You are on page 1of 2

Ministry of Education, Culture and Research of the Republic of Moldova

Chișinău "Ion Creangă" State Pedagogical University

Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature


English Philology Chair

Onofrei Olga
Criteria for Evaluation of Writing Activities at the Upper-Intermediate Level
Master Degree Thesis

Scientific leader:
E. Sagoian,
Ph.D.,associate professor

Chișinău, 2018
CONTENTS:

INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………3
1. THEORETICAL DIMENSION OF TEACHING WRITING FROM
THE PERSPECTIVE OF EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES
1.1 Background for teaching writing……………………………………………...…7
1.2 Approach structure of teaching writing………………………………………...13
1.3 Stages of writing activities……………………………………………………......26
1.3.1 Prewriting..…………………………………………………………………27
1.3.2 While-writing……………………………………………………………….32
1.3.3 Post-writing ………………………………………………………………..36
2. PRAXIOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF CRITERIA FOF
EVALUATION OF WRITEN ACTIVITIES
2.1 Forms and Criteria of Assessment of Written Activities……………………….42
2.1.1 Forms of assessment of written activities………………………………...43
2.1.2 Criteria for evaluating of written activities………………………………45
2.2 Written Activities at Upper-intermediate level…………………………………46
2.2.1 Informal and Formal letters………………………………………………47
2.2.2 Writing an essay……………………………………………………………52
2.2.3 Writing Articles…………………………………………………………….59
3. EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF WRITTEN ACTIVITIES AT
UPPER-INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
3.1 Description of the research material……………………………………………..68
3.2 Description of the experimental work……………………………………….......69
3.3 Results of the experiment……………………………………………………….…81
CONCLUSIONS…………..………………………………………………………………..85
BIBLIOGAPHY…….……..………………………………………………………………..87

You might also like