CHIR13008- Professional Chiropractic Practice -1
ASSESSMENT 1- PORTFOLIO MARKING RUBRIC & FEEDBACK
SUBMISSION DETAILS (student to complete)
Name: Chelsea Graving
https://chelseagravings0268698.weebly.com
SID: s0268698
First marker:
EXCELLENT
MARKING DOMAIN
(100-85%)
COMPLETION OF
• All assessment preparation tasks
ASSESSMENT TASKS were fully completed and accurately
submitted in a timely manner
(15 MARKS)
• Language used always supported
the self-reflective learning process
• The language used always
GRAMMAR & LANGUAGE demonstrated candour and
intellectual honesty with respect to
(5 MARKS) the chosen topics
• All portfolio topics were written
without any grammatical or spelling
errors
• The level of knowledge and
reflection was always appropriate
for the year of study engaged.
CRITICAL SELF- • The student clearly demonstrated an
REFLECTION,
appreciation of the nuances relating
KNOWNLEDGE, AND to their chosen clinical/professional
LOGIC topics and clearly embedded their
newly discovered understanding.
• The student was always successful in
(10 MARKS)
putting forward an argument that
was logical, underpinned by good
evidence, and well-reasoned
REFERENCING & THE USE • There were ample references, or
external resources, to support the
OF ADDITIONAL
video task
EXTERNAL REFERENCES • All references fully adhered to the
OR RESOURCES prescribed style guide
VERY GOOD
(84-75%)
• Some minor omissions were noted
in the assessment preparation task
but were submitted in a timely
manner
• Language used almost always
supported the self-reflective
learning process
• The language used almost always
demonstrated candour and
intellectual honesty with respect to
the chosen topics
• Most of the portfolio was written
without any grammatical or spelling
errors
• The level of knowledge and
reflection was always appropriate
for the year of study engaged.
• The student mostly demonstrated
an appreciation of the nuances
relating to their chosen
clinical/professional topics and in
most occasions embedded their
newly discovered understanding
within their written reflections
• The student was in most cases
successful in putting forward an
argument that was logical and well-
reasoned
• There were ample references, or
external resources, to support most
of the video task
• Most references fully adhered to the
prescribed style guide
Due date: 20/5/20
Submission for unit/course: CHIR13008
Second marker:
ABOVE AVERAGE
(74-65%)
• Some considerable omissions were
noted in the assessment preparation
task but were submitted in a timely
manner
• In a majority of instances, the language
used supported the self-reflective
learning process
• In a majority of instances, the language
used always demonstrated candour and
intellectual honesty with respect to the
chosen topics
• The majority of portfolio was written
without any grammatical or spelling
errors
• The level of knowledge and reflection
was usually appropriate for the year of
study engaged. The reflective process,
as a vehicle for change, was mostly
apparent throughout the portfolio
• The student somewhat demonstrated
an appreciation of the nuances relating
to their chosen clinical/professional
topics and in the majority of cases
embedded their newly discovered
understanding within their written
reflections
• The student was successful in putting
forward an argument that was logical
or well-reasoned in a majority of cases
• There were ample references, or
external resources, to support the slight
majority of the video task
• The majority of references fully adhered
to the prescribed style guide
PASS
(64-50%)
• Some significant omissions were
noted in the assessment preparation
task but was submitted after due
date
• The language used sometimes
supported the self-reflective
learning process
• The language used sometimes
demonstrated candour and
intellectual honesty with respect to
the chosen topics
• Only some of the portfolio was
written without any grammatical or
spelling errors
• The level of knowledge and
reflection was occasionally
appropriate for the year of study
engaged. The reflective process, as a
vehicle for change, was occasionally
apparent throughout the portfolio
• The student somewhat
demonstrated an appreciation of
the nuances relating to their chosen
clinical/professional topics and on
occasion embedded their newly
discovered understanding within
their written reflections
• The student was occasionally
successful in putting forward an
argument that was logical and/or
well-reasoned
• There were ample references, or
external resources, to support some
of the video task
• Some of the references adhered to
the prescribed style guide
BORDERLINE
(49-45%)
• A majority of elements in the
assessment preparation task were
missing and submitted after due
date
• Rarely did the language support the
self-reflective learning process
• Rarely did the language used
demonstrate candour and
intellectual honesty with respect to
the chosen topics
• Only elements of the portfolio was
written without any grammatical or
spelling errors
• The level of knowledge and
reflection was rarely appropriate for
the year of study engaged. The
reflective process, as a vehicle for
change, was infrequently apparent
throughout the portfolio
• The student generally failed to
demonstrate an appreciation of the
nuances relating to their chosen
clinical/professional topics, but
attempted to embed their
understanding within their written
reflections
• The student was seldom successful
in putting forward an argument that
was logical and/or well-reasoned
• There were very few references, or
external resources, to support the
video task
• Only a few references adhered to
the prescribed style guide
FAIL
(< 45%)
• Assessment preparation tasks were
not completed or submitted
• Language used almost never
supported the self-reflective
learning process
• The language used almost never
