You are on page 1of 10

Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol. 9, No 3, pp.

223-232 (2006) 223

Concrete Beams Strengthened with Externally


Bonded Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates
Ming-Hung Hsu
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Penghu University,
Penghu, Taiwan 880, R.O.C.

Abstract
In this work, the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by epoxy bonded
glass fiber reinforced plastic plates is investigated through the finite element method. The finite
element models based on the widely used package ABAQUS are employed in simulating the behavior
of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by externally bonded glass fiber reinforced polymer. The
numerical results of four-point bending test of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by externally
bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates in comparing with the experimental results show satisfactory
agreement. The results indicate that the flexure strength of reinforced concrete beams can be
significantly increased by externally bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates. The dynamic behavior
of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates is
investigated through the differential quadrature method. In this approach, only eleven sample points
are required to obtain convergence.

Key Words: Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plate, Reinforced Concrete Beam, Finite Element Method,
Differential Quadrature Method

1. Introduction et al. [16,17] experimentally studied the failure mo-


des of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with
Existing cracking reinforced concrete beams may pre-stressed carbon composite plates and the anchor-
require increasing the shear capacity and cracking. age length of carbon fiber composite plates used to
The glass fiber reinforced plastic plate is used to bond strengthen reinforced concrete beams. Kankam [18]
the beam in order to increase flexural capacity. Sa- studied the flexural strength and deformation charac-
adatmanesh et al. [1-12] experimentally investigated teristics of concrete beams reinforced with threaded
the static strength of reinforced concrete beams and steel bars that were tensioned against steel plates bear-
column strengthened by gluing glass fiber reinforced ing on the concrete ends by means of tighten nuts.
plastic plates. High strength fiber reinforced plastic Subedi and Baglin [19] analyzed the ultimate load of
straps are wrapped around the column in the potential plate reinforced concrete beams. Picard et al. [20] in-
plastic hinge region to increase confinement and to vestigated the influence of various design parameters
improve the behavior under seismic forces. Hamoush such as cube strength, size and position of main em-
and Ahmad [13] investigated the strength of steel-pla- bedded tensile bars, width of the beam, plate thick-
te-strengthened concrete beams. Adhikary et al. [14,15] ness, and ratio of plate width on the magnitude of ulti-
investigated the shear strengthening of reinforced con- mate plate peeling moment. Nguyen et al. [21] inves-
crete beams using steel plates bonded on beam web tigated an analytical model for reinforced concrete
through experiments and numerical analysis. Garden beams with bolted side plates accounting for longitu-
dinal and transverse partial interaction. Shen et al.
*Corresponding author. E-mail: hsu@npu.edu.tw [22] presented an analytical-numerical procedure for
224 Ming-Hung Hsu

the bending and transverse vibration analysis of mod- ened by epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic pla-
erately thick plates strengthened by a bonded thin com- tes using the DQM.
posite plate under different kinds of boundary condi-
tions. Ascione and Feo [23] developed a finite ele- 2. Flexural Strength of Reinforced Concrete
ment model for predicting shear and normal stresses Beams Strengthened by Epoxy Bonded Glass
in the adhesive layer of plated reinforced concrete beams. Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates
Raoof et al. [24] investigated the theoretical and ex-
perimental study on externally plated reinforced con- Figure 1 shows the geometry of a reinforced concrete
crete beams. Barnes et al. [25,26] solved the transfer beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a glass fiber rein-
of stress through steel to concrete adhesive bond and forced plastic plate for four-point bending test. L is the
analyzed the external steel plate systems for the shear length of the reinforced concrete beam. An epoxy layer is
strengthening of reinforced concrete beams based on applied to the straps while wrapping for inter laminar
the equilibrium of forces along the critical section. Sa- bond. The finite element models based on the widely used
pountzakis et al. [27,28] studied the interface forces and package ABAQUS are employed in simulating the be-
stresses in composite steel-concrete structure. Wang [29] havior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by ex-
investigated the analytical and experimental study on se- ternally bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates. We
ismic performance of reinforced concrete T-beams with use the method for measuring the shear strength to get
design deficiency in steel bar curtailment. the simple compressive strength and the simple tensile
ABAQUS standard finite element analysis code is strength by Mohr-Columb criterion. Meshes with trian-
used to model the reinforced concrete beams bonding gle type elements are created with an automatic mesh ge-
glass fiber reinforced plastic plates to the tension sur- nerator. In this two dimensional non-linear finite element
face. ABAQUS offers the facility of nonlinear model- model, the boundary nodes are considered simple sup-
ing for the reinforced concrete beam. The differential ported. The modeling approach performed in this study
quadrature method (DQM) is used to form the vibration is based on finite element method to describe the total
problems of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by strain. ABAQUS provides an elastic plastic damage the-
epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates in ory; including tension cracking, compression crushing,
matrix form. To the author’s knowledge, very few pub- and post crack response. In this study of FEM model, the
lished papers in the literature have presented the dy- elastic plastic damage theory is adopted to solve the stress
namic analysis of reinforced concrete beams strength- distribution.

