You are on page 1of 1

RULE AGAINST DUPLICITY

1st COMPONENT 2nd COMPONENT


3rd COMPONENT
Offence Should Be Subject of Every Charge to be separately tried
Every Charge to be separately tried
separate charge

● Offences in the alternatives, Two ● Exceptions to this general rule which ● Sec 170 (1) : When more persons
distinct offences & Latent Duplicity allow the joining of more than 1 charge at accused of the same offence or different
one trial as well as the holding joint trial for offence committed in the same transaction
● It has (2) exceptions to rule against 2 or more persons
duplicity which is : ● Joint Charge : The prosecution
● Offences of some kind : prefers joint charge & consequently
●Sec 153 (2) Offences those of joint trial for the purpose to avoid
Criminal Breach of trust or criminal ● Punishable with the same from duplicity
misappropriation amount of punishment
● Joint charge invoking common
● The offence Sec 193 PC ● Offence punishable under Sec intention : where the charge is
379,380,382,392 0r 397 of PC
● It also has (2) provisions in CPC that premised not a joint charge but on
provide a cure for omission & Defects In a ● Same Transaction : Sec 165 (1) CPC common intention, the prosecution
charge which is under Sec 156 & Sec 422 need only establish that one
● Offence falling under different accused persons committed the act
definations : Eg Syaheed hit Muhaimin and there is some evidence that
maybe separetly charge of offence under the others participate in it in
Sec 353 & 323 PC furtherance of a common intention

● Acts by itself or themeself constitute ● Sec 170 (2) : Persons accused of offences
another offence : Eg Rizal was robbery relating to property and persons accused of
hafsham and also cause hurt too. Charge receiving, retaining in such property
offence under 323, 392 &394 CPC
● Allows the trial of persons
● Alternative Charges ; Sec 166 CPC accused of an offence of theft,
extortion, criminal breach of trust
which person abetment to coomit
the offence

You might also like