Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • LAW3106 - Seweda V Seweda

    Uploaded by

    Donette Anthony
    48 views4 pages

    Original Title

    LAW3106 - Seweda v Seweda

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    48 views4 pages

    LAW3106 - Seweda V Seweda

    Uploaded by

    Donette Anthony

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4
    oat \ Sank necieouRt | No rar DEMERARA “INTHE PULL, COURT OF ccwvi avr BerweEn: In te matter ofthe Mari Persons Propenty Act Chapter 45:04 as amended by the Martied Persons Property (hmeniment) Act No. 20 of 190, nde 1m the matter of an application for Division of Property by SHEVANT SEWEDA, SEVANE SEWEDA, Appean, a AMAR CHAND SEWEDA Respondent The Honourable fstices James Novell Drakes and Navid Singh, Pisne Jiges MC. A. Nigel Hughes eprseting the Appellant Me A, Jom ain representing the Resposent ental November 20, Deceuer 192015, Jannary and March 82014 DECISION Civil Action No, 4597 SA of 2010 was insted by the Appellant on June 28° 2010 by way of om oxiginating somone otha the ining inter alia a Deca Appellant i ned to an equity bn the movable ad immovable propestis inthe rae ofthe Respondent prchssed fom the esouces ofthe mange a ding ‘he mnie, Writen submissions: were press ved on tehalf of oth the Appellant ant Respondent toa Jvge in Chawhers and on May 182012, her Honour Juste nsonally pave a decison graming the Appellant “a 1/3 share in aud to te ‘atrimanial property en the furniiwe and equipment less the items already Jake by tho applinnt (the Appellant herein), co since the applicant already ‘wns ome nf the voheles, he Responient shal retain the eke vehicle for hi own ‘use and benefit the television tn remain inthe possession ofthe Responder.” 18s fom at oer that this appeal is "he substantive lw applicable i his case i he Maurie! Persons Property Act. meaty CAmendment) Act AvtN0.20.0F 1950 tion 448) of tae Mand Persons’ Proper {Amendmen) Act 199) is very sor in is wording und dereve $0 lengihy dissourse by me is required eying its interpretation, Counsel forthe Respondent, Me Juman-Yasia, sant spouse ie a Gator which Thi Ju that contin by im take into acount in considering ‘whit Wo vary the statutory award Sein 4b) (0) 0 of the Matted Persons ‘pert (Amentnen) Act 1990.1 disagree ta * opinion the Married Resons” Propety (Anicndment) Act 1990 was ‘rncially enacted fo bring to an en oad remo the need fr & Cout to sit ‘aut engage in frctsic mavimonalacouing. A Cour sno ange egured to ‘ital detenine wit every peany Ut came in on maage was sent ono by ‘whom {354 progmatic recognition dat both spouses contibue to the operation of he family unit and the vale of nt comtitation, whete the parties have hese Nogethee fora least five yeas, ls been asses by the ng egialors to be either ‘vet or one-half sed on wither oF ot the cana spouse was gaily

    You might also like