You are on page 1of 2

RAMON R. DEL ROSARIO, JR., as SECRETARY OF FINANCE & JOSE U.

ONG, as 21 and 29 of the National Internal Revenue Code,' as amended. Petitioners also
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE contend it violated due process.
G.R. No. 109446 October 3, 1994
 The Solicitor General espouses the position taken by public respondents.

FACTS  The Court has given due course to both petitions.

 Two consolidated cases assail the validity of RA 7496 or the Simplified Net ISSUE
Income Taxation Scheme ("SNIT"), which amended certain provisions of the
NIRC, as well as the Rules and Regulations promulgated by public respondents Whether or not the tax law is unconstitutional for violating due process?
pursuant to said law.
RULING
 Petitioners posit that RA 7496 is unconstitutional as it allegedly violates the
NO. The due process clause may correctly be invoked only when there is a clear
following provisions of the Constitution:
contravention of inherent or constitutional limitations in the exercise of the tax
-Article VI, Section 26(1) — Every bill passed by the Congress shall embrace only one power. No such transgression is so evident in herein case.
subject which shall be expresPhilippine Amusement And Gaming Corporation 1. Uniformity of taxation, like the concept of equal protection, merely requires that
vs. Bureau of Internal Revenue, GR no. 208731, January 27, 2016Philippine all subjects or objects of taxation, similarly situated, are to be treated alike both in
Amusement And Gaming Corporation vs. Bureau of Internal Revenue, GR no. privileges and liabilities. Uniformity does not violate classification as long as: (1) the
208731, January 27, 2016Philippine Amusement And Gaming Corporation vs. standards that are used therefor are substantial and not arbitrary, (2) the
Bureau of Internal Revenue, GR no. 208731, January 27, 2016 sed in the title categorization is germane to achieve the legislative purpose, (3) the law applies, all
thereof. things being equal, to both present and future conditions, and (4) the classification
applies equally well to all those belonging to the same class.
- Article VI, Section 28(1) — The rule of taxation shall be uniform and equitable. The
Congress shall evolve a progressive system of taxation. 2. What is apparent from the amendatory law is the legislative intent to increasingly
shift the income tax system towards the scheduler approach in the income taxation
- Article III, Section 1 — No person shall be deprived of . . . property without due of individual taxpayers and to maintain, by and large, the present global treatment
process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws. on taxable corporations. The Court does not view this classification to be arbitrary
and inappropriate.
 Petitioners contended that public respondents exceeded their rule-making
authority in applying SNIT to general professional partnerships. Petitioner ISSUE 2
contends that the title of HB 34314, progenitor of RA 7496, is deficient for being
merely entitled, "Simplified Net Income Taxation Scheme for the Self-Employed Whether or not public respondents exceeded their authority in promulgating the RR?
and Professionals Engaged in the Practice of their Profession" (Petition in G.R.
No. 109289) when the full text of the title actually reads, RULING

'An Act Adopting the Simplified Net Income Taxation Scheme For The Self-Employed No. There is no evident intention of the law, either before or after the amendatory
and Professionals Engaged In The Practice of Philippine Amusement And Gaming legislation, to place in an unequal footing or in significant variance the income tax
treatment of professionals who practice their respective professions individually and
Corporation vs. Bureau of Internal Revenue, GR no. 208731, January 27,
of those who do it through a general professional partnership.
2016Philippine Amusement And Gaming Corporation vs. Bureau of Internal
Revenue, GR no. 208731, January 27, 2016 Their Profession, Amending Sections
Philippine Amusement And Gaming Corporation vs. Bureau of Internal
Revenue, GR no. 208731, January 27, 2016

You might also like