Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHM 510
Experiment 7
Group members:
Prepared for:
Dr Intan Soraya
Date of experiment:
08 October 2019
Date of submission:
15 October 2019
INDEX FULL MARKS MARKS
Objective 1.0
Introduction 2.0
Procedure 1.0
Calculations 3.0
Discussion 2.0
Conclusion 1.0
Questions 3.0
References 1.0
Jotter 2.0
OBJECTIVE:
To analyse compound in the waste water using Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) and Gas
Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector (ECD).
INTRODUCTION:
Figure 1: chlorpyrifos
(ii). The cartridge was rinsed by passing 6 mL of deionized water without applying vacuum.
(iii). Then, the filtered water sample was passed through the preconditioned column using a
vacuum manifold at ~6 mL per min (about 48 drops min-1). The column should not be
allowed to dry during this sample enrichment step.
(v). The interference was removed by eluting the column with 10 mL of deionized water and
the cartridge was dried by vacuum for 30 minutes. The cartridge was placed into tube rack.
(vi). After that, the pesticide was eluted using 5 mL of hexane. The sample was concentrated
to 1 mL by blowing down using gentle nitrogen and the sample were sealed by using parafilm
for GC analysis.
c) Instrument Set-up
Column Temperature: Initial Temperature 165oC for 3 minutes, increase to 260oC at 3oC
min-1 with final time of 2 minutes
d) Quantitative Analysis Of Chlorpyrifos
(i). 1 µL of sample was injected onto the column. The injection was repeated to get
reproducible peak areas.
(ii). Then, 1 µL of standard chlorpyrifos were injected and repeated to get reproducible peak
area.
(iii). The concentrations of chlorpyrifos in the sample were calculated using the data from
standard solution.
CALCULATION
x = 0.0001 g/mL
MV mass
No. mole = =
1000 molar mass
MV
Mass chloropyrifos = × molar mass
1000
g
= ( 0.0001
mL )
(100 mL)
× 350.59 g/mol
1000
= 0.003506 g @ 0.3506 mg
amount
RF =
peak area
30
=
3.07805e4
= 9.7464e¯⁴ ppm/Hz*s
= 11.79 ppm
Percentage of recovery of sample:
11.79 ppm
= × 100 %
30 ppm
= 39.3%
DISCUSSION
In this experiment, CG with Electron Capture detector is used because the analyte to be
analysed is halogenated compound. ECD only can detect analytes which contain
electronegative functional groups that can capture electrons as halogens, peroxides, quinones
and nitro groups. The disadvantage of ECD is it involve radioactive component. The amount
of chlorpyrifos in samples is calculated by using response factor calculation that base on the
standard compound. The amount of chlorpyrifos in each sample does not show big different,
it show that same procedure was carried out each sample. The retention time of chlorpyrifos
in standard is 5.516min while retention time of chlorpyrifos in sample is 5.602 min, the
retention time in sample we get from the retention time of standard in range. Then we
calculated of response factor for standard and we get 9.7464e¯⁴ ppm/Hz*s. We multiply
peak area of sample with respon factor to get the amount of chloropyrifos in sample to
calculated the average amount of chlorpyrifos. The average of chlorprifos in the sample is
5.895ppm, that is about half from the amount of chlorpyrifos in the standard. The percentage
recovery calculated 39.3% in average. In order to get higher amount of chlorpyrifos or the
percentage recovery, the SPE must be carried out carefully so it will extract more
chlorpyrifos efficiciently.
CONCLUSION
The average amount of chlorpyrifos in sample is 5.895ppm and the percentage recovery is
39.3%.
REFERENCE: