Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
In this work, the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by epoxy bonded
glass fiber reinforced plastic plates is investigated through the finite element method. The finite
element models based on the widely used package ABAQUS are employed in simulating the behavior
of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by externally bonded glass fiber reinforced polymer. The
numerical results of four-point bending test of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by externally
bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates in comparing with the experimental results show satisfactory
agreement. The results indicate that the flexure strength of reinforced concrete beams can be
significantly increased by externally bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates. The dynamic behavior
of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates is
investigated through the differential quadrature method. In this approach, only eleven sample points
are required to obtain convergence.
Key Words: Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plate, Reinforced Concrete Beam, Finite Element Method,
Differential Quadrature Method
the bending and transverse vibration analysis of mod- ened by epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic pla-
erately thick plates strengthened by a bonded thin com- tes using the DQM.
posite plate under different kinds of boundary condi-
tions. Ascione and Feo [23] developed a finite ele- 2. Flexural Strength of Reinforced Concrete
ment model for predicting shear and normal stresses Beams Strengthened by Epoxy Bonded Glass
in the adhesive layer of plated reinforced concrete beams. Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates
Raoof et al. [24] investigated the theoretical and ex-
perimental study on externally plated reinforced con- Figure 1 shows the geometry of a reinforced concrete
crete beams. Barnes et al. [25,26] solved the transfer beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a glass fiber rein-
of stress through steel to concrete adhesive bond and forced plastic plate for four-point bending test. L is the
analyzed the external steel plate systems for the shear length of the reinforced concrete beam. An epoxy layer is
strengthening of reinforced concrete beams based on applied to the straps while wrapping for inter laminar
the equilibrium of forces along the critical section. Sa- bond. The finite element models based on the widely used
pountzakis et al. [27,28] studied the interface forces and package ABAQUS are employed in simulating the be-
stresses in composite steel-concrete structure. Wang [29] havior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by ex-
investigated the analytical and experimental study on se- ternally bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates. We
ismic performance of reinforced concrete T-beams with use the method for measuring the shear strength to get
design deficiency in steel bar curtailment. the simple compressive strength and the simple tensile
ABAQUS standard finite element analysis code is strength by Mohr-Columb criterion. Meshes with trian-
used to model the reinforced concrete beams bonding gle type elements are created with an automatic mesh ge-
glass fiber reinforced plastic plates to the tension sur- nerator. In this two dimensional non-linear finite element
face. ABAQUS offers the facility of nonlinear model- model, the boundary nodes are considered simple sup-
ing for the reinforced concrete beam. The differential ported. The modeling approach performed in this study
quadrature method (DQM) is used to form the vibration is based on finite element method to describe the total
problems of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by strain. ABAQUS provides an elastic plastic damage the-
epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates in ory; including tension cracking, compression crushing,
matrix form. To the author’s knowledge, very few pub- and post crack response. In this study of FEM model, the
lished papers in the literature have presented the dy- elastic plastic damage theory is adopted to solve the stress
namic analysis of reinforced concrete beams strength- distribution.
Figure 1. Schematic view of the reinforced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a glass fiber reinforced plastic plate
along the tension face.
Concrete Beams Strengthened with Externally Bonded Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates 225
Figure 2 shows the central deflection of the reinfor- crete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a 6 mm thick
ced concrete beam. The beam size used is 0.20 m (b) ´ glass fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face.
0.30 m (h) ´ 3.00 m (L). b is the width of the reinforced The experimental ultimate load is 255.7 kN [30]. The an-
concrete beam. h is the thickness of the reinforced con- alytical ultimate load is 248.4 kN. The agreement between
crete beam. The beams are reinforced with two D6 bars numerical and experiment curves is satisfactory.
in the compression zone, whereas two D9 bars are pro- Figure 6 displays the central deflection of the rein-
vided in the tension. The diameter of D6 bar is 6.35 mm. forced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a 6
The diameter of D9 bar is 9.53 mm. Young’s modulus of mm thick glass fiber reinforced plastic plate along the
the concrete is 21000 MPa. The experimental ultimate
load is 91.9 kN [30]. The analytical ultimate load is 98.9
kN. The agreement between numerical and experiment
curves is satisfactory.
