Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The present study was carried out to ascertain the benefits of online recruitment, and ways in which it
could be improved, at a leading UK technology firm – with respect to graduate, experienced and
executive employees. Review of existing literature pointed out that Innovations in technology have
revolutionized recruitment processes. Several theorists also claimed that online recruitment leads to an
improved quality and quantity of applications, an enhanced platform for information sharing, more
operational effectiveness, cost effectiveness and a lack of boundaries. In order to verify or discredit
these assertions, quantitative surveys and semi-structured interviews were carried out on 14 students &
graduates, and four members of Google Inc. graduate recruitment team respectively. The results
obtained from graduates suggested that they were highly influenced by the corporate brand, presence
of the organisation on the web and online job boards. Results from Google Inc.’s recruitment
department suggested that they achieved a number of efficiencies such as reduced cost, overhead and
faster response rate. They have also generally increased their number of applicants by a six fold since
adopting online recruitment. However the quality of candidates received is said to be low compared to
the quantity, and the company has difficulties in meeting their diversity and disability quotas. These
results suggest that the company is not being effective in leveraging their brand, and other means
available to them, in attracting the required quality of candidates. Numerous graduates also chose
agency as a preferred form of finding a job, thereby illustrating that traditional methods should not be
totally abolished. A synergy between agency, job board, branding, and online recruitment is therefore
proposed, as an effective method of meeting quantity and quality employment targets for the
organisation.
1.Introduction
An organisation’s human resource has been defined as it is most important and effective asset,
in terms of building and sustaining competitive advantage (Singh and Finn, 2003). The
recruitment and selection of this very important resource is therefore very crucial in any
organisation looking to build organisational competencies through its people.
a. Online Recruitment
Job searches and recruitment had been predominantly done through newspaper postings,
word-of-mouth and agency recruitment before the advent of the Internet (Singh and Finn,
2003). Recruiting companies then went through daunting tasks of sorting, filing and choosing
through a vast list of paper based job applications, which usually involved a lot of resources in
terms of human capital and costs.
However, the penetration of the Internet, and the near 100% adoption of Internet job
applications, has seen this trend change drastically. Younger (2007) reports that 100% of all
Fortune 500 companies in the US and FTSE 100 companies in the UK utilize the Internet
predominantly for their job postings and for receiving applications, as opposed to just one-third
of Fortune 500 companies in 1999. This trend has become so widespread that a vast majority of
job applicants (96%) in a study conducted by the Society for Human Resource Management in
2006 reported using the Internet for job search and applications (Younger, 2007). Some
companies are also known to utilize Internet virtual worlds, such as Second Life, in holding
recruitment fairs, and having career session with prospective students (Riley, 2007). The archaic
use of newspaper publishing and other sources has diminished greatly, as the UK newspaper
industry has suffered a 20% year on year fall in ad revenue, in recent years (Guardian, 2009).
b. Organisation under study
Google Inc. is one of the biggest technology firm in the UK, with a global presence in several
countries and employees exceeding 23,331, possesses a fully functional online recruitment
website (http://www.google.com/intl/en/jobs/index.html). The website provides information
regarding available vacancies, and steps that prospective applicants should take in order to fill
an application. It also provides relevant information about the organization and the vacancy
position.
Google Inc.’s online recruitment procedure (see appendix) has undergone major changes when
compared to traditional recruitment process it practised, which only required candidates to
send in their application forms when the firm makes a visit to the university campus or through
referral system. The university students are then invited to take first round of technical tests if
their CVs and Cover letters were deemed suitable. Candidates living miles away from the test
centre would have their accommodation and transportation catered for, only to partake in a 1-
hour technical test, where their likelihood of success is uncertain (Times Online, 2005). Now
with the advent of technology, there’s the possibility that these processes may have been made
more efficient and effective.
c. Research Objective
The research objective is therefore to ascertain the benefits – when related to Google Inc. – of
adopting a wholly Internet centred focus to candidate recruitment (graduate or experienced
hires). This research would aim to ascertain the improved efficiencies and effectiveness that
Google has gained through the adoption of an Internet based approach to recruitment.
The following research question would be expatiated further in the literature review chapter,
after relevant literatures have been reviewed. This research topic has been chosen because of
the researcher’s previous experience with online recruitment. Google Inc. was chosen because
of the researcher’s relationship with a member of the firm’s recruitment team. It would
therefore reduce barriers associated with gaining access to the organization for primary
interviews and secondary information.
As described further in the Methodology chapter, this research would be based on a
quantitative study with students and graduates; and semi-structured interviews with members
of Google Inc.’s graduate recruitment team. Analysis of the existing literature would be carried
out in Chapter 2, while the research methodology, results and ensuing discussion would be
outlined in Chapters 3 – 5 respectively. Chapter 6 concludes.
2.Literature Review
Rynes (1991, p 429) defines recruitment in organizations as “all practices and decisions that
affect either the number or types of individuals who are willing to apply for or to accept a given
vacancy”. It includes organizational actions carried out with the intent of identifying and
attracting prospective employees (Breaugh and Starke, 2000). Attracting high quality
employees is a source of true competitive advantage, especially in periods of fierce competition
(Birgelen et al, 2008). Recruitment is therefore regarded as an important constituent of Human
Resources, as its main function is to attract and grow human capital – an important resource,
within the organization (Barber, 1998).
Shortages in the labour market, and difficulties in finding the right talent, especially in
technological and knowledge based organizations, have led to a more competitive recruitment
industry in recent years (HRL, 2006; Parry and Wilson, 2006). The emphasis for HR professionals
is now on attracting competent talent that have specialties in important skills (Jones et al,
2002), as research has shown that recruitment constitutes the second most important priority
for HR (Parry and Tyson, 2008).