Figure 1. Schematic view of the reinforced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a glass fiber reinforced plastic plate
along the tension face.
Concrete Beams Strengthened with Externally Bonded Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates 225

Figure 2 shows the central deflection of the reinfor- crete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a 6 mm thick
ced concrete beam. The beam size used is 0.20 m (b) ´ glass fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face.
0.30 m (h) ´ 3.00 m (L). b is the width of the reinforced The experimental ultimate load is 255.7 kN [30]. The an-
concrete beam. h is the thickness of the reinforced con- alytical ultimate load is 248.4 kN. The agreement between
crete beam. The beams are reinforced with two D6 bars numerical and experiment curves is satisfactory.
in the compression zone, whereas two D9 bars are pro- Figure 6 displays the central deflection of the rein-
vided in the tension. The diameter of D6 bar is 6.35 mm. forced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a 6
The diameter of D9 bar is 9.53 mm. Young’s modulus of mm thick glass fiber reinforced plastic plate along the
the concrete is 21000 MPa. The experimental ultimate
load is 91.9 kN [30]. The analytical ultimate load is 98.9
kN. The agreement between numerical and experiment
curves is satisfactory.
Figure 3 shows the central deflection of the reinfor-
ced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a 2 mm
thick glass fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension
face. Young’s modulus of the glass fiber reinforced plas-
tic plate is 37230 MPa. The experimental ultimate load is
172.4 kN [30]. The analytical ultimate load is 165.5 kN.
The results solved using FEM and experimental results
are put together for comparison. Results indicate that the
central deflection calculated using the FEM agreed very
well with the measured deflection. Figure 4 shows the
central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam stren-
gthened by epoxy bonded a 4 mm thick glass fiber rein-
forced plastic plate along the tension face. The experi-
Figure 3. Central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam
mental ultimate load is 182.5 kN [30]. The analytical ul- strengthened by epoxy bonded a 2 mm thick glass
timate load is 220.0 kN. The numerical results and the re- fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face.
sults measured experimentally correspond closely. Fig-
ure 5 shows the central deflection of the reinforced con-

Figure 4. Central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam


strengthened by epoxy bonded a 4 mm thick glass
Figure 2. Central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam. fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face.
226 Ming-Hung Hsu

Figure 5. Central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam Figure 7. Central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam
strengthened by epoxy bonded a 6 mm thick glass strengthened by epoxy bonded a 6 mm thick glass
fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face. fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face.

reveals the central deflection of the reinforced concrete


beam strengthened by epoxy-bonding a 6 mm thick glass
fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face. The
beams are reinforced with two D13 bars in the compres-
sion zone, whereas two D25 bars are provided in the ten-
sion. The experimental ultimate load is 255.0 kN [30].
The analytical ultimate load is 263.0 kN. The numerical
results of four-point bending test of reinforced concrete
beams strengthened by externally bonded glass fiber re-
inforced plastic plates in comparing with the experimen-
tal results show satisfactory agreement.

