COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ANNEX I TO GUIDELINE 1 EXTERNAL INSPECTION ENGINEER (412.2003) General Requirements 1. The extemal inspection enginter shall be a qulified engineer of an inspection engineering ‘group which is registered with CQHP for inspection works in the project. 2. ‘Theminimum number of engincers inthe group should be 3, 3. The minimum qualification of the leader of the group shall be in accordance with the ‘minimum qualification requirements shown in Guideline 1(B). 4. The minimum qualification forthe members inthe group shall be a follows: Category A: BE (Civil) with minimum 6 years of related experience Category B: BE (Civil) with minimum 4 Years of related experience (Category C: BE (Civil) with minimum 3. years of related experience Duties and Respons 1. The extemal inspection engineer must check before concreting all the rebar, formwork ete. as mentioned in the checklist of Guideline TI to se whether the works done are according to the structural drawings. He/She must fil the forms of check lists and sign on it 2. ‘The external inspection engineer must be atthe site during concreting end check the works of quality contol. He / She has to advise the siteengineers onthe measures that should be taken to meet the requirements of CQHP Guidelines TV and V. 3, The inspection engineering group has to submit the results of inspection and monthly reports toCQHP.COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ANNEX (1) TO GUIDELINE IIT NUMBER OF BORE HOLES AND DEPTH OF BORING (20-11-2003 ) . A, Number of Bore Holes For average soil and terain conditions, 1. Up to 10,000 f%, minimum no. of bore holes shall be one bore hole / 2800 A of [wojected building’ area but aot less than 2 holes 2 Ifthe projected area is more than 10,000 (2) for the ist 10,000 17, follow Rale (©) for addtional "ares, no, of additonal bore holes shall be one bore hol!5,000 of projected. building area. For ivegular soil and terain conditions, no. of addtional bore oles will be cided trough consultation between siactural engineer and geotechnical consultant 1B Depth of Boring 1. For shallow foundations, [At least 15 times lesser dimension, but not less than 30‘. IF the depth given by te above guideline is more than the capability ofthe boring machine or for special conditions, Consult the structural engineer 2. For deep foundations, Use the following equation to determine the minimum depth of boring Z= 15 S°7 (Rh, where S istheno. of storeys including basement However, boring shall not be terminated until minimum SPT value forthe last three consecutive levels is 40.COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING ‘CONSTRUCTION. PROJECTS. ANNEX (I) TO GUIDELINE TH FORMAT FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (20.11.2003) Section 1: Site location plan Section 2: Boring program Cncloding bore hoe location plan, equipment used, sampling, storage and ‘eansporation methods, standards used, environmental conditions ) Section 3 : Description of tboratry tests (Casper Guideline I) Section 4 = Evaluation of est results in consultation with the stetral enginecr (including all the detailed calculations mentioned the Guideline and investigation of Tiguefction potential) Section $- : Recommendations “Appendices : Field data, Test results, Other data, Diagrams, Sources of erature, etCOMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ANNEX II TO GUIDELINE ‘Geotechnical report shall include lquefsction analysis by using any acceptable methods, one ‘of Which is stated below. ONE METHOD OF LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS 4.122003), “The Method of Analysis is a follows ‘Step 1: The fist step isto determine the Seismic Shear Stress Ratio (SSR).SSR indved by the earthquake a any point inthe ground is estimated by SSR = 0.65ts (aun) ( 6 ) e in which ux ~Peak acocleration measured or estimated a the ground surface of the sim 3), 8 =aczeeration of gravity (2.81 m/s?) Ove = total vertical stress at a particular depth, where the liquefaction anlysisis being performed yy = vertical effective stress at that same depth where 6 yp was calculated = (GutFe) ty ~surated unit weight ofthe soil fy “rit weight of water a= depth tion fete Srey) % = depth in meters below the ground surfice where the liquefaction analysis is performed (the same depth used to calculate Gy and 6 w Step 2: The seconi step is to determine the Seismic Shear Stress ( SSR’) that will cause liquefaction ofthe in situ sol. Fig 1 can be used to determine SSR’. In order to use the fig. SPT (Ni)g9 must bernown. SPT (Ni) isthe corrected SPT Nay for th effect of ‘overburden pressure (Nidoo = Cw Noo = [100 ]°* Noo Ove Ne “1.61 Eq Cy Cy 'NWhere, Ney =SPT N value corrected forthe field testing procedure Eq heme ficiency : ‘ Stwrasateyianne: ( Free Pall — frabo/ Te) retest ions T Rupe « Pally cromead ) borehole diameter conection . ‘for 65t0 11S tam 0 boreholes 15 for 150 mm 0. boreholes 15 fr 200 min ‘O.bovholes C, rod length correction 0.75 for up to 