The increasing priority being attributed to recruitment has also been corroborated by a
research report by CIPD (2009) reporting that 84% of all organizations experience difficulties in
recruitment. Recruitment techniques could therefore be facilitated further through an efficient
application of technologies, such as online recruitment (Parry and Tyson, 2008)
a. Recruitment, HR and Technology
Technology utilization in HRM has grown at an exponential rate in recent years, as a survey by
CIPD (2009) showed that 77% of all organizations adopt efficient HR practices through
Information System Technologies. Internet technology is increasingly being used in
sophisticated functions such as talent recruitment, training and development as opposed to
basic functions such as payroll, benefits or
absent management (Martinsons, 1994). HRL (2006) also states that technology plays an
important role in the ‘growing sophistication and effectiveness of talent attraction and
management.’
Traditional forms of recruitment, which had been through internal labour markets, world of
mouth, newspaper adverts and agencies (Ford et al, 1986) has been modernized through the
adoption of the Internet, as organizations are increasingly reviewing or changing their
perspectives on talent attraction and selection (Othman and Musa, 2006). The Internet has
been acclaimed as the future of talent attraction and selection in coming years, and is
increasingly becoming a preferred method in organizations (Parry, 2009). This adoption has led
to a consistent decline in newspaper job adverts in recent years (HRL, 2006).
However, these technological improvements though compelling, do not necessarily warrant a
complete abolishment of traditional recruitment procedures. Though technology would
continue to be an important tool in the recruitment process, Younger (2007) asserts that online
recruitment should be regarded as one of the tools available to meet the organization’s goals of
talent attraction. HRL (2006) therefore recommends a blended approach, in which both internal
and external recruitment is utilized. They also advocate that technology should constitute a
platform, rather than a process driver, thereby confirming Younger’s views.
b. Traditional recruitment methods
Though technology may constitute an increasing proportion of recruitment method in recent
years, it was never the predominant method in which employees were usually hired. The most
common traditional recruitment methods – based on existing theories (Harris et al, 2003; Van
Rooy et al, 2003; and Othman and Musa, 2006) – has been outlined in a cognitive diagram
displayed in figure 1. Existing literatures on traditional recruitment methods are discussed in
appendix.
c. Online Recruitment
Recruitment over the Internet first started between 1990 and 2000, and was regarded then as a
revolution in recruitment due to the enormous benefits it presented to employers and
prospective job applications (Boydell, 2002). It is no surprise then that its use has grown
substantially in recent years, fuelled mainly by a ‘headlong rush’ by large organizations to utilize
technology and adopt competitive practices in their recruitment processes (Anderson, 2003).
This has also been facilitated by new forms of media and innovations in psychometric
procedures that have significantly changed the recruitment processes within organizations, and
made it more engaging and appealing for prospective applications (Highhouse and Hoffman,
2001; Searle, 2004).
The Electronic Recruiting Index of 2000 has shown that there is a dramatic increase in the
spending on online recruiting. The research conducted shows that majority of the visitors (71%)
to the job sites are not actively interested in changing jobs. Only 15% actually think of changing
work while only 10% are actively looking for a job. Of 5% of the visitors are unemployed.
Online recruitment is now a very popular recruitment portal for employees and job seekers in
most developed countries (Highhouse et al, 2004). A study of US companies in 2006 showed
that 50% of all new hires were from the Internet (Cober and Brown, 2006); with a larger portion
being recruited from the company’s own Internet site (Birgelen et al, 2008). Crispin and Mehler
(2006) also reported that 20% of external hires were hired through company websites, while
13% were through online job boards. CIPD (2009) also reported that 67% of UK companies used
online recruitment; thus confirming earlier views regarding the growth prospects of the
Internet as an important recruitment tool (Parry and Tyson, 2009). Recruitment websites, in the
forms of job boards, corporate websites, and agency websites are increasing in numbers, while
expenditures on the Internet recruiting totalled $7 billion in 2005 and are also forecasted to
increase continuously in coming years (Birgelen et al, 2008).
The main drivers facilitating this growth has been the need for organizations to streamline and
automate recruitment processes in order to make them more efficient, in such a way that
applicant details were entered by themselves, and communications processes are sped up
(Parry et al, 2007). Younger (2007) also reports that innovative recruitment technologies such
as online numerical, verbal, logical or psychometric tests could be administered immediately to
applicants over the Internet, and results could be derived almost instantaneously; thereby
removing previously daunting tasks of coding answers and marking tests scripts. The soaring
growth of recruitment job boards and various websites that offer a variety of functions to job
seekers and employers, has also facilitated the continued growth in this field (Searle, 2004)
The diagram in figure 2, is also based on existing theories (Searle, 2004; Othman and Musa,
2006; Parry et al, 2007), and outlines the online recruitment procedure for job applications
seeking to apply for jobs through online methods, as opposed to traditional methods (Figure 1).
The need to drive traffic to a corporate website using effective external advertisement such as
job boards, search engine adverts and newspaper clips is therefore essential in communicating
a company’s suitable as an organization of choice (Parry and Tyson, 2008). If a company were
not readily available through such advertisement portals, it would be highly unlikely that a job
applicant would consider sending in applications to such companies (Birgelen et al, 2008). The
web therefore plays a huge role in the gathering research on potential employers, and Rozelle
and Landis (2002) states that it is perceived as more realistic than other sources for company
information. It enables students to make informed decisions about which companies to apply
to and how to write their applications (Searle, 2004).
