Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Covarrubias
SBS 328 – Social Module Theory
21 December 2018
Selection/Introduction:
After a long period of time researching and careful considering, I have chosen the topic
of “Animal Rights Movement” as my social movement selection. The reason why I chose this
movement over other significant movements is because of my love and passion for all things
related to animals, especially their wellbeing. Knowing that animals do not have voices of their
own to share their thoughts or opinions, and the movements overall indispensable value and
impact on them, I want to learn more about the details. I have heard many different opinions on
PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and I am curious about their techniques and
methods of protecting animals and the reasons why so many people are against the organization.
Throughout the process of writing this social movement paper, I hope to gain further
Thematic Section:
Animal Advocacy Movement, is a movement created on behalf of animals of all kinds. The
movement was originally established in order put an end to the cruel treatments inflicted upon all
animals within a farm, laboratory, home, or wild setting across the world. The Animal Rights
Movement strives to protect both the moral and legal rights of animals. One distinguishable
group amongst countless others with the goal of advocating and protecting nonhuman animals
would be the PETA, which stands for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The
organization was founded in March 1980 by Ingrid Newkirk and Alex Pacheco, renowned
British and American animal activists, whose ideas went against speciesism, the belief that
different values, rights, or special consideration are assigned to individuals completely based on
the basis of their species membership. Deductively speaking, Newkirk and Pacheco
straightforwardly rejected the idea that nonhuman animals such as cows, pigs, dogs, and
monkeys do not belong in the species homo sapiens, therefore do not deserve similar rights and
respects as humans receive. Ever since the organization’s first introduction, PETA has been
advocating for animals by: lobbying government agencies to impose fines, promoting a vegan
lifestyle, dispatching undercover investigators into farms, laboratories that carried out researches
on animals, and circuses. Their efforts had paid off tremendously, with the production of movies
similar to the 2008 American documentary film widely known as Food, Inc. and the publish
journals similar to the 2001 nonfiction book Fast Food Nation written by Eric Schlosser.
PETA’s undercover investigators entered farms, laboratories, and circuses impersonating as farm
workers and cleaners to gather information about the mistreatment of animals through the use of
modern-day cameras by recording videos and taking pictures of the cruel events. By taking part
in the work of those corporations, investigators have a clear understanding of how animals are
regularly handled and tended to by the workers of those corporations. PETA claims that there are
about 6.5 million members and supporters; not including those that have been making private
donations to the organizations throughout the years to support their causes regarding animal
rights. After researching and analyzing PETA’s website, I have learned that the organization is
extremely against: electric-shock training for dogs, caging birds, euthanasia of ill and/or healthy
animals, declawing cats, zoos, crafting dogs and puppies, catch-and release fishing, so on and so
forth.
According to Andrew Lawler, author of Animal Activists Target NASA Mission, animals’
rights activists are extremely concerned and had expressed opposition against a multinational
space project to study the effects of weightlessness on rhesus monkeys conducted by NASA
(Lawler, 1996). This information clarifies that PETA indeed gets involved with many important
organizations in order to protect animal rights. Constance Holden has also published an article
stating that PETA has created a great impact by successfully persuading the state of Louisiana to
stop the planned euthanasia of three monkeys that used to be laboratory animals (Holden, 1989).
This information, which dates back to the beginning days of PETA, also confirms its effort in
saving animals. According to Frankie Trull, author of Biomedical Attacks, PETA has also
successfully established and advocated rights for animals against biomedical attacks (Trull,
1999). This is important because every day animals are subjected to abuse in laboratories.
Theoretical Section:
Social movements are collective and purposeful organized groups established to resist
changes or defend beliefs. Within these groups, members will often collaborate with one another
in order to work towards a common goal. Although these goals may vary, they all seek to create
and develop a social change; changes that will alter the social order of society. Social changes
may contain but are not limited to: a change in the social institution, social behavior, and beliefs,
or social relations. Social movements apply enormous amounts of changeability, despite this
everyone consists of a sense of individuality and mobilization for the sake of change to an
Social movements can occur on the local, regional, national, or even global stage. In
other words, movements are everywhere, from towns, nations, to around the world. For example,
the Flint water crisis, which first started in 2014, gave rise to the FLOW (For Love of Water)
program. FLOW’s mission is to safeguard and protect the world’s largest freshwater lake system
of Great Lakes. FLOW is considered to be within all of the three stages: local, regional and
national stages of social movement because its goal of protecting the water affects both the area
where it is located, including Clint, Michigan, and the whole nation. As long as there are
discontented populations whose needs and interests are not met and provided, social movements
will always be a part of society. These movements are commonly caused by impulses. A group
of people that starts a social movement could feel threatened by something or some situation, and
they feel a great necessity to form a unity to create an impactful movement in hopes of change.
They are driven by the determination of fighting for what they have been longed for, whether it
be justice or freedom. These people have similar experiences that causes them to strive for the
same goal by starting a movement that will raise awareness among their society. Due to the
spontaneous characteristic of social movements, the movements themselves do not belong to any
certain organization. For example, the #MeToo movement has been an uproar on social media
with the purpose of raising awareness in regard to sexual harassment and sexual assault,
especially in a work environment. The term #MeToo was popularized by actress Alyssa Milano
in 2017. It has caused an uproar when people realized how effective it is, that it greatly helps
victims of sexual abuse find their justice. This movement was not initially formed by any
organization, but it simply became widespread due to the power of social media.
The Black Lives Matter movement is a perfect example for the Structural Strain Theory,
in which the theory refers to the pressure caused from social factors, including but not limited to,
a difference in income level, or lack of quality education. According to an article written by Dr.
Structural Strain theory was developed by a sociologist named Robert K. Merton. This theory
mainly focuses on the underprivileged group (Medley-Rath, 2015). In this case, the individuals
of the movement most likely do not have the intention of achieving cultural goals. Due to this,
strain social movements are created. One crucial social movement is the Resource Mobilization
Theory, which is also applied to social movement. This theory has five main principles. The
influenced by power imbalances and interest conflicts. This movement is effective partly due to
the resources and organization behind it. Therefore, the more centralized and formally structured
a social movement is, the more impactful it will be due to qualities such as a group strategy and
the political climate. Movements like this are supported with efforts and finances by volunteer
staff, local leadership, collective actions, and donated resources from direct beneficiaries. There
have been arguments saying that social movements that are based on Resource Mobilization
theory form from changes in group resources and organization. In sum, Social Mobilization is
the process of persuading individuals to join and support an organization that is focused on
making social changes. It is a significantly effective theory as its resources play a major role in
keeping the movements running. These resources go beyond finance because they also include
physical goods, human resources, and co-operation within the organization. Mass Society Theory
refers to the mob mentality of when a large group of people have the same mindset. For example,
this theory is used to explain the #MeToo movement and #BlackLivesMatter where victims of
sexual assaults and racial discrimination who may feel threatened at first, but then through the
empowerment of others with the same experience who speak out, also feel the urge to join the
movements. This theory was also strong during the 20th century, the time of Stalinism, Nazism,
and Fascism when people divided into sides that resembled their beliefs mostly.
Deprivation Theory is also one of the most important theories that are applied to social
movements. Deprivation Theory refers to the actions of groups who are oppressed or deprived of
rights that other people in their society enjoy. According to American sociologist Charles Glock,
deprivation is distinguished by five types, depending on the kinds of strain felt: economic, social,
organismic, ethical, and psychic deprivation (Glock, 1964). For example, sex workers joined the
Sex Workers’ Rights Movement because they recognize the sense of oppression and lack of
protection towards those who are involved in the sex industry. However, critics state that
Deprivation Theory does not explain why some people participate in the Animal Rights’
Social movements began their early growth back in the mid-18th century. These
movements were derived from various reasons and formed by different groups of people that had
a common goal. These groups, whether or not they are formally formed, strive for a social
change to form a better community. These social movements are not limited to the size because
social issues can take place in different levels, such as local, state, national, or even global level.
There are four main theoretical perspectives on social movements, including Structural Strain
theory, Resource Mobilization theory, Mass Society Theory, and Deprivation theory. These
Analytical Section:
As stated, social movements are enacted as a result of an impulse due to the injustice or
#MeToo movements are caused by differentiating factors than that of the Animal Rights
Movement, all three are the result stemming from an impulse; the individual's belief that the
situation was unjustified, immoral, or both. Theories such as the Strain Theory indirectly
promotes for the development of animal abuse; due to struggles to acquire sufficient income or
education, these failures will amplify and promote individuals’ desire to conduct crimes due to
stress. In a sense, individuals may relieve such stress by inflicting abuse upon animals, whether it
is their own or another’s. Although the Animal Rights Movement also focuses on a wide array of
farm animals, another way they counter such outrages, but on a smaller scale is through local
shelters. Participants who volunteer at these shelters have similar mindsets in which they wish to
help animals. The Mass Society and Resource Mobilization theory are demonstrated within
shelters through the numerous volunteers that participate to help care for, tend to, and seek
loving homes for many animals as a result of their abuse and abandonment or through generous
donations to continue caring for them. Another example of the Mass Society theory that's
strongly supported and recognized in the present day would be Hope for Paws; an online
organization that records and documents their heroic acts of saving animals from cruelty. By
visually showing society their rescues and results, individuals who weren’t previously open to
volunteering, begin to volunteer or donate supplies to the organization; leading to the Resource
Mobilization theory. Many animals that are found within shelters are often strays, and more
importantly, strays that have been left behind after a series of physical abuse by neglectful
owners in which situations where they are often deprived of proper nutritious meals or care and
attention.
Conclusion:
In our beautiful world, animals definitely have the right to live a life free of pain and
suffering. Just because humans are at the top of the food chain, it does not mean that we should
be the only ones with rights. Resource Mobilization theory helps support Animal Rights
Movement because the majority of people around the world love animals, which explains the
likeliness of them spending a great amount of time advocating for animals and encouraging
others to do the same thing. Mass Society theory is thriving in today’s world of modern
technology, specifically social media. Social media is a quick and effective way to spread
awareness about Animal Rights Movement to everyone across the world. We access a great
amount of information on the internet and therefore it is the ideal platform to exhibit pictures and
details of the movement in order to gain more supporters. Strain theory contribute to the rise of
this movement because without the deviant behaviors towards animals, there would be no need
for Animal Rights Movement. Deprivation theory also explains the creation of this movement
because as intelligent beings, we are constantly looking for better living conditions for not only
Glock, C. Y. (1964). The Role of Deprivation in the Origin and Evolution of Religious Groups.
Religion and Social Conflict , ed. R. Lee and M. E. 24-36
Lawler, A. (1996). Life Sciences: Animal Activists Target NASA Mission. Science, 272(5258),
26-26. doi:10.1126/science.272.5258.26
Holden, C. (1989). Monkey euthanasia stalled by activists. Science,244(4911), 1437-1437.
doi:10.1126/science.2499929
Medley-Rath, S. (2015). Structural Strain Theory and the Baltimore Riots. Sociology in Focus.
Trull, F. L. (1999). Biomedical Attacks. Science, 286(5444).
doi:10.1126/science.286.5444.1477b