Professional Documents
Culture Documents
doi: 10.1038/nchem.967
General Information: The following commercially obtained reagents for the C-H lactonization were used as received:
HPLC grade CH3CN (Fisher Scientific), glacial acetic acid (AcOH, Fisher Scientific), 50 wt.% H2O2 solution in water
(Aldrich, stored at 4oC), 97% H218O (Cambridge Isotopes, stored at 4oC). All C-H lactonization reactions were run under
air with no precautions taken to exclude moisture. All products were filtered through a glass wool plug prior to obtaining
a final weight. Each antipode of the Fe(PDP) catalyst was prepared as previously described and stored at 4oC.1 All other
reactions were run under an atmosphere of N2 or Ar gas with dry solvent unless otherwise stated. Dry solvents
tetrahydrofuran (THF), methylene chloride (CH2Cl2), diethyl ether (Et2O), methanol (MeOH), and 1,4-dioxane were
purified prior to use by passage through a bed of activated alumina (Glass Contour, Laguna Beach, California). Achiral
gas chromatographic (GC) analyses were performed on an Agilent Technologies 6890N Series instrument equipped with
FID detectors using a HP-5 (5%-Phenyl)-methylpolysiloxane column (30m, 0.32mm, 0.25mm). Chiral GC analysis was
performed on an Agilent 5890 Series instrument equipped with FID detectors using a J&W cyclodex-β column (30 m,
0.25 mm, 0.25 mm). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was conducted with E. Merck silica gel 60 F254 precoated plates
(0.25 mm) and visualized with potassium permanganate, p-anisaldehyde, bromocresol green, and ceric ammonium
molybdate staining. Flash column chromatography was performed as described by Still et al.2 using EM reagent silica gel
60 (230-400 mesh). 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Unity-400 (400 MHz), Varian Unity-500 (500 MHz), or
a Varian Unity Inova 500NB (500 MHz) spectrometer and are reported in ppm using solvent as an internal standard
(CDCl3 at 7.26 ppm). Data reported as: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, p = quintet, m = multiplet, b =
broad, app = apparent; coupling constant(s) in Hz; integration. Proton-decoupled 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a
Varian Unity-400 (100 MHz) or Varian Unity-500 (125 MHz) spectrometer and are reported in ppm using solvent as an
internal standard (CDCl3 at 77.16 ppm). IR spectra were recorded as thin films on NaCl plates on a Mattson Galaxy Series
FTIR 5000 and are reported in frequency of absorption (cm-1). High-resolution mass spectra were obtained at the
University of Illinois Mass Spectrometry Laboratory. Optical rotations were measured using a 1 mL cell with a 50 mm
path length on a Perkin-Elmer 341 polarimeter. Optical rotations were obtained with a sodium lamp and are reported as
follows: [α]λT°C (c = g/100 mL, solvent).
General Procedure B
C-H oxidation of Non-Carboxylic Acids (0.5 mmol substrate): Into a 40 mL borosilicate vial was added hydrocarbon
substrate (0.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), followed by 5 mol% Fe(PDP) catalyst 1 (23.3 mg, 0.025 mmol, 0.05 equiv.), 0.75 mL
CH3CN, 14.3 µL AcOH (0.25 mmol, 0.5 equiv.), and a magnetic stir bar. While the resulting deep red solution stirred, a
solution of H2O2 (50 wt% in H2O, 34.6 µL, 0.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) in 4.5 mL CH3CN was added over a period of 1 minute
(dropwise addition for 45 seconds, followed by streamwise addition for 15 seconds), generating an amber brown solution.
Stirring followed for 10 minutes at ambient temperature, and a solution of 5 mol% 1 (23.3 mg, 0.025 mmol, 0.05 equiv.)
and 14.3 µL AcOH (0.25 mmol, 0.5 equiv.) in 0.5 mL CH3CN was added in one burst. A second solution of H2O2 (50
wt% in H2O, 34.6 µL, 0.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) in 4.5 mL CH3CN was added as before and stirring followed for 10
minutes. Following this stirring period, a second solution of 5 mol% 1 (23.3 mg, 0.025 mmol, 0.05 equiv.) and 14.3 µL
AcOH (0.25 mmol, 0.5 equiv.) in 0.5 mL CH3CN was added in one burst, followed by a third solution of H2O2 (50 wt% in
H2O, 34.6 µL, 0.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) in 4.5 mL CH3CN. The reaction stirred approx. 16h at ambient temperature to
ensure complete lactonization of intermediate hydroxyester products and was thereafter concentrated in vacuo and
purified by flash chromatography using EtOAc/hexanes mixtures, or for reactions generating volatile products,
Et2O/pentanes mixtures. For 0.30 and 0.10 mmol reactions, the quantities of reagents were scaled accordingly.
Representative procedure for preparation of lactone standard curve: Stock solutions of nitrobenzene (98.5 mg, 10.00
mL EtOAc) and authentic 5,5-dimethyldihydrofuran-2-one (57.1 mg, 5.00 mL EtOAc) were prepared. To each of nine
GC vials was added 500 µL nitrobenzene stock solution (4.9 mg, 0.040 mmol per vial), followed by an aliquot of the
lactone stock solution, in increasing amounts (100 µL, 200 µL, …, 900 µL; 0.01 mmol, 0.02 mmol, …, 0.09 mmol). As
such, the first GC vial represented a 10% yield of lactone for a 0.10 mmol reaction, while the ninth vial represented a
90% yield of lactone. These solutions were mixed thoroughly and analyzed by GC; a plot of % yield vs. measured
lactone/nitrobenzene generated data points that could be readily fit to a linear equation of the form y = mx + b.
Representative procedure for measurement of GC yield from Carboxylic Acids (0.10 mmol): The oxidation reaction
of 4-methylvaleric acid (11.6 mg, 0.10 mmol) was performed according to general procedure A, immediately subsequent
to measurement of the standard curve. After the reaction was complete, nitrobenzene (4.9 mg, 0.040 mmol) was
transferred to the reaction mixture from a separate vial using EtOAc. The resulting solution was mixed thoroughly and
analyzed by GC, providing the measured lactone/nitrobenzene ratio.
5,5-dimethyldihydrofuran-2-one5 (Isolated): 4-methylvaleric acid (8) (58.1 mg, 0.50 mmol) was reacted
according to general procedure A using Fe(R,R-PDP). The crude reaction mixture was poured over a
saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (50 mL) and extracted 3X with Et2O (3 x 75 mL). The
combined organics were dried over MgSO4 and filtered through celite. The filtrate was concentrated carefully by rotary
evaporation to minimize loss of the volatile product, and before reaching dryness, was loaded onto a column of silica and
purified by flash chromatography (50% Et2O/pentane), affording the title compound as a clear, colorless liquid. Run 1
(27.1 mg, 0.238 mmol, 48%); run 2 (27.6 mg, 0.242 mmol, 48%). Average isolated yield: 48%.
5-(hydroxymethyl)-5-methyldihydrofuran-2-one6 (9): 4-methylvaleric acid (8) (58.1 mg, 0.50 mmol) was
reacted according to general procedure A using Fe(R,R-PDP). Purification by flash chromatography (40%
Et2O/pentane 70% Et2O/pentane), yield quantified relative to nitrobenzene. Run 1 (7.2 mg, 0.055 mmol,
11%); run 2 (7.2 mg, 0.055 mmol, 11%). Average isolated yield: 11%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 3.71
(AB d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.52 (AB d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.76-2.66 (m, 1H), 2.65-2.57 (m, 1H), 2.54-2.39 (br s, 1H), 2.36
(ddd, J = 12.5, 10.5, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.92 (ddd, J = 12.8, 10.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.37 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ
177.6, 86.8, 68.5, 29.7, 29.7, 23.2. IR (film, cm-1): 3438 (br), 2978, 2931, 2879, 1763, 1460, 1383, 1302, 1213, 1161,
1099, 1061, 945. HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d C6H10O3Na [M+Na]+: 153.0528, found 153.0521.
