issed from his employment by CCC-Equity.

The trial court rendered a decision in favor of the petitioner. The decision became final and,
accordingly, a Writ of Execution was issued. However, the judgment remained unsatisfied, prompting
petitioner to le a Motion for alias Writ of Execution. [Meanwhile, in 1983, CCC became known as the
General Credit Corporation (GCC).]

The Regional Trial Court of Quezon City then issued an Order directing GCC to file its comment
on petitioner's motion. GCC alleged that it was not a party to the case. Consequently, the trial court
ordered the issuance of an alias of writ of execution. Thus, GCC instituted a petition for certiorari with

oath and be admitted to the practice of law. He averred that his probation period had been
terminated. It is noted that his probation period did not last for more than 10 months.

Issue: W/N Argosino should be allowed to take the oath of attorney and be admitted to the
practice of law.

Facts: Yes. Given the fact that Mr. Argosino had exhibited competent proof that he possessed
the required good moral character as required before taking the Lawyer’s Oath and to sign the
Rolls of Attorneys, the Supreme Court considered the premises that he is not inherently in bad
moral fiber. In giving the benefit of the doubt, Mr. Argosino was finally reminded that the
Lawyer’s Oath is not merely a ceremony or formality before the practice of law, and that the
community assistance he had started is expected to continue in serving the more unfortunate
members of the society.

PATRICK A. CARONAN, Complainant

vs.
RICHARD A. CARONAN a.k.a. "ATTY. PATRICK A. CARONAN," Respondent
A.C. No. 11316
Used the identity of Patrick caronan

case, namely: the unity of interests, management, and control; the transfer of funds to suit their
individual corporate conveniences; and the dominance of policy and practice by the mother corporation
insure that CCC-QC was an instrumentality or agency of CCC. A court judgment becomes useless and
ineffective if the employer, in this case CCC as a mother corporation, is placed beyond the legal reach of
the judgment creditor.

The decision of the Court of Appeals was REVERSED and SET ASIDE.