The provision of accurate corporate information, through the most appropriate online medium
is advised by Birgelen et al (2008) as an effective way of attracting new employees. Williamson
et al (2003) also illustrated that differences in the ways in which recruitment websites orient
themselves with regards to availability of information online, influences perception of
organizational attractiveness. He further asserts that application decisions and their attraction
to organizations are as a result of the amount and quality of information they are able to gather
about potential employers, as well as their perception about the organization.
iii. Corporate brand
The brand of an organization is very crucial in attracting the right kind of employee (Wilson,
2008). Potential job employees are usually attracted to a more developed corporate brand, as
they believe that an established brand would constitute a more stable and growing
organization (Crispin and Mehler, 2006). Big brands also offer better opportunities for job
seekers, as opposed to smaller companies (Younger, 2007), which is probably why they have
been successful at online recruitment.
Wilson (2008) also asserts that on-going corporate processes that positively impact on the
company’s reputation should be communicated in such a way that it has a positive impact on
people’s intentions to seek a career in the company. Williamson et al (2003) also states that
companies unable to leverage existing brands, or do not possess the relevant reputable brand,
usually face recruitment problems, especially in highly competitive sectors. The methods in
which brands are being delivered and represented are very crucial in attracting talent globally.
Wilson (2008) asserts that a global brand could be leveraged in attracting talent resources in
several parts of the world. Inversely, Othman and Musa (2006) also theorises that online
recruitment can increase the image of an organization, especially with regards to dedicated
recruitment websites. It imposes an image of innovation and flexibility on the organization
(Fister, 1999)
However, job applications derived through an effective use of corporate branding, recruitment
website and online information do not necessarily impact on the quality of candidates received,
just the quantity (Fister, 1999). A study carried out by Williams (2008), illustrated that a
majority of companies still believe that the use of employment agencies is still one of the best
ways to improve quality of job applicants received. Miller and Weckert (2000) also found that
some undergraduates applying for jobs had privacy concerns and were unwillingness to submit
personal details.
e. Impact and Effectiveness of online recruitment
i. Better quality candidates
Candidates usually attracted and recruited off the Internet are usually young, educated,
computer literate, and have some understanding of the processes and functions of the
recruiting company (Ganalaki, 2002). Othman and Musa (2006) also assert that the Internet
helps attract better quality candidates as Internet users tend to be more educated and
computer literature than non-users.
Younger (2007) states that the evolution of technology in online recruitment has allowed
employers to extend their search to the broad network so as to attract potential candidates.
This search extension has allowed organizations to broaden the geographic and demographic
scope of their search, helping them attract high quality candidates from a variety of sources
(Searle, 2004). Elgin and Clapham (2000) also conforms to this by illustrating that the use of
online recruitment has demolished predominant geographical, cultural or time constraints that
had once narrowed job applications from prospective candidates.
Online recruitment technology also allows companies to filter, deter and weed out unsuitable
candidates through the administration of organizational fit tests and application screening,
whilst still maintaining a positive view of the firm (Searle, 2004). Thus by extending recruitment
advertisement over the web in order to attract the broadest selection of applicants possible,
and then removing unsuitable candidates through the use of filters, online recruitment helps
the company attract the best quality candidates from the broadest net possible.
Parry (2009) thereby concludes that these benefits are well suited to today’s workplace where
diversity is appreciated and proclaimed as a source of competitive advantage, especially in
global companies.
ii. Improved platform for information sharing
Another main advantage of online recruitment, as depicted by Birgelen et al (2008) is the nearly
infinite space for companies to communicate information about themselves, opportunities and
benefits offered to prospective candidates. Websites are a very effective platform for
portraying an organization’s achievements. They can also provide information regarding current
and future vacancies (Searle, 2004)
Information can also be customised to suit potential new employees, if there preference has
already been known. Lin and Stasinskaya (2002) discuss other advantages such as improved
accuracy and verifiability of information gathered through Internet sources. Cober et al (2004)
also depicted that ease of use and interactivity of corporate websites, and the information
contained in those portals, are powerful factors that make online recruitment far better than
traditional methods.
Highhouse et al (2004) confirms these arguments by stating that the web provides interactive
possibilities for organizations to present candidates with realistic job previews, as this could
create positive reactions towards the organization. Information shared through these portals
also more valuable in the longer term, as they convey the organization’s value and help shape
the psychological contracts of new employees (Searle, 2004)
iii. Efficiency
Rozell and Landis (2002) suggest that recruitment through online channels offers the
organization a quick and efficient method of identifying and classifying a virtually unlimited
number of job applicants. Younger (2007) also states that the most immediate benefit of online
recruitment, as opposed traditional recruitment processes, is the greatly improved degree of
recruitment process management being offered. He further explains that every phase of the
recruitment process is facilitated by a more streamlined online system. Previous daunting tasks
such as coding, sorting, filing and routing application materials are now processed automatically
with the use of technology. Parry (2009) confirms these attestations and also adds that the
average recruitment cycle is now about a third of what it was before the emergence of Internet
recruitment, and that online recruitment offers quick, effective and cost efficient means of
accessing potentially suitable workers. It also encourages quicker response and reduces
turnaround and communication procedures.
iv. Cost Effectiveness
This improved operational efficiency associated with online recruitment also contributes
significantly to its cost effectiveness. Younger (2007) explains that the costs associated with
developing and implementing complete corporate recruitment platforms is mostly
inconsiderable and often a small fraction of traditional recruitment costs. This is because
publishing a company’s vacancies through their own corporate website, and also advertising
through job boards, costs so much less than traditional approaches such as the newspaper
(Othman and Musa, 2006). This arguments are supported by a CIPD (2009) survey in which 71%
of employers claim to adopt online recruitment as a
method of reducing recruitments costs, while 60% use it to broaden the candidate pool and
47% use it to reduce recruitment cycles.
The cost savings inherent in online recruitment, are reported to be as high as 90% of traditional
recruitment costs (Othman and Musa, 2006) and these cost savings can be achieved in the
following areas:
Reduced direct costs associated with newspaper adverts
Abolishment or reduction in job fairs and head-hunter fees
Reducing costs associated with mailing letters to prospective candidates
Reduced workload and overtime required for the HR department.