Enantioselectivity of Hydroxylactonization
4-methylvaleric acid (8) (58.1 mg, 0.5 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure A using Fe(R,R-PDP).
Purification by flash chromatography (75% EtOAc/hexanes) afforded the desired hydroxylactone product. Approximately
1 mg of the product was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) in a GC vial and was treated with several crystals of 4-
dimethylaminopyridine, three Pasteur pipette tips of triethylamine, and three Pasteur pipette tips of acetic anhydride. The
GC vial was capped and placed atop the White group oven for 1-2 h and the resulting acetylated hydroxylactone product
was analyzed by chiral GC (J&W cyclodex-β, 100°C isothermal); major enantiomer tR = 50.16 min, minor enantiomer tR
= 48.19 min. Run 1: 12% ee; run 2: 13% ee. Average ee: 13%. Repeating the above procedure with the Fe(S,S-PDP)
catalyst led to isolation of hydroxylactone product of 13% ee, with the opposite sense of stereoinduction.
4-methylpent-4-enoic acid (10) (11.4 mg, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was reacted according to a modification of
general procedure A using Fe(R,R-PDP), whereby the standard three cycles of catalyst/oxidant addition were replaced
with a single cycle. Additionally, 10 equiv. AcOH (57.6 µL, 1.0 mmol, 10 equiv.) were included in the reaction mixture
prior to oxidant addition as a means of simulating the reaction conditions under which the putative olefin intermediate
would be generated, in low concentrations, from the corresponding alkane. The crude reaction mixture was filtered
through a short celite/silica plug (100% EtOAc) and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. Scale-up reactions (0.2 mmol
starting olefin) provided the hydroxylactone product after flash chromatography (100% EtOAc). Run 1 (19.8 mg, 0.152
mmol, 76%); run 2 (18.2 mg, 0.140 mmol, 70%). Average isolated yield: 73%. The resulting hydroxylactone product
was converted to the acetoxy derivative as described above and analyzed by chiral GC (J&W cyclodex-β, 100°C
isothermal); major enantiomer tR = 50.26 min, minor enantiomer tR = 48.10 min. Run 1: 12% ee; run 2 14% ee. Average
ee: 13%. Repeating the above procedure with the Fe(S,S-PDP) catalyst led to isolation of hydroxylactone product of 13%
ee, with the opposite sense of stereoinduction.
4-hydroxy-4-methylpentyl pivalate (12): 4-methylpentyl pivalate (11) (55.9 mg, 0.30 mmol) was
reacted according to general procedure B using Fe(R,R-PDP). Purification by flash
chromatography (5% EtOAc/hexanes 20% EtOAc/hexanes 40% EtOAc/hexanes) afforded
the tertiary alcohol product as a clear, colorless liquid. Notably, GC analysis of the crude reaction mixture revealed
the absence of the epoxide product prepared as a standard (vide infra). Run 1 (29.8 mg tertiary alcohol, 0.147 mmol,
49%; 7.9 mg rsm, 0.042 mmol, 14%); run 2 (28.5 mg tertiary alcohol, 0.141 mmol, 47%; 7.8 mg rsm, 0.042 mmol, 14%)
Average yield: 48%. Average rsm: 14%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 4.07 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.75-1.68 (m, 2H),
1.58 (br s, 1H), 1.54-1.49 (m, 2H), 1.23 (s, 6H), 1.20 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 178.8, 70.7, 64,8, 40.0,
38.8, 29.4, 27.3, 23.9. IR (film, cm-1): 3458 (br), 2970, 2935, 2875, 1730, 1714, 1481, 1464, 1367, 1286, 1159. HRMS
(ESI) m/z calc’d C11H22O3Na [M+Na]+: 225.1467, found 225.1467.
1-oxaspiro[4,4]nonane-2,6-dione (18)8: 3-cyclopentylpropanoic acid (16) (71.1 mg, 0.50 mmol) was reacted
according to general procedure A using Fe(R,R-PDP). Purification by flash chromatography (20%
EtOAc/hexanes 40% EtOAc/hexanes 60% EtOAc/hexanes) afforded the ketolactone as a white,
crystalline solid. Run 1 (12.6 mg, 0.082 mmol, 16%); run 2 (11.5 mg, 0.075 mmol, 15%). Average yield:
16%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 2.78 (dt, J = 17.5, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 2.56 (ddd, J = 17.8, 9.8, 4.5 Hz, 1H),
2.45-2.29 (m, 4H), 2.16-2.01 (m, 3H), 1.96-1.87 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 213.7, 176.0, 86.8, 35.2, 35.0,
28.8, 28.3, 17.8. IR (film, cm-1): 2976, 2954, 2914, 2891, 1772, 1743, 1454, 1412, 1396, 1248, 1223, 1161, 1128, 1039,
980. HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d C8H10O3Na [M+Na]+: 177.0528, found 177.0522.
Representative Procedure for Preparation of 18-O Labeled Carboxylic Acids: Into a solution of 4-
methylpentanenitrile (100 mg, 0.9 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and 97% H218O (120 µL, 6.0 mmol, 6.7 equiv.) in anhydrous 1,4-
dioxane (1 mL, 0.9 M) in a 1 dram borosilicate vial was bubbled anhydrous HCl (g) for ~10 seconds. pH paper indicated
that the vapor above the reaction mixture had a pH <2 and the reaction vial was tightly capped with a Teflon cap and
stirred at ambient temperature for 2h. The pH of the reaction vapor was again checked to ensure a low pH and the
resulting reaction mixture stirred overnight at 100oC. 1H NMR analysis of a reaction aliquot revealed full conversion of
the starting nitrile and the reaction was purified directly by flash chromatography using gradient elution (10%
EtOAc/hexanes 20% EtOAc/hexanes 40% EtOAc/hexanes), affording a pale yellow liquid (84 mg, 72%). To
measure the isotopic enrichment of the resulting carboxylic acid, the corresponding benzyl ester was prepared (1.0 equiv.
carboxylic acid, 4.0 equiv. benzyl bromide, 4.0 equiv. anhydrous triethylamine, and 1 mL anhydrous DMF; stirred
mixture overnight at ambient temperature), and submitted for FI isotope ratio mass spectral analysis (88% double
incorporation of 18-O).
