Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Annual Reviews is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annual Review of
Anthropology.
http://www.jstor.org
KEYWORDS:performance, movement,identity,folklore
embodiment,
ABSTRACT
Since the mid- 980s, therehas been an explosion of dance studies as scholars
from a variety of disciplines have turned their attention to dance. Anthro-
pologists have played a criticalrole in this new dance scholarship,contribut-
ing comparative analyses, critiquing colonial and ethnocentric categories,
and situating studies of dance and movement within broaderframeworksof
embodimentand the politics of culture.This review highlights ethnographic
and historical studies that foregrounddance and other structuredmovement
systems in the making of colonial cultures;the constitutionof gender, ethnic
and national identities; the formationof discourses of exoticization; and the
production of social bodies. Several works that employ innovative ap-
proaches to the study of dance and movement are explored in detail.
INTRODUCTION
It has been 20 years since Adrienne Kaeppler's review of anthropology and
dance in this series (Kaeppler 1978). At that time, given the marginal status of
dance, Kaeppler wondered about the propriety of devoting an Annual Review
article to such an "esoteric aspect" of anthropology. But in the intervening dec-
ades, the anthropology of dance has gained greater legitimacy as a field of in-
quiry, even as it is being reconfigured within the broader framework of an an-
thropology of human movement (Famell 1995b, Kaeppler 1985). As Lewis
(1995) has argued, this shift to "movement," motivated by a critique of
"dance" as a universally applicable category of analysis, parallels develop-
503
0084-6570/98/1015-0503$08.00
Colonialism
Dance studies have much to contributeto recent scholarlydebatesand discus-
sions in colonialism and culture(Cooper & Stoler 1997, Dirks 1992), demon-
stratingthe importanceof dance in the "civilizing process," the control and
regulationof "disorderly"practices,and the profoundrefigurationsof both lo-
cal and Europeanculture.
The suppression,prohibitionandregulationof indigenousdancesunderco-
lonial rule is an index of the significance of dance as a site of considerablepo-
litical and moralanxiety. Colonial administrationsoften perceived indigenous
dance practices as both a political and moral threatto colonial regimes. Local
dances were often viewed as excessively erotic, and colonial agents and mis-
sionariesencouragedand sometimes enforcedthe ban or reformof dance prac-
tices (Comaroff 1985, Kaspin 1993). However, dance was also a site of desire,
and colonial accountsrecordthatmale colonists were often captivatedby "na-
tive dancers,"sometimes even joining them in dances. Thus, in many colonial
arenas,dance tended to generatemultiple and contradictorypolicies and atti-
tudes.
In some colonized areas,dance practicesposed a genuine threatof political
resistanceor rebellion,particularlyin societies where dance was a site of male
collective performance,in which a sense of unity and power was heightened,
potentially spawning uprisings against colonial rulers or slave masters. In
Hazzard-Gordon'sanalysis of dance on slave plantationsin North America, it
is evident thatwhile attitudestowardandregulationof plantationdance varied
widely across time and region, dance was very often perceived as a significant
threat(Hazzard-Gordon1990:3-62). In some states, legislation banningdance
and drummingwas enacted as dances came to be seen as likely sites for plot-
ting insurrections, or even the occasions for the insurrections themselves
(Hazzard-Gordon1990:32-34).
Poole's analysis of the choreographyandhistoryof Andeanritualdance fo-
cuses on the complex ways in which convergences between SpanishCatholic
and Andean conceptions of dance as "devotion"allowed the dance to be sus-
tainedover centuries,in partbecause of the uncomprehendingcultural"blind-
ness" of the Spanishto "non-religious"political meanings of the dance (Poole
1990). Employing vivid descriptions, diagrams,and photographsof Andean
the present.She keeps the focus of herresearchon the perspectivesof the deva-
dasis, insofar as these are made visible in documents such as ritual texts and
protestletters,and in the "visible body" of the dancer.Meduritracesthe trans-
figurationof the devadasi from her precolonialpracticeas a temple ritualper-
formerto her naming, in the 19th century,as temple "prostitute"or "dancing
girl" and finally, in the 20th century,to emblem of the nation.