3. Dynamic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete


Beams Strengthened by Epoxy Bonded Glass
Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates
Figure 6. Central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam
strengthened by epoxy bonded a 6 mm thick glass This work demonstrates the dynamic behavior of re-
fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face. inforced concrete beams strengthened by epoxy bonded
glass fiber reinforced plastic plates using the DQM. The
tension face. The beam size used is 0.205 m (b) ´ 0.565 influences of glass fiber reinforced plastic plate thickness
m (h) ´ 4.875 m (L). The beams are reinforced with two on the dynamic behavior of reinforced concrete beams
D13 bars in the compression zone, whereas three D25 strengthened by epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plas-
bars are provided in the tension. The diameter of D13 bar tic plates are investigated. The DQM is used to form the
is 12.7 mm. The diameter of D25 bar is 25.4 mm. The ex- reinforced concrete beams strengthened by epoxy bond-
perimental ultimate load is 325.0 kN [30]. The analytical ed glass fiber reinforced plastic plates problems in matrix
ultimate load is 352.0 kN. The agreement between nu- form. The calculated accuracy and integrity of this prob-
merical and experiment results is satisfactory. Figure 7 lem is demonstrated by a series of case studies using the
Concrete Beams Strengthened with Externally Bonded Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates 227

DQM. There are many computational methods available N

for vibration analysis. Bellman et al. [31,32] introduced Dii( ) = -


1
å
j =1, j ¹ i
Dij( ) for i = 1, 2, …, N
1
(4)
the DQM. DQM reduces the partial differential equations
into a set of algebraic equations and has been used exten- The second-order and higher-order derivatives of the DQ
sively to solve a variety of problems in different fields of coefficients can also be obtained by matrix multiplica-
science and engineering [33-48]. tion [33,34], thus:
The efficiency and accuracy of the DQM are not de-
pendent on the number and accuracy of the selected com- N
Dij(2) = å Dik(1) Dkj(1) for i, j = 1, 2, …, N (5)
parison functions. The essence of the DQM is that the de- k =1
rivative of a function at a sample point is approximated
N
by a weighted linear sum of the functional values at all Dij(3) = å Dik(1) Dkj(2) for i, j = 1, 2, …, N (6)
the sample points in the domain. DQM approximates the k =1

mth order partial derivate of f(z) with respect to z as: N


Dij(4) = å Dik(1) Dkj(3) for i, j = 1, 2, …, N (7)
k =1

ì f (z1 ) ü ì f (z1 ) ü
ï ï ï ï
¶ ï f (z2 )ï é (m ) ù ï f (z2 )ï
m M
í ý @ D í ý for i, j = 1, 2, …, N
¶z m ï M ï ë
ij û
ï M ï (1) N
ï f (z N )ï
î þ
ï f (z N )ï
î þ Dij( m ) = å Dik(1) Dkj( m -1) for i, j = 1, 2, …, N (8)
k =1

where f(zi) is the functional value at the sample point zi, The selection of sample points always plays an im-
and Dij(m) are the DQ coefficients of the mth order differ- portant role in the solution accuracy of the DQM. The
entiation attached to these functional values. unequally spaced sample points of each beam using the
The DQ coefficients are difficult to obtain, because Chebyshev-Gauss-Lobatto distribution in the present com-
they may be ill conditioned. To overcome the numerical putation are chosen as the following equation:
ill-conditioning in determining the DQ coefficients Dij(m) ,
Quan and Chang [42,43] established a set of algebraic 1é (i - 1)p ù
zi = ê1 - cos ú for i, j = 1, 2, …, N (9)
expressions to calculate the DQ coefficients, namely: 2ë N -1 û

