Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=pic.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Population Investigation Committee is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Population Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
Mauritius: DemographicUpsurge and Prospect
By H. C. BROOKFIELD
Lr. ~ -ILr
00
1;~~~~~~~~~0
04
Ii ~~~~~~~~0
__ - ~~00
Ii~~~~-
F-~~~F
0F--' C,,l--
104 HI. C. BROOKFIELD
Hence only very limited use is made of the " ethnic" classificationof the
populationin the followinganalysis.'
HISTORY(Figure z)
RECENT DEMOGRAPHIC
The recent upsurge was produced by the combined effectof a substantial
coupled withan unprecedentedfallin mortality.Its mainincidence
risein fertility
lay only in the shortperiod between I946 and i 95 I, since when therehas been
some narrowingof the gap between birthand death rates. In order to under-
stand the causes of the upsurge it is necessary brieflyto trace the recent
demographichistoryof the colony.
120 1-- 50
100 = = I100 1 _ 10
I \/~~~~~~~~~~~~0
80 = 101_ll
60 ___R_IAGE RA1IE
50 ___50
_ _ 30
430O IF
30 ew a_ BIR^THANIDDEATH
_ _ _
RkATES \5.: 20
1840 50 60 70 80 90 1900 10 20 30 40 50
FIGURE 2. The movementof vital rates. (Birth and death ratesin part from Kuczynski).
225 and 263. In 1952 a new indexusing I946=IOO stood aroundI 50.1 In
I947, therefore,realwageswereaboutdoublepre-war, but subsequentincrease
has been small. Greateremployment and higherwages forcasual femaleand
juvenilelabourhaveundoubtedly madeforsomerealincreases in familyincome,
but therewerefew membersof the workingclass whose averagewage stood
above Rs. 6 per day, while a substantial proportionearnedless than Rs. 3.
Absenteeism due to illnesshas declined,but absenteeismfromothercauseshas
remainedstable.
Table i, showingtherelation oftheactualand" lifetable"age-sexcompositions
for 1944 and 1952 demonstrates thedegreeof changethathas takenplace. In
I944 a long periodof stability had broughtabout a close fitof the actualand
stationarypyramids.
I944 1952
Age Males Females Males Females
0- 4 . ... ... I03 io8 206 2I8
5- 9 ... ... .. IO9 I 12 '47 ' 59
IO-I4 ... ... ... I04 io6 I15 123
I5-I9 ... ... ... I I6 io8 117
20-24 ... ... ... IOI I09 I05 III
25-29 ... ... ... 88 98 II3 113
30-34 ... ... 9 94 9I 87
35-39 ... ... * go90 88 82 84
40-44 ... ... 94 89 73 70
45-49 ... ...9I 8o 65 59
50-54 .1 . ... I03 90 6z 57
55-59 ... ... 92 75 51 49
60-64. ... ... I05 90 51 54
65-69 .105 82 4' 51
fluctuatedsomewhat, rising for two years, then again falling sharply. These
movementshave not yetbeen sufficiently prolongedto discerntrendsor suggest
causes, but a few tentativeobservationsmay be made. The fall in the crude
birthrate has been much greaterin the wholly rural than in the partlyurban
districts,virtuallyeliminating,in fact,any differentialthat mightbe recognised
from 1952 data. Any real differential, in fact,must be limited to the urban
areas proper of Plaines Wilhems,and probably to the elite withinthose areas.
This generalfall in the crude birthrate,however,is a phenomenonof no small
importanceto Mauritius; if it can be regarded as in any sense " voluntary",
it may representa clear break fromthe high fertilitypatternsof the past. It
maywell be, however,thatit is governedby a fallin realwages and some tendency
for increased unemployment. Certainlythe wind of bad times was to be felt
in Mauritiusin I954, as a resultof a small drop in the sugar price,and the fear
communicateditselfverywidelythroughthe community.'