It also results in time saving and can help achieve faster recruitment cycles (Othman and Musa,
2006). Searle (2004) also reports that the early deterrence of unsuitable applicants represent a
significant cost saving, as companies would not need to accommodate or interview candidates
who may eventually not pass traditional paper based psychometric tests. Now that these can
be done online, only suitable candidates are invited for interviews and catered for.
v. Lack of Boundaries
A study by Parry and Tyson (2008) reports that organizations with a strong brand and
geographical presence are better able to attract more applicants through their corporate
websites. Also, Ganalaki (2002) states that corporate websites are very good tools for reaching
global targets as the Internet does not necessarily have any boundaries.
Though the effectiveness of online recruitment has been widely acclaimed as a crusher to
traditional recruitment, it is still unclear as to whether online recruitment can totally wipe out
traditional recruitment methods (Rozell and Landis, 2002). Parry and Tyson (2008) report that
some organizations are still not willing to fully accept online recruitment, while some are not
prepared to discard more traditional methods such as print media and employment agencies.
There is also a large portion of UK businesses, especially small and medium scale businesses,
who are still yet to adopt online recruitment in any capacity, while there are those who still use
a larger portion of
traditional recruitment methods (Parry and Wilson, 2009). The following subchapter therefore
critically analyses the cons associated with online recruitment, based on existing theories.
h. International employees
In a highly globalised world of today the role Human Resources becomes highly crucial. It
becomes essential to develop effective International HR policies which would be aligned with
the organisation’s international business strategy. Expatriate management has become a
significant challenge in International HR management. International HR practices are critical to
a help firms build competitive advantage by providing a differentiated set of products and
services (Capelli and Crocker,1996). Mergers between firms are quite common these days and
thus there is limited freedom in managing business which includes a highly culturally diverse
environment with new challenges.
Expatriate recruitment of employees requires many complex considerations along with the
normal requirements in domestic requirements. Gender plays a major role in international
placements as women face some challenges of their own in global work scenarios (Harris,
1993). Expatriate HR management success requires constant planning, preparation and
continuous support.
i. Literature Review Summary
Recruitment has been described as the practices and decisions that affect the quantity and
quality of job seekers that are willing to apply to an organization.
Innovations in technology have revolutionized the way recruitment processes are handled
today, and there has been a significant shift towards web-based methods of recruitment,
especially for medium and large companies.
In order for online recruitment to have the predicted impact on the recruitment industry that
has been envisioned, it must offer considerable advantages over traditional recruitment
processes such as newspaper job advertisement. These advantages can be achieved if these
companies have a thorough and effective web presence, a widely recognized brand, advertise
properly and make sure
there is ample amount of information present regarding the organization on the web. Online
recruitment is said to produce better quality candidates, provide an improved platform for
information sharing, more operational efficiency and cost effectiveness, and also provides a
lack of boundaries thus making it available on a global scale.
Though the effectiveness of online recruitment does seem to outweigh traditional methods in a
number of core factors, its use is being criticised as it excludes candidates without Internet
access, filters candidates based on their demographic, attracts a huge number of unsuitable
candidates, and is more effective for known companies and records difficulties in recruiting
experienced or executive level hires. Several theorists have therefore proposed a synergy on
the different ways in which online and traditional methods can be combined in order to attain
effectiveness in online recruitment.
The capability to motivate and retain talent is increasingly becoming one of the core
competences of top performing firms in global organisations. Improving this competence will
be important in the future as “demographic, social and economic developments strengthen the
connection between human talent and sustainable profitability”.
It will be quite difficult to find a complete supply of talented professionals in the next couple of
years. The study suggests that the organisations need to arm themselves with a number of new
generation strategies and practices to retain and motivate the best of professionals in their firm
to gain competitive advantage in this highly globalised world.
j. Research Question
Based on the literature review, and the purpose of the study as discussed in the introduction,
the following research question has been coined:
- Is online recruitment a more effective and efficient method of attracting, selecting and
recruiting prospective graduate, experienced and executive hires in a large technology firm? If it
were not, then what forms of recruitment practices would be most suitable to each category of
applications, and if it is, then how could current practices be improved in order to attract and
recruit an increased number of better-qualified candidates?
3.Methodology
a. Research Philosophy:
This study will adopt a positivist approach to interrogate the social existence of technology
firms and graduates. These are independent from the researcher and thus, need to be assessed
through objective methods such as reflection, sensation or intuition (Easterby-Smith, 2002).
Reliable information can be established by an investigation of observed occurrences (Saunders
et al, 2007). This study will not use social interpretivism philosophy, which investigates
internalized emotion, because the research question looks to determine the efficiency of online
recruitment at an organization. Objective methods are used to evaluate this efficiency (such as
increase in candidate application and reduction in costs), thereby warranting a positivist
approach.
b. Research approach
This study will assume a deductive method because of its positivist quality (Saunders et al,
2007). This is popular method demonstrates the affiliation between theory and research.
Logical reasoning is then used to develop the results of this study (Bryman and Bell, 2007). The
data findings would be compared against existing literature to ascertain if they concur with
what has already been published in the field of online recruitment.
c. Access
Getting granted access to a suitable resource within a business is vital in attaining primary
information. The investigation questions, designs and related objectives determine how
suitable the source will be (Saunders et al, 2007). As the researcher is a friend of an employee
within the organization, he was able to get access. I contacted a friend of mine who currently
works within graduate recruitment at Google Inc., and discussed the prospects of my
dissertation. She spoke to several of her colleagues on my behalf and they agreed for me to
conduct telephone interviews with 4 members of the graduate recruitment team, some of
which had been there for an average of 5 –
10 years (reasons expatiated further in this chapter). The organisation and participants did not
oppose or object to my enquiry, nor to the questions I asked.
d. Research Strategy
I will use a case study strategy for the purpose of this investigation and for my research. If it is
necessary to attain a thorough comprehension of the research perspective, the case study
strategy is particularly valuable (Robson, 2002). Therefore as this study aims to understand the
recruitment process within Google Inc. and also any benefits associated with online
recruitment, a case study would be most effective.