N M (z ) By assuming the reinforced concrete beam strength-


f (z ) @ å f ( zi ) (2)
i =1 ( z - zi ) M 1 ( zi ) ened by epoxy bonded a glass fiber reinforced plastic
plate is long, the strain energy of the reinforced concrete
where beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a glass fiber rein-
forced plastic plate can be simplified as:
N
M (z ) = Õ (z - z j ) , 2 2
j =1
1 L æ ¶ 2u ö 1 L æ ¶ 2u ö
N
Ue = ò
2 0
E1 I1 ç 21 ÷ dz + ò E2 I 2 ç 22 ÷ dz
è ¶z ø 2 0 è ¶z ø
M 1 ( zi ) = Õ (z i - z j ) for i = 1, 2, …, N
j =1, j ¹ i 1 L
+ ò k (u1 - u2 ) dz
2
(10)
2 0
Substituting equation (2) into equation (1) yields:
where E1 is Young’s modulus of the reinforced concrete
M 1 ( zi ) beam and E2 is Young’s modulus of the glass fiber rein-
Dij(1) = for i, j = 1, 2, …, N and i ¹ j
(z j ) ( )
- zi M 1 z j forced plastic plate. u1 is the transverse displacement of
(3) the reinforced concrete beam and u2 is the transverse de-
flection of the glass fiber reinforced plastic plate. I1 is
and the 2nd moment area of concrete beam section and I2 is
228 Ming-Hung Hsu

the 2nd moment area of glass fiber reinforced plastic plate u 2 (L, t ) = 0 (21)
section. k is the stiffness of the epoxy adhesive. The ki-
netic energy of the reinforced concrete beam strength- ¶ 2 u 2 (L, t ) (22)
E2 I 2 =0
ened by epoxy bonded a glass fiber reinforced plastic ¶z 2
plate is
Consider the displacements to be of the form
2 2
1 L æ ¶u ö 1 L æ ¶u ö
T e = ò r1 A1 ç 1 ÷ dz + ò r 2 A2 ç 2 ÷ dz (11)
2 0
è ¶t ø 2 0
è ¶t ø u1 (z , t ) = U1 (z ) exp (iw t ) (23)

where r1 is the density of the material of the concrete u2 (z , t ) = U 2 (z ) exp (iw t ) (24)
beam and r2 is the density of the material of the glass fi-
ber reinforced plastic plate. The cross-section area of the Equations (13) and (14) can be simplified to
concrete beam is A1 and the cross-section area of the
glass fiber reinforced plastic plate is A2. Substituting equ- d2 æ d 2U 1 ö
w 2 r1 A1U 1 = ç E1 I 1 ÷ + k (U 1 - U 2 ) (25)
ations (10) and (11) into Hamilton’s equation, dz 2 è dz 2 ø

ò t (d T - d U )dt = 0
t2 e e
(12) d2 æ d 2U 2 ö
1 w 2 r 2 A2U 2 = ç E2 I 2 ÷ + k (U 2 - U 1 ) (26)
dz 2 è dz 2 ø
the differential equations governing the dynamics of re-
inforced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded The corresponding boundary conditions of the reinfor-
a glass fiber reinforced plastic plate are: ced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a glass
fiber reinforced plastic plate are:
¶ 2 u1 ¶ 2 æ ¶ 2 u1 ö
r1 A1 + ç E I ÷ + k (u1 - u2 ) = 0 (13)
¶t 2 ¶z 2 è
1 1
¶z 2 ø U 1 (0 ) = 0 (27)

¶ 2 u2 ¶ 2 æ ¶ 2 u2 ö d 2U1 (0 ) (28)
r 2 A2 + ç 2 2
E I ÷ + k (u2 - u1 ) = 0 (14) E1 I1 =0
¶t 2 ¶z 2 è ¶z 2 ø dz 2

The corresponding boundary conditions of the reinfor- U 1 (L ) = 0 (29)


ced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a glass
fiber reinforced plastic plate are: d 2U1 (L )
E1 I1 =0 (30)
dz 2
u1 (0, t ) = 0 (15)
U 2 (0 ) = 0 (31)
¶ u1 (0, t )
2
E1 I1 =0 (16)
¶z 2 d 2U 2 (0 )
E2 I 2 =0 (32)
dz 2
u1 (L, t ) = 0 (17)
U 2 (L, t ) = 0 (33)
¶ 2 u1 (L, t )
E1 I1 =0 (18)
¶z 2 d 2U 2 (L )
E2 I 2 =0 (34)
u2 (0, t ) = 0 (19) dz 2