Allen's (1997) work focuses on the complex processes involved in the re-
contextualizationof the devadasi dance duringthe late colonial period. Allen
discusses the multiple influences on the developmentof bharatanatyamin the
1930s and 1940s, and his work illustratesthe complex process by which a rit-
ual dance form was extractedfrom its original context and then domesticated,
reformed, and resanctified for middle-class consumption. Illluminating the
many transformationsthataremaskedby the term"revival,"Allen shows how
this celebratory and seemingly innocent term obscures several processes,
which he succinctly glosses as re-population(one communityappropriatinga
practice from another), re-construction(altering elements of repertoireand
choreography),re-naming(from nautch and other terms to bharata natyam),
re-situation(from temple and courtto the stage), and re-storation(the splicing
togetherof performancesto invent a seemingly ancientpractice)(Allen 1997:
63-64).
The dynamic exchanges that occurredbetween colony and metropole are
the heartof Erdman's(1987) study of the IndianorientaldancerUday Shankar
(Erdman1987) and her critical analysis of the ways in which nationalismhas
affected the constructionof the history of Indian dance (Erdman1996). Erd-
man shows that the importantplace of"oriental dance"-the dances first de-
veloped in Europeand based on orientalthemes-in histories of Indiandance
has long been overlooked for political reasons. After Independence,only two
genres of Indiandanceswere recognizedby nationalists:the "classical"dances
based on regional styles, and the numerous "folk" dances derived from re-
gional and local contexts (Erdman 1996:296). Because histories of Indian
dance were constructedas nationalisthistories-thus erasingthe influences of
Europeansand Americans, such as Anna Pavlova and Ruth St. Denis (Coor-
lawala 1992), as well as European-influenced Indian dancers like
Shankar-Erdman argues that a "new history of Indian dance"is required,a
critical history that questions long-held tenets about the alleged authenticity
and antiquityof classical dance.
Erdman'scritique of Indian dance histories has many implications for the
developmentof a critical dance scholarship,and in calling for new, politically
awarehistoriesof dance, Erdmanis keenly awareof the difficulties of the task,
and leaves open-endedthe forms that such histories might take. In the Indian
case, she argues, they certainlyshould include the many contemporarydevel-
opmentsin the art,the new choreographiesof inventive Indiandancersthatare
popularculture in the New World (Szwed & Marks 1988:29). Some of these
hybriddances, such as the cakewalk, became phenomenallypopularin North
America in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, even becoming an interna-
tional dance craze (Malone 1996). Rangerdocumentshow the Beni-ngoma or
"drumband"complex of East Africa, a caricatureof the Europeanmilitarypa-
rade, became incorporatedinto social practices that predated colonialism
(Ranger 1975). The matachines dance, performedwidely in Native American
and Hispanic communities throughoutthe Americas, derives from medieval
European folk dramas and was brought to the New World by the Spanish
(Rodriguez 1996:2; see also Poole 1990:114). Most scholars, according to
Rodriguez, agree it was brought for the purpose of "Christianizingthe Indi-
ans," and as it is performedtoday it "symbolically telescopes" centuries of
Iberian-Americanethnic relations as interpretedwithin individual communi-
ties (Rodriguez 1996:2).
In some colonized societies, imitations of European dances became a
means of upwardmobility, much as the speaking of Europeanlanguages and
the wearing of Europeandress could become markersof prestige and status.
Ness, for example, shows how a Phillipine dance, the troupe sinulog, devel-
oped in the late 19thcenturyby incorporatingfeaturesfromHispanicperform-
ance forms such as the war dance/drama,comedia, and the dances of Spanish
Catholicboy choristers(Ness 1992). Ness arguesthatthis process was partof a
wider movement towardsEuropeanizationamong Cebu elites in the 19th cen-
tury, in which elements of European,especially Spanish,culturewere consid-
ered marksof cosmopolitanism.
us, the imperial, bourgeois classes of Europe constituted the exotic as both
desirable and repulsive, fascinating and scandalous. Unlike other exotic
dances (such as the African American cake-walk and the Brazilian maxixe),
the tango did not have a clear-cutclass or race identity, and its erotic character
was displayed as a process of controlled seduction, not instinctive or wild
sexuality. Tango, in short, was highly malleable, an "exotic dance that could
easily be stretched in various directions"(Savigliano 1995:114). In order to
make the exotic palatableas a Europeanpractice,however, elements of its raw
and passionate "primitiveness"had to be reshapedto suit cosmopolitan aes-
thetic sensibilities. Dance mastersin early 20th centuryParisplayed a key role
in standardizingthe dance, simplifying its improvisationalcharacteristicsinto
a morallyacceptableset of steps, while tango manualsand congresses contrib-
uted to its domestication, "a choreographictransformationsuited to French
mannersand good taste" (Savigliano 1995:122).
