You are on page 1of 21

This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized

by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the


information in books and make it universally accessible.

https://books.google.com
agi
S647
P73

Precipitated Impurities in 18-46-0. Fertilizers


Prepared from Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid
/
ABSTRACT

The use of marginal-quality phosphate rock and the


increased use of the sludge fraction from wet-process phos
phoric acid have created grade problems in the production of
18-46-0 fertilizers. Detailed chemical and crystallographic
characterizations of 26 commercial 18-46-0 fertilizers were
made, and the results were correlated with the fertilizer
properties and process parameters. These samples repre
sented a wide range of impurities from Florida, North
Carolina, and western phosphate rock sources. Several
reasons for grade problems and suggested methods for
alleviating them were identified during this research study. P. º |
Better control of wet-process acid processing variables will
decrease high calcium and sulfate levels in DAP. Eliminating º º
natural sludge from merchant-grade acids will significantly
decrease iron, aluminum, and magnesium concentrations. Pºº
Proper operating conditions for moisture removal in the
preneutralizer were established to prevent the formation
of citrate-insoluble P2 Os. The precipitation of fluoride
containing compounds was shown to be advantageous in
improving grade and lowering fluoride emissions. Adding a
small quantity of water with the ammonia to the rotary
granulator will prevent caking around the sparger and
decrease ammonia loss.

Introduction and Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.


Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.

Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Acknowledgment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

OHIO STATE
UNIVERSITY
LIBRARIES
Prepared by

Ewell F. Dillard
A. William Frazier
Terry C. Woodis, Jr.
Frank P. Achorn

NATIONAL FERTILIZER DEVELOPMENT CENTER, MUSCLE SHOALS, ALABAMA 35660


Precipitated Impurities in 18-46-O Fertilizers
Prepared from Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid

Introduction and Background Interest in 18-46-0 grade problems and the


identification of fluorophosphates as components
With the declining chemical quality of commer of ammoniated wet-process phosphoric acids have
cial phosphate raw materials, increasing amounts of resulted in a refinement in the identification of the
metal impurities, which subsequently precipitate metallic precipitates. The identification of the
upon ammoniation, occur in the wet-process components in 18-46-0 fertilizers has been com
phosphoric acid. The compositional form and plicated by the large number of impurities, the
relative abundance of these metal salts depend poor crystallinity of the precipitates, the lack of
upon both acid composition and operative parame fundamental information, and the large number of
ters during ammoniation and granulation. Conse process variables used in production processes.
quently, grade problems with respect to N or P2 Os The poor crystallinity of the precipitates is some
content, or both, may have different origins, times due to the amorphous or cryptocrystalline
depending upon the particular controlling precipi nature of the original precipitates and at other
tation reactions. Characterization of the solid times to the fact that the crystalline phases are
phase components in fertilizer products of nominal decomposed to amorphous phases during drying of
18-46-0 grade is an important step in identification the 18-46-0 fertilizer product. The identification
of specific causes of grade dilution (1). Certain of these new fertilizer compounds, along with
solid-phase components precipitate and dilute the phase system studies and the use of argon plasma
grade to a value less than the nominal grade of emission spectrometry for detailed chemical
18-46-0. analysis, have provided a more thorough under
During ammoniation the loss in acidity causes standing of the composition of 18-46-0 grade
precipitation of dissolved metal impurities. The fertilizers. Multielement determinations can be
various types of precipitates depend on the pH, performed by emission spectrometry, whereas only
temperature, and retention time during ammonia single, or at most dual, elements can be performed
tion. The solubility properties of the diammonium by atomic absorption spectrometry. Also, the
phosphate fertilizer depend upon the total content cooperative effort of microscopic, x-ray, and
of impurity solids and their specific compositional infrared techniques was required to confirm the
forms. presence of these compounds.
For many years the iron and aluminum com
pounds that precipitate above pH 2, which were Methods
observed by optical microscopy and x-ray to be
cryptocrystalline or amorphous, were assigned the Chemical Analysis and Component Analysis—In
composition (Fe,Al)PO4 'nH2O on the basis of order to simplify the problem, only the water
their recognized constituents (2). When crystal insoluble fraction from the 18-46-0 fertilizers
Lº linity was observed the identified compound was was initially studied and characterized, then the
(Fe, Al)NH4 (HPO4)2 - 0.5H2O, and it was assumed results were related to the initial fertilizer. These
that the amorphous material had largely crystal samples, representing the range of impurities in
lized to this compound. In fact, it was determined different phosphate rock sources (Florida, North
that high temperatures and long retention times in Carolina, western), are shown in Table l. The
a preneutralizer at pH 3 to 6 would cause sufficient component analysis for these samples as deter
crystal development to allow for easy removal of mined from chemical composition, optical micros
the impurities by filtration. copy, x-ray, infrared, and phase chemistry