By employing the DQM, the equations of motion of the


¶ 2 u2 (0, t )
E2 I 2 =0 (20) reinforced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bond-
¶z 2
ed a glass fiber reinforced plastic plate can be discre-
Concrete Beams Strengthened with Externally Bonded Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates 229

teized in a matrix form as the following equation: Cij = 0


For i ¹ j + N, i = N + 3, N + 4, …, 2N - 2 and j = 1, 2,
[Cij ]{W ( z j )} = w 2 [ M ij ]{W ( z j )} (35) …, N (45)

where Ci,i-N = -k
for i = N + 3, N + 4, … 2N - 2 (46)
ì W (z1 ) ü ì U1 (z1 ) ü
ï ï ï ï
ï W (z 2 ) ï ï U 1 (z 2 ) ï d 2 E2 I 2 ( z ) Di(- N) , j - N dE2 I 2 (z )
2

ï ï ï M ï Cij = +2
M dz 2
L 2
dz
ï ï ï ï z = zi - N z = zi - N
ï W (z N ) ï ïU1 (z N )ï
í ý=í ý (36) (3) (4 )
ïW (z N +1 )ï ï U 2 (z1 ) ï
Di - N , j - N Di - N , j - N
+ E2 I 2 ( zi - N )
ïW (z N + 2 )ï ïU 2 (z2 )ï L3 L4
ï ï ï ï for i ¹ j, i = N + 3, N + 4, …, 2N - 2
ï M ï ï M ï
ï W (z ) ï ïU (z )ï and j = N + 1, N + 2, …, 2N (47)
î 2N þ î 2 N þ
The elements in the mass matrix are: d 2 E2 I 2 ( z ) Di(- N) ,i - N dE2 I 2 (z )
2

Cii = +2
Mii = r1A1 for i = 3, 4, …, N - 2 (37) dz 2 z = zi - N
L2 dz z = zi - N

Di(- )N ,i - N Di(- N) ,i - N
3 4
Mii = r2A2 for i = N + 3, N + 4, …, 2N - 2 (38)
+ E2 I 2 ( zi - N ) +k
L3 L4
Mii = 0 for i = 1, 2, N - 1, N, N + 1, N + 2, 2N - 1, 2N
for i = N + 3, N + 4, …, 2N - 2 (48)
(39)

Mij = 0 for i ¹ j, i = 1, 2, …, 2N and j = 1, 2, …, 2N The boundary conditions of the simple supported rein-
(40) forced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a
glass fiber reinforced plastic plate can be rearranged into
The elements in the stiffness matrix are: the matrix form as

Dij(
2)
d 2 E1 I1 (z ) dE1 I1 (z ) Dij( ) é 1 0 0 L 0 0 ù
3

Cij = +2 ê (2) ú ì0 ü
dz 2
L 2
dz L 3
ê D11 D (2)
D (2)
D (2)
1, N -1 D1,(2)N ú {U1 ( z j )} = í ý
z = zi z = zi 12 13
L î0 þ
êë L2 L 2
L 2
L2
L2 úû
Dij(
4)

+ E1 I1 (zi ) for j = 1, 2, ..., N (49)


L4
for i ¹ j, i = 3, 4, …, N - 2 and j = 1, 2, …, N (41) é 1 0 0 L 0 0 ù
ê (2) ú ì0 ü
ê D11 D12(2) D13(2) D (2)
1, N -1 D1,(2)N ú {U 2 ( z j )} = í ý
L î0 þ
d E1 I1 (z )
2 (2 )
Dii dE I (z ) Dii (3) ëê L2 L2 L2 L 2
L2 ûú
Cii = +2 1 1
dz 2
L2
dz L3 for j = 1, 2, ..., N (50)
z = zi z=z i

Dii( )
4

+ E1 I1 (zi ) +k é 0 0 0 L 0 1 ù
L4 ê (2) ú ì0 ü
ê DN 1 D (2)
D (2)
D (2)
N , N -1 DN(2), N ú {U1 ( z j )} = í ý
N2 N3
L î0 þ
for i = 3, 4, …, N - 2 (42) êë L2 L2
L 2
L 2
L2 úû
for j = 1, 2, ..., N (51)
Cij = 0
for i ¹ j - N, i = 3, 4, …, N - 2 and j = N + 1, N + 2, é 0 0 0 L 0 1 ù
…2N (43) ê (2) ú ì0 ü
ê DN 1 D (2)
D (2)
D (2)
N , N -1 DN(2), N ú {U 2 ( z j )} = í ý
N2 N3
L î0 þ
Ci,i+N = -k êë L2 L 2
L 2
L 2
L2 úû
for i = 3, 4, …, N - 2 (44) for j = 1, 2, ..., N (52)
230 Ming-Hung Hsu