As can be viewed in table 1 below, dual approaches will be employed to complete this study:
i. Quantitative Questionnaire
To attain research data in the shape of, or articulated as, numbers, quantitative methods are
primarily utilized (Easterby-Smith et al, 2008). Questionnaires issued to 10 graduates and
undergraduates, used a rating scale system which asked participants to use a scale from 1 – 5 to
indicate the strength of their answer for each question. Secondary information was determined
by the participant’s application activity, partiality and status (the full questionnaire is outlined
in the appendix).
ii.Qualitative Semi Structured Interviews
Four members of the recruitment team were permitted to perform 20 minute telephone
interviews because of the access granted within the organisation. These telephone interviews
were semi-structured as they relied upon a series of pre-determined questions. These
qualitative interviews look to determine data via informal talks (Collis and Hussey, 2003). The
semi-structured system is preferred because unstructured modes are felt to generate
insignificant data, whilst structured systems overlook unanticipated results. Thus, the more
specific nature of the semi-structured system, as well as its potential for probing answers, was
better suited to the study’s aims and objective. Questioning a participant’s answer was shown
to be helpful in situations where further description was needed. The questions used in the
study were based on a series of themes that came from the literature review. Because of the
adaptation of online recruitment recently, the semi structured interviews was targeted at
members of the team who had witnessed or orchestrated the shift towards online recruitment,
that way these respondents would be better able to answer questions that relate to the
comparison of both methods.
Also, members of the online recruitment team being interviewed had different positions within
recruitment and handled separate tasks. The questionnaires were given to them beforehand,
when the approval was first sought, and each respondent chose the questions that they were
more qualified to respond to. Therefore the research was such that all respondents answered
some questions, while some others were answered by a particular individual because of their
knowledge of that process. Table 2 outlines the respondent details and their interview theme.
Table 2: Interview Respondents and Questions asked
Participants were asked for consent before being interviewed and were told that their names
would be withheld to prevent the results of the interview being distributed. Fictional names
have therefore been used.
e. Data Collection
i. Sampling Method
For the purpose of this study, results would have been more accurate if all the recruitment staff
within the organization had been subjected to the interview. Unfortunately, because of the
time and resource restraints, non-probability sample was assumed: in this sample the likelihood
of each case is chosen from an unknown total population (Oppenheim, 2000). These samples
are commonly deployed when using case studies strategy.
Unfortunately, the samples taken from the technology firms and graduates are too small to
represent the larger populations; the small sample of graduates used in this study cannot
reflect the probability sample of those within London or the United Kingdom, and the Google
Inc. participants are not high enough to represent the entire recruitment department.
Consequently, the study specialised in quantitative certainties: of the understanding of
recruitment within Google Inc., and what graduates perceived of Internet employment.
ii. Primary Data Collection
Easterby-Smith et al (2008) argues that primary and secondary data can be gathered using
quantitative methods. Whilst there are advantages and disadvantages to each of these
methods, the assimilation of independent data provides reassurance that the data suits the
research objectives, and also offers a greater influence over the organization of the sample.
4.Results
The results chapter has adopted a deductive analytical approach, therefore the findings of this
study would be collated according to the research questions asked and theories read. The
transcript from the semi-structured interviews and data from questionnaires are shown in
appendix.
The results are categorized according to the section under study and also according to the
perception of recipients towards particular questions. All questions asked are also shown in
appendix.
a. Graduate Questionnaire
Figure 3: Answers to Graduate Questionnaire (Q1 – Q5)
The responses to the graduate questionnaire are outlined in figures 3 – 5. Information
illustrated in figure 3 illustrates that the 15 graduate applicants surveyed believe that the
Corporate Brand is one of the major determinants of their choice to apply to an organization.
The second most important factors are the organization’s online web presence and their
utilisation of online job boards (figure 4). All three top factors that mode figures of 5 (Corporate
Brand and Job Boards) and 4 (Online Web Presence). Respondents who answered to Graduate
events had an average rating of 3.47; however the majority of them chose a rating of 5. The
lowest rating however, as illustrated in figure 4, is the graduate’s perceived fit with the
organisation. The average rating was 2.33, with most of the respondents choosing the lowest
rating of 1.
Figure 4: Answers to Graduate Questionnaire (Q6 – Q10)
Figure 5 below illustrates graduates’ job application preference. A majority of them (40%) chose
the Internet as the preferred mode of job application, while 26.67% of them chose to apply
through agencies. A minority of applications (6.67%) chose to apply through Newspaper Ads
and Word of Mouth from friends and colleagues.
Figure 5: Graduate application preference
b. Semi-Structured Interviews
i. Internet Recruitment Background
The organization started utilizing online recruitment system fully in 2003. Prior to its adoption,
online recruitment had primarily been through traditional means such as word of mouth and
executive search agencies
Temporary roles were filled through agencies. Executive hires were recruited through executive
search agencies.
ii. Adoption
The major drive towards online recruitment has been the need to increase efficiency. Nick
believes ‘the availability of technology makes everything easier’ and Martha states Google’s
major reason for adopting online recruitment. The respondent also believes that they can
recruit a better diversity and quality of candidates using online processes.