3
90IO “ O 9900 * O OZZO” O 89 00 * 0 / 670° O 06 º € 66 ° O€” Z 89 * 0 09 * O 68° O 8 * 947 I * 9T 9Z * ON ÆGI
Z600 * O IGOO * O 8IZO” O #9 OO.º O GA +70° O 6 7 * #7 39 ° O7° Z 89 ° 0 09 * O 18 *O I º 97 9 º 8T GZ * ON ÕIGI
ZIZO” O OTO0 * 0 OOTO” O GCIO “ O 0600 * O 68 ° € 39 ° O9° Z 97 ° 0 G8* Ö 6T * I Z * 9f7 6 */ I '7Z * ON GICI
9900°0 6800° 0 97/0°0 0680’0 00ZI’ O 60 * g / #7 “O zgºz gº * O OI º I (g * 0 0 · 97 0 º gT gz • ON āCI
9800° 0 9000' 0 Z600 * 0 09 TO “O OITO “O 6T * 7 99 º O /9 * I gſ; * O 63* 06 * T G º 97 ; * 9I ZZ * ON GIGI
79I0° O Z000 * 0 1800 * 0 09 IO "O Z 900 * 0 60 ° § €g º OG“ Z 99 ' 0 / 6° O 9 I“ I Iº gº 6° LI IZ , , oN āCI
€GI0°0 Z9I0°0 08/0° 0 89ZI ’0 8ZGI’ O 66 ºg 9zº o 96 · I 8£ ‘o 60’I C9 º o zº 97 I • 8I oz. º oN aq
ZGI0°0 9000' 0 7800° 0 8ZIO” O 8900 º 0 677 · 7 8 /* O 98 * I 97° O g6 * 0 șT · I gº 97 z • (T 6T , oN āCI
19I0°0 €000 * 0 7 100 * 0 ſ/ZIO ‘O 89.00° 0 60 ° § 89 * O I8 * I 77° O £5°0 șT • T I • 9,7 g * (I 3T • ON āCI
IGI0°0 7000' 0 9000' 0 / 9I0°0 89.00° 0 67 º 7 GL *O Z8* I gſ; * O 16 * 0 6I º I (* 97 z • LI LT • ON āCI
78T0°0 ZI00 * 0 0800° 0 £7IO” O 9900° 0 60 ºg 90° O II º I 99 "O 03 * O £9 * O 6 · 97 9 · 3T 9I • ON HOI
06I0°0 ST00°0' S 100° 0 67T0°0 0900’0 6I º L 90° O £O’I C*; * 0 // * O 78° O 6 * #ff 9 • 9I ÇI • ON āCI
18T0°0 9I00°0 Z800° 0 67 TO “O 6900 * 0 09 ° € 70.“ O IT” I Z 9. * O £8 * O G8 * O 6 */ $7 8 * 8T #7T • ON AICI
#70ZO” O LIOO” O £100 * O Iſ; IO * O £100 * O 6T * ? †70* 08° O Z9 * O ZA * O 10 * I £ º 147 g * 3I ȘI “ ON AICI
OZIO * O GOETO * O G 790 * O OGOT * 0 0 / 7I * O 60 * Gç* IZ * 9. 89 * 0 06° 0 09 * O 8 * #7f7 I” / I ZI • ON ÕIGI
9 #7T0 * 0 0Z 00 * 0 // ZO * 0 £OZO” O 178ZO” O 60 ° § €6 * 0#7 * I Z; *O GZ * O 17 * 0 ; * / 17 /*
3T#}Ë
0900 * O GOOO “ O Z600 * 0 9600 * 0 G600 * O 60 * 9. Tº. * OG“ Z 99. * O £7/ * 0 // * O £ º G*7 / * 8I6 " ON AICI
94700 * 0 ? 000 * O Z 800 * 0 GGIO * 0 0 100 * 0 69 ° § € £ º O# * I ſyg º O £79°0 9Z * I 8 · 97 z • 8I8 " ON AICI
08IO “ O GO00 * 0 //00 * 0 69 TO * O 8900 * 0 6/ * 47 0£” Og * I Gº * O 89 * O 6 Iº I º ‘ / 47 9. * 8I/ * ON AICI
87 TO “O Z000 * O £800 * 0 89 TO “O 0900 * 0 6/ * ſ; 0£ * 0g * I £47 * O £79 * O £9 * I 9° 9′7 Z • 8I9 ° ON AICI
I9 IO º 0 ? 000 * 0 0800 * O Iſ; IO * 0 0.800 * 0 60 º 9 07° 08 * I 19. * O £79 * O 6T“ I Z * 937 O º 8T9 ° ON AICI
OLIO “ O £000 * 0 9 100 * 0 09 TO “O G900 * 0 68 ° € Iſ7 *0#7 “Z 847 * 0 69°0#7 “I O • 947 O • 8I#7 ° ON ÕIGI
47 100 * 0 9000 * 0 Z800 * 0 647 TO “O Z 800 * 0 66 ° S IZ * OZ * I 19. * O £79 * O 9Z * I g * 937 € * 8I€ * ON AICI
£8 TO “O ZOOO “O Z 100 * 0 / 47 TO “O Z ZOO” O 6T * #7 € £ * 0#7 “Z Çț7 * 0 69°0 6T ‘ T Z * 947 Z * 8IZ * ON AICI
478 TO “ O TOOO * O £7/00 * 0 89 TO * 0 0 100 * 0 68 ° € Z9 * 09 ° Z. Zſ; * 0 69° 0Tº I gº 97 % * 3TT " ON AICI
[]pOJOAUIZºOSeoJ3īTV3. IGozaN• ONTēȚdūēS
TeņOL
ZīĀTºsȚSKTēūē Tē5Țūſēų5
Suaz!!!ņu3J 0-9#-81 go sįsÁIeue ſepļuuºuſ) º 1 914 e 1
89 * 0I • Ig * I7I * O IZ * O 8900 * 0 8ZOO” O 9Z " ON AGI
-O* I9 ° Z.9T * 0 0Z * 0 0 100 * 0 8ZOO” O SZ * ON AICI
/Z * 06 * T-9I * O OZ. “O G6ZO” O “7IOO” O “7Z * ON AGI
IO * 0O “ Z/* Z£Z * O IZ * O 1600 * O OOTO” O £Z * ON AICI
97 '0/* Z9 ° C£I * O OZ * O 1990 * 0 GZOO * O ZZ * ON AICI
IO * 09 • ZZ * gII º O OZ * O 08ZO” O SZOO * O IZ * ON AICI
TO “O8 * T# º z60 * 0 90 ° 0 07IO * O 89IO * O OZ. “ON AGI
IZ * O/* Zſy º £SI “ O 9Z * O G8 ZO * O OZOO * O 6T ‘ ON AICI
10 * 0O “ ZI º ç6I º O LZ * O Ç Ç ÇO” O 9I00 * O 8I “ ON AICI
ZI * 0ſy º zg º £9T * 0 ?Z * O 89-90 ° 0 /I00 * 0 /I “ ON ÕIGI
10 ° 0I • Z6 * ZGO * O £0 * O IGCO” O STOO” O 9I “ ON AICI
IO * 09 ° Z.g º £90 * 0 €0 * 0 96ZO * O IZOO * O ŞI “ ON AICI
IO * 09. “ Z# * g90° O £70 “O ISSO “O GIOO” O “7I “ ON ÕIGI
ZO " O6 “ Z9 º ££0 * 0 €0 * O IZ 90° O / ZOO” O £T º ON AICI
IO * 09. “ ZI º ç#7Z * O 19. * O Z800 * O £17-IO “ O ZI • ON AGI
IȚuzº T8 * T60·0 9T-0 Itto-o ººooºo !! •lºº
OT
ºº
ON AICI
80 ° 06 * T9 ° Z60 * 0 60 * 0 0990 * O ITOO * O 6 ° ON ÕIGI
OI º O/ * I# º z60 * 0 10 * O ITCO º 0 6 TOO * O 8 ° ON AGI
478 ° 0# * I/ * IIT “ O 60 * 0 6Z 90° O OZOO * O Z * ON AICI
*70 ° 0z ºz9 ° ZII* O OI ‘O OLZO.“ O SZOO” O 9 * ON ÕIGI
8T º O© º z8° Z.ZI * O OI ‘O ZZCO” O IZOO” O 9 ° ON ÕIGI
Z9. *0O “ ZO º £II* O SI “ O #6ZO” O 6T00 * 0 ? ° ON AGI
19. *0/ * I6 * I90° O GO * O 09 00 * O ZZOO * O £ º ON AICI
90 ° 0Tº z6 * Z80 ° 0 €T * 0 699.0 ° 0 /I00 * O Z * ON AICI
10 * 03 * Ig * Z80 ° 0 60 * O Zț790 * 0 8T00 * O I “ ON AICI
SO2 aOº H 3318OºH IeņOLXIeNUWȚN°ONTēTđūēS
3TqnIosuȚ–32 eurų. ĮO
% ūſā ºsȚSKTēūē Tē5ȚūlēūO
pºnuļļu00 º 1 9|qe 1
publications is presented in Table 2; the process these cations precipitate as other forms, such as
parameters for several samples are listed in Table 3. fluorophosphates. Ando (4) states:
The data in Table l show that several impurity Fluorine forms a previously unknown compound,