4 m of drill ods 0.85 for 4 to 6 m of drill ods 0.95 for 610 10 mf drill rods 1.00 for > 10 maf dil rods NN =measured SPT N valve a= N value corrected for bot field testing procedure and overburden pressure Cu = comection factor to account for overburden pressure - 100 Sve chore “el, 2 effective overburden prenure tn (Pa) Fig. 2 presents 2 chart for sand (5% or less fines ) and different magnitude earthquake ‘Step 3 : The final step in the liquefaction analysis is to compute the Seismic Shear Stress Ratio ‘Values. If the SSR values is greater than the SSR’ values obtained from Fig.l or Fig 2 then liquefaction could occur during the earthquake, and vice veraSEISMIC SHEAR STRESS RATIO Percent Fines = 35 15 <5 oo 20 3040 60 CORRECTED SPT BLOW COUNT (Nilgp £ 8 2 SEISMIC SHEAR STRESS RATIO CORRECTED SPT BLOWCOUNT (Nj)gg peeCOMMITTER FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROIECTS, ANNEX (2) TO GUIDELINE VI KEY POINTS WHICH WILL BE CHECKED BY CQHP AND WHICH MUST BE, ‘MENTIONED, CONSIDERED AND ANSWERED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Project Tite Project Reference No: Date Part A- OVERALL DESIGN REVIEW TASKS (Mention Codes OF Practice (1) Mention Specifications of Materials Used design strength of cones, tel oe Soil Investigation Report (UD) Mention Design Loadings “loadings used inthe design load combinations used inthe design (AY) Mention Structural design concept + structural system use (¥)- Mention Structural Analysis ~ engineering information and models used in the analysis design assumptions an limitations ofthe computer programs used (VD. Mention Stability & Robustness sail and robustness of the structural system, including considerations for lateral loads, lateral es, bracngs and lateral wansfer of lands (VID) Mention All Key Structural Elements design ofall key structural elements and the foundation systemvn, cs) Part (ote * = COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING ‘CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Structural Drawings “Mention the detatings in drawings of al key structural elements “Consider ductile detailing Mention Other Aspects in Design other aspects of design which are peculiar to the building t0 be constructed or affected by the builng works and which are essential to the structural integrity ofthe bung FOUNDATION & STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ele the item that snot applicable) () Foundation Founds f Specific Design Tasks Carried Out * Foundation ‘+ Menton values of en, ive vind and notional lads use + Describe how elma loads ae computed + Consider the effect of wind and earthquake notional loads om the bung strate |COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING ‘CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, “+ Meation whether ples have been designed for akin fiction and end bearing ‘apace ‘+ Menton wheter pies ave been designe for ltr loud and bending moment ‘show how plein have been designed for Pits fe ‘+ Menton wheter piles have ben designed for uit "Menton wheter sckatings hae bea designed fr pls with shor peneraon depts |+ Menton whether ies ave teen designed for agave skin ftom + Menton allowable bearing apaiy of sil assumed in design + Mention modulus of b-grade rection ofthe sol assumed indesign a 4+ Describe the mode used for stuctual analysis of healt ‘+ Menton wheter the raft as been designed to resist punching shear fom columns ‘+ Menton wheter he balding or structure has ben designed to cate for probable diferent and wal setlement (0 Specie Structural Elemes (ope the stvey levels relrence gris) Structural Elements* | —peiicDesiga asks eariedo ‘+ Mention whether effective height tas ‘een compete scsording toe ‘+ Mestion wheter being moment soot minor ans has been designed for Stender Colamns || ‘Mention whether adtonal Bening ‘moment dasa lenders bas been signed for « “+ Menton whee bial Bending nomen hasbeen designed for‘COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE. BUILDING (CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, ‘Columns supporting [+ Ar they designed for bending franfer beams momen duet frame seen? ‘Columns supporting [+ At they desgnd for bending tong span beams ‘moment duets fame sean? > Are they designed for bending ‘Columns spperting |" ment deta fae scion” Aree designed for horizontal load ‘tnd moment ating on columns du to che ore roof? ‘Columns ina wo Cote nae ay [Are thy designed fr bending moment atthe clan be? ‘Are they designed for bending | ‘nomen ue fame acon” | + ts the cntever supports been esr tres bedig moment td shex? -Caniteverbeams [+ Arethy designe rata stbiy ‘cant + Arte designed to mer allowable span depth rato? + Ith sional igi of Beam as teen check? Arete desigoed for aera esi ‘tteam? Are they designed for support ant {Long span beams Goan 350) + Are they designed to met allowable syn det ai + Are they designed for tool copay Are they designed for sear capacity? ‘Teaneer beams 1 are they designed fr all eleva ppe oor oad on he ean? /+ Ave they designed for lateral restraint oftean(COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Fat slabaplates ‘+ Deserte the mal ued for aaa 7 a apanitepth aso lab has boon checked? + Ts adequacy of op and boom reinforcement throughout sb panel], Ivebeen check + Are they designed to resist punching ‘Sear fom cohunas? 