The fluctuationsin the death rate are more easily examined. Nearly all the
increase in deaths between 1951 and 1954 was due to enteritisand diarrhcea,
which accounted for I7720% of all deaths in the latteryear. These diseases,
together with anxmia, deficiencydiseases, debility and " fever, unspecified"
accountforabout one-thirdof all deaths; theyare clearlyrelatedto ankylostomiasis
and the other helminthiases,to dirt and bad housing, and in the long run to
the poverty and slum conditions in which most Mauritians live.2 In these
circumstances,the death rate may be expected to fluctuate. It is noteworthy,
however,thatthe districtsshowing the greatestrise in death ratesbetween I952
and 1954 were not those showing the greatestfall in the birthrate. No direct
correlationmay thereforebe made.
Age ... F T F T F T F T T
The followingare gross and net reproductionrates for 1952, computed with
thetwo seriesof maternalage distributions.Mortalityis fromthe 195 2 lifetable.
CSO HCB'
GRR, 1952 ... ... ... ... 3-I92 3-070
NRR, 1952 ... ... ... ... 2-436 2-366
Mean lengthof a
generation(years) ... ... 29-05 27.98
For 1955, rateswerecomputedby doublingthesix-months birthsforeach group
to obtain a year'stotal,while the femalequinquennialage groups were obtained
by applying the mortalityexperienceof the 1952 life table population to the
correspondingcohortsin the 1952 census. A comparisonof femalesat the re-
productive agesin 195 2 and 1955 is as follows: I952 1955
I0-14 ... ... ... ... .. 23,722 28,356
I5-19 ... ... ... ... ... 22,372 24,40I
20-24 ... ... ... ... 20,876 I2,746
25-29 ... ... ... ... ... 20,647 22,237
.15 ... ,
30-34 5,230 I8,783
35-39 ... ... ... ... ... I4,I73 14,335
40-44 ... ... ... ... 11,28o1 13,1I6
45-49 ... ... ...
* ... 9,147 I 0,028
Table 3.
Table 4.
I2 3 4 5 6
I. C.S.O., Mauritius,
1953
2. C.S.O., Mauritius,1955
3. Colonial Office,1954
4. data
3, revisedwith I955 fertility
5. 3,revisedas above,withrevised1952 base
and mortality
6. Assumingdecliningfertility
1 " married" includesdefactounions.
M AUTRITTITS: DFMOGR APHI-TC TTPSTTRGF ANDT PROSPECT IT
B
II2 H. C. BROOKPIELD
Age distribution: % % % %
Projection 5 0-14 ** 40.59 4o0 82 37'53 39- 26
M I 5-49 . 25 I I 24.36 25.46 24.24
F 15-49 ... i228o 22-94 24.52 23.53
over 5? ... I" 50 II *88 I2.49 12.97
Projection6 0-14 ... 40'59 4o063 35.96 34.6I
M 15-49 ... 25.11 24 49 26- ii 26-o4
F 15-49 ... 22 8o 22-95 25 07 25s25
over So ... 15 I0I * 194 i2z86 I4.I0
Child/womanratio:
Projection5 ... ... ... 871.59 724'04 704 I0 757*94
Projection6 ... ... ... 87I 59 693 26 6o2z36 547'82
Crude birthrates:
Projection3 ... ... ... 43 6 42 7 4I 7 415 4I 4 43 7
Projection
5 ... ... ... 40'3 352 33'5 36.5 38.4 38.2
Projection6 ... ... ... 40'3 33 4 3I*3 31 * 29-7 27 7
-952 1957 I962 I967 1972 I977 1982
toRodrigues equallyamongthethreemalequinquennial
leaves5,144 toMauritius.Thiswasdistributed
groupsfrom20 to 34.
3. Thebasisusedfortheseadjustments wasthefigure inthecensus,
of50o,200printed notthefigure
intheReport
of50I,224 printed oftheCommittee 3 and4. Thelatter
andusedin Projections
onPopulation
figure persons
seemstoinclude24 additional whodidnotstatetheirage.