elements occur over a wide concentration range, MgNH4HFPO4(MAFP), when monoammonium phosphate
made from wet-process phosphoric acid is treated with
indicating the potential areas for applying puri
magnesium hydroxide above about 75 C in the presence of
fication treatments which will have the most effect moisture. When preparation of MAFP was conducted at
on the fertilizer grade. The large iron and alumi 90 to 100 C in the presence of a small amount of water
num ranges were expected; however, calcium and using a mixture of monoammonium and diammonium
phosphates, magnesium hydroxide reacted very slowly
fluorine, which were previously thought to be releasing ammonia; the product contained MgNH4 PO4” H2O
unimportant constituents, were sometimes highly and less MAFP in the same manner as in the test with com
significant. The solid-phase identifications in mercial ammonium phosphate, indicating that only a small
part of the fluorine forms MAFP at high pH.
Table 2 reflect these chemical analyses and show
the fate of each impurity element associated with These results indicate that MgNH4 HFPO4 could
the phosphoric acid. The process parameters in precipitate in the preneutralizer (lower pH), and
Table 3 show that there are significant differences MgNH4 PO4· H2O could be formed in the granu
in the operating conditions for moisture removal in lator where the pH is high. However, TVA labora
the preneutralizer. tory tests indicate that fluorine is precipitated as
(Al,Fe)NH4 HPO4 F2 . xH2O and CaF2 before mag
Results and Discussion nesium can react with fluorine. The compound
MgNH4 PO4· H2O should be the precipitating phase
Calcium—Calcium is present in several forms, in the preneutralizer slurry and the granulator,
depending mainly on the total fluorine content. which would not cause any production problems
The chukhrovite (Caa Si AlSO4 F13 - 12H2O), which with high magnesium acids since the MgNH4 PO4 -
ranges up to 1.67%, is carried over from the H2O (5 to 10 p.) is well crystallized and would not
wet-process acid because of incomplete removal contribute significantly to viscosity problems. This
during the acid filtration step. When fluorine is in compound can lose ammonia and water during
excess of that required by aluminum, iron, chro drying of the product to produce an amorphous
mium, and vanadium, it can precipitate as CaF2, material. If the magnesium concentration in the
provided that the soluble silica also has been DAP-grade acid (~ 40% P2 Os) is too high to make
satisfied. This condition has been observed for grade (18-46-0), it can be removed effectively
samples DP No. 25 and DP No. 26. The stable from the acid by adding byproduct H2 SiF6 to
calcium salt in diammonium phosphate solution precipitate MgSiF6 to reduce the magnesium
between pH 5.3 and 8.0 is Ca(NH4)2 (HPO4)2 -- concentration to an acceptable level.
H2O, which was used for the calculations in
Table 2 even though a direct observation of its Iron and Aluminum-Previously the gelatinous
presence was not possible at the concentrations materials from the ammoniation of wet-process
shown in Table 2 (3). This salt dissolves incon phosphoric acid were described as amorphous
gruently in water; and its reaction product, iron and aluminum phosphate and given the
Cas (PO4)3OH, was detected in the water-insoluble formula (Al,Fe)PO4 'nH2O. Chemical analyses of
fraction. Investigation at several phosphoric acid the water-insoluble components from commercial
plants showed that the acids contain higher cal diammonium phosphate fertilizers show that the
cium contents; two possible sources of this are: Fe and Al precipitate is much more complex than
(1) the phosphoric acid unit was operated at high the (Al,Fe)PO4 nH2O formula indicates.
extraction temperatures, which caused an unusu Akiyama and Ando (5) reported in their inves
ally large amount of calcium to be dissolved in the tigation that the main constituent of the gel-like
product acid from the plant; and (2) the amount of substance is a compound having the composi
gypsum in the acid also was high because of the tion of (Al,Fe)NH4 HF2PO4. This compound can
type of filter used or maintenance of the filter. be identified readily by x-ray powder diffraction
techniques when crystallized sufficiently. It
Magnesium–Like calcium, the magnesium became apparent that the composition of
ammonium phosphate was too poorly crystallized (Al,Fe)NHa HF2 PO4 was affected by the tempera
to be observed directly in the fertilizer. Since ture and retention time during precipitation of the
the calcium and magnesium salts shown in Table 2 compound. This fact was confirmed by Pechkovskii
could not be identified directly, it is possible that (6), who states:

6
Compound
2
3
4
5
D
6
7
No.
1P
DP

fertilizers,
18-46-0
in
compounds
of
analysis
Component
2.
Table
%
wt

number
Sample (69.96
NH4)2HPO,
49
74.
75.35
28
67.
72.73
71.4l
72.78
73.42

H2PO4
NHL,
l.04
36
l.
2.14
1.
-

(NH4)2SO4
5.25
6.54
6.49
6.96
5.31
19
8.
5.7l
7.33

(HPO4)2
FeNHu
0.84
2.46
23
l.
5.22
12
3.74
71
5.
3.35 (0.12
NH4)2SiF6
1.08
64
l.
0.51
0.49
0.71
1.16
0.33

(1.64
(NH4)2
Ca
HP04).2°H2O
1.86
1.50
2.57
14
1.
29
2.43
1Cau2H20

0.24
0.34
0.26
0.45
0.20SiAlSO4F13
0.04
0.21
0.53
°xH2O 4.
F2
FeNHLHPO,
0.82
1.61
0.65
1.90
36
0.73
78
3.
3.15 °xH2O
F2
HPO,
AlNHL,
78
3.
11
4.18
4.52
4.24
44 °xH2O
F2
HP0,
CrNHu
0.03
°xH2O
F2
HPO,
VNHu
0.06
0.05
07
0.
0.07

*H2O
POL,
MgNHL,
2.75
2.68
2.36
07
3.
2.17
2.24

(HPO4)2
AlNHu
- 61
98.
07
98.21
98.41
Summation
99.09
98.40
98.71
98.55
POu
ZnNHL
0.02 UO2NH4
0.03
0.007
0.02
0.01 NiNHL,
PO1, 0.006
0.005
0.007 POu
MnNHL
POu 0.10
0.08
0.09
0.11 H2O
Free
2.0
1.7
2.1
1.8
2.2
2.3
1.4
NHLPO,
Cd
0.0004
0.0002
0.001 (NH4)3P0,
4.87
73
3. -
-

0.26
0.68
0.47
52
0.
0.78
0.37
57 KH2POu
NaH2PO4 0.28
0.21
0.42
0.38
0.31

CaF2
-
-
-
DCompound
9
16
15
14
13
12
No.
DP
11
and
10
Nos.P

number
Sample

Continued
2.
Table

°xH2O
F2
A1NHaHPOu
4.44
l.26
4.91
4.15
07
4.
3.02
97
5.

•H20
MgnHuP04
2.68
30
2.
2.75
ll
2.04
2.43

H2.08
*
(HPO4)2
(NH4)2
Ca2O
4.15
0.38
0.14
0.20
0.24
5.08
CauSiAlSO4F13°12H20
0.03
0.06
0.47
67
1.
0.10
0.07
°xH2O
F2
CrNH4HPO,
0.04
0.25
0.03
0.11
exh2O
F2
HPO,
VNHa
0.06
0.42
0.08
0.04
20
exh
F2
FeNHaHPO,
2.86
2.23
20
1. -

POu
UO2NH4
0.027
0.03
0.02
0.009 (HPO4)2
FeNH4
27 AlNH4
0.74
4.08
13
4.
4.18
5.- (HPO4)2
36
2.
1.18
1.26
1.98
- (0.22
NH4)2SiF6
0.18
0.33
0.21
20
1.
50
0.
1.40 40
99.
98.01
97.21
98.73
98.93
98.83
97.47
Summation
CóNHaPOa
0.03
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.001 0.04
0.01
0.006
0.004
0.003
0.008 MnNHaPOu
NiNHaPOu 0.11
0.09
0.10
0.03 (NH4)2SO4
92
70
6.
6.98
6.99
9.87
4.94
76
5. (67.
NH4)2HP04
64
73.
66.91
61
75.
35
71.
69.94
84
73.94 H2O
Free
2.3
1.2
2.6
1.9
2.9
2.1
PO4
Zn/NHL
0.018
0.02
0.40
0.08
0.03 NHaH2PO4
2.17
- (NH4)3P04
3.31
97
4.
5.18
4.24
2.85
-
-

NaH2PO4
0.16
0.21
1.93
0.89
0.47
KH2PO4
0.84
0.30
0.31
0.17
0.10
CaF2
-
-
Compound
23
22
No.
DP
21
19
18
17

number
Sample

Continued
2.
Table

1Cau2H2O
-
53
0.
0.20
0.04
1.06SiAlSO4F13
0.45
0.23
(3.93
(NH4)2
Ca
HPO4)2-H20
4.16
5.00
07
3.
3.15
3.48
79
1.
FeNHa
24
1.
12
2. -
- exh2O
F2
AlNHaHPOu
F2°xH2O 6.
HPO, 38
29
7.
5.78
39
6.47
6.30
5.58
CrNHaHPOuF2°xH20
0.034
0.29
0.31
0.03
0.04
20
exh
F2
HPO,
WNHu
0.05
0.055
0.35
0.06
51
0.
“H2O
MgNHaPO,
2.24
30
2.
2.43
2.94
2.81
2.88

