Assessment Report

Learners name: Dumitru Cotia Date:01/10/2018

Assessor’s name: Ionut Mirea Location: Mill Road, Cambridge
Qualification: Occupation Work Supervision - Level 3

Assessment details: Learning Assessment

outcomes criterion
T/503/2723 – Implementing and Maintaining Health, Safety and
Welfare.
R/503/2924 – Confirming the Occupational Method of Work
M/503/2915 – Developing and maintaining good occupational working
relationships
F/503/2725 – Co-ordinating and organising work operations
A/503/2723 – Confirming work activities and resources for an
occupational work area
J/503/2743 – Confirming work meets quality standards
L/503/ 2744 – Implementing Procedures to Support the team’s
performance

I came to visit again Dumitru to student’s accommodation in

Cambridge where he was responsible with checking and
fixing incomplete working in the current universities’ blocks,
work being provided by the Stace Construction and Property
Consultants.
When I arrived at the site, Dumitru greeted me and was
happy to have me there offering few information about the
whole projects. We headed to the main office where I was
supposed to be offered a short induction, part of the
company’s policy for everyone that visits the site. After I
finished the induction, I could see Dumitru preparing for the
day as he was supposed to bring the list of snagging and
discussion relevant for the health and safety. T/503/2723 2.1, 2,2, 3.1,
After that we went to meat his team made up of 4 workers 3.3, 3.4; 4.1,
that had different qualifications considering the fact that the 4.2
tasks included all range of work; there were a plumber,
electrician, carpenter and a painter.
While observing Dumitru he made sure everyone is wearing
their PPE and offered some short information about risk and
hazards from the site and how to overcome potential harms
to them and others. I could see him speaking easily to his
team and encouraged communication in such a way that
could promote two-way dialogue for a positive health and
safety culture at work. He assigned responsibilities according
to each level of competency and ensured that performance 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
and quality are considered while communicating effectively. 1.4, 2.1, 2.2,
He also advised them that any problems should be reported T/503/2723 3.1, 3.2, 3.3,
and dealt with immediately (T/503/2723 – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 3.4, 4.1, 4.2
2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1, 4.2)
Dumitru told me that all the decisions he was taking was
according to company’s policies and requirements and when
he had any misunderstanding was asking his manager for
clarification. He was able to assigned work activities and not
to affect others activities and schedule and maintain tidiness A/503/2772 2.1, 3.1, 4.1,
and try not disturb as there were students in the campus 4.2
(A/503/2772 - 2.1, 3.1, 4.1, 4.2; R/503/2924 – 1.1, 1.2, 3.1,
3.2, 4.1, 4.2) R/503/2924
Dumitru easily communicated arrangements in terms of 1.1, 1.2, 3.1,
timescales and quality expectations and agree work 3.2, 4.1, 4.2
programmes not to disturbs other workers in the building,
such as cleaners as at a specific time they are cleaning
around. They where supposed to finish by that time and also
to maintain tidiness and make sure they dispose the waste
accordingly. He advised where all the materials, tools and
equipment needed to the works and how to store them after
they finished (F/503/2725 – 1.1, 3.1, 5.1, 6.2, 6.3, 7.1, 7.2,
F/503/2725 1.1, 3.1, 5.1,
8.1, 8.2)
While observing Dumitru I could see how he was checking 6.2, 6.3, 7.1,
the work to be according quality standards and project 7.2, 8.1, 8.2
requirements and even took some notes to discuss with his
manager about one of the tasks it was on the list, changing
skirting in one of the kitchens as the materials where not J/503/2743
provided and they needed to do it in a different day 1.1, 2.1, 2.2,
(J/503/2743 – 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1) 3.1, 3.2, 4.1
He was discussing with his team and acknowledged good
performance and facilitated discussions. Some of the tasks
were agreed with all the team members and accepted
recommendations or proposals (L/503/2744 – 1.3, 2.1, 2.5, L/503/2744 1.3, 2.1, 2.5,
3.2, 3.3) 3.2, 3.3
Overall, Dumitru gave appropriate advice and information
and applied the principles of equality and diversity and
explained at all times the course of tasks. He engaged his
team in discussions to be sure that they understood and
agreed with them in order to reach the required outcomes of M/503/291
the proposed method of work (M/503/2915 – 1.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5 1.2, 3.1, 4.1,
5.1) 5.1
In the picture, Dumitru prepared all the paperwork that his
manager gave him that morning and was preparing the day
activities and the course of working, including assigned
responsibilities and tasks.
Feedback Assessor
Well done, Dumitru! Under observation you used good management skills I could see how you
coordinated effectively both the tasks and your team and offered feedback, suggestions and
other recommendations. You proved a professional and you communicated effectively with
your team while delegating tasks and dealing with problems. Keep up the good work and you
will gain more experience in supervising other workers.
You have achieved all the LO from the units below:
T/503/2723 – Implementing and Maintaining Health, Safety and Welfare
2.1, 2,2, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4; 4.1, 4.2
R/503/2924 – Confirming the Occupational Method of Work
1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2
M/503/2915 – Developing and maintaining good occupational working relationships
1.1, 1.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1
F/503/2725 – Co-ordinating and organising work operations
1.1, 1.2, 3.1, 5.1, 6.2, 6.3, 7.1, 7.2, 8.1, 8.2
A/503/2723 – Confirming work activities and resources for an occupational work area
1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4
J/503/2743 – Confirming work meets quality standards
2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2
L/503/ 2744 – Implementing Procedures to Support the team’s performance
1.3, 2.1, 2.5, 3.2, 3.3
Assessor Signature Ionut Mirea Date: 01/10/2018
Next observation Date:28/11/2018