MAURITIUS: DEMOGRAPHIC UPSURGE AND PROSPECT I13
peopled territoryof equal or largersize in the world. Later, both in I907 and
in I909 the annual ColonialReportsdeclared flatlythat sugar productionwas at
its maximum; on the formeroccasion a limited" wages fund" which should
limit population was postulated. In the depressionperiod around I93 I, when
conditionsin Mauritiuswere worse than at any previous time,it was said that:
by ig20 then,Mauritiushad a populationwhichto all intentsand purposeshad
reachedsaturationpoint."1
All these views were proved wrong by events, and the fact should make us
pause beforeacceptingpresent-dayMalthusianthinkingtoo readily. Figure 3,
which shows the progress of moving averages of sugar production,area and
population,and of yield and productionper head, demonstratesthat in I907 a
major improvementwas in fact in progress,and in the middle of the Great
Depression, a very substantialincreasein yield per arpentwas in full train. At
the end of the series,all the curves are moving upward, but with the difference
that the curves of sugar production per head, and, still more significantly, of
the productof the crop in rupeesper head, are now moving upwardsless rapidly
than the curve of population.
Mauritius is no simple case of an overpopulated peasant country: on the
contrary,productionis highlyspecialisedforexporton the world market. There
is no real peasant class in the island and very littletrue subsistencecultivation.
Though thereis a group of cultivatorswho work on theirown account, their
main productis for sale. The mass of Mauritiansdraw all or the major part of
their subsistencefrom wage labour, and the overwhelmingbulk of foodstuffs
consumed are importedfromwithout.
Furthermore,Mauritiusis not burdenedby the wastefulover-employment in
primaryproduction that characterisesthe typical" underdeveloped country".
Some 58% of a work forcethatnumberedI63,908 in I952 were engaged in the
secondary and tertiarysectors of the economy. The sugar industry,which
supplies over 99% of the exportincome, employsdirectlyonly about one-third
of the working population, though it employs all but a few thousands of the
work forceengaged in primaryproduction.
This notwithstanding,Mauritius has a static problem in the sense that
productivityand income per head are low, and that the numbersof population
in relationto the developmentof the colony make for inefficient use of labour
resources. However, the real problem in Mauritiusis not static,but dynamic.
It arises fromthe currentand prospectiverapid growthof population. Due to
the age structure,the impact of this growth has only just begun to be felt.
Though the populationin I952 was almost ioo,ooo greaterthan it had been ten
yearsearlier,the numberin employmentgrew by only a fractionof this figure.
The male population aged between I 5 and 64 was only a few hundredlargerin
I95 2 than in i88i, and grew by only io% between I944 and I952. The work
force grew by 7% in the same period (Figure 4). Growth has so far resulted
chieflyin an increasedburdenof dependency: theemployedfractionof thewhole
fellfrom 8 s0/ in I92i and ;7 i0/in I9)44 to only 32 7 /in Iqz2.
"
1 D. Drysdale Anderson," The point of population saturation; its transgressionin Mauritius,
Biology,
Human i, 4 (1930), 528.
MAURITIUS: DEMOGRAPHIC UPSURGE AND PROSPECT II5
AN 4-Q. I - I
LU~~~~L
A1o(1S)a
Z~~~~~~Z
o 00~0
11 1--
U) ~ ~ )
__ f
-t8
LUI
T1_ 0t l 1 1110 lz
o _~~~~~~L
Z ~~~~
crS IIIIJ o 0~
,__ (9 U)@ I' ___ I I ____
ZI B I
i
_ (~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
DISTRICTS& TOWNS
Tote!Populbon.