Oxidation of 18-O labeled 4-methylvaleric acid using Fe(PDP): To a solution of 18-O labeled 4-methylvaleric
acid (88% doubly 18-O labeled, 24 mg, 0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and Fe(S,S-PDP) (9.3 mg, 0.01 mmol, 0.05 equiv.) in 0.3
mL CH3CN was added a solution of 50% H216O2 (13.8 µL, 0.24 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) in 1.8 mL CH3CN over a period of 1
min. Stirring followed at ambient temperature for 10 min. The crude reaction mixture was filtered through a short
silica/celite plug (100% EtOAc) and the resulting filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The crude reaction was dissolved in
anhydrous DMF (0.75 mL) and to this solution was added anhydrous triethylamine (83 µL, 0.6 mmol, ~3 equiv.) and
benzyl bromide (71 µL, 0.6 mmol, ~3 equiv.). Stirring followed overnight at ambient temperature in a capped 1 dram vial
and the reaction was thereafter purified directly by flash chromatography (10% EtOAc/hexanes 40% EtOAc/hexanes
75% EtOAc/hexanes). Isolated benzylated starting material (9.1 mg), lactone (4.9 mg), and hydroxylactone (~3 mg)
were submitted to FI isotope ratio mass spectral analysis. Run 1 (benzylated starting material: 88% doubly incorporated;
lactone: 87% singly incorporated, 8% doubly incorporated, 5% no incorporation; hydroxylactone: 78% doubly
incorporated, 22% singly incorporated); run 2 (benzylated starting material: 88% doubly incorporated; lactone: 87%
singly incorporated, 7% doubly incorporated, 6% no incorporation; hydroxylactone: 71% doubly incorporated, 29%
singly incorporated); run 3 (benzylated starting material: 88% doubly incorporated; lactone: 86% singly incorporated, 8%
Oxidation of 18-O labeled 4,4-dimethylvaleric acid using Fe(PDP): To a solution of 18-O labeled 4,4-
dimethylvaleric acid (86% doubly 18-O labeled, 13.8 mg, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and Fe(R,R-PDP) (4.7 mg, 0.005 mmol,
0.05 equiv.) in 0.15 mL CH3CN was added a solution of 50% aqueous H216O2 (6.9 µL, 0.12 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) in 0.9 mL
CH3CN over a period of 1 min. The reaction stirred 10 min at ambient temperature and was filtered through a short
silica/celite plug (100% EtOAc). Unreacted starting material was recovered (13.0 mg, 94% rsm) and submitted for FI
isotope ratio mass spectral analysis (86% doubly 18-O labeled).
Generation of a peroxyacid intermediate using H216O2 would lead to approx. 50% loss in 18-O label in
recovered starting material; because the 18-O label is fully retained, our results demonstrate that such a pathway is not
operative with Fe(PDP).
Taxane-derivative Oxidation/Rearrangement
Fe(PDP)
OAc H2O2 AcO OAc
AcO H O H O
OH O O
O OH O
Reaction of taxusin derivative 24 with Fe(PDP). Independently synthesized 1-hydroxy-4α,20-carbonato-taxusin 24 (37.4 mg,
0.0644 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was reacted following general procedure B with (R,R)-1. No products matching rearranged compound
23 were observed by crude 1H NMR or TLC comparison with a known standard, despite 100% conversion.
"CCDC 794910 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be
obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif."
(R)-5-ethyl-5-methyldihydrofuran-2-one (26): (S)-4-methylhexanoic acid (25) (65.1 mg, 0.50 mmol) was
reacted according to general procedure A and purified by flash chromatography (40% Et2O/pentanes),
taking care to concentrate the volatile product below room temperature by rotary evaporation. The title
compound was isolated as a clear, colorless liquid. Run 1 (35.3 mg, 0.28 mmol, 56%); run 2 (35.9 mg, 0.28 mmol, 56%).
Average yield: 56%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 2.59 (m, 2H), 2.08 (m, 1H), 1.96 (m, 1H), 1.70 (m, 2H), 1.37 (s,
3H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 176.9, 87.3, 33.7, 32.5, 29.3, 25.2, 8.3. IR (film, cm-1):
2974, 2933, 2885, 1768, 1462, 1383, 1240, 1165, 1134, 1103, 937. HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d C7H13O2 [M]+: 129.0916,
found 129.0914. Enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by chiral GC analysis (J&W cyclodex-β, 85°C isothermal);
major enantiomer tR = 15.67 min, minor enantiomer tR = 16.83 min; 98% ee. The starting material was also 98% ee, as
determined by chiral GC analysis of the corresponding methyl ester (J&W cyclodex-β, 45°C isothermal); minor
enantiomer tR = 25.68 min, minor enantiomer tR = 26.18 min; 98% ee. No erosion in ee was observed.
O O
(±)-4-trans-2-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)cyclopropyl)butanoic acid (27): To a flame-dried 50 mL
round-bottomed flask under an atmosphere of N2 was added Rh2(OAc)4 (20.0 mg, 0.045 mmol,
HO OtBu
0.0045 equiv. dimer), methyl 5-hexenoate (1.28 g, 10 mmol, 1 equiv.), and 10 mL dry CH2Cl2.
While at ambient temperature, a solution of tert-butyl diazoacetate (Aldrich, 2.2 g, 14 mmol, 1.4 equiv.) in 20 mL dry
CH2Cl2 was added via syringe pump addition over a period of 4h. The crude reaction mixture was filtered through a short
plug of neutral alumina and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and purified by flash chromatography (hexanes 3%
EtOAc/hexanes 6% EtOAc/hexanes 10% EtOAc/hexanes), affording the trans diastereomer as a colorless oil (dr >
10:1, 370 mg, 15% yield). The resulting methyl ester was hydrolysed by stirring with LiOH•H2O (0.32 g, 7.65 mmol, 5.0
equiv.) in a 3:1 THF:H2O mixture (12 mL THF, 4 mL H2O) overnight at ambient temperature. The reaction was acidified
with 1M aq. HCl (pH = 2) and extracted 3X with CH2Cl2. The combined organics were dried over MgSO4, filtered
through celite, and concentrated in vacuo, affording the title compound as a pale yellow oil (0.33 g, 1.45 mmol, 94%). 1H
NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 2.39 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.76 (p, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.32-1.24 (m, 3H), 1.10-1.07
(m, 1H), 0.65-0.61 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 179.8, 173.8, 80.3, 33.6, 32.4, 28.3, 24.3, 21.8, 21.3, 15.1. IR
(film, cm-1): 3203 (br), 3005, 2980, 2933, 2870, 1712, 1477, 1456, 1408, 1367, 1342, 1284, 1252, 1215, 1155, 1086,
1043, 987, 933. HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d C12H20O4Na [M+Na]+: 251.1259, found 251.1259.
O O
(±)-4-trans-2-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)cyclopropyl)-4-oxobutanoic acid (28): (±)-4-trans-2-
HO OtBu(tert-butoxycarbonyl)cyclopropyl)butanoic acid (27) (Run 1: 57.1 mg, 0.25 mmol, Run 2: 68.5
O mg, 0.30 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure A and purified by flash
chromatography (10% EtOAc/hexanes, 1% AcOH 40% EtOAc/hexanes) to separately provide pure unreacted starting
material and a mixture of ketoacid 28 and lactones 29 that was further purified by flash chromatography (20%
EtOAc/hexanes, no AcOH 40% EtOAc/hexanes, 1% AcOH) to obtain pure samples of each oxidation product. The
title compound was isolated as a white solid. Run 1 (20.5 mg ketoacid, 0.085 mmol, 34% ketoacid; 20.6 mg rsm, 0.090
mmol, 36% rsm); run 2 (22.8 mg ketoacid, 0.094 mmol, 31% ketoacid; 27.0 mg rsm, 0.12 mmol, 40% rsm). Average
O Picrotoxinin-8,9-ene [(+)-34]. To a vigorously stirred solution of solid HgCl2 (1.2 g, 4.42 mmol, 2.6 equiv.) and
Zn dust (12 g, 0.184 mol, 108 equiv.) under argon atmosphere (maintained with a rubber septum and balloon) in a
O 250 mL round bottom flask was added 1M aqueous HCl (30 mL) via syringe. After 15 min, the stirring was
OH stopped, allowing the solution to settle. The liquid was decanted with a syringe, and fresh 1M HCl was added (30
O mL), maintaining inert atmosphere. In a separate 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, chromium(III) chloride hexahydrate
O (19.5 g, 73.2 mmol, 43 equiv.) was dissolved in 30 mL of 1M HCl. The septum on the flask containing the
Zn(Hg) amalgam was quickly removed and the Cr(III)Cl3 solution was rapidly added by pouring. The septum on
the flask was replaced, and the reaction purged with an argon balloon. The reaction was stirred for 1 h, changing from dark forest
green to a deep blue color (CrCl2). In a separate 250 mL round bottom flask containing a stir bar, picrotoxinin (500 mg, 1.71
mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was dissolved in acetone (33 mL, degassed for 30 min with argon). The flask was then purged with argon for 5
min. All of the Cr(II)Cl2 solution was added to the solution of substrate, and the reaction allowed to stir for 15 hrs under argon.