Of considerable import for anthropologistsis Savigliano's discussion of
"auto-exoticization,"the process by which the colonized come to represent
themselves to themselves throughthe lenses of the colonizers. Globally, dance
has come to play this role in many postcolonial nations, and Savigliano's de-
scriptionof how tango played back home afterits incorporationinto the exotic
dance repertoireof Europeis relevantfor analyzingmore generallythe role of
the arts in constitutingnational identities. Although tango originated among
the low working-class sectors of Argentina's Rio de la Plata region in the
1880s, it was only after it achieved fame in the world's culturalcapitals in the
20th centurythatit became popularthroughoutArgentina.Moreover,this rein-
troductionof tango also broughtwith it new ideas about the social and moral
meanings of dancing-ideas that were culturallydependenton the colonizers
(Savigliano 1995:137). Savigliano's analysis maintains the tension between
two key effects of exoticization:one thatis empowering,grantinglocal recog-
nition to certainsocial groupsandtheirpractices,the otherco-opting andbind-
ing, reifying a "tasteful"exotic that served to maintain the (neo)colonized
population's dependent status. As Savigliano points out, the (neo)colonizers
maintainthe upperhandin this process, the threatof withdrawalof recognition
always being in their power.
The role of media and mediating images in the representationand presen-
tation of bodily practicesis exploredby Zarrilliin his study of the Indianmar-
tial art form kalarippayattu (Zarrilli 1998). Zarrilli, who situates kalarip-
payattu within the contemporarytransnationalzone of late 20th century"pub-
lic culture" (Appadurai& Breckenridge 1988), examines how "an increas-
ingly diverse group of cultureproducersand their audiences"are using mass
media to shape martialpractices (Zarrilli 1998: 4). Zarrilli's interestis in "the
dynamic and shifting relationshipbetween body, bodily practice[s], knowl-
edge, power, agency and the practitioner's'self or identity, as well as the dis-
courses and images of the body and practice createdto representthis shifting
relationship"(Zarrilli1998: 4). He outlines a model for the study of these vari-
ous domains as a complex of four interactivearenas:(a) the "literal"arenasof
practice, such as the trainingground, competitions, and the public stage; (b)
the social arenasof the school, lineage, and formal associations;(c) the arena
of"culturalproduction"thatgenerateslive or mediatedpresentationsor repre-
sentations such as films; and (d) the arena of experience and self-
formation-the individual'sexperienceof embodiedpracticein the shapingof
a self (Zarrilli 1998:9).
The impact of media images on popular reception and practices of dance
is explored in Franken'shistorical account of the changing image of female
dancers in Egyptian film and television (Franken 1996). Frankenargues that
the emergence of a "respectable"female dance form in Egypt and other parts
of the Arab world can largely be attributedto the enormouspopularityof the
cinematic dance performances of a single dancer, Farida Fahmy. While
Fahmydancedin a style thatwas recognizablyEgyptian,her modest costumes
and the de-eroticized context of her dancing projected an image of a "sweet
Egyptiangirl who was a truedaughterof the country-the antithesisof the im-
age of the belly-dancer who appeared in cabarets and films" (Franken
1996:279). Though Fahmy's films were made in the 1960s, they are still
shown on television throughoutthe Middle East, and thus continueto popular-
ize ideas about dancing and respectability far beyond Egypt (Franken 1996:
282).
ments for women. In urbanSenegal, women's dances range from bawdy and
explicitly sexual to highly restrainedmovements (Heath 1994). While tradi-
tional dancingis consideredto be "women's business,"dancingis also consid-
ered risky for a woman's reputation,particularlyaftermarriage.Yet theirper-
formancesare requiredfor public ceremonies, and men's reputationseven de-
pend on them. However, upper-classmen often try to controlthe dancers-in-
sisting on restraint,ratherthansexual expressivity.Women,however, often re-
sist, testing the limits of appropriatenessby sneaking in risque movements,
thus attemptingto defy total control by males (1994:93).