Graduate recruitment has received the highest priority (5) with respect to the use of online
recruitment, as opposed to a mid-level priority for experienced hires (3) and for Executive hires,
Martha states that it is given ‘Lowest priority, but not abolished totally. Let’s say 2.’
iii.Effectiveness
Figure 6: Estimate of employees hired through each recruitment channel
According to estimates gotten from Nick, the company hires a higher portion of its graduates
(92 – 95%) from online recruitment systems as opposed to traditional recruitment that account
for about 5 – 8%. Recruitment for experienced hires is somewhat evenly split between online
recruitment and agency hire and other traditional recruitment methods. Executive hires
however are hired less often (0 – 10%) from online recruitment channels, than from agencies
and executive search agents.
According to Martha, graduates receive a higher priority because the company believes they
are ‘better users and more frequent on the Internet. We receive a higher traffic from graduate
applicants than any other job applicant category; it is therefore logical that we choose to adopt
a majority Internet based approach to their recruitment.’
Alice also asserts that the company ‘believes it is a better approach to their recruitment since a
majority of their application process – such as the online tests can be conducted online.
The company also set up a specific graduate website because of online job boards that directs
graduates to the online recruitment site. Previous research conducted by the organization also
illustrates that they believe graduates are more likely to look for companies to apply to through
online websites. A smaller portion of experienced hires is through online recruitment, but
better quality candidates are derived through agencies, thereby prompting the smaller priority.
Rating of 4 – 5 given to job boards in their effectiveness in attracting and generating traffic and
applications for the company’s recruitment website. High traffic job boards are expensive to
advertise in, but effective in directing traffic. They contain detailed information about job
positions open at recruiting companies.
According to Chloe, Job boards represent the following benefits:
- Effective in directing traffic to recruitment website
- Applicants are able to get some details about the vacancies on offer
- Much cheaper than newspaper adverts
- Most effective way in reaching a large number of graduates
Other forms of advertisement include
- Career websites of universities
- Host a number of open events and evenings at university locations and London head office
- Attend career fairs organized by external parties
iv.Effectiveness of advertisement methods
Vacancies on career sections in university websites help in attracting students from particular
targeted institutions.
Open events and evenings is to ‘give aspiring applicants much more information regarding the
organization, and information that could assist during their applications’
Open evenings at London office help in reaching out to aspiring applications who are graduates
but not in university anymore.
‘Career fairs are used to raise awareness and also discuss career prospects with prospective
students and graduates.’ – Chloe
v.Traditional recruitment for graduates
‘… All our graduates are recruited primarily through our graduate channels. We do not accept
agency referrals for graduate admissions because of the number of tests that would be
conducted.’ – Martha
vi.Effectiveness of traditional methods in meeting recruitment agenda
Figure 7: Effectiveness of Traditional Channels
According to information represented in Figure 7, traditional channels are most effective for
Temporary, Experienced and Executive Hires, and not so for graduates who received the lowest
rating. Temporary hires are mostly recruited through Agencies, while Google Inc. exercises all
channels in recruiting experienced hires. Executive hires however are recruited more through
executive channels than through agencies or word of mouth.
vii.Quantity or Quality Candidates
Alice: ‘From my personal point of view, I think we get a mix of both. We receive applications
from people who are not just qualified for the job, while we also receive applications from
qualified candidates. So yes, I believe it is a mix.’
Martha: ‘: I believe we receive more of quantity and a reasonable number of quality candidates.
If we did not receive quality, then our recruitment efforts would be futile.’ Respondent asserts
that it’s the advertisement and awareness programs are the main determinant of quality.
Nick: ‘Uhm, We receive more quantity than quality to be honest’. Number of applications from
quality candidates received is usually not enough to fill all available vacancies.
Chloe: Believes they receive more quantity than quality. ‘But that’s acceptable considering the
nature of online recruitment and how open it is’. The available recruitment steps however help
shortlist candidates up to a certain number.
viii.Efficiency
Overhead cost
Most recruitment procedures are now handled automatically, as opposed to traditional
procedures that entailed hiring a number of external interviewers and taking managers out of
their daily jobs. Success rate of applicants have now improved because only candidates who
have passed initial online screening are invited for interviews.
Data Accuracy
‘All applicants enter their information directly into the system; therefore it is much easier for us
to sort and process data effectively’ (Martha). No more problems recorded with interpreting
and coding application information, except those that are made specifically by each applicant.
Printing costs
No more costs associated with printing application forms, letters or correspondence to
applicants. Database handles all applicant correspondence.
Cost effectiveness
No more costs associated with printing, newspaper advertisements or extra overhead costs
associated with graduate recruitment. These costs have been replaced by costs associated with
online adverts, designing and maintaining websites and posting ads on job boards. These costs
are much lower than those of traditional recruitment.
ix.Other efficiencies
- Reduce costs and staff in recruitment activities
- Print less paper
- Communicated much faster to applicants seeking employment
x.Possible Disadvantages
Unsuitable candidates
Applicants from inexperienced candidates are received but manageable due to online screening
processes.
Ratio of applications received to jobs granted
Traditional Recruitment: 600 – 800 applications; 300 – 400 first round interviews; 60 – 80 jobs.
Online Recruitment: 3,200 – 4000 applications, 500 – 600 interviews, about 100 get the job.
Diversity and disability quotas
‘I believe we are lucky enough to achieve diversity goals most times, however whenever we do
not, we outsource our recruitment to agencies for help in seeking candidates from particular
backgrounds’ – Martha.
100% adoption
‘Well, like before the online recruitment era, we still receive a number of applications, but it’s
the level of fit that has reduced. Therefore if we adopt a 100% approach to online recruitment, I
believe we would be able to recruit a considerable percentage of candidates to meet our goals.’