7_Are openings in alab, epi near ‘columna have been designed or? + tothe wesonl igi at sab edges as ben checked? + Are effeas of onstruction loads have een check Cantteveed structures With teach + Is tesback anchorage fo esis pull-out designee? Are they designed for eral stbiliy ‘the ste? Are they designed forte duaiey tthe tebacke? ‘© Are they designed for edundancy to reset caliaps? (Ai Earth Retsining Structures arth retaining sewetare, ‘Has thestrctre bon designed reset ovetming, sliding and bearing capaci alr? “+ Has hestrutre bon designe resis sip ile lr? “Has thestretre bean designed fr witer pes ating om i? ‘+ Has adequate suchage load ben taken int account in design? ‘+ Has embedment int ground for stably been designed forin ‘antlveredstuctre?(COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING Constaverion PRosPcTS (9) Bung strstr Type ating pe Spee Design Tas Care Out + bidsiped tevin? itp rei dd oer ot ‘+ Are corewalls and columns designed to resist Iateral loads due to wind and Ciuc denen bien [> Rant cari st oer one et Antone oene — - + iio sig way da es)? ign nit veal er ect ding? + tte nt ety i fing? '* Are the columns and walls have been checked for resistance to dynamic | ‘iese ae wniad eng edn ug? = a a AIT TT See a Athy dg rcs nl opal es rove aby? pauanpsenn [77 etl doped rd indus etapa ore "Sangeet “ Semen preted rw silyl enol ity ofc Soest sre? 7 ase comin med n dni bern ced plan ele poneCOMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING Section Section Section CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ANNEX (I) TO GUIDELINE. VI FORMAT FOR DESIGN CALCULATIONS REPORT (20.11.2003) PART (A) FOUNDATION * Design Parameters and Assumptions + Loadings and load Combinations = Strvtural Systems All plans and section in both directions (including assumed member sizes forthe final un) Input Data = Output (Important or significant results only) Detailing of Foundation Reinforcement Discussion (Discussions on relevant CQHP key points plus any other discussions) Note: All the detail involved inthe analysis nd design processes mst be submited in CD.COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING ‘CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, ANNEX (U) TO GUIDELINE VI FORMAT FOR DESIGN CALCULATIONS* REPORT (20.11.2003) PART (B) SUPERSTRUCTURE Section 1 : Design Parameters and Assumptions ‘Loadings and load Combinations Structural Systems ‘All plans and sections in both directions (including assumed member sizes forthe final run) Section 4 + Input Data Section $1 Output (important or significant results only) Member Type Grouping Tables Detling of Reiafancment Discussion (Discussions on elevant CQHP key pint plus anyother discussions) "Note: All he deals involved inthe analysis and design processes must be submited in CD,COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF HIGH-RISE. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ANNEX TO GUIDELINE vi COLLABORATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE PLANNING STAGE (102.2008 ) 1. Itis very important shat there must be good collaboration and integration among Structural Engineers, ESM Engineers, Architects, Clients and Fire Departments for ensuring efficient utility networks and facilitating the process ofthe projects in the planing sage. 2. The Architect must preseat and explain the following Architectural Key Points to the con. 2.1 Conceptual planning and site layout 2.2 Functional and spatial requirements 23 Ventilation & lighting considerations (Natural & artificial lighting, emergency lighting ek) 24 Building services for ESM networks, waste disposal system, space allocation for ‘treatment plant, water supply & sanitation ete. 25 Car parking space 26 Fire detection & fire alarm systems, emergency communication systems (eg: stirs, corridors, emergency sats ete.) 2.7 Security systems (eg: security doot lock system, ete) 28 Choice of building materials & fenestrations ( eg: curtain walls, windows, roofing, Interiors, et) 29 Choice of structural system and form consiering earthquake effetsANNEX (I) TO GUIDELINE (VII, ‘Top bars ae not tobe spiceed: * Within joins, * Within a distance of twice the member depth from the face ofthe joint, * Atlocations where analysis indicates flexural yielding caused by inelastic lateral displacements of the frame, Splice Location for Top Bars Bottom bars are not tobe spliced: * Within joins. * Within a distance of twice the member dept from the face of the joint, ® At locations where analysis indicates flexural yielding caused by inelastic lateral displacements of ne fame, Atte beams that supporting the secondary beams, if possible. * Atmid span, Splice Location for Bottom Bars