The reaction was worked up by dilution with CH2Cl2 (150 mL) and water (150 mL). The organic layer was separated, and the
aqueous layer extracted twice with CH2Cl2 (2 x 100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with sat. NaHCO3 (2 x 150
mL), dried with MgSO4, and the slurry filtered through celite. Evaporation of solvents yielded white solids, which were further
purified by column chromatography on silica gel (40% ethyl acetate/hexane + 5% acetone) to give the diene product as a white
solid (275.9 mg, 0.98 mmol, 57% yield).
1
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.39 (dd, J = 2.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.98 (dd, J = 4.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (d, J
= 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.39 (bs, 1H), 3.35 (dd, J = 18.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.09 (dd, J = 18.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (d, J =
4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.15 (s, 1H), 1.95 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 3H); 13C NMR: (125 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 175.8, 164.5, 143.8, 141.6, 135.0, 111.8,
O H Tetrahydropicrotoxinin [(-)-35]. To 250 mL round bottom flask was added 34 (523.6 mg, 1.9 mmol, 1.0
equiv.), acetic acid (50 mL), and a stir bar. Platinum oxide (10 mg) was added, and the reaction capped with a
O rubber septum. H2 gas was then bubbled through the solution while vigorously stirring, until white solids began
OH to form in the flask (4-6 hr). The hydrogen balloon was then removed, and additional platinum oxide catalyst was
O added (6 mg). CAUTION: The hydrogen in the flask headspace may ignite during catalyst addition. Keep
O a watch glass nearby to extinguish. The reaction was stirred an additional 8 hr (with H2 bubbling for 2 h, then
stirred with a H2 atmosphere maintained by balloon for 6 h), and then diluted with EtOAc (50 mL). The
solution/catalyst mixture was filtered on silica/celite, and the solvent removed to yield white solids. (466.2 mg, 1.58 mmol, 83%
yield).
1
H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 4.79 (dd, J = 5.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 2.90 (t, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (d, J
= 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.42 (dd, J = 12.8, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (app dt, J = 11.7, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.09-1.94 (m, 4H), 1.57-1.48 (m, 1H), 1.44 (s,
3H), 1.08 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR: (125 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 177.4, 176.1, 83.4, 80.2, 79.2, 55.0,
51.9, 51.8, 51.1, 44.1, 26.6, 26.0, 24.8, 22.3, 20.9; IR (film, cm-1): 3504 (broad), 2960, 2926, 2873, 1788, 1745, 1477, 1448, 1389,
1367, 1319, 1228, 1201, 1176, 1126, 1093, 1012, 970, 920; HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d for C15H21O5 [M+H]+: 281.1389, found
281.1379; [α]D25 = -36.2° (c = 0.57, EtOH).
O
Hydroxy methyl ester [(+)-36]. To a 250 mL round bottom flask was added bis-lactone 35 (466.2 mg, 1.66
H
mmol, 1.0 equiv.), methanol (75 mL), and a stir bar. With stirring, 1N NaOH (75 mL) was slowly added
O (exothermic!). The reaction was stirred for 3 h at room temperature, then quenched by dropwise addition of
OH 2M HCl until reaching a pH of 2. The reaction then extracted with ether (3 x 300 mL), dried over MgSO4,
OMe filtered through celite, and evaporated to produce a crude white powder. The crude material was further
HO
O
purified by elution through a pad of silica gel (90 x 60 mm) with 50% EtOAc/hexanes (ca. 3L) to provide
the methyl ester as a white solid (446.0 mg, 1.43 mmol, 86% yield).
1
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.45 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (dd, J = 11.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 2.80 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H),
2.60 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.18-2.07 (m, 2H), 2.01 (s, 1H), 1.96 (app t, J = 11.8 Hz, 1H), 1.85 (td, J = 13.9, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 1.77-1.71
(m, 2H), 1.56 (dd, J = 14.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.13 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.99 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR: (125 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 178.8, 172.8, 87.4, 81.4, 69.4, 55.2, 53.9, 51.8, 51.4, 40.6, 37.4, 29.5, 27.5, 22.6, 19.7, 16.1; IR (film, cm-1): 3462
(broad), 2958, 2879, 1764, 1732, 1643, 1437, 1367, 1284, 1228, 1196, 1173, 1068, 1011, 980; HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d for
C16H25O6 [M+H]+: 313.1651, found 313.1646; [α]D25 = +56.5° (c = 1.0, CHCl3).
O H Methyl ester acetate [(+)-33]. To a 1-dram screw-top vial was added methyl ester 36 (200.0 mg, 0.64
mmol, 1.0 equiv.), a stir bar, pyridine (1 mL), and acetic anhydride (1 mL). While stirring, N,N-
O dimethylaminopyridine was added (5.0 mg, 0.041 mmol, 0.06 equiv.), and the reaction was stirred at room
OH temperature for 8 hr. The reaction was then slowly poured onto a stirring solution of sat. NaHCO3 (ca. 50
OMe
AcO mL), and allowed to quench until bubbling stopped (10 min). The mixture was extracted with diethyl ether
O (3 x 40 mL), and the combined organic layers washed with 1N HCl (5 x 10 mL). After drying the organic
layer over MgSO4, filtration through celite, and evaporation of the solvent, the crude acetate was isolated as
a white solid (194.2 mg, 0.55 mmol, 86% yield). This material required no additional purification.
1
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.95 (dd, J = 11.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 2.73 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H),
2.66 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 2.31 (td, J = 12.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 2.14 (s, 1H), 2.11 (s, 3H), 2.16-2.06 (m, 2H), 1.86 (td, J = 13.5, 6.0 Hz,
1H), 1.68 (septet, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.53 (dd, J = 14.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 1.33 (s, 3H), 1.06 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.83 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H);
13
C NMR: (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.9, 172.3, 170.1, 83.4, 81.1, 70.4, 54.9, 54.1, 52.0, 51.6, 37.8, 37.6, 29.3, 27.4, 22.4, 21.2, 19.5,
16.2; IR (film, cm-1): 3489 (broad), 2954, 2933, 2879, 1765, 1738, 1730, 1464, 1439, 1369, 1232, 1194, 1173, 1149, 1036, 1011,
980, 951, 903; HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d for C18H27O7 [M+H]+: 355.1757, found 355.1745; [α]D25 = +75.0° (c = 0.9, CHCl3).
O
Carboxylic Acid [(+)-30]. This procedure was adapted from Wu and coworkers.11 To a dry, 10 mL
H
microwave tube containing methyl ester 33 (27.8 mg, 0.079 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was added lithium chloride
O (200 mg, dried 24 h at 200°C, 0.1 torr) and a stir bar (inside the glove box). Dry DMF (0.5 mL) was added
OH while stirring vigorously under an argon atmosphere for 10 min; the tube was then quickly closed with a
OH
AcO
O
O H Lactone [(+)-31]. Following general procedure A, acid 30 (71.4 mg, 0.21 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was reacted with
catalyst (S,S)-1. Analysis of the crude reaction mixture indicated a mixture of diastereomers. [Run 1: (1.6:1
O
d.r.); run 2: (1.5:1 d.r.); average: 1.6:1 d.r. (32α/32β, 1H NMR, acetone-d6). Flash chromatography with silica
OH
O
gel (gradient, 20%30%50% acetone/hexanes) was used to isolate the lactone product as white crystals
AcO [Run 1: (26.1 mg, 0.077 mmol), 37% yield; run 2 (74.2 mg scale): (29.1 mg, 0.086 mmol, 39% yield);
O average: 38% yield], along with a mixture of hydroxylactones 32α and 32β [Run 1: (29.6 mg, 0.084 mmol,
40% yield); run 2: (29.7 mg, 0.084 mmol, 38% yield); average: 39% yield]. The hydroxylactone diastereomers could be separated
by MPLC (gradient, 050% acetone/hexanes) to obtain pure samples for spectroscopic analysis.