Figure 3 shows the central deflection of the reinfor-
ced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a 2 mm
thick glass fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension
face. Young’s modulus of the glass fiber reinforced plas-
tic plate is 37230 MPa. The experimental ultimate load is
172.4 kN [30]. The analytical ultimate load is 165.5 kN.
The results solved using FEM and experimental results
are put together for comparison. Results indicate that the
central deflection calculated using the FEM agreed very
well with the measured deflection. Figure 4 shows the
central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam stren-
gthened by epoxy bonded a 4 mm thick glass fiber rein-
forced plastic plate along the tension face. The experi-
Figure 3. Central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam
mental ultimate load is 182.5 kN [30]. The analytical ul- strengthened by epoxy bonded a 2 mm thick glass
timate load is 220.0 kN. The numerical results and the re- fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face.
sults measured experimentally correspond closely. Fig-
ure 5 shows the central deflection of the reinforced con-
Figure 5. Central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam Figure 7. Central deflection of the reinforced concrete beam
strengthened by epoxy bonded a 6 mm thick glass strengthened by epoxy bonded a 6 mm thick glass
fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face. fiber reinforced plastic plate along the tension face.
ì f (z1 ) ü ì f (z1 ) ü
ï ï ï ï
¶ ï f (z2 )ï é (m ) ù ï f (z2 )ï
m M
í ý @ D í ý for i, j = 1, 2, …, N
¶z m ï M ï ë
ij û
ï M ï (1) N
ï f (z N )ï
î þ
ï f (z N )ï
î þ Dij( m ) = å Dik(1) Dkj( m -1) for i, j = 1, 2, …, N (8)
k =1
where f(zi) is the functional value at the sample point zi, The selection of sample points always plays an im-
and Dij(m) are the DQ coefficients of the mth order differ- portant role in the solution accuracy of the DQM. The
entiation attached to these functional values. unequally spaced sample points of each beam using the
The DQ coefficients are difficult to obtain, because Chebyshev-Gauss-Lobatto distribution in the present com-
they may be ill conditioned. To overcome the numerical putation are chosen as the following equation:
ill-conditioning in determining the DQ coefficients Dij(m) ,
Quan and Chang [42,43] established a set of algebraic 1é (i - 1)p ù
zi = ê1 - cos ú for i, j = 1, 2, …, N (9)
expressions to calculate the DQ coefficients, namely: 2ë N -1 û
the 2nd moment area of glass fiber reinforced plastic plate u 2 (L, t ) = 0 (21)
section. k is the stiffness of the epoxy adhesive. The ki-
netic energy of the reinforced concrete beam strength- ¶ 2 u 2 (L, t ) (22)
E2 I 2 =0
ened by epoxy bonded a glass fiber reinforced plastic ¶z 2
plate is
Consider the displacements to be of the form
2 2
1 L æ ¶u ö 1 L æ ¶u ö
T e = ò r1 A1 ç 1 ÷ dz + ò r 2 A2 ç 2 ÷ dz (11)
2 0
è ¶t ø 2 0
è ¶t ø u1 (z , t ) = U1 (z ) exp (iw t ) (23)
where r1 is the density of the material of the concrete u2 (z , t ) = U 2 (z ) exp (iw t ) (24)
beam and r2 is the density of the material of the glass fi-
ber reinforced plastic plate. The cross-section area of the Equations (13) and (14) can be simplified to
concrete beam is A1 and the cross-section area of the
glass fiber reinforced plastic plate is A2. Substituting equ- d2 æ d 2U 1 ö