Figure 8 illustrates the frequencies of the reinforced ing the DQM. The results indicate that bonding compos-
concrete beams strengthened by epoxy bonded glass fi- ite plates to concrete beams increase the stiffness, yield
ber reinforced plastic plates with different thicknesses. moment, and flexural strength of the beams. The simplic-
The beam size used is 0.20 m (b) ´ 0.30 m (h) ´ 3.00 m ity of this formulation makes it a desirable candidate for
(L). The beams are reinforced with two D6 bars in the modeling reinforced concrete beams strengthened by ep-
compression zone, whereas two D9 bars are provided in oxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates.
the tension. The numerical results show that higher fre-
quencies are found for the beam with a higher thickness References
glass fiber reinforced plastic plate. The frequency of the
reinforced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy-bond- [1] Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “RC Beams St-
ing a 2 mm thick glass fiber reinforced plastic plate along rengthened with GFRP Plates. I. Experimental Study,”
the tension face is greater than the frequency of the rein- Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 117, pp. 3417-
forced concrete beam strengthened by no epoxy-bonding 3433 (1991).
glass fiber reinforced plastic plate for mode 1. The fre- [2] Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “Flexural Stren-
quencies of the reinforced concrete beam strengthened gth of Externally Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Pro-
by epoxy-bonding a 2 mm thick glass fiber reinforced ceedings of the First Material Engineering Congress,
plastic plate along the tension face is smaller than the fre- pp. 1152-1161 (1990).
quency of the reinforced concrete beam strengthened by [3] Saadatmanesh, H., “Fiber Composites for New and Exi-
no epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plate for sting Structures,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 91, pp.
mode 2 to mode 6. 346-354 (1994).
[4] Jin, L., Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “Seismic
4. Conclusion Retrofit of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns by
Glass-fiber Composites,” Proceedings of the Materials
The results conduct that the flexure strength of rein- Engineering Conference, pp. 758-763 (1994).
forced concrete beams can be significantly increased by [5] Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R. and Jin, L., “Seismic
externally bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates. Strengthening of Circular Bridge Pier Models with Fi-
The calculated results agreed closely with the measured ber Composites,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 93, pp.
results in the literature. This paper demonstrates the dy- 639-647 (1996).
namic behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened [6] Tannous, F. E. and Saadatmanesh, H., “Environmental
by epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates us- Effects on the Mechanical Properties of E-glass FRP
Rebars,” ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 95, pp. 87-100
(1998).
[7] Albrecht, P., Li, W. and Saadatmanesh, H., “Fatigue
Strength of Prestressed Composite Steel-concrete
Beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 121,
pp. 1850-1856 (1995).
[8] Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “Fiber Compos-
ite Plates Can Strengthen Beams,” Concrete Interna-
tional: Design and Construction, Vol. 12, pp. 65-71
(1990).
[9] Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R. and Li, M. W., “St-
rength and Ductility of Concrete Columns Externally
Reinforced with Fiber Composite Straps,” ACI Struc-
tural Journal, Vol. 91, pp. 434-447 (1994).
Figure 8. The frequencies of the reinforced concrete beams
strengthened by epoxy bonded glass fiber reinfor- [10] Ehsani, M. R., Saadatmanesh, H. and Tao, S., “Bond
ced plastic plates with different thicknesses. Behavior of Deformed GFRP Rebars,” Journal of Com-
Concrete Beams Strengthened with Externally Bonded Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates 231

