also is very
• Mostly consist of skilled workers, important to both segments. Any promotional
and other occupational groups
(farmers, homemakers, etc.) ffort in which the Festival engages should al-
• Consist of more female visitors ways maintain the focus of the event and its
features, and highlight diverse entertainment that
goes with it.
It is hoped that the information generated from
Concluding Comments
this study would complement and enhance the
The objective of this study was to examine and economic impact and general visitor data base that
profile motivations, demographic, and event char- were generated by the Chamber of Commerce of
acteristics of visitors to Umbria Jazz Festival. By Perugia for Umbria Jazz Festival.
using a priori segmentation approach the study
has revealed some differences and similarities be- References
tween the two segments of visitors that warrant
special attention. As a consequence, specific and Associazione Umbria Jazz. (1995). Associaljone Umbria
differentiated strategies should be developed by Jazz Notes.
Bonn, M., Furr, L., & Uysal, M. (1992). Seasonal varia-
the festival's management to effectively serve and tion of coastal resort visitors: Hilton Head Island. Jour-
reach these two target markets with the most ap- nal of Travel Research, 31( 1), 50-56.
propriate promotional devices. Cal antone, R., & Mazanec, J. (199]). Marketing manar,e-
The findings suggest that event attendees are ment and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 18( I),
not homogeneous and may require a combination 101-119.
CENSIS. (1994). L'impatlo Economico Delle Grandi Man-
of segmentation and promotion strategies. For ex- ifestazioni Cultura/i in Provincia di Perl/gia. Roma:
ample, out-of-the-region visitors include more Marzo.
younger, male, and professional visitors. Such de- Cha, S., McCleary, K., & Uysal, M (1995). Travel motiva-
mographic information can be useful in expanding tions of Japanese overseas travelers: A factor-cluster
the existing out-of-the region market(s) to include segmentation approach. Journal of Travel Research,
34( I), 33-39.
other subsegments of the traveling public, and de- Dimanche, F. (1994). Cross-cultural tourism marketing re-
veloping promotional materials targeted at that search: An assessment and recommendations for future
market. studies. Journal of International Consumer Marketing,
The appropriate allocation of limited resources 6(3/4), 123-134.
and new management actions depend upon sys- Getz, D. (1990). Festivals, special events, and tourism.
New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
tematic and objective information about and from Mazanec, J. (1992). Classifying tourist into market seg-
visitors. Table 6 provides a summary of the differ- ments: A neural network approach. Journal of Travel
entiating and important characteristics of the two and Tourism Marketing, 1( I), 39-60.
182 FORMICA AND UYSAL

McCleary, K. (1995). Applying internal marketing tech- vice quality and economic impact of visitors to the 1987
niques for better festival organization and management. Dickens on the Strand emerging from a mail-back sur-
Festival Management & Event Tourism, 3( I), 1-7. vey. Report No.3 for the Galvaston Historical Founda-
McQueen, J., & Miller, K. (1985). Target market selection tion. Texas A&M University.
of tourists: A comparison of approaches. Journal of Shoemaker, S. (1994). Segmenting the US travel market
Travel Research, 24( I), 2-6. according to benefit realized. Journal of Travel Re-
Mohr, K., Backman, K., Gahan, L., & Backman, S. search, 32(3), 8-21.
(1993). An investigation of festival motivations and Smith, L. J. S. (1989). Tourism analysis. New York: John
event satisfaction by visitor type. Festival Management Wiley & Sons, Inc.
& Event Tourism, 1(3), 89-97. Uysal, M., & McDonald, C. (1989). Visitor segmentation
Oh, H., Uysal, M., & Weaver, P. (1995). Product bundles by trip index. Journal of Travel Research, 29(3), 38-
and market segments based on travel motivations: A 42.
canonical correlation approach. International Journal Uysal, M. Gahan, L., & Martin, B. (1993). An examina-
of Hospitality Management, 14(2), 123-137. tion of event motivations: A case study. Festival Man-
Perdue, R. (1985). Segmenting state travel information in- agement and Event Tourism, 1(1), 5-10.
quiries by timing of the destination decision and previ- van Veen, W. M., Opedijk, X., & Verhallen, M. W. T.
ous travel experience. Journal of Travel Research, (1986). Vacation market segmentation: A domain-
23(3), 6-11. specific value approach. Annals of Tourism Research,
Ralston, L., & Crompton, L. J. (1988). Motivations, ser- 13(1), 11-36.

You might also like