Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indi
Number of
Type of Activity: vidu ☒ Collaborative ☒ 3
Weeks
al
Initi
Evaluation al
☐ Intermediate ☐ Final ☒
Moment: Unit
1
Environment to Submit the
Total Score of the Activity:
Activity: Monitoring and Evaluation
125
Environment
Starting Date of the
Deadline of the Activity:
Activity:
May 22th, 2020
May 9th , 2020
Competences to Develop:
To be able to identify basic characteristics concerning main approaches,
methods and trends in teaching foreign languages where it is required to
implement different methods.
Task 2: In the forum Final task, the group must select a study case
and all the members of the group design the lesson plan. Each student
posts in the forum the activity for the lesson plan. Hence
collaboratively you need to create single lesson plan
Task 3
Each student must write one recommendation for the application of
the lesson plan, in other words students need to clear up to other
teachers what kind of elements are important to take in mind in order
to apply the lesson plan.
Also each student must write a conclusion about the use of methods
in English classrooms, here you should mention the factors involved
that can lead you to choose a method, the role of context and how
can you choose the right method according to your students’ needs.
6. Evaluation Rubric
Evaluation Rubric
Task 7 – Final activity
Activity Individual Collaborative
☒ ☒
type: Activity Activity
Evaluatio
Intermediate
n Initial ☐ ☐ Final ☐
unit
moment
Evaluated Performance levels of the individual activity
Score
items High score Average score Low score
Selection The student 25
and selected the The student The student
justificati community from selected the didn’t select
on of the the options and community but the community
communit give the reasons didn’t present from the
y from for the selected the justification. options.
the method.
options. (Up to 25 (Up to 12 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Evaluated Performance levels of the individual activity
score
items High score Average score Low score
The student
presented the
The student
argumentation The student
Selection selected a
of the topic and didn’t select a
of functional topic
approach functional topic
functional but not the
selected and it and Method or 20
topic and method or
is quite approach
Method or approach
complete and
Approach.
meaningful
(Up to 20 (Up to 10 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The lesson plan
The lesson plan
presented
is quite
doesn’t The student
complete. It
correspond to didn’t present
shows evidence
the method the lesson
Lesson of real analysis
selected or it plan. 30
plan and relation to
doesn’t provide
the topic
meaningful
contents.
information
(Up to 30 (Up to 15 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The
contributions
Give meaningful are not No
contributions to meaningful for contributions to
Contributi the the the
os final development of development of development of 20
task final task. final task. final task.
These are
superficial.
(Up to 10 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Gramma The grammar The student The student 20
tical used is properly makes some cannot use
range and errors in sentence forms
accuracy grammar and at all
punctuation but
they rarely
reduce
communication.
(Up to 20 (Up to 10 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The students
handed in a final
The students product, but on
handed in a final separate files or
product, one file on the wrong
The student
per the whole space or the
did not hand in
Final group on the students
presented the a final product 10
product correct link on
the evaluative communities but
setting did not propose
one approach on
learning needs.
(Up to 10 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 125