posite Materials, Vol. 31, pp. 1413-1430 (1997). Transverse Partial Interaction,” International Journal
[11] Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R. and Jin, L., “Seismic of Solids and Structures, Vol. 38, pp. 6985-6996 (2001).
Retrofitting of Rectangular Bridge Columns with Com- [22] Shen, H. S., Chen, Y. and Yang, J., “Bending and Vi-
posite Straps,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 13, pp. 281- bration Characteristics of a Strengthened Plate under
304 (1997). Various Boundary Conditions,” Engineering Structures,
[12] An, W., Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “RC Vol. 25, pp. 1157-1168 (2003).
Beams Strengthened with FRP Plates. II. Analysis and [23] Ascione, L. and Feo, L., “Modeling of Composite/
Parametric Study,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Concrete Interface of RC Beams Strengthened with
Vol. 117, pp. 3434-3455 (1991). Composite Laminates,” Composites: Part B, Vol. 31,
[13] Hamoush, S. A. and Ahmad, S. H., Debonding of Steel- pp. 535-540 (2000).
plate-strengthened Concrete Beams, Journal of Stru- [24] Raoof, M., El-Rimawi, J. A. and Hassanen, M. A. H.,
ctural Engineering, Vol. 116, pp. 356-371 (1990). “Theoretical and Experimental Study on Externally
[14] Adhikary, B. B., Mutsuyoshi, H. and Sano, M., “Shear Plated R.C. Beams,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 22,
Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using pp. 85-101 (2000).
Steel Plates Bonded on Beam Web: Experiments and [25] Barnes, R. A. and Mays, G. C., “The Transfer of Stress
Analysis,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. through a Steel to Concrete Adhesive Bond,” Interna-
14, pp. 237-244 (2000). tional Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, Vol. 21, pp.
[15] Adhikary, B. B. and Mutsuyoshi, H., “Numerical Sim- 495-502 (2001).
ulation of Steel-plate Strengthened Concrete Beam by [26] Barnes, R. A., Baglin, P. S., Mays, G. C. and Subedi,
a Non-linear Finite Element Method Model,” Const- N. K., “External Steel Plate Systems for the Shear St-
ruction and Building Materials, Vol. 16, pp. 291-301 rengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Engine-
(2002). ering Structures, Vol. 23, pp. 1162-1176 (2001).
[16] Garden, H. N. and Hollaway, L. C., “An Experimental [27] Sapountzakis, E. J. and Katsikadelis, J. T., “Interface
Study of the Failure Modes of Reinforced Concrete Forces in Composite Steel-concrete Structure,” Inter-
Beams Strengthened with Prestressed Carbon Compo- national Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 37, pp.
site Plates,” Composite Part B, Vol. 29B, pp. 411-424 4455-4472 (2000).
(1998). [28] Smith, S. T. and Teng, J. G., “Interfacial Stresses in
[17] Garden, H. N., Quantrill, R. J., Hollaway, L. C., Thorne, Plated Beams,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 23, pp.
A. M. and Parke, G. A. R., “An Experimental Study of 857-871 (2001).
the Anchorage Length of Carbon Fibre Composite [29] Wang, Y. C., “Analytical and Experimental Study on
Plates Used to Strengthen Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Seismic Performance of RC T-beams with Design De-
Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 12, pp. 203- ficiency in Steel Bar Curtailment,” Engineering Struc-
219 (1998). tures, Vol. 25, pp. 215-227 (2003).
[18] Kankam, C. K., “Structural Behavior of Bolted End- [30] Hsu, M. H., Quantitative Analysis of RC Beams St-
plated Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Materials & De- rengthened by Externally Bonded GFRP, Master The-
sign, Vol. 24, pp. 367-375 (2003). sis, Feng Chia University (1997).
[19] Subedi, N. K. and Baglin, P. S., “Ultimate Load Analy- [31] Bellman, R. E. and Casti, J., “Differential Quadrature
sis of Plate Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Engineering and Long-term Integration,” Journal of Mathematical
Structures, Vol. 23, pp. 1068-1079 (2001). Analysis and Application, Vol. 34, pp. 235-238 (1971).
[20] Picard, A., Massicotte, B. and Boucher, E., “Stren- [32] Bellman, R. E., Kashef, B. G. and Casti, J., “Differen-
gthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Compo- tial Quadrature: A Technique for Rapid Solution of
site Materials: Theoretical Study,” Composite Struc- Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,” Journal Com-
tures, Vol. 33, pp. 63-75 (1995). putational Physics, Vol. 10, pp. 40-52 (1972).
[21] Nguyen, N. T., Oehlers, D. J. and Bradford, M. A., “An [33] Bert, C. W., Jang, S. K. and Striz, A. G., “Two New
Analytical Model for Reinforced Concrete Beams with Approximate Methods for Analyzing Free Vibration of
Bolted Side Plates Accounting for Longitudinal and Structural Components,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 26, pp.
232 Ming-Hung Hsu