(HPO4)2
FeNHL
35 AlNHa
5.61
5.86
4.08
3.10
9.- (HPO4)2
0.67
1.04
- (0.39
NH4)2SiF6
0.66
0.23
0.72
58
0.
0.61
30
1. (63.
NH4)2HPO,
18
68.
64.01
60
62.
69.90
38
71.
41
13 98.54
97.62
99.06
99.03
98.83
97.83
98.70
Summation
Zn/NHaPOu
0.016
0.33
0.03
0.017
0.42
0.02 PO4
UO2NH4
0.02
0.023
0.010
0.022
0.01
0.0198 0.030
0.11
0.086
0.043
0.09
0.109
0.10
MnNHaPOu (NH4)2SO4
92
6.
6.13
6.96
8.23
5.98
66
5. 2Free
H2O
2.7
2.0
2.4
2.6
1.8
7
2..0
CaMHaPO,
0.018
0.0004
0.032
0.001
0.0008 NiNHLPO,
0.049
0.006
0.029
0.005
0.007 H2PO4
NHL,
1.59
3.24
-
-
- (NH4)2P04
3.31
3.52
38
5. -
-

NaH2PO4
1.36
1.41
1.25
1.04
0.31
10
1.
KH2PO4
0.52
0.66
0.56
0.38
0.31
0.80
0.45
CaF2
-
-
Compound
26
No.
DP
25
24

number
Sample

Continued
2.
Table

CauSiAlSO4F13
•12H2O
0.078
0.17
(4.02
(NH4)2
Ca
HP04).2°H20
2.59
exh2O
F2
FeNHLHPO,
3.23
3.54
3.31 °xH2O
F2
HPO,
CrNHu
0.09
0.039
20
exh
F2
A1NHLHP0,
5.64
1.99
20
exh
F2
HPO,
VNHu
0.054
0.02
0.01
H2O
-
MgNHaPOa
2.94
3.71

POu
ZnNHL
0.14
0.13
0.025 NiNHaPOu 0.09
(HPO4)2
FeNH4
1.18 AlNHL
- (HPO4)2
-
- (1.16
NH4)2SiF6
0.97
0.78 (67.78
NH4)2HPO,
74.92
73.25 Summation
98.41
97.92
97.36
UO2NHLPO, 0.004
0.032
0.02
0.01 0.01 0.02
MnNHuPOu (NH4)2SO4
6.17
33
5.
36 H2O
Free
1.9
1.0
1.1
PO4
NHL,
Cd
0.002
0.01 NH4H2PO4
2.43
- (NH4)2P04
3.00-

NaH2PO4
1.04
1.10
KH2PO4
0.56
0.49
CaF2
14
1.
0.92
-

3
Table 3. Process parameters in 18-46-0 production
Sample No.: DP No. 3 DP No. 4 DP No. 5

Production Rate 37.5 tons/hour 50 tons/hour 77 tons/hour

Preneutralizer Operation
Number Used 2 1 1
Size of Each (1) 11 ft x 15-1/4 ft 12 ft x 20 ft high 14.75 ft x 22 ft high
high
(2) 12 ft x 10 ft high
Retention Time (1) 101 min; (2) 29 min 74 min 61 min

Slurry
Depth in Preneutralizer (1) 15-1/4 ft; (2) 3.5 ft 12 ft 10 ft
Mole Ratio N: P (1) 1.15; (2) 1.55 1.46 1.5
Temperature 240°F 225 °F 250°F
Specific Gravity 1.5 1.56 1.57

Granulator
Product Temperature 185°F 204 °F 205 °F

DP No. 6 DP No. 7 DP No. 8


Sample No.:

Production Rate 110 tons/hour 44 tons/hour 55 tons/hour

Preneutralizer Operation
Number Used 1 l 1
Size of Each 17 ft x 25 ft high 14 ft x 25.5 ft high 12 ft x 20 ft high
Retention Time 48 min 98 min 49 min

Slurry
8.5 ft 10 ft 9 ft
Depth in Preneutralizer
Mole Ratio N: P 1. 48 1.65 1.6
Temperature 245°F 230°F 232°F
Specific Gravity 1.56 1.625 1.52

Granulator
Product Temperature 205 °F 175°F 197°F

Sample No.: DP No. 10 and DP No. 11 DP No. 24

Production Rate 75 tons/hour 37 tons/hour

Preneutralizer Operation
Number Used 1 1
Size of Each 11 ft x 25 ft high 12 ft x 25 ft high
Retention Time 31 min 128 min

Slurry
Depth in Preneutralizer 9 ft 15 ft
Mole Ratio N:P 1.5 1.4
Temperature 23.5°F 240°F
Specific Gravity 1.56 1.58