.5 LOCATION 0 oso
M SAMEIQUE MILES 3 j
-?Me/es Ma $ ed 5-4. 2 400000
Tote! 6e171f1//1,'
Occupled CJRENIONI
( - 300.000-I
TOte!;hn lk4,491/tCe/0 SCAR (Fr) O
MADAG 8 4
200000
--occupetcs. J _
___ Tot,i end
fi1'fe/iodufctuAr/g 6 / ,,..,
Cornstructo?n/nwdustr/ex. : ___- /g
50,000 _________
30,000 ,. - /
20,000
20,000 '/-.,'
5.003 -<8
15,000
4,000
4.000 ....l...../''''v'\i
2,000
1,000
, .ras -r. .' Fr, ar co as r a) rO 'iO r c'o O N i CO? ar r ) co a Z a] co a) a - "
co-a-sascoa
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
PORT PAMPLE RIV.DU FLACQ GRAND SAVANNE BLACK PLAINESMAURITIUS
MOKA WILHEMS
LOUIS MOUSSES REMPART PORT RIVER
thatmightbe expected. Then, takinga 19 52 average of about Rs. i,ooo per head
(C75) per annum as a " desirable level of living standardto be maintained"
theyarrivedat an acceptable maximumof 6oo,ooo for the island's population.
They mentioned,but did not consider,the problemof employment.'
The problem of productivityand employmentis perhaps best consideredby
separatingprimary,secondaryand tertiaryactivities. Primaryproductionis the
basis of all income in Mauritius,and has increasedenormouslyin recentyears.
However, it has not generatedincreasedemployment. Employmentin the sugar
industry has variedbetween50,000 and 6o,ooo sinceabout I890. Duringthe
same period productionhas grown by more than 350?% while the input of land
and labour have only varied but not greatlyincreased. Application of capital
in many formsis the principalfactorresponsible. The startlingfact therefore
emergesthatin all but one of the ruraldivisionsof theisland the male population
between I5 and 64, the total employedpopulation,and the population employed
in agriculture,are all lower to-daythanat the beginningof the century; further-
more, in four of the seven rural divisions the decline has continued between
'944 and 1952 (Figure 4). The only major increasein agriculturalemployment
has takenplace in the rapidlygrowingmainlyurban districtof Plaines Wilhems,
whence increasing numbers of labourers-commuting in reverse-are carried
dailyby lorryto sugar estatesin severalpartsof the island.
We have alreadyreferred to the substantialgainsin the yieldof sugarper arpent
and per head achieved in recentyears(Figure 3). Researchin cane breedingand
applicationare both showing resultswhich indicatethatthese trends
in fertiliser
mightcontinue. Improvementsin yieldon the existingacreage (especiallyfrom
the small planters'land), and extensionsof profitableacreage beyond both the
sub-humidand super-humidboundaries may well occur. A crop of 6oo,ooo
tons is now in sight,2and thereis no reason to suppose that this is the limit.
There have also been moves to rationalisethe transportand factorysides of the
industry. Concentrationof factoriesis still proceeding,and the recentlarge
returns have madepossibleextensivere-equipment of mills,3 thoughveryfew
would rankas firstclass modernfactories. Road transportis increasinglyreplac-
ing rail for carriagewithinthe island, and therehave been experimentsin bulk
loading onto ships. As in so muchelse thatis Mauritian,however,thereremains
a great deal that is archaic in the sugar industry. Many mills are still below
standard,the bullock carts of the small plantersstill carrycane fromthe fields,
fragmentationof land still bedevils efficiencyand the low yield of the small
growersremainsa drag on the whole industry.
Provided thata marketcan be foundforsugargrownabove theCommonwealth
Sugar Agreement quota, and prdvided that the price remains remunerative,
there seems no reason why sugar productionin Mauritius should not surpass
700,000 tons, but it is unlikelythatthiswould be matchedby more than a small
increase in employment. Benefitswould accrue in total income and perhaps
1 Committee
onPopulation,19-25.
2 DepartmentofAgriculture,AnnualReports. The 1956 crop reached 572,000 tons of sugar.
3 Sincetheend ofthewar theindustryhas investedoverRs.zoo,ooo,oooin improvements, thusbringing
the standardup muchnearerto the best. There is, however,some way to go, particularly onthefactory
sideof theindustry.
