You have added detail and Your thinking has facts and Your thinking is specific and examples. research to back it up. exact.
Could you elaborate? How could we check on Could you be more
that? specific? Could you illustrate what you mean? How could we test that? Could you give more details? Could you give me an How do we know this is example? true? Could you be more exact?
RELEVANCE DEPTH BREADTH
Your thinking is directly You have predicted difficulties You have considered other related to the central idea, or problems with your points of view. problem or question you are thinking. You imagine what working on. could go wrong and what you Do you need to look at this could do about it. from another perspective? How does this relate to the problem? What will make this Do you need to consider difficult? other points of view? Does this answer the question? Have you predicted Do you need to look at this different possible in another way? How does this help us? outcomes?
Have you looked ahead?
LOGIC FAIRNESS SIGNIFICANCE
You show your thinking in a You are aware of the thoughts Your thinking is important way that make sense to and ideas of others. You do to the central idea, others. not ignore facts that disagree problem or question you with your thinking. You are are working on. Does all this make sense open to changing your mind. together? Which of these facts are Am I considering the the most important? Does your thinking follow thinking of others? the evidence? Is this the most important Is my purpose fair in this thing to consider? situation? Are you focusing on the Is my thinking based on most important thing? facts, or just opinions?
Richard Paul and Linda Elder: Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life, 2006