w 2 r1 A1U 1 = ç E1 I 1 ÷ + k (U 1 - U 2 ) (25)
ations (10) and (11) into Hamilton’s equation, dz 2 è dz 2 ø
ò t (d T - d U )dt = 0
t2 e e
(12) d2 æ d 2U 2 ö
1 w 2 r 2 A2U 2 = ç E2 I 2 ÷ + k (U 2 - U 1 ) (26)
dz 2 è dz 2 ø
the differential equations governing the dynamics of re-
inforced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded The corresponding boundary conditions of the reinfor-
a glass fiber reinforced plastic plate are: ced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a glass
fiber reinforced plastic plate are:
¶ 2 u1 ¶ 2 æ ¶ 2 u1 ö
r1 A1 + ç E I ÷ + k (u1 - u2 ) = 0 (13)
¶t 2 ¶z 2 è
1 1
¶z 2 ø U 1 (0 ) = 0 (27)
¶ 2 u2 ¶ 2 æ ¶ 2 u2 ö d 2U1 (0 ) (28)
r 2 A2 + ç 2 2
E I ÷ + k (u2 - u1 ) = 0 (14) E1 I1 =0
¶t 2 ¶z 2 è ¶z 2 ø dz 2
where Ci,i-N = -k
for i = N + 3, N + 4, … 2N - 2 (46)
ì W (z1 ) ü ì U1 (z1 ) ü
ï ï ï ï
ï W (z 2 ) ï ï U 1 (z 2 ) ï d 2 E2 I 2 ( z ) Di(- N) , j - N dE2 I 2 (z )
2
ï ï ï M ï Cij = +2
M dz 2
L 2
dz
ï ï ï ï z = zi - N z = zi - N
ï W (z N ) ï ïU1 (z N )ï
í ý=í ý (36) (3) (4 )
ïW (z N +1 )ï ï U 2 (z1 ) ï
Di - N , j - N Di - N , j - N
+ E2 I 2 ( zi - N )
ïW (z N + 2 )ï ïU 2 (z2 )ï L3 L4
ï ï ï ï for i ¹ j, i = N + 3, N + 4, …, 2N - 2
ï M ï ï M ï
ï W (z ) ï ïU (z )ï and j = N + 1, N + 2, …, 2N (47)
î 2N þ î 2 N þ
The elements in the mass matrix are: d 2 E2 I 2 ( z ) Di(- N) ,i - N dE2 I 2 (z )
2
Cii = +2
Mii = r1A1 for i = 3, 4, …, N - 2 (37) dz 2 z = zi - N
L2 dz z = zi - N
Di(- )N ,i - N Di(- N) ,i - N
3 4
Mii = r2A2 for i = N + 3, N + 4, …, 2N - 2 (38)
+ E2 I 2 ( zi - N ) +k
L3 L4
Mii = 0 for i = 1, 2, N - 1, N, N + 1, N + 2, 2N - 1, 2N
for i = N + 3, N + 4, …, 2N - 2 (48)
(39)
Mij = 0 for i ¹ j, i = 1, 2, …, 2N and j = 1, 2, …, 2N The boundary conditions of the simple supported rein-
(40) forced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy bonded a
glass fiber reinforced plastic plate can be rearranged into
The elements in the stiffness matrix are: the matrix form as
Dij(
2)
d 2 E1 I1 (z ) dE1 I1 (z ) Dij( ) é 1 0 0 L 0 0 ù
3
Cij = +2 ê (2) ú ì0 ü
dz 2
L 2
dz L 3
ê D11 D (2)
D (2)
D (2)
1, N -1 D1,(2)N ú {U1 ( z j )} = í ý
z = zi z = zi 12 13
L î0 þ
êë L2 L 2
L 2
L2
L2 úû
Dij(
4)
Dii( )
4
+ E1 I1 (zi ) +k é 0 0 0 L 0 1 ù
L4 ê (2) ú ì0 ü
ê DN 1 D (2)
D (2)
D (2)
N , N -1 DN(2), N ú {U1 ( z j )} = í ý
N2 N3
L î0 þ
for i = 3, 4, …, N - 2 (42) êë L2 L2
L 2
L 2
L2 úû
for j = 1, 2, ..., N (51)
Cij = 0
for i ¹ j - N, i = 3, 4, …, N - 2 and j = N + 1, N + 2, é 0 0 0 L 0 1 ù
…2N (43) ê (2) ú ì0 ü
ê DN 1 D (2)
D (2)
D (2)
N , N -1 DN(2), N ú {U 2 ( z j )} = í ý
N2 N3
L î0 þ
Ci,i+N = -k êë L2 L 2
L 2
L 2
L2 úû
for i = 3, 4, …, N - 2 (44) for j = 1, 2, ..., N (52)
230 Ming-Hung Hsu
Figure 8 illustrates the frequencies of the reinforced ing the DQM. The results indicate that bonding compos-
concrete beams strengthened by epoxy bonded glass fi- ite plates to concrete beams increase the stiffness, yield
ber reinforced plastic plates with different thicknesses. moment, and flexural strength of the beams. The simplic-
The beam size used is 0.20 m (b) ´ 0.30 m (h) ´ 3.00 m ity of this formulation makes it a desirable candidate for
(L). The beams are reinforced with two D6 bars in the modeling reinforced concrete beams strengthened by ep-
compression zone, whereas two D9 bars are provided in oxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates.