Granulator
Product Temperature 210°F 210°F
The chemical analysis of the product showed a lower fluorine citrate-insoluble P2 Os as percent of total P2 Os
concentration in comparison with that calculated theo
retically for the formula AlNH4HF2PO4 in that the fluorine
present in the iron ammonium phosphate was
content was not constant for specimens obtained in different necessary in order to compensate for the total
experiments, whereas the Al2O3 concentration varied within quantity of this compound in the sample. For
closer limits. This could be linked with a possible isomor
*- 1- . 1- . -
example, the weight percent citrate-insoluble P2 Os
phous replacement of a F" ion by an OH" ion in
hydrothermal treatment. x 100, divided by the weight percent P2 Os re
ported as FeNH4 (HPO4)2, provides an interaction
The compound was written as cryptocrystalline term that relates the quantity of the citrate
(Al,Fe)NHa HPO4 F2 . xH2O to denote the variable insoluble compound to its effective solubility
chemical composition of the compound due to properties.
different temperatures and retention times en The citrate-insoluble fraction also was studied in
countered in 18-46-0 production (Table 3). For a series of 18-46-0 fertilizers for which the reten
simplicity of calculations the theoretical chemical tion time in the preneutralizer stage was available.
composition of (Al,Fe)NH4 HF2PO4 was used These data are shown in Table 4 and plotted in
instead of calculating the composition of the Figure 2. Again, the citrate-insoluble P2 Os was
compound that would precipitate for each set of
16O I I I I
conditions (temperature and retention time).
Iron and aluminum also can precipitate as
(Fe, Al)NH4 (HPO4)2 when there is insufficient
fluorine in the phosphoric acid to precipitate | 20 H.
(Al,Fe)NHa HPOa F2 . xH2O. The Al end member Sº
precipitates first; the Fe end member precipitates if "E
sufficient fluorine is present. If insufficient <f
# 8 O H.
fluorine is present, the Fe end member of the «
compound (Fe, Al)NH4 (HPO4)2 precipitates first, Lll
O
with the Al end member precipitating next. When <ſ
Ul
or 40 T
(Fe, Al)NH4 (HPO4)2 precipitates in the preneu >
ow)
tralizer, it occurs as an amorphous gel which
could contribute toward viscosity problems in the
preneutralizer. This condition quickly dissipates O I | | I

O IO 2O 3O 4O 5O
with the temperature and retention times en
countered in 18-46-0 production to produce large % C.I. P2 Os: % P2O5 IN HASEMAN E
euhedral crystals of (Fe, Al)NH4 (HPO4)2. Figure 1. Effect of surface area on citrate-insoluble
In the preneutralizer, conditions of slightly phosphate in 18-46-0 fertilizers.
higher temperatures and longer retention times
have resulted in citrate-insoluble phosphate. 50 i i T I T

The citrate-insoluble phosphate problem in 18-46-0


fertilizer was found to be related to the
FeNHA (HPO4)2, but not always directly to its
total quantity in the fertilizer (7). Microscopic
observations showed that with increasing crystal
size of the iron compound, the level of citrate 3 O H.

insoluble P2 Os also increased. To relate crystal


size and citrate-insoluble P2 Os, three samples were
2O H.
chosen that differed widely in their reported
content of citrate-insoluble P2 Os but had similar
quantities of the iron ammonium phosphate.
The surface area of the three samples was
determined on the water-insoluble fraction and
compared to the citrate-insoluble P2 Os reported O l l l I I
O 25 50 75 IOO 125 150
as percent of total P2 Os in the iron ammonium
phosphate compound. These results (Figure 1) RETENTion TIME, (MIN) AT 230°-250°F
show a good correlation for surface area and Figure 2. Relationship of preneutralizer time and citrate
citrate-insoluble P2 Os content. Reporting the insoluble P2 Os in 18-46-0 fertilizers.

12
FP20s
0%
-
(HPOu)2
it.5H2O
C%
o
ase.NHu
rate-inf
cRetention
in
time soloulbubele
No.
sample
18-46-0
0Pre.5H2O
min
- neutralizer,
(HPOu)2
FeNHL
18-46-0
in
P20s
6–0
18–4
in

freunction
a
pas
in
time
retention
ofrnteuitlriazliezresr

ll
and
10
Nos.
DP
31
0.74
0.0
nil

Citrate-insoluble
4.
Table
18-46-0
commercial
in
Os
P2

2
(HPOu)
FeNHa
Pure
145.9
22.4
50
-

35.
6
No.
DP
1.4
0.04
710 8
No.
DP
4
12
5.
3.
0.10
9 DP
6
5
No.
0.18
3.35
10.4
1 DP 4 DP
72.46
4
No.
25.2
0.32 7
No.
93.74
44.0
0.84
8 DP
128
24
No.
44.3
0.27
18
1.
C
expressed as percent of total P. Os in FeNH4 FeNH4 (HPO4)2 crystallizes as small crystals in
(HPO4)2. The pure sample of FeNH4 (HPO4)2 in which the P2 Os is available.
Table 4 was prepared in the laboratory under The total retention time for sample DP No. 3
similar conditions encountered in commercial (Table 3) in two preneutralizers is relatively high
preneutralizers. These data show that crystal (135 minutes); the retention in the second pre
growth is complete after 100 minutes at 230° to neutralizer, in which the mole ratio N:P of the
250°F, where the citrate-insoluble P2 Os reaches a slurry is 1.45, is low (29 minutes). The citrate
maximum of 45% of the P2 Os present as insoluble P. Os in this product was relatively low
FeNH4 (HPO4)2. Thus, the citrate-insoluble P2 Os as compared with the product citrate-insoluble
can be decreased by decreasing the total quantity P., Os of some of the other companies, which also
of iron ammonium phosphate and by decreasing had relatively high slurry retention times in their
the retention time in the preneutralizer, which single preneutralizers. Data in Tables 1 and 3
effectively decreases crystal size. show that the temperature of the slurry from the
A detailed evaluation of Tables 1 and 2 indicates preneutralizer or granulator seems to have little
that the quantity of the citrate-insoluble salt can effect on the citrate-insoluble P2 Os of the prod
be decreased by maintaining a high fluorine con uct, provided that the product temperatures from
tent. This favors the formation of the citrate the ammoniation units are less than 250°F for the
soluble iron-fluorophosphate and also effectively preneutralizers and 210°F for the ammoniator
releases a mole of H3PO4 for ammoniation to granulator. Additional data are needed to deter
decrease the effect of iron on the nitrogen grade. mine if there is an upper ammoniation temperature
There is no indication that the fluorophosphate limit.
compounds become a citrate-insoluble problem Excessive quantities of iron and aluminum can
during long retention times in the preneutralizer. be decreased in the phosphoric acid by better
For acids with insufficient fluorine values, a very clarification of the insoluble sludge components
short preneutralizer period will be necessary to from merchant-grade acids. Iron and aluminum are
prevent crystal growth of the iron ammonium decreased to 0.2 to 0.3% Fe2O3 and 1.6 to 1.8%
phosphate. Obviously, the preferable way to lower Al2O3 in wet-process acid containing 54% P2 Os
the retention time in the preneutralizer is to by addition of a soluble source of potassium. This
decrease the effective size of this tank. This causes precipitation of (Fe, Al)3 KH 1.4 (PO4)s -
can be accomplished by one of the following: 4H2O, which settles readily and allows for decan
(1) lower the depth of slurry in the existing pre tation of the purified acid. The settled sludge
neutralizer, (2) install a smaller preneutralizer, or fraction can be recovered in superphosphate or
(3) install a pipe-cross or pipe reactor. suspension fertilizer production where the high
Some producers fear that they will encounter analysis phosphate solid is not detrimental. The
high ammonia losses and low water evaporation composition of the precipitating compound shows
from the preneutralizer if retention time is de that addition of 0.1% K2O to merchant-grade
creased. If this is a problem, it might be preferable acid will decrease the Fe2O3 by 0.50% and the
to install two preneutralizers, as shown in the flow Al2O3 by 0.32%.
diagram (Figure 3). The first preneutralizer is
relatively large and should be operated at a mole Zinc, Cadmium, Nickel, Manganese, and
ratio N:P of 0.6. Microscopic and chemical ana Uranium—The divalent trace elements (Zn, Cd, Ni,
lyses show that at this low degree of ammoniation Mn) and U" " complex ion, UO, **, most often
there is no reversion of the P2 Os to an unavailable precipitates as M* "NH, PO, and were calculated as
form. The exit gases from this preneutralizer may this anhydrous compound. Although each divalent
contain fluorine; however, they will not contain trace element is relatively insignificant in quantity,
NH3. Because of the large exposed surface area of their collective effect, particularly in western acids,
is to neutralize a significant quantity of phosphoric
the slurry in the first preneutralizer, there is
acid as a low-nitrogen content compound.
an excellent evaporation efficiency. The degree of
ammoniation in the second preneutralizer results in Chromium, Vanadium-Stability constants for
a slurry having a mole ratio N:P of 1.4 to 1.5. The complex ion formation of fluorine with chromium
citrate-insoluble FeNH4 (HPO4)2 forms at the and vanadium are similar to those for fluorine
higher degrees of ammoniation (8). Since the and iron. Therefore, these trivalent cations were
retention time in this preneutralizer is low, the calculated as the fluoride compounds. Further

14

-
·oheųdsoud unſuº
_-
londo ºd
nooº
ae gno0
lon008d 0\
038 0.1mT)

© T

gouwn nnwº
- Jõī£ın0www.º
|
-
-
-
-
-
ae |-

, …
• ſ) -l,~ ----
|-. .
|
- ----
o loſ
omaeo HdSOHd
-…--
! Odwº
sN338 (31-v^^
0S{|a
nonok [×E
º{| tautaſ,#ſ……
characterization work is necessary to accurately was something less than 0.6, there was a significant
predict the correct composition of matter of the loss of fluorine from the scrubbers. For this reason
precipitating solids. the amount of acid added to the scrubbers was
limited.
Silica—The silica content was associated with the
water-soluble fluorine and was calculated as Phosphate—The N:P adjustment can be used to
(NH4)2SiF6. At first, the water-soluble fluorine augment either the nitrogen or phosphate level in
was suspected to be (NH4)3 AlF6; however, the the 18-46-0 product at the expense of the other
absence of a significant water-soluble aluminum component by precipitating NH4H2PO4 (low N,
component eliminated this possibility. high P2 Os) or (NH4)3 PO4 (high N, low P2 Os).
The precipitation of (NH4)3PO4 was observed on a
Sulfate—Only two sulfate-containing compounds recent plant trip, confirming earlier microscopic
have been detected, namely (NH4)2SO4 and findings. During the operation of the ammoniator
Caa Si/AlSO4 F13 - 12H2O, which is an insoluble granulator, it was observed that there were several
component carried over in the wet-process phos lumps of frozen material which had stuck to the
phoric acid. Phase studies indicate that the metal ammonia spargers. When the material was broken
ammonium sulfates, M(NH4)2(SO4)2 XH2O, down, it contained large quantities of ammonia.
formed by divalent metals are possible solid The producers were told that if they could add a
components over a wide pH range. However, small quantity of water with the ammonia, this
essentially all of these double sulfate compounds caking around the sparger could be practically
have a much higher solubility than the comparable eliminated and they could have less loss of ammo
metallic ammonium phosphate. Thus, (NH4)2SO4 nia from the ammoniator-granulator. Microscopic
is the stable sulfate in equilibrium with the ammo analyses show that some of the 18-46-0 products
nium phosphates. Double salts comprising ammo contained triammonium phosphate which was
nium sulfate and phosphate exist only in the acid present in these lumps off the ammonia spargers in
region below pH 1 and thus are not present in the ammoniator-granulator.
18-46-0 fertilizers (9).
Water-Free water, which decreases both fer
Fluorine–Other than ammonia and phosphate, tilizer components, is decreased by slightly higher
fluorine is the most widely distributed element in temperatures and much longer retention times in
18-46-0 fertilizers. Fluorine occurs as Caa SiAlSO4 - the preneutralizer. Moisture can be decreased
F13 - 12H2O, CaF2, (Al,Fe)NH4HPO4 F2’xH2O, before complete ammoniation (first-stage pre
(V,Cr)NHa HPO4 F2’xH2O, and (NH4)2SiF6. Pre neutralizer) if the fluorine concentration is low or
cipitation of the complex metal ammonium fluoro
phosphates presents a potential method for con CLEAN
OUTLEF
GA s

verting residual fluorine derived from wet-process


phosphoric acid to an insoluble form in the
18-46-0 grade product rather than scrubbing the
fluorine by expensive pollution abatement proc
esses. Some commercial 18-46-0 producers are
using their ammonia scrubbers for fluorine scrub
bing by operating at a low mole ratio N:P; which is
effectively the same as a preneutralizer slurry, only
a little lower in pH. The producers report that the
mole ratio N:P of the slurry from the scrubber is
between 0.6 and 0.7. At this degree of ammonia
tion of the acid, most of the fluorine remains in
the acid when using a Doyle impingement-type
scrubber (Figure 4), and there is no difficulty with Li QUID
loss of fluorine from the process. Usually about SUPPLY

one-third of the acid used in the process is added


to the scrubbers and the remaining acid is added OvºRFLOW
system
directly to the preneutralizer. When all of the acid
was added to the scrubbers and the mole ratio N:P Figure 4. Impingement-type scrubber.