1
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.10 (dd, J = 11.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 2.76 (d, J =
7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (bs, 1H), 2.50 (dd, J = 14.5, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.35-2.30 (m, 1H), 2.19 (dd, J = 12.3, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.13 (s, 3H), 1.95
(dd, J = 13.3, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 1.59 (td, J = 13.5, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.53 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H); 13C NMR: (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ
178.5, 173.7, 170.0, 84.5, 84.2, 79.8, 70.8, 55.0, 54.1, 48.3, 44.0, 35.3, 28.7, 28.5, 20.7, 20.5, 19.1; IR (film, cm-1): 3489 (broad),
2954, 2922, 2854, 1780, 1739 (2 peaks), 1464, 1377, 1263, 1240, 1174, 1120, 1072, 1036; HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d for C17H23O7
[M+H]+: 339.1444, found 339.1448; [α]D25 = +130.1° (c = 1.22, CHCl3).
O H Hydroxylactone [(+)-32α]. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.48 (dd, J = 12.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.66 (d, J = 4.0
Hz, 1H), 3.86 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (d, J = 7.5 Hz,
O 1H), 2.56 (dd, J = 14.5, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.38-2.30 (m, 1H), 2.19 (dd, J = 12.5, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.17 (s, 1H), 2.13 (s,
OH 3H), 1.88 (dd, J = 13.3, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 1.58 (td, J = 13.5, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H); 13C NMR: (125
O
AcO MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.7, 175.0, 170.2, 85.5, 84.4, 80.2, 70.9, 66.1, 55.2, 54.0, 48.7, 43.6, 34.6, 28.6, 24.3, 20.9,
O 19.2; IR (film, cm-1): 3473 (broad), 2947, 2929, 2873, 1763, 1751, 1462, 1379, 1329, 1286, 1236, 1178, 1119,
1066, 1038; HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d for C17H22O8Na [M+Na]+: 377.1212, found 377.1205; [α]D25 = +132.7° (c
OH
= 0.32, EtOH).
O H Hydroxylactone [(+)-32β]. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.11 (dd, J = 11.3, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 4.0
Hz, 1H), 3.78 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 2.88 (ABq, Δυ = 34.9 Hz, Jab = 15.0 Hz, 1H),
O 2.87 (ABq, Δυ = 22.4 Hz, Jab = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 2.77 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.39-2.31 (m, 1H), 2.20 (dd, J = 12.5,
OH 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.13 (s, 3H), 1.94 (dd, J = 13.5, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 1.66 (bs, 2H); 1.64 (td, J = 13.5, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 1.37
O (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 3H); 13C NMR: (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.4, 173.5, 170.0, 86.3, 84.1, 79.9, 70.7, 67.4, 55.1,
AcO
O 54.1, 47.9, 37.4, 35.3, 28.5, 20.8, 19.2, 15.9; IR (film, cm-1): 3464 (broad), 2929, 2872, 2854, 1765, 1749,
1462, 1377, 1329, 1284, 1236, 1186, 1115, 1070, 1036, 982; HRMS (ESI) m/z calc’d for C17H22O8Na
OH [M+Na]+: 377.1212, found 377.1220; [α]D25 = +104.7° (c = 0.47, EtOH).
Reaction of Methyl Ester (+)-33. Methyl ester 33 (70.9 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was reacted according to general procedure B
with catalyst (S,S)-1. Flash chromatography yielded only recovered starting material as a white solid (63.9 mg, 0.18 mmol, 90%
recovery). Reaction of methyl ester 33 (63.0 mg, 0.18 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) with catalyst (R,R)-1 under identical conditions also
provided only starting material (59.8 mg, 0.169 mmol, 94% recovery).
References
1
Chen, M.S.; White, M.C. Science 2007, 318, 783-787.
2
Still, W.C.; Kahn, M.; Mitra, A. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2923-2925.
3
Rodeschini, V.; Van de Weghe, P.; Salomon, E.; Tarnus, C.; Eustache, J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2409-2412. Takasu,
K. Mizutani, S.; Ihara, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2881-2884.
4
Jahn, U.; Hartmann, P.; Dix, I.; Jones, P.G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 3333-3355.
5
Martín, D.D.; Marcos, I.S.; Basabe, P.; Romero, R.E.; Moro, R.F.; Lumeras, W.; Rodríguez, L.; Urones, J.G. Synthesis
2001, 1013-1022
6
Sato, T.; Kaneko, H.; Yamaguchi, S. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3778-3782.
7
Schomaker, J.M.; Travis, B.R.; Borhan, B. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3089-3092.
8
Mandal, A.K.; Jawalkar, D.G. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2364-2369.
9
Marschall, H.; Penninger, J.; Weyerstahl, P. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1982, 49-67.
10
Prepared according to the following procedure: Mello, R.; Fiorentino, M.; Fusco, C.; Curci, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 6749-6757. Despite extensive experimentation, we were unable to generate solutions of TFDO with concentrations
greater than 0.1-0.2 M.
11
Wu, X.-A.; Ying, P.; Liu, J.-Y.; Shen, H.-S.; Chen, Y.; He, L. Synth. Comm. 2009, 39, 3459.