the tension. The numerical results show that higher fre-
quencies are found for the beam with a higher thickness References
glass fiber reinforced plastic plate. The frequency of the
reinforced concrete beam strengthened by epoxy-bond- [1] Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “RC Beams St-
ing a 2 mm thick glass fiber reinforced plastic plate along rengthened with GFRP Plates. I. Experimental Study,”
the tension face is greater than the frequency of the rein- Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 117, pp. 3417-
forced concrete beam strengthened by no epoxy-bonding 3433 (1991).
glass fiber reinforced plastic plate for mode 1. The fre- [2] Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “Flexural Stren-
quencies of the reinforced concrete beam strengthened gth of Externally Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Pro-
by epoxy-bonding a 2 mm thick glass fiber reinforced ceedings of the First Material Engineering Congress,
plastic plate along the tension face is smaller than the fre- pp. 1152-1161 (1990).
quency of the reinforced concrete beam strengthened by [3] Saadatmanesh, H., “Fiber Composites for New and Exi-
no epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plate for sting Structures,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 91, pp.
mode 2 to mode 6. 346-354 (1994).
[4] Jin, L., Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “Seismic
4. Conclusion Retrofit of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns by
Glass-fiber Composites,” Proceedings of the Materials
The results conduct that the flexure strength of rein- Engineering Conference, pp. 758-763 (1994).
forced concrete beams can be significantly increased by [5] Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R. and Jin, L., “Seismic
externally bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates. Strengthening of Circular Bridge Pier Models with Fi-
The calculated results agreed closely with the measured ber Composites,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 93, pp.
results in the literature. This paper demonstrates the dy- 639-647 (1996).
namic behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened [6] Tannous, F. E. and Saadatmanesh, H., “Environmental
by epoxy bonded glass fiber reinforced plastic plates us- Effects on the Mechanical Properties of E-glass FRP
Rebars,” ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 95, pp. 87-100
(1998).
[7] Albrecht, P., Li, W. and Saadatmanesh, H., “Fatigue
Strength of Prestressed Composite Steel-concrete
Beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 121,
pp. 1850-1856 (1995).
[8] Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “Fiber Compos-
ite Plates Can Strengthen Beams,” Concrete Interna-
tional: Design and Construction, Vol. 12, pp. 65-71
(1990).
[9] Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R. and Li, M. W., “St-
rength and Ductility of Concrete Columns Externally
Reinforced with Fiber Composite Straps,” ACI Struc-
tural Journal, Vol. 91, pp. 434-447 (1994).
Figure 8. The frequencies of the reinforced concrete beams
strengthened by epoxy bonded glass fiber reinfor- [10] Ehsani, M. R., Saadatmanesh, H. and Tao, S., “Bond
ced plastic plates with different thicknesses. Behavior of Deformed GFRP Rebars,” Journal of Com-
Concrete Beams Strengthened with Externally Bonded Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Plates 231
posite Materials, Vol. 31, pp. 1413-1430 (1997). Transverse Partial Interaction,” International Journal
[11] Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R. and Jin, L., “Seismic of Solids and Structures, Vol. 38, pp. 6985-6996 (2001).
Retrofitting of Rectangular Bridge Columns with Com- [22] Shen, H. S., Chen, Y. and Yang, J., “Bending and Vi-
posite Straps,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 13, pp. 281- bration Characteristics of a Strengthened Plate under
304 (1997). Various Boundary Conditions,” Engineering Structures,
[12] An, W., Saadatmanesh, H. and Ehsani, M. R., “RC Vol. 25, pp. 1157-1168 (2003).