A numberof studies illustratethe contradictionsand ambiguities of dance
for women in Islamic societies (al Faruqi 1978). In the "Iranianculture
sphere,"which includes diaspora communities, Shay (1995) argues that the
bazi-ha-ye nameyeshi, a women's theatricaldance-play performed only for
women, is simultaneouslya site of bawdy, erotic expression and also a social
critiquethatreinscribesa patriarchalsystem in which women are defined pri-
marilythroughtheirhusbands.Deaver's study of SaudiArabianbelly dancing
(a termused by her informants)echoes this interpretation,as women dance for
each otherin a competitiveway, displayingtheirwealth, social status,and sex-
ual desirability (Deaver 1978). Outside the safety of the feminine private
sphere are professional female dancers. Van Nieuwkerk's historical and eth-
nographic account of professional female belly dancers and singers in Cairo
explores the way in which these performersnegotiatetheiridentitieswithin re-
ligious and classed discourses of honor and shame, while also showing how
Orientaliststereotypesof the dancersstill persist in contemporaryEgypt (van
Nieuwkerk 1995). A key contributionof Buonaventura'slavishly illustrated
book on baladi (belly dance) is her documentationof Orientalistrepresenta-
tions of dancers in 19th and early 20th century paintings, photographs,and
other media (Buonaventura1990).
Kapchan'sanalysis of the many "bodies"ofshikhat, Moroccanfemale per-
formerswho representthe quintessentialtransgressivefemale in Moroccanso-
ciety, highlights the complexity of dancers' identities and both the costs of
marginalityand its freedoms (Kapchan 1994). As exemplarsof the quality of
matluqat-free, unlimited and unrestricted-shikhat are admiredas "lively,
animated,spirited,"embodying featuresof "exhilarationand flowing move-
ment"(1994: 94). At the same time, the "loose language"of the shikha, both
corporealand linguistic, is seen as inseparablefrom her shamefulmoral char-
acter (1994: 86). Describing the multiple "bodies" of the dancers, Kapchan
evokes the complex meanings of these performers.The "competentbody" of
the dancer denotes her as an artist of the physical, exemplifying her sexual
prowess, while the "nonsense body" is an expression of subversion and the
camivalesque(1994: 93-95). However, these more pleasurablebodies come at
the cost of the "exiled body" (1994: 96). Shikhatmay be independentand fun-
loving, but the majorityhave been rejectedby their families and thus uprooted
from place, a state which Kapchandescribes as "...the greatesthardshippossi-
ble" in Moroccan society (1994: 97). Critiquing"resistance"as a limited con-
struct for understandingthe role of the shikhat, Kapchannotes how, despite
their independence,shikhatalso internalize"...the dominantvalue system that
degradestheir materialand spiritualworth"(1994: 96).
Dance and Feminist Theory. Gaze and Reception
As dance historianAnn Daly has indicated,the common interests of feminist
scholarshipand dance studies would suggest a naturalalliance (Daly 1991a),
althoughas yet, few anthropologicalstudies of dance have drawnexplicitly on
feminist theories. Daly's study of Isadora Duncan and American culture
(1995) provides an importantmodel for interpretingthe culturalsignificance
of theatricaldance and the importanceof audiences. Daly presents a complex
and fluid model for understandingthe ways in which dancersmirror,contest,
and transform gender, ethnic, and class identities. One of Daly's primary
points is her definition of the body as a complex, contradictory,and ever
changingculturalsite of"discursive intercourse"which is constructeddialogi-
cally by the dancer and her audiences (1995:17). Daly's extensive research
into primary sources of Duncan's audience of mostly upper-class white
women (dance reviews, articles, and memoirs) provides the basis for her
analysis. In foregroundingthe importanceof reception as co-creation,Daly's
analysis is highly suggestive for anthropologistswho, with few exceptions
(Hanna 1983), have tendedto focus primarilyon performersor the contexts of
performance.