H. C. BROOKFIELD
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paperstemsfromresearchon thepopulationof Mauritiuscarriedout withtheaid of a grantfrom
the Population InvestigationCommittee. Work was commencedin the Universityof Natal, Durban,
and Mauritiuswas visitedfromSouth Africain I954. The main body of researchwork,however,was
done in the Universityof New England, Armidale,New South Wales. Among the manypersonsto
due to Mr. M. V. M.
whom the writeris indebtedforassistanceand advice, thanksare particularly
Herchenroder,Director of Statisticsin Mauritiusand to membersof his staff,and to Sir Alexander
Carr-Saunders,withoutwhose interestthe projectcould neverhave been begun.
APPENDIX I
A personal communicationfrom Dr. Burton Benedict, formerlyof McGill
University,who in I955-57 conducted anthropologicalresearchin Mauritius,
provides the followingadditionalinformationon the subject of birthcontrol:
" As to your question on birthcontrol (in its widest sense), I can findvery littleevidence
that it is practised. It is likely that the age of marriage for men may be later than formerly,
as I think there is a tendencyfor joint families (among the Indo-Mauritian population) to
split up earlier. . . I thinkthereis a certainamount of receptivityto birthcontrol especially
among the Hindus, many of whom point to the policy in this direction in India. Hindu
journalists are also prone to bring up this point. The receptiveness, I estimate, extends
from the town to the village elite but not, I'm prettysure, to the labourer. The Catholics
and Muslims oppose birthcontrol, the formervery vocally, though whether their elite do
so in practice is another question. Contraceptives are almost certainly not used in the
villages. I have heard of a few of the more educated villagers attempting the rhythm
method and of one case of regularly practised coitus interruptus, but my impression is
that such methods are very rare. I have heard that abortion is very common in the towns.
I do not think it is much practised in the village though I have no evidence one way or
the other and it is possible that the village " dai " or midwife may do this. I have put
your question about birth control to two of my most reliable informantsand they both
thought that by and large there was no practice of it, but that there would be some recep-
tiveness to it, particularlyamong women.
MAURITIUS: DEMOGRAPHIC UPSURGE AND PROSPECT I2I
>+
ro d - 011.0t 00 st>0% 0 eN N N CK 0 34
ONtCh 1- -too "D N Ft s P4 %. a 0 4J t
.~~~~~~6 , . 1 . . co
u ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ 0 t_& * V~~~~~~~~~~~0
* J t
"O4 ORO CrT CTo N' FO W%O" r0 eA "' P- 1' N' >
O~~~..4 WO W ON e . .
e
o C a 00
ONo p- P-D 'l O W% eq 05 eD t- OO
so o,, oN o oN o, o, o. os os aooo o o o-, o% o^ o
0 0 0
0s +FtO
t- ^ ', cro1* oo N 0 eQ r^ t 00 \0
oh C.
ao o o o- r-o oD o- o o o oD o4 o4 o Noo
0 o
H ~~~~~a*
00
N
0
oo -4
o
r- -, CNO
eJ o ON "%FoH o o*
t- 0oo f- f%o \0 lq Ch\. N \ HH
> oo 0, C4 cr 04 a, a, a\ coo oo0 oo Fs .
1- . . . . .. .
? 00000 6q
$ F Q o ~~o
o o, o o - oo
t~~~~O ON .\ ON ONCsONa . _
o oh1o oo o
.0 43
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4 r
110 00
a\ ??\ F\ 00 ?
lt O O O O -,OO0 IO %OOO
o o ao o o o o i
I
Qc0 a 7 n>c sW
4 . . . . .r
O O
W W r- % OOOOOOOO
r-000000 r-10w%'%Oa
\0~~~~~~~~
4) .. _
********
.. 0...............................
..................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........