Beams Strengthened with FRP Plates. II. Analysis and [23] Ascione, L. and Feo, L., “Modeling of Composite/
Parametric Study,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Concrete Interface of RC Beams Strengthened with
Vol. 117, pp. 3434-3455 (1991). Composite Laminates,” Composites: Part B, Vol. 31,
[13] Hamoush, S. A. and Ahmad, S. H., Debonding of Steel- pp. 535-540 (2000).
plate-strengthened Concrete Beams, Journal of Stru- [24] Raoof, M., El-Rimawi, J. A. and Hassanen, M. A. H.,
ctural Engineering, Vol. 116, pp. 356-371 (1990). “Theoretical and Experimental Study on Externally
[14] Adhikary, B. B., Mutsuyoshi, H. and Sano, M., “Shear Plated R.C. Beams,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 22,
Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using pp. 85-101 (2000).
Steel Plates Bonded on Beam Web: Experiments and [25] Barnes, R. A. and Mays, G. C., “The Transfer of Stress
Analysis,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. through a Steel to Concrete Adhesive Bond,” Interna-
14, pp. 237-244 (2000). tional Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, Vol. 21, pp.
[15] Adhikary, B. B. and Mutsuyoshi, H., “Numerical Sim- 495-502 (2001).
ulation of Steel-plate Strengthened Concrete Beam by [26] Barnes, R. A., Baglin, P. S., Mays, G. C. and Subedi,
a Non-linear Finite Element Method Model,” Const- N. K., “External Steel Plate Systems for the Shear St-
ruction and Building Materials, Vol. 16, pp. 291-301 rengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Engine-
(2002). ering Structures, Vol. 23, pp. 1162-1176 (2001).
[16] Garden, H. N. and Hollaway, L. C., “An Experimental [27] Sapountzakis, E. J. and Katsikadelis, J. T., “Interface
Study of the Failure Modes of Reinforced Concrete Forces in Composite Steel-concrete Structure,” Inter-
Beams Strengthened with Prestressed Carbon Compo- national Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 37, pp.
site Plates,” Composite Part B, Vol. 29B, pp. 411-424 4455-4472 (2000).
(1998). [28] Smith, S. T. and Teng, J. G., “Interfacial Stresses in
[17] Garden, H. N., Quantrill, R. J., Hollaway, L. C., Thorne, Plated Beams,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 23, pp.
A. M. and Parke, G. A. R., “An Experimental Study of 857-871 (2001).
the Anchorage Length of Carbon Fibre Composite [29] Wang, Y. C., “Analytical and Experimental Study on
Plates Used to Strengthen Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Seismic Performance of RC T-beams with Design De-
Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 12, pp. 203- ficiency in Steel Bar Curtailment,” Engineering Struc-
219 (1998). tures, Vol. 25, pp. 215-227 (2003).
[18] Kankam, C. K., “Structural Behavior of Bolted End- [30] Hsu, M. H., Quantitative Analysis of RC Beams St-
plated Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Materials & De- rengthened by Externally Bonded GFRP, Master The-
sign, Vol. 24, pp. 367-375 (2003). sis, Feng Chia University (1997).
[19] Subedi, N. K. and Baglin, P. S., “Ultimate Load Analy- [31] Bellman, R. E. and Casti, J., “Differential Quadrature
sis of Plate Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Engineering and Long-term Integration,” Journal of Mathematical
Structures, Vol. 23, pp. 1068-1079 (2001). Analysis and Application, Vol. 34, pp. 235-238 (1971).
[20] Picard, A., Massicotte, B. and Boucher, E., “Stren- [32] Bellman, R. E., Kashef, B. G. and Casti, J., “Differen-
gthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Compo- tial Quadrature: A Technique for Rapid Solution of
site Materials: Theoretical Study,” Composite Struc- Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,” Journal Com-
tures, Vol. 33, pp. 63-75 (1995). putational Physics, Vol. 10, pp. 40-52 (1972).
[21] Nguyen, N. T., Oehlers, D. J. and Bradford, M. A., “An [33] Bert, C. W., Jang, S. K. and Striz, A. G., “Two New
Analytical Model for Reinforced Concrete Beams with Approximate Methods for Analyzing Free Vibration of
Bolted Side Plates Accounting for Longitudinal and Structural Components,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 26, pp.
232 Ming-Hung Hsu