exp1 std1h
dp y wc 250
hs nn hzmm 22.39
is 500.00
rfl 5320.6
rfp 2903.6
th 20
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 std13c
46.465
43.491
42.414
39.994
28.812
23.843
21.369
16.719
at 1.311 PROCESSING
np 65536 lb 1.00
sw 25000.0 wtfile
fb 14000 proc ft
bs 16 fn not used
tpwr 54 math f
pw 5.1
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1966.4 wexp
nt 1200 wbs
ct 119 wnt
alock n DISPLAY
77.160
76.841
77.471
gain not used sp -0.9
FLAGS wp 22106.9
il n vs 162
in n sc 0
S2
dp y wc 250
hs nn hzmm 88.43
is 500.00
rfl 8786.0
rfp 7759.7
th 14
ins 100.000
nm ph
180.267
209.482
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -994.8
wp 6992.2
vs 144
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 27.97
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.cis55.acid.carbon
exp1 s2pul
29.287
30.225
23.674
ACQUISITION dmf 19608
29.961
sfrq 125.661 dseq
22.517
alock n PROCESSING
S4
FLAGS wtfile
il n proc ft 77.416
76.911
in n fn not used
dp y math f
77.160
hs nn
DISPLAY werr
sp 0.2 wexp
wp 27624.2 wbs
183.259
vs 105 wnt
sc 0
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1011.9
wp 7024.7
vs 80
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 17.01
is 33.57
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
STANDARD CARBON PARAMETERS
exp1 s2pul
77.416
77.160
76.911
ACQUISITION dmf 19608
sfrq 125.661 dseq
tn C13 dres 90.0
at 1.086 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 30165.9 lb 1.00
40.130
fb 17000 wtfile
23.814
27.528
41.295
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 54 math f
43.486
pw 6.0
d1 1.000 werr
21.000
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -11.8
wp 27641.7
vs 162
85.520
sc 0
wc 250
207.027
hzmm 110.57
is 500.00
rfl 10968.8
rfp 9694.9
th 8
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -996.0
wp 6995.1
vs 75
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 27.98
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.820A.hl1.si.carbon
exp1 s2pul
77.417
77.160
76.903
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 3.9
d1 10.000 werr
23.286
43.986
ct 908 wnt
alock n
S8
FLAGS
50.386
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp 8.2
86.593
wp 27632.8
vs 1937
sc 0
wc 250
207.102
175.188
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -2.8
wp 5996.3
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 23.99
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ppm
MAB.820A.hl2.si.carbon
exp1 s2pul
77.417
77.160
76.903
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 3.9
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
nt 12000 wbs
ct 2352 wnt
alock n
S10
hs nn
DISPLAY
43.294
sp 11.2
42.905
23.846
wp 27632.8
16.684
vs 162
sc 0
66.118
wc 250
is 500.00
206.939
174.014
rfl 11889.6
rfp 9689.9
th 4
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -993.8
wp 6982.2
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 27.93
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.826A.si.carbon
exp1 s2pul
77.417
77.160
76.903
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
30.144
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
29.336
fb 18000 wtfile
26.591
28.698
bs 16 proc ft
23.869
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 3.9
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
50.433
nt 1200 wbs
ct 482 wnt
46.677
alock n
S12
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
180.422
is 500.00
rfl 11892.6
rfp 9689.9
th 9
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
dp y lb 0.30
hs nn wtfile
DISPLAY proc ft
sp -1011.9 fn not used
wp 7024.7 math f
vs 70
sc 0 werr
wc 250 wexp
hzmm 28.10 wbs
is 998.42 wnt
rfl 4639.9
rfp 3627.8
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.826A.hl1.carbon.final
exp1 s2pul
77.416
77.160
76.904
at 1.086 dmf 19608
np 65536 dseq
sw 30165.9 dres 90.0
fb 17000 homo n
bs 16 DEC2
ss 1 dfrq2 0
tpwr 54 dn2
pw 6.0 dpwr2 1
d1 6.000 dof2 0
tof 1884.7 dm2 n
nt 120000 dmm2 c
ct 4281 dmf2 10000
alock n dseq2
gain not used dres2 1.0
FLAGS homo2 n
il n PROCESSING
S14
in n lb 1.00
dp y wtfile
hs nn proc ft
29.067
sp -13.6 math f
46.409
25.125
wp 27650.9
vs 582 werr
48.688
66.375
sc 0 wexp
wc 250 wbs
hzmm 110.60 wnt
is 500.00
rfl 10966.1
rfp 9694.9
th 6
180.028
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -994.5
wp 6992.2
vs 52
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 27.97
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.826A.hl2.si.carbon
exp1 s2pul
77.417
77.160
76.911
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
30.401
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 3.9
29.025
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
26.614
nt 120000 wbs
45.674
ct 4128 wnt
alock n
70.465
S16
dp y
18.838
hs nn
86.849
DISPLAY
sp 8.2
wp 27632.8
vs 1126
sc 0
180.880
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -993.3
wp 6982.2
vs 151
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 27.93
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
2.00 6.56
2.03
MAB.4methylvaleric.lac.si.carbon
exp1 s2pul
np 65536 lb 1.00
sw 32000.0 wtfile
fb 18000 proc ft
29.406
bs 16 fn not used
ss 1 math f
tpwr 63
pw 3.9 werr
d1 1.000 wexp
tof 1880.0 wbs
nt 1200 wnt
ct 240
S18
alock n
77.417
gain not used
76.903
FLAGS
77.160
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp 20.9
84.649
wp 27594.7
vs 162
sc 0
176.736
hzmm 110.38
is 500.00
rfl 11899.4
rfp 9689.9
th 9
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 std1h
FLAGS wc 250
il n hzmm 22.39
in n is 500.00
dp y rfl 5322.0
hs nn rfp 2902.1
th 20
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
77.417
77.160
76.903
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
29.686
29.725
pw 3.9
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
nt 1200 wbs
23.169
ct 464 wnt
alock n
S20
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp 0.4
wp 27641.6
vs 162
sc 0
29.818
wc 250
is 500.00
177.575
rfl 11891.6
rfp 9689.9
th 5
ins 100.000
nm ph
S21
=====================================================================
Injection Date : 4/8/2010 7:11:44 PM
Sample Name : MAB.958B Location : Vial 101
Acq. Operator : sad
Acq. Instrument : Chiral GC Inj Volume : Manually
Acq. Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB100MB.M
Last changed : 4/8/2010 7:09:40 PM by sad
(modified after loading)
Analysis Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB210DC.M
Last changed : 4/24/2010 11:56:17 AM by sad
(modified after loading)
Test
FID1 A, (SAD\SR002050.D)
Ar 48.074
Ar 50.212
counts
.1
.6
59
79
2000
80
79
:2
:2
ea
ea
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 min
=====================================================================
Area Percent Report
=====================================================================
Sorted By : Signal
Multiplier : 1.0000
Dilution : 1.0000
Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs
Signal 1: FID1 A,
S22
=====================================================================
Injection Date : 4/9/2010 8:09:12 AM
Sample Name : MAB.958D Location : Vial 101
Acq. Operator : sad
Acq. Instrument : Chiral GC Inj Volume : Manually
Acq. Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB100MB.M
Last changed : 4/9/2010 8:03:11 AM by sad
(modified after loading)
Analysis Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB210DC.M
Last changed : 4/24/2010 4:36:32 PM by sad
(modified after loading)
Test
FID1 A, (SAD\SR002051.D)
Ar 50.160
counts
6
26
70
31
:1
11
A48.185
ea
13
a:
re
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 min
=====================================================================
Area Percent Report
=====================================================================
Sorted By : Signal
Multiplier : 1.0000
Dilution : 1.0000
Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs
Signal 1: FID1 A,
S23
=====================================================================
Injection Date : 4/8/2010 5:53:15 PM
Sample Name : MAB.958B Location : Vial 101
Acq. Operator : sad
Acq. Instrument : Chiral GC Inj Volume : Manually
Acq. Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB100MB.M
Last changed : 4/8/2010 5:52:05 PM by sad
(modified after loading)
Analysis Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB210DC.M
Last changed : 4/24/2010 4:36:32 PM by sad
(modified after loading)
Test
FID1 A, (SAD\SR002049.D)
Ar 50.263
counts
.9
86
59
:1
1500
ea
7.