16
in the preneutralizer if the fluorine is sufficiently summation of metallic oxides is compared with
high to prevent the precipitation of FeNH4 (HPO4)2. the nitrogen values and the fluorine plus sulfate is
compared with phosphate. To simplify the nitro
Grade Limitations—A few 18-46-0 products gen curve, only the major impurities of iron,
were selected from Table 1 to represent the range aluminum, calcium, and magnesium oxides were
of impurities and nitrogen and phosphate values. used. The same effect was observed when all the
The effect of these impurity levels on the fertilizer metallic oxides were included. The data used in
grade is shown in Figures 5 and 6, where the Figures 5 and 6 show that the fertilizer grade is
affected to the extent that each percent increase of
7
impurity oxide and fluorine plus sulfate will lower
the grade level by 1%. When the average value
for hydrated and free water is added to the other
impurities, the total impurities are limited to 15%
6 H. -
in order to maintain an 18-46-0 grade. It is im
portant to recognize the fact that 18-46-0 is 85%
o
of the theoretical value for pure (NH4)2 HPO4.
The maximum level of impurities will require
5 H- -
close pH control to compensate for the ratio of
total cation to anion impurities. Above this level,
purification processes will be required to maintain
4 H - 18-46-0 grade.

Pipe-Cross Reactor Production of 18-46-0–The


design shown in Figure 7 is used in the TVA pilot
plant for the production of 18-46-0 and it is TVA’s
recommended design for large plants (10). This is
a reactor with a very short slurry retention time
1 I I l
2 which produces 18-46-0 with low citrate-insoluble
15 I6 I7 18 19 2O
P2 Os. All TVA pilot-plant samples in the study
NITROGEN, 3%
(DP 13, DP 14, DP 15, DP16) proved this con
Figure 5. Effect of cation impurities on nitrogen content clusion by having citrate-insoluble P2 Os analyses
of 18-46-0 fertilizers.
of less than 0.1%, even though the quantity of
(Fe, Al)NH4 (HPO4)2 was greater than that present
I
in most of the commercial samples made by the
use of the preneutralizer.
7 H. There have been some problems encountered
with buildup of scale in pipe-cross reactors used to
produce diammonium phosphate. Microscopic
analyses reveal that there are two types of crys
6 H.
talline scale. The first is (Fe,Al)NHA (HPO4)2,
28
º, which occurs with phosphoric acids having iron
O and aluminum as the major impurities; and sec
º
+ M

ondly, MgNH4 PO4 H2O, which occurs with


* *
phosphoric acids having magnesium as the major
impurity. The formation of these compounds can
4 IT
be avoided by the addition of fluorine to the acid
used in the process to convert the scale to the
corresponding fluorophosphate compound. These
3 L 1 I 1
compounds, which precipitate as cryptocrystalline
43 44 45 46 47 48 compounds, will not form large scalar crystals like
P2O5, 3% (Fe, Al)NH4 (HPO4)2 and MgNH4 PO4 H2O, and
Figure 6. Effect of anion impurities on phosphate content their P2 Os will be completely available. The
of 18-46-0 fertilizers. following problems can be solved by using the

17
T0 RENEW CALL
Jul 14% DATE DUE
422-3900

>RUBBER
REC

SCRUBBER LIQUOR S UBBER


OutR §§§ BED
wºn º- COSpARGE
* Po, of
NPSLU

AM Mon! A l
º

scrubaer Lloº" **
PIPE - CRO
REACTO

AMMON

CHARGE

- - HIGHSMITH 45-220
pipe-cross reactor instead -- - F:Fe2O3, it is advantageous to
------

preneutralizer tanks: have lower retention times in the preneutralizer


1. Difficulty in pumping and metering the hot and ammoniator-granulator when the mole ratio
slurry from the preneutralizer. N:P is 1.4:1 or higher.
2. Foaming and boiling over of the slurry in the The mole ratio N:P in the slurry coming from
preneutralizer. the preneutralizer to the granulator must be above
3. Difficulty in controlling the slurry level in 1.4:1 to avoid nitrogen deficiencies. At lower
the preneutralizer. ratios the product will contain some MAP; this
4. Plugging of the ammonia sparger and poor causes nitrogen deficiency in the product.
ammonia distribution in the preneutralizer. The Mg and Al contents of the acids have less
5. Scarcity and high price of fuel needed for effect on grade deficiency than Ca and Fe.
drying the product (11). To avoid highly viscous preneutralizer slurries
In summary, this study identifies the main when low preneutralizer retention times are used,
problems in meeting DAP-grade specifications and ensure that there is sufficient fluorine available (wt
suggests some possible solutions to these problems. ratio F:Fe2O3 > 2.0:1) to combine with the
Calcium was the major cause of grade deficiency Fe2O3 to form cryptocrystalline Fe-NH4-PO4-F-
in the commercial samples which were investigated. H2O instead of FeNH4 (HPO4)2 gel. An alterna
Possible solutions to this problem are to maintain tive to this latter suggestion is to replace the
filter cloths in the phosphoric acid unit in good preneutralizer