While the "male gaze" (Kaplan 1983, Mulvey 1975) and the genderedre-
ception and readingof dances has been the subjectof considerablecriticaldis-
cussion by dance historians and sociologists (Coorlawala 1996, Daly 1992,
Manning 1997, O'Shea 1997, Thomas 1996), there has been little ethno-
graphicresearchon dance receptionand spectatorship.Miller's study of same-
sex female sexual dancing in the Trinidadiancarnivalunderscoresthe critical
importanceof exploring gender in the interpretationof dance (Miller 1991),
although one wishes he had furtherexplored this dimension of analysis. In
Trinidad,lower-class women's dance groupsperformin a sexually expressive
way, often parodyingmen. Indeed, in the Carnivalof the late 1980s, same-sex
female dancing had become so conspicuous that the Trinidadianmen Miller
interviewed deemed it an expression of "lesbianism gone rife" (1991:333).
This interpretationwas considered incomprehensibleby Miller's female con-
sultants,who, accordingto Miller, did not carewith whom they danced. Situat-
ing his interpretationwithin the wider contexts of cross-gender relations
among the lower classes, Miller argues that this form of sexual dancing,
Most of the works of Cynthia Jean Cohen Bull were published underthe name of Cynthia
Novack. In the last monthsof her life, Cynthiarequestedthather name be changed.
explores how the Kaluli concept for style and aesthetics, "lift-up-over-
sounding," reverberates in sound, text, face painting, costume, and dance
movements (Feld 1988, 1990a). Kersenboomhighlights how dance is integral
to an understandingof the Tamil language (muttamil,literally "threeTamil")
which, by definition, includes dance, music, and text (Kersenboom 1995).
Otherstudies examine aesthetic and stylistic relationshipsbetween dance and
music (Cheroff 1983, Erlmann 1996, Thompson 1966), dress (Kealiinoho-
moku 1979), mime (Royce 1984), and sculpture, painting, mythology, and
literature(Gaston 1982, Thompson 1974, Vatsyayan 1968).
CONCLUSION
Since the mid-1980s, there has been an explosion of dance studies as scholars
from a variety of disciplines have turnedtheir attentionto dance. Anthropolo-
gists have played a critical role in this new dance scholarship, contributing
comparativeanalyses, critiquingethnocentriccategories, and situatingstudies
of dance and movement within broaderframeworksof embodiment and the
politics of culture.Counteringtheoriesof the body which view it primarilyas a
site of inscription, dance scholars have demonstratedhow performersinvent
and reinvent identities throughmovement. Dance scholars have also refuted
notions of the body as an isolated entity by showing how a multiplicityof bod-
ies is producedthroughdance.
As scholars of dance and movement explore new ways of thinkingthrough
and with the body, there is no doubt that they will continue to challenge con-
ventions, undermining entrenched dualisms (e.g. mind/body, thinking/feel-
ing), critiquingevolutionary,colonial, and nationalisttypologies (e.g. classi-
cal, folk, ethnic), exposing the limits of conceptualcategories (e.g. dance, art),
and revealing dimensions of dance experience (e.g. the sensual, the divine)
that have often been neglected in scholarly inquiry.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to express my thanks to those friends and colleagues who pro-
vided much encouragementand critical commentaryon this review: E Valen-
tine Daniel, Mary Des Chene, Jeanne Marecek, and Elizabeth Tolbert. I am
grateful to J Lowell Lewis, Bill Smith, and Faye Harrisonfor useful sugges-
tions in the final stages. AdrienneKaeppler,JanetO'Shea andthe late Cynthia
Jean Cohen Bull generously provided numerousreferences.
Literature Cited
ies of Tongan Dance. Nuku'alofa, Tonga: American South Texas. Madison, WI:
Vava'u Press Univ. Wis. Press
Kaeppler AL. 1993b. Hula Pahlz Hawaiian Lock M. 1993. Cultivating the body: anthro-
Drum Dance, Volume 1. fHa'a and Hula pology and epistemologies of bodily prac-
Pahu. Sacred Movements. Honolulu: tice and knowledge. Annu1. Rev.Anthropol.
