1.

It would be better if the authors could state the merits and demerits is short of the work
provided in the literaure. Clubbing of the literatures could be avoided.
2. It would be better if the authors could corelate with the actual experimental studies rather
than justifying it will work in the real turning process. If implemented a major constraint is
the occurance of non-lineratlity that occurs in the tool vibration.
3. In continutaion with the previous point sometimes noise can be mis-read as non-linearity
and this this paper the pre-processing of the signals are not dealt to a fullest.
4. It sections 2.1 it as has been mentioned that previously recorded cutting force signals were
used for the study. The equipment used for measuring should be mentioned along with the
sample rate. Similarly the workpiece used and also the cutting parameters used during
turning should be mentioned. And if the data is huge then a data repository can be created.
The paper lacks in the details related to this which is the input to the whole system. The
details of the input signals is very important in the case of the looped system as in this case.
5. In the newly added part in the section 5.1 it has been mentioned that a feed-forward
algorithm was effective. But in the recent past there are new models in deep learning that are
much more effective. But considering the fact that the data invovled in this study is low for
deep learning even a feed froward back propogation algorithm could be used as an alternate
rather than the only the feed-forward algorithm.
6. Even though the authors has defended the work, it seems very outdated. The table (table 4)
provided is has reference of the papers that are pretty old.
7. The results and discussions do not justify the title of the work and the change brought when
the input signal is replaced by a another also should be considered.
8. Most of the time, a time domain data can lead to misconseptions hence a FFT or Wavelet
analysis is a must to prove that the damping works effectively.
9. Its better that new literatures are used and only one paper from 2019 is present.