– Martha
‘I think we may be shorthand when it comes to very skilled candidates who are being recruited
directly by other firms. In this case, agencies and direct hires are much more effective. In
general online recruitment does help satisfy a vast majority of our recruitment objectives.’ –
Chloe
(2) If it were not, then what forms of recruitment practices would be most suitable to each
category of applications? (30 PTS.)
(3) If it is, then how could current practices be improved in order to attract and recruit an
increased number of better-qualified candidates?’ (30 PTS.)
(4) If you were formulate a TITLE for this article/journal, what would be your TITLE? (10 PTS.)
References
Baloh, P., & Trkman, P. (2003). Influence of Internet and Information Technology on Work and
Human Resource Management . Informing Science, 497-506.
Barber, A.E. (1998), Recruiting Employees, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 345pp
Birgelen, M. J., Wetzels, M. G., and van Dolen, W. M. (2008) Effectiveness of corporate
employment web sites: How content and form influence intents to apply, International Journal
of Manpower, Vol. 29 (8), pp731 751
Boydell, M. (2002), Internet recruitment helps HR careers, Canadian HR Reporter, Vol. 11
No.20, pp.5.
Breaugh, J.A., Starke, M. (2000), Research on employee recruitment: so many studies, so many
remaining questions, Journal of Management, Vol. 26 (3), pp.405-34.
Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2007) Business Research Methods, 2nd Ed, Oxford University Press:
Oxford, 786pp
Capelli, P., & Crocker, H. (1996). Distinctive human resources are firms’ core competencies.
Organisational Dynamics , 7-22.
CIPD (2009) E-recruitment, www.cipd.co.uk, (accessed 12/12/10)
Cober, R., Brown, D. (2006), Direct Employers Association Recruiting Trends Survey, Booz Allen
Hamilton, Washington, DC
Collis, J. and Hussey, R. (2003) Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and
Postgraduate Students, 2nd Ed, Palgrave McMillan: NY, 374pp
Crispin, G., Mehler, M. (2006), Career X Roads 6th Annual 2006 Sources of Hire Study,
www.careerxroads.com, (accessed: 12/12/10)
Dash, J. (1999, October 18). Telecommuting Continues to Rise. Computerworld .
Drucker, P. (2001). The Essential Drucker. New York: Harper Business.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., and Lowe, A. (2008) Management Research: An Introduction,
2ndEd, Sage: London, 194pp
Elgin, P.D., Clapham, M.M. (2000), Attributes associated with electronic versus paper résumés,
paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational
Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
Ferratt, T. W., Agarwal, R., Moore, J. E., & Brown, C. V. (1999). Observations from “The Front”:
IT Executives on Practices to Recruit and Retain Information Technology Professionals. ACM ,
102-111.
Fister, S (1999), Online recruiting; good, fast and cheap?, Training, Vol. 36(5), pp.26-8.
Ford, J. R., Bryman, A., Beardsworth, A. D., Bresnen, M., Keil, E. T., and Jenkins, R. (1986)
Changing Patterns of Labour Recruitment, Personnel Review, Vol. 15 (4), pp14-18
Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P., & Taylor, C. (2006). The Race for Talent: Retaining and Engaging
Workers in the 21st Century. Human Resource Planning , 12-25.
Galanaki, E. (2002), The decision to recruit online: a descriptive study, Career Development
International, Vol. 7 (4), pp.243-51.
Gopal, C. (1195, June 19). Knowledge Information, Learning and IS Manager. Computerworld .
Guardian (2009) UK ad spend will fall further 16%., (accessed: 12/12/10), www.guardian.co.uk
Harris, H. (1993). Women in international management: opportunity or threat? Women in
Management Review , 9-14.
Harris, M.M., De War, K. (2001), “Understanding and using web-based recruiting and screening
tools: key criteria, current trends, and future directions”, workshop presented at the Annual
Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
Harris, M.M., Van Hoye, G., Lievens, F. (2003), “Privacy and attitudes towards internet-based
selection systems: a cross-cultural comparison”, International Journal of Selection and
Assessment, Vol. 11(2/3), pp.230-236.
Highhouse, S., Hoffman, J.R. (2001), Organisational attraction and job choice”, in Cooper, C.L.,
Robertson, I.T. (Eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 16
pp.37-64
Highhouse, S., Stanton, J.M., Reeve, C.L. (2004), Examining reactions to employer information
using a simulated web-based job fair, Journal of Career Assessment, Vol. 12 pp.85-96
Hiltrop, J.-M. (1999). The Quest for the Best:Human Resource Practices to Attract and Retain
Talent. European Management Journal , 422-430.
Horwitz, F. M., Heng, C., & Quazi, H. A. (2003). Finders, keepers? Attracting, motivating and
retaining knowledge workers. Human Resource Mangement Journal , 23-44.
Human Resources leader (2006) HR under pressure on recruitment,
www.humanresourcesmagazine.com.au, accessed: 12/12/10
Jerman Blazic, B. (1996). Internet. Novi Forum .
Johnston, P. &. (2000). eWork 2000. Status Report on New Ways to Work in the Information
Society. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from eWork 2000:
http://www.eto.org.uk/twork/tw00/pdf/tw2000.pdf
Jones, J.W., Brasher, E.E., Huff, J.W. (2002) Innovations in integrity-based personnel selection:
building a technology-friendly assessment”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment,
Vol. 10 No.1-2, pp.87-97.
Lindstrom, J. M. (1997). On the classification of telework. European Journal of Information
Systems , 243-255.
Maka, B., & Sockel, H. (1999). A confirmatory factor analysis of IS employee motivaton and
retention. Information & Management , 265-276.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Martinsons, M. (1994) Benchmarking human resource information systems in Canada and Hong
Kong, Information and Management, Vol. 26: 305 16
Nilles, J. (1998). Managing Telework: Strategies for managing the virtual workforce. John Wiley
& Sons. .