Bishop Mus. 22:133-55
Kaeppler AL. 1995. Visible and invisible in Malefyt T. 1998. "Inside"and "outside"Span-
Hawaiian dance. See Farnell 1995a, pp. ish Flamenco:gender constructionsin An-
31-43 dalusian concepts of Flamenco tradition.
Kaeppler AL. 1996. The look of music, the Anthr'o. Q. 71(2):63-73
sound of dance: music as visual art. I'is. Malone J. 1996. Steppin' on the Blues. The
Anthropol. 8(2-4): 133-53 Visible Rhylthms of Afirican American
Kapchan DA. 1994. Moroccan female per- Dance. Urbana/Chicago: Univ. Illinois
formers defining the social body. J. Am. Press
Folk. 107(423):82-105 Manning S. 1993. Ecstasy and the Demon.:
KapfererB. 1983. A Celebration of Demons. Feminism and 7nNationalismnin the Dances
Exoicisnmand the Aesthetics of Healing in of Mar' Wigman. Berkeley, CA: Univ.
Sri Lanka. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Calif. Press
Univ. Press Manning S. 1995. Modern dance in the Third
Kaplan EA. 1983. 'Womenand Film.: Both Reich: six positions and a coda. See Foster
Sides of the Camera. London/New York: 1995a, pp. 165-76
Methuen Manning S. 1997. The female dancer and the
Kaspin D. 1993. Chewa visions and revisions male gaze: feminist critiques of early
of power: transformations of the Nyau modern dance. See Desmond 1997, pp.
dance in centralMalawi. In Modernityand 153-66
Its Malcontents, ed. Jean Comaroff, John Marglin F. 1985. Wi'vesof the God-King: The
Comaroff, pp. 34-57. Chicago: Univ. Chi- Rituals of the Devcadasisof Ptu,i. Delhi:
cago Press Oxford Univ. Press
Katz R. 1982. Boiling Energy:. Communitly MartinR. 1990. Perbfrmciance as Political Act.
Healing am0ongthe KalaharciKung. Cam- The Elmbodiecd Self Westport,CT: Green-
bridge, MA: HarvardUniv. Press wood
KealiinohomokuJ. 1979. You dance what you Meduri A. 1988. Bharathanatyam-what are
wear, andyou wear your culturalvalues. In you? A,sianThecareJ. 5(1): 1-22
The Fabhricsof Cultiure,ed. JM Cordwell, MeduriA. 1996. Nation, 14omanln, Representa-
RA Schwarz,pp. 77-83. The Hague, Neth- tion:. ThieSltured History of'the Deivadasi
erlands:Mouton c7nd Her Dance. PhD. thesis. New York
Kealiinohomoku J. 1983. An anthropologist Univ., New York
looks at ballet as a form of ethnic dance. Mendoza Z. 1998. Defining folklore: mestizo
In What Is Dance? Readings in Theorye and indigenous identities on the move.
and Criticism, ed. R Copeland. M Cohen, Bull. Lat. A-m.Res. 17(2): In press
pp. 533-49. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Mendoza-WalkerZ. 1994. Contesting identi-
Press ties through dance: mestizo performance
Kersenboom S. 1995. Word, Sound, Image.: in the southern Andes of Peru. Repercus-
The Life of the Tamil Text. Oxford, UK: sions.: Crit. A/te'rnm.`iew'points hMlsic'
Berg Scholarlship3 (2):50-80
Kersenboom-StoryS. 1987. Nitlyasumangali: Meyer M. 1995. Dance andthe politics of oral-
Devadasi Traditionin South India. Delhi: ity: a study of the Irishscoil rince. Dance
Motilal Banarsidas Res. J. 27(I):25-39
Koritz A. 1994. Dancing the orient for Eng- Miller D. 1991. Absolute freedom in Trinidad.
land: Maud Allan's The Vision of Salo/me. Man (NS) 26(2):323-41
Theatre J. 46:63-78. Reprinted in Des- Mohd AMN. 1993. Zapi:. Folk Dance of the
mond, 1997a, pp. 133-52 Maltc 'World. Singapore: Oxford Univ.