612-618 (1988). International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engi-


[34] Bert, C. W. and Malik, M., “Free Vibration Analysis of neering, Vol. 39, pp. 1237-1258 (1996).
Tapered Rectangular Plates by Differential Quadrature [42] Quan, J. R. and Chang, C. T., “New Insights in Solving
Method: a Semi-analytical Approach,” Journal of Sound Distributed System Equations by the Quadrature Met-
and Vibration, Vol. 190, pp. 41-63 (1996). hod-I. Analysis,” Computers in Chemical Engineer-
[35] Bert, C. W. and Mailk, M., “Differential Quadrature ing, Vol. 13, pp. 779-788 (1989).
Method in Computational Mechanics: A Review,” Ap- [43] Quan, J. R. and Chang, C. T., “New Insights in Solving
plied Mechanics Review, Vol. 49, pp. 1-28 (1996). Distributed System Equations by the Quadrature Met-
[36] Bert, C. W. and Malik, M., “On the Relative Effects of hod-II. Numerical Experiments,” Computers in Chem-
Transverse Shear Deformation and Rotary Inertia on ical Engineering, Vol. 13, pp. 1017-1024 (1989).
the Free Vibration of Symmetric Cross-ply Laminated [44] Sherbourne, A. N. and Pandey, M. D., “Differential
Plates,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 193, pp. Quadrature Method in the Buckling Analysis of Beams
927-933 (1996). and Composite Plates,” Computers and Structures, Vol.
[37] Bert, C. W., Wang, X. and Striz, A. G., “Differential 40, pp. 903-913 (1991).
Quadrature for Static and Free Vibration Analysis of [45] Feng, Y. and Bert, C. W., “Application of the Quadra-
Anisotropic Plates,” International Journal of Solids and ture Method to Flexural Vibration Analysis of a Geo-
Structures, Vol. 30, pp. 1737-1744 (1993). metrically Nonlinear Beam,” Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol.
[38] Bert, C. W., Wang, X. and Striz, A. G., “Convergence 3, pp. 13-18 (1992).
of the DQ Method in the Analysis of Anisotropic [46] Chen, W. and Zhong, T., “The Study on the Nonlinear
Plates,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 170, pp. Computations of the DQ and DC Methods,” Journal of
140-144 (1994). Numerical Method for Partial Differential Equations,
[39] Jang, S. K., Bert, C. W. and Striz, A. G., “Application Vol. 13, pp. 57-75 (1997).
of Differential Quadrature to Static Analysis of Struc- [47] Chen, R. P., Zhou, W. H., Wang, H. Z. and Chen, Y. M.,
tural Components,” International Journal for Numeri- “One-dimensional Nonlinear Consolidation of Multi-
cal Methods in Engineering, Vol. 28, pp. 561-577 (1989). layered Soil by Differential Quadrature Method,” Com-
[40] Wang, X. and Bert, C. W., “A New Approach in Ap- puters and Geotechnics, Vol. 32, pp. 358-369 (2005).
plying Differential Quadrature to Static and Free Vi- [48] Tomasiello, S., “Differential Quadrature Method: Ap-
brational Analyses of Beams and Plates,” Journal of plication to Initial-boundary-value Problems,” Journal
Sound and Vibration, Vol. 162, pp. 566-572 (1993). of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 218, pp. 573-585 (1998).
[41] Malik, M. and Bert, C. W., “Implementing Multiple
Boundary Conditions in the DQ Solution of Higher- Manuscript Received: Dec. 21, 2004
order PDE’s Application to Free Vibration of Plates,” Accepted: Nov. 4, 2005

You might also like