Oppenheim, A. N. (2000) Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement,
Continuum: London, 303pp
Othman, R. M., and Musa, N. (2006) E- Recruitment Practice: Pros VS. Cons, Public Sector ICT
Management Review, Vol. 1 (1) pp35 – 65
Parry, E. (2009) Factors influencing the adoption of online recruitment, Personnel Review, Vol.
38 (6) 19p
Parry, E., and Tyson, S. (2008) An analysis of the use and success of online recruitment methods
in the UK, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 18 (3), pp257-274
Parry, E., Tyson, S., Selbie, D., and Leighton, R. (2007) HR and Technology: Impact and
Advantages,CIPD Research Paper, www.cipd.co.uk
Parry, E. and Wilson, H. (2009) Factors influencing the adoption of online recruitment,
Personnel Review, Vol. 38 (6), pp655-673
Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Riley, J. (2007) Virtual worlds are 2008′s ‘breakthrough technology’. Computer Weekly,
00104787, (accessed: 12/12/10)
Robson, C. (2002) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-
researchers, 2nd Ed, Wiley-Blackwell: NY, 599pp
Rozelle, A.L., Landis, R.S. (2002), “An examination of the relationship between use of the
internet as a recruitment source and student attitudes”, Computer in Human Behavior, Vol. 18
pp.593-604
Rynes, S.L. (1991), Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: a call for new research
directions, Sage: New York
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2007) Research methods for business students,
Pearson Education: NJ, 624pp
Searle, R. H. (2004) New technology: the potential impact of surveillance techniques in
recruitment practices, Personnel Review, Vol. 35 (3), pp336-351
Singh, P., and Finn, D. (2003) The Effects of Information Technology on Recruitment, Journal of
Labor Research, Vol. 14 (3)
Snell, A. (2002), Global 500 Internet Recruiting: 2002 Survey, iLogos Research/Recruitsoft.com,
San Francisco, CA,
Spencer, D. G. (1986). Employee Voice and Employee Retention. Academy of Management
Journal , 488-502.
Steers, R. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative
Science Quarterly , 163-189.
Tampoe, M. (1993). Motivating Knowledge Workers – The Challenge for the 1990s. Long Range
Planning , 49-55.
Times Online (2005) Online is best for passing the test, www.business.timesonline.co.uk,
(accessed: 12/12/10)
Ulrich, D. (1997). Human Resource Champions. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Van Rooy, D.L., Alonso, A., Fairchild, Z. (2003), In with the new, out with the old: has the
internet revolution eliminated the traditional job search process?, International Journal of
Selection and Assessment, Vol. 11 (2/3), pp.170-4.
Warhurst, C. &. (1998). Hands, Hearts and Minds: Changing Work and Workers at the End of the
Century. Workplaces for the Future , 1-24.
Williamson, I.O., Lepak, D.P., King, J. (2003), The effect of company recruitment web site
orientation on individuals’ perceptions of organizational attractiveness, Journal of Vocational
Behavior, Vol. 63 pp.242-63
Williams, N. (2008) Online recruitment is best money saver, Personnel Today, 09595848,
03/04/2008
Wilson, F. (2008) Meeting the challenges of global resourcing, Strategic HR Review, Vol. 7 (2),
pp5-10
Winer, D. (2005). The History of Weblogs. Retrieved December 10, 2010, from
http://oldweblogscomblog.scripting.com/historyofweblogs.
Wright, D. K., & Hinson, M. (2006). Weblogs and Employee Communciation: Ethical Questions
for Corporate Public Relations. 9th Annual International Public Relations Research Conference.
Miami.
Younger, J. (2007) Online Job Recruitment – Trends, Benefits, Outcomes and Implications,
25/09/2007, Ezinearticles.com (accessed 12/12/10)
Zusman, R.R., Landis, R. (2002), “Applicant preferences for web-based versus traditional job
postings”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 18 (3), pp.285-96.
7. Appendix
a. Google Inc. Graduate Recruitment Steps
Google Inc.’s online graduate recruitment system involves four main steps. First the applicants
fill an application form online, which contains their basic details, CV and cover letter. Then the
applicant is invited for one telephonic interview of 40 minutes, which measures the candidate’s
communication skills. If the interviewer is not satisfied then the candidate might be called for
another round of telephonic interview of the same duration. After clearing the initial round of
telephonic interviews, the candidate is called for 4 rounds of interviews on a single day. Each of
these interviews lasts for a minimum of 45 minutes. Lots of situation based questions which
tests candidates problem solving skills are asked in these interviews. Candidates need to solve
these questions in real time. The main focus is given on the process followed by the candidate
to arrive at the solution. If the candidate successfully clears all the rounds of interviews then he
would be offered a job in couple of weeks’ time.
b. Traditional recruitment methods
Though technology may constitute an increasing proportion of recruitment method in recent
years, it was never the predominant method in which employees were usually hired. Previous
methods of attracting and selecting job candidates were through ‘traditional methods’, such as
paper based brochures, adverts in trade journals or other print media, and recruitment fairs
and talks, all of which were designed to create a positive brand for the firm (Highhouse et al,
1999; Galanaki, 2002).
These approaches were aimed at specific groups, therefore companies seeking graduates could
advertise in media that specifically target this demographic, while those seeking executive level
positions would advertise in national media which have a broader distribution and are normally
read by the social class sought (Searie, 2004). Less direct approaches are also common such as
media publicity, family open days and work previews (Zusman and Landis, 2002).
Traditional recruitment methods were the predominant (and sometimes only) way in which
large, medium or small scale organizations could communicate their job vacancies to
prospective employees (Van Rooy et al, 2003). However nowadays, traditional recruitment
methods are usually predominant in smaller companies, and also companies seeking to fill
executive level positions (Harris et al, 2003).