Lewis JL. 1992. Ring of Liberation:Deceptive Press
Discourse in Br'azilian Capoeira. Chi- Morris G, ed. 1996. Moving IWor'ds.Re-
cago: Univ. Chicago Press 'writingDance. London: Routledge
Lewis JL. 1995. Genre and embodiment:from Mulvey K. 1975. Visual pleasureand narrative
Brazilian capoeira to the ethnology of hu- cinema. Scr'een16(3):6-18
man movement. Cult. Anthr'opol. 10(2): Ness SA. 1992. Bodyl,Movemment andCCultlure.'
221-43 Kinesthetic' cand 1'is'alc Sl'mbolism71in a
Limon JE. 1994. Dancing w,iththe Devlil.Soci- Philippine Com0m1nnit'. Philadelphia:
ety and Cutltural Poetics in Mexican- Univ. Penn. Press
Ness SA. 1996. Observing the evidence fail: Mime. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ.
difference arising from objectification in Press
cross-culturalstudies of dance. See Morris Savigliano M. 1995. Tango and the Political
1996, pp. 245-69 Economy of Passion. Boulder, CO: West-
Ness SA. 1997. Originality in the postcolony: view
choreographing the neoethnic body of SchechnerR. 1990. Wayang Kulit in the colo-
Philippine ballet. Cult. Anthropol. 12(1): nial margin.Drama Rev. 34(2):25-61
64-108 Senelick L. 1992. Introduction.In Gender in
Novack CJ. 1990. Sharing the Dance: Contact Performance: The Presentation of Differ-
Improvisation and American Culture. ence in the Performing Arts, ed. L Sene-
Madison: Univ. Wis. Press lick, pp. ix-xx. Hanover/London: Univ.
Novack CJ. 1995. The body's endeavors as Press New England
cultural practices. See Foster 1995a, pp. ShapiroT. 1994. Dance and the Spirit of Cam-
177-84 bodia. PhD thesis. Cornell Univ., Ithaca,
OrtnerS. 1995. Resistance and the problem of NY
ethnographic refusal. Comp. Stud. Soc. Shapiro T. 1995. The dancer in Cambodia.
Hist. 37(l):173-93 Asian Art Cult. 8(1):8-23
O'Shea J. 1997. Darshan, drishti and the de- Shay A. 1995. Bazi-ha-ye Nameveshi: Iranian
vadasi: bharata natyam and the male women's theatrical plays. Dance Res. J.
gaze(s). Presented at Conf. Re-Presenting 27(2):16-24
Women: Women Vis., Lit. Perform. Arts Sklar D. 1997. In memoriam: Cynthia Jean
India, Berkeley Cohen Bull. Dance Res. J. 29(1):111-15
O'Shea J. 1998. "Traditional"Indian dance Spencer P, ed. 1985a. Society and the Dance.
and the making of interpretive communi- Cambridge,UK: CambridgeUniv. Press
ties. Asian TheatreJ. 15(1):45-63 Spencer P. 1985b. Introduction: interpreta-
Poole DA. 1990. Accommodation and resis- tions of the dance in anthropology. See
tance in Andean ritual dance. Drama Rev. Spencer, 1985a, pp. 1-46
34(2):98-126 Srinivasan A. 1984. Temple "prostitution"
Quigley C. 1993. Report on International and communityreform: an examination of
Council for Traditional Music Study the ethnographic, historical and textual
Group on Ethnochoreology, 17th sympo- context of the Devadasi of Tamil Nadu,
sium. Dance Res. J. 25(1):51-54 SouthIndia. PhD thesis. CambridgeUniv.,
Quigley C. 1998. Methodologies in the study Cambridge,UK
of dance: ethnology. See Cohen, 1998, 4: Srinivasan A. 1985. Reform and revival: the
368-72 devadasi and her dance. Econ. Polit. Wklv.