demonstrated candour and
intellectual honesty with respect to
the chosen topics
• All of the portfolio included
significant grammatical or spelling
errors
• The level of knowledge and
reflection was not appropriate for
the year of study engaged. The
reflective process, as a vehicle for
change, was not apparent
throughout the portfolio
• The student clearly demonstrated a
lack of understanding of the
nuances relating to their chosen
clinical/professional topics and
failed to embed their newly
discovered understanding within
their written reflections
• The student did not put forward an
argument that was logical and/or
well-reasoned
• There were not any references, or
external resources that supported
the video task
• None of the references adhered to
the prescribed style guide
 • All references were from recognised
(5 MARKS) and well-respected journals and
were PubMed indexed
• The supporting material was always
well referenced and followed the
prescribed style guide
• Overall the videos/multimedia
material were developed to an
exemplary level and were very easy
to watch and/or understand
GENERAL COMPOSITION • Any links to other multimedia
& OVERALL sources (if used) were all functional
and/or relevant to the topic at hand
VIDEO/MULTIMEDIA
• The learner has demonstrated a
PRESENTATION
commendable degree of ownership
and production value with respect
to the videos/multimedia material
(15 MARKS) presented
• The video/multimedia portfolio
always remained within the stated
time limit (+/-10%)
ADDITIONAL FOCUSED
FEEDBACK
Markers to complete
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
• Most references were from
recognised and well-respected
journals and were PubMed indexed
• The supporting material almost
always strengthened the points
being made in the portfolio
• The supporting material was almost
always well referenced and followed
the prescribed style guide
• Overall the videos/multimedia
material were developed to an
exemplary level and were somewhat
easy to watch and/or understand
• Any links to other multimedia
sources (if used) were mostly
functional and/or relevant to the
topic at hand
• The learner has demonstrated a
notable sense of ownership and
production value with respect to the
videos/multimedia material
presented
• The video/multimedia portfolio
mostly remained within the stated
time limit (+/-10%)
COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT TASKS (15)
GRAMMAR & LANGUAGE (5)
CRITICAL SELF-REFLECTION, KNOWLEDGE AND LOGIC (10)
REFERENCING & THE USE OF ADDITIONAL EXTERNAL REFERENCES OR RESOURCES (5)
GENERAL COMPOSITION & OVERALL VIDEO/MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION (15)
• The majority of references were from
recognised and well-respected journals
and were PubMed indexed
• The supporting material in the majority
of times some-what strengthened the
points being made in the portfolio
• In the majority of times, the supporting
material was well referenced and
followed the prescribed style guide
• Overall the videos/multimedia material
were developed to an above average
level and were somewhat easy to watch
and/or understand
• Any links to other multimedia sources
(if used) were all functional and/or
relevant to the topic at hand in a
majority of instances
• The learner has demonstrated an above
average sense of ownership and
production value with respect to the
videos/multimedia material presented
• In the majority of instances, the
video/multimedia portfolio always
remained within the stated time limit
(+/-10%)
DOMAINS
TOTAL ( /50)
• Only some references were from
recognised and well-respected
journals and were PubMed indexed
• The supporting material on occasion • The supporting material rarely
strengthened the points being made
in the portfolio
• The supporting material was
occasionally well referenced and
followed the prescribed style guide
• Overall the videos/multimedia
material were developed to an
adequate level and were on
occasion easy to watch and/or
understand
• Any links to other multimedia
sources (if used)) were occasionally
functional and/or relevant to the
topic at hand
• The learner has demonstrated a
satisfactory sense of ownership and
production value with respect to the
videos/multimedia material
presented
• The video/multimedia portfolio on
occasion remained within the stated
time limit (+/-10%)
• Only a few references were from
recognised and well-respected
journals and were PubMed indexed
strengthened the points being made
in the portfolio
• The supporting material was rarely
well referenced and did not follow
the prescribed style guide
• Overall the videos/multimedia
material were developed to a below
average level and was difficult to
watch and/or understand
• Any links to other multimedia
sources (if used) were rarely
functional and/or relevant to the
topic at hand
• The learner has demonstrated a
below average sense of ownership
and production value with respect
to the videos/multimedia material
presented
• The video/multimedia portfolio
rarely remained within the stated
time limit (+/-10%)
FIRST SECOND
MARKER MARKER
• None of the references were from
recognised and well-respected
journals or PubMed indexed
• The supporting material failed to
add much to the points being made
in the portfolio
• The supporting material was not
well referenced and did not follow
the prescribed style guide
• Overall the videos/multimedia
material were very poorly developed
and was very difficult to watch
and/or understand
• Any links to other multimedia
sources (if used) were never
functional and/or relevant to the
topic at hand
• The learner has demonstrated a very
poor sense of ownership and
production value with respect to the
videos/multimedia material
presented
• The video/multimedia portfolio
failed to remain within the stated
time limit (+/-10%)
FINAL AGREED MARK