04
A48.116
12
a:
re
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 min
=====================================================================
Area Percent Report
=====================================================================
Sorted By : Signal
Multiplier : 1.0000
Dilution : 1.0000
Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs
Signal 1: FID1 A,
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -994.0
wp 6992.4
vs 151
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 27.97
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.848C.tert.alcohol.carbon
exp1 s2pul
77.416
77.160
76.911
nt 1200 wbs
ct 256 wnt
alock n
40.013
23.902
S25
64.814
sp 7.6
wp 27647.2
vs 162
38.848
sc 0
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1012.2
wp 7024.7
vs 26
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 28.10
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.864B.epox.si.carbon
exp1 s2pul
27.294
ACQUISITION dmf 19608
sfrq 125.661 dseq
77.416
76.904
tn C13 dres 90.0
77.160
at 1.086 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 30165.9 lb 1.00
fb 17000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 54 math f
pw 6.0
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1884.7 wexp
24.539
nt 12000 wbs
ct 224 wnt
64.074
alock n
33.170
S27
FLAGS
21.000
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
56.564
sp 7.6
38.841
wp 27647.2
vs 162
sc 0
178.621
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1012.2
wp 7024.7
vs 98
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 17.01
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.912A.si.carbon
exp1 s2pul
38.527
23.838
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
32.563
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
29.911
pw 3.9
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
nt 1200 wbs
ct 192 wnt
alock n 76.903
77.409
S29
sc 0
wc 250
176.899
is 500.00
rfl 11897.5
rfp 9689.9
th 9
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1011.7
wp 7024.7
vs 96
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 10.22
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.786A.ketolac.si.carbon
exp1 s2pul
77.409
77.160
76.903
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 3.9
d1 10.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
nt 1200 wbs
35.044
28.838
ct 65 wnt
alock n
S31
35.238
FLAGS
il n
28.294
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp 25.8
wp 27594.7
86.779
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
213.681
is 500.00
rfl 11894.5
rfp 9689.9
th 7
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -994.3
wp 6996.1
vs 178
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 27.98
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.925A.V-147.si.carbon
exp1 s2pul
77.417
77.160
76.903
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
26.676
29.398
34.834
31.746
tpwr 63 math f
pw 3.9
19.281
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
nt 12000 wbs
ct 288 wnt
alock n
S33
wp 27650.4
vs 162
sc 0
177.467
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.846A.V-66.carbon
exp1 std13c
77.479
77.160
76.841
ACQUISITION PROCESSING
sfrq 100.527 lb 1.00
tn C13 wtfile
at 1.311 proc ft
np 65536 fn not used
sw 25000.0 math f
fb 14000
bs 16 werr
tpwr 50 wexp
pw 5.1 wbs
d1 1.000 wnt
tof 1966.4 DISPLAY
nt 10000 sp -2.5
ct 1689 wp 22106.9
alock n vs 162
gain not used sc 0
S35
FLAGS wc 250
il n hzmm 88.43
in n is 500.00
39.778
dp y rfl 8783.7
23.793
hs nn rfp 7755.8
th 4
ins 100.000
nm ph
35.869
30.108
82.192
80
60
40
20
211.3
208.3
209.3
212.3
0 © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
m/z 200 202 204 206 208 210 212 214 216 218 220
University of Illinois SCS Mass Spectrometry Laboratory
File: MAB811AV35 Date Run: 09-10-2009 (09:51:56) Ionization mode: FI+
Sample: M. Bigi MAB.811A.V-35
S37
Instrument: 70-VSE(A)
80
60
40
20
211.2
208.2
209.2
212.2
0 © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
m/z 206 208 210 212 214 216 218 220
University of Illinois SCS Mass Spectrometry Laboratory
File: MAB822ASPOT1 Date Run: 09-25-2009 (09:53:49) Ionization mode: FI+
Sample: M. Bigi MAB.822A.spot1
S39
Instrument: 70-VSE(A)
80
60
40
117.1
20
118.1
114.0
115.0
119.1
107.0
0 © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
m/z 106 108 110 112 114 116 118 120 122 124
University of Illinois SCS Mass Spectrometry Laboratory
File: mab822aspot2 Date Run: 09-25-2009 (09:15:38) Ionization mode: FI+
Sample: M. Bigi MAB.822A.spot2
S41
Instrument: 70-VSE(A)
80
135.1
60
40
132.1
133.1
20
136.1
131.1
130.1
0 © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
m/z 126 128 130 132 134 136 138 140
University of Illinois SCS Mass Spectrometry Laboratory
File: mab822aspot3 Date Run: 09-25-2009 (09:40:40) Ionization mode: FI+
Sample: M. Bigi MAB.822A.spot3
S43
Instrument: 70-VSE(A)
80
60
40
135.2
20
117.1
133.2
80
60
40
135.2
20
117.1
133.2
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1510.6
wp 7999.8
vs 103
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 32.00
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 ppm
sr46vii-col2-row3
sr46vii-col2-row3
Pulse Sequence: s2pul
exp1 s2pul
77.256
77.000
76.751
76.509
42.513
41.568
39.011
27.097
26.467
26.094
24.753
23.727
ACQUISITION dmf 19608
sfrq 125.661 dseq
tn C13 dres 90.0
at 1.086 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 30165.9 lb 1.00
fb 17000 wtfile
bs 8 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 54 math f
pw 6.0
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1884.7 wexp
nt 18500 wbs
17.426
ct 18500 wnt
20.554
79.081
20.635
68.823
62.852
alock n
69.043
20.840
75.667
69.248
21.097
S49
il n
85.323
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
168.629
169.361
170.072
170.622
sp -1290.3
wp 30165.0
137.277
146.048
vs 730
sc 0
wc 250
152.796
S50
=====================================================================
Injection Date : 3/23/2010 11:59:55 AM
Sample Name : MAB.943A Location : Vial 101
Acq. Operator : sad
Acq. Instrument : Chiral GC Inj Volume : Manually
Acq. Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB045MB.M
Last changed : 3/18/2010 10:05:02 AM by sad
Analysis Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB210DC.M
Last changed : 4/24/2010 3:31:24 PM by sad
(modified after loading)
Test
FID1 A, (SAD\SR002032.D)
Ar 25.354
counts
.1
33
64
:5
ea
3500
3000
1
6.
79
A26.136
30
2500
a:
re
2000
1500
1000
500
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 min
=====================================================================
Area Percent Report
=====================================================================
Sorted By : Signal
Multiplier : 1.0000
Dilution : 1.0000
Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs
Signal 1: FID1 A,
S51
=====================================================================
Injection Date : 3/23/2010 9:20:08 AM
Sample Name : MAB.948A Location : Vial 101
Acq. Operator : sad
Acq. Instrument : Chiral GC Inj Volume : Manually
Acq. Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB085DC.M
Last changed : 12/1/2007 4:37:26 PM by SR
Analysis Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB210DC.M
Last changed : 4/24/2010 3:35:14 PM by sad
(modified after loading)
Test
FID1 A, (SAD\SR002030.D)
Ar 16.740
counts
.9
24
4000
04
:3
ea
3500
8
9.
86
A15.956
16
a:
3000
re
2500
2000
1500
1000
=====================================================================
Area Percent Report
=====================================================================
Sorted By : Signal
Multiplier : 1.0000
Dilution : 1.0000
Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs
Signal 1: FID1 A,
S52
=====================================================================
Injection Date : 3/23/2010 2:34:24 PM
Sample Name : MAB.943.chiral Location : Vial 101
Acq. Operator : sad
Acq. Instrument : Chiral GC Inj Volume : Manually
Acq. Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB045MB.M
Last changed : 3/18/2010 10:05:02 AM by sad
Analysis Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB210DC.M
Last changed : 4/24/2010 3:31:24 PM by sad
(modified after loading)
Test
FID1 A, (SAD\SR002035.D)
Ar 26.188
counts
.6
90
2500
17
:3
ea
2250
2000
1750
1500
1250
1000
1
16
0.
A25.670
35
750
a:
re
500
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 min
=====================================================================
Area Percent Report
=====================================================================
Sorted By : Signal
Multiplier : 1.0000
Dilution : 1.0000
Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs
Signal 1: FID1 A,
S53
=====================================================================
Injection Date : 4/10/2010 1:56:16 PM
Sample Name : MAB.947C Location : Vial 101
Acq. Operator : sad
Acq. Instrument : Chiral GC Inj Volume : Manually
Acq. Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB085DC.M
Last changed : 12/1/2007 4:37:26 PM by SR
Analysis Method : C:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\SUB210DC.M
Last changed : 4/24/2010 3:35:14 PM by sad
(modified after loading)
Test
FID1 A, (SAD\SR002054.D)
Ar 15.476
counts
23
60
6000
:4
ea
5000
4000
3000
2000
9
74
8.