Ramsey K. 1997. Vodou, nationalismand per- 20(44):1869-76
formance: the staging of folklore in mid- Srinivasan A. 1988. Reform or conformity?
twentieth century Haiti. See Desmond Temple "prostitution"and the community
1997, pp. 345-78 in the Madras Presidency. In State, Conm-
Ranger TO. 1975. Dance and Society in East munity and Household in Modernizing
Africa 1880-1970. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Asia, ed. B Agarwal, pp. 175-98. New
Press Delhi: Kali for Women
Reed SA. 1991. The Transformationof Ritual Stillman AK. 1996. Hawaiian hula competi-
and Dance in Sri Lanka. Kohomba Kank- tions: event, repertoire,performance, tra-
ariya and the KandyanDance. PhD thesis. dition. J. Am. Folk. 109: (434)357-80
Brown Univ., Providence, RI Stoller P. 1989. The Taste of Ethnographic
Reed SA. 1995. Thepolitics of aesthetic pro- Things: The Senses in Anthropology.
duction in Kandyandance. Presentedat Sri Philadelphia:Univ. Penn. Press
LankaConf., 5th, Durham,NH StraussG. 1977. Dance and ideology in China,
Reed SA. 1998. Between Purity and Respect- past and present: a study of ballet in the
ability. WomenDancers in Postcolonial People's Republic. Asian and Pacific
Sri Lanka. Presented at South Asia Conf., Dance. Selected Papersfor the CORDand
13th, Berkeley SEM Conference, 1974, CORD Annual
Rodriguez S. 1996. The Matachines Dance. 8:19-54. New York: Comm. Res. Dance
Ritual Symbolism and Interethnic Rela- Strong T. 1998. Orientalism.See Cohen 1998,
tions in the Upper Rio Grande Valley. Al- 5:44-47
buquerque:Univ. NM Press Sweet JD. 1980. Play, role reversal and hu-
Royce AP. 1977. TheAnthropologyof Dance. mor: symbolic elements of Tewa Pueblo
Bloomington: IndianaUniv. Press Navajo dance. Dance Res. J. 12(1):3-12
Royce AP. 1984. Movement and Meaning. Sweet JD. 1985. Dances of the TenwaPueblo
Creativityand Interpretationin Ballet and Indians. Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Am. Res.
Szwed JF, Marks M. 1988. The Afro- Vail JA. 1996. Balkan tradition,American al-
American transformationof European set ternative:dance, community and the peo-
dances and dance suites. Dance Res. J. ple of the pines. See Morris 1996, pp.
20(1):29-36 306-19
Taylor J. 1987. Tango. Cult. Anthropol. 2(4): van Nieuwkerk K. 1995. A Trade Like Any
481-93 Other. Female Singers and Dancers in
Thomas H. 1993. An-other voice: young Egypt. Austin: Univ. Texas Press
women dancing and talking. In Dance, VatsyayanK. 1968. Classical IndianDance in
Gender and Culture, ed. H Thomas, pp. Literature and the Arts. New Delhi: San-
69-93. London: Macmillan geet Natak Akad.
Thomas H. 1996. Do you want to join the WagnerAL. 1997. Adversaries of the Dance.
dance?: Postmodernism/poststructuralism, From the Puritans to the Present. Urbana:
the body and dance. See Morris 1996, pp. Univ. Ill. Press
63-87 Williams D. 1991. TenLectureson Theoriesof
Thompson RF. 1966. An aesthetic of the cool: the Dance. Metuchen,NJ: Scarecrow
West African dance. Afr. Forum 2(2): Williams D. 1995. Space, intersubjectivity,
85-102 and the conceptual imperative: three eth-
Thompson RF. 1974. African Art in Motion. nographic cases. See Farnell 1995a, pp.
Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press 44-81
Turner T. 1995. Social body and embodied Youngerman S. 1998. Methodologies in the
subject: bodiliness, subjectivity and so- study of dance: anthropology. See Cohen
ciality among the Kayapo. Cult. Anthro- 1998, 4:368-72
pol. 10(2):143-70 Zarrilli P. 1998. Whenthe Body Becomes All
Udall SR. 1992. The irresistible other: Hopi Eyes. Paradigms, Discourses and Prac-
ritual drama and Euro-American audi- tices of Power in Kalarippayattu,a South
ences. Drama Rev. 36(2):23-43 Indian Martial Art. Delhi: Oxford Univ.
Urciuoli B. 1995. The indexical structureof Press
visibility. See Farell 1995a, pp. 189-215