A16.357
44
a:
re
1000
=====================================================================
Area Percent Report
=====================================================================
Sorted By : Signal
Multiplier : 1.0000
Dilution : 1.0000
Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs
Signal 1: FID1 A,
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1012.2
wp 7024.7
vs 21
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 28.10
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.1048E.sm.carbon
exp1 s2pul
32.357
28.283
24.319
ACQUISITION dmf 19608
sfrq 125.661 dseq
tn C13 dres 90.0
at 1.086 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 30165.9 lb 1.00
fb 17000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 54 math f
pw 6.0
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1884.7 wexp
nt 1200 wbs
33.624
ct 128 wnt
21.828
alock n
S55
21.323
FLAGS
il n 77.416
76.911
77.160
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -21.0
80.296
wp 27662.8
vs 162
179.764
sc 0
173.771
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1012.4
wp 7024.7
vs 14
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 28.10
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.1048E.ketoacid.carbon.overnight
exp1 s2pul
alock n
gain not used
25.382
FLAGS
28.847
il n
in n
dp y
76.904
17.286
77.160
hs nn
77.416
81.497
DISPLAY
sp -22.8
wp 27662.8
vs 162
sc 0
171.221
hzmm 110.65
205.862
is 500.00
rfl 10968.8
rfp 9694.9
th 6
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
205.862
d1 1.000 wexp
tof 1884.7 wbs
nt 120000 wnt
ct 17088
S58
alock n
gain not used
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp 20668.4
wp 6970.7
vs 1870
sc 0
is 500.00
rfl 10968.8
rfp 9694.9
th 6
ins 100.000
nm ph
215 210 205 200 195 190 185 180 175 170 ppm
MAB.1048E.lacs.proton
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1000.4
wp 7004.4
vs 15
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 28.02
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -0 -1 ppm
MAB.1048E.lacs.carbon
exp1 s2pul
77.409
77.160
76.903
28.231
28.037
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 4.3
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
nt 1200 wbs
ct 992 wnt
alock n
S60
FLAGS
27.990
28.706
18.527
19.460
il n
11.925
in n
80.939
dp y
hs nn
28.815
81.001
DISPLAY
11.481
sp -56.2
82.005
wp 27660.2
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
172.303
is 500.00
176.767
rfl 11889.6
rfp 9689.9
th 7
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1510.1
wp 7999.8
vs 20
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 32.00
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 ppm
sr105vi-col1-13C
exp1 s2pul
80.400
78.993
29.956
29.800
29.644
206.423
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
111.801
29.333
19.815
30.259
sfrq 125.596 dseq 23.315
29.489
30.111
tn C13 dres 1.0
49.777
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
50.197
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
50.360
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 3.9
54.280
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
141.638
nt 32767 wbs
ct 47 wnt
83.480
alock n
S62
134.959
il n
in n
dp y
143.761
hs nn
DISPLAY
175.768
sp -2123.9
wp 31999.0
vs 162
164.501
sc 0
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1502.5
wp 7999.8
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 32.00
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 ppm
sr107vi-crude-c13
exp1 s2pul
29.945
29.789
29.642
206.171
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f 30.100
pw 3.9
29.486
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
nt 32767 wbs
ct 205 wnt
alock n
S64
in n
dp y
51.843
44.129
26.041
51.120
24.844
20.886
22.347
51.858
26.593
hs nn
54.953
29.331
79.169
83.352
80.172
DISPLAY
sp -2111.5
wp 31999.0
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1508.4
wp 7999.8
vs 151
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 1.31
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 ppm
sr111vi-c13
exp1 s2pul
77.249
77.000
76.751
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
81.417
bs 1 proc ft
ss 1 fn 16384
tpwr 63 math f
40.607
53.795
37.310
pw 3.9
51.338
36.532
27.449
51.774
16.158
29.409
19.611
22.504
d1 10.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
87.420
nt 32 wbs 55.102
ct 23 wnt
69.348
alock n
S66
gain 60
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
172.804
sp -2224.7
178.932
wp 31996.1
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1509.1
wp 7999.8
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 32.00
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 ppm
sr119vi-crude
exp1 s2pul
77.257
77.000
76.743
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 8 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 3.9
d1 2.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
nt 32767 wbs
ct 135 wnt
alock n
S68
DISPLAY
52.022
54.869
54.091
70.429
29.347
sp -2217.9
16.213
19.533
37.574
21.236
37.807
wp 31999.0
vs 162
sc 0
172.322
170.129
wc 250
178.947
is 500.00
rfl 11888.7
rfp 9669.8
th 7
ins 100.000
nm ph
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Pulse Sequence: s2pul
11
sr134vii-pure
12
exp1 s2pul
77.508
77.252
76.995
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 32000.0 lb 0.10
fb 18000 wtfile
bs 16 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 3.9
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp
nt 32767 wbs
ct 1632 wnt
alock n
S70
hs nn 83.675
16.348
19.746
DISPLAY
81.521
22.740
29.645
70.564
27.724
sp -2187.3
55.097
37.943
wp 31999.0
52.041
37.709
54.218
vs 162
179.378
170.490
sc 0
wc 250
176.944
is 500.00
rfl 2188.2
rfp 0
th 3
ins 100.000
nm ph
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1502.1
wp 7999.8
vs 202
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 32.00
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 ppm
sr71vii-col1-lactone-13C
exp1 s2pul
84.185
79.838
77.257
77.000
76.751
28.725
20.746
ACQUISITION dmf 22222
35.303
28.476
20.482
sfrq 125.596 dseq
tn C13 dres 1.0
at 1.024 homo n
54.075
48.321
np 65536 PROCESSING
19.129
sw 32000.0 lb 1.00
44.005
fb 18000 wtfile
70.756
bs 4 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 63 math f
pw 5.5
d1 1.000 werr
tof 1880.0 wexp 55.032
nt 32767 wbs
ct 331 wnt
alock n
S72
84.527
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
170.005
hs nn
DISPLAY
173.698
sp -2220.8
wp 31999.0
178.496
vs 162
sc 0
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1510.4
wp 7999.8
vs 51
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 32.00
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 ppm
sr71vii-col2-HL-A-13C
exp1 s2pul
77.256
77.000
76.751
ACQUISITION dmf 19608
sfrq 125.661 dseq
tn C13 dres 90.0
at 1.086 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 30165.9 lb 1.00
fb 17000 wtfile
bs 8 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 54 math f
pw 6.0
d1 3.000 werr
tof 1884.7 wexp
nt 32767 wbs
ct 400 wnt
alock n
54.016
70.911
S74
48.733
80.180
84.385
66.134
55.247
il n
19.177
24.335
20.862
in n
28.570
43.627
dp y
85.514
34.644
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1290.3
178.725
wp 30165.0
175.010
vs 572
170.175
sc 0
wc 250
exp1 s2pul
FLAGS
il n
in n
dp y
hs nn
DISPLAY
sp -1510.4
wp 7999.8
vs 60
sc 0
wc 250
hzmm 1.36
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 ppm
sr71vii-col2-HL-B-13C
exp1 s2pul
77.256
77.000
76.751
ACQUISITION dmf 19608
sfrq 125.661 dseq
tn C13 dres 90.0
at 1.086 homo n
np 65536 PROCESSING
sw 30165.9 lb 2.00
fb 17000 wtfile
bs 8 proc ft
ss 1 fn not used
tpwr 54 math f
pw 6.0
d1 2.000 werr
tof 1884.7 wexp
nt 32767 wbs
ct 1780 wnt
alock n
S76
in n
70.655
67.358
79.945
84.070
35.325
dp y
15.902
19.192
37.443
hs nn
47.935
DISPLAY
28.548
20.804
86.342
sp -1288.5
55.056
wp 30165.0
vs 807
169.992
173.486
sc 0
wc 250
178.373
is 500.00
rfl 10964.2
rfp 9674.8
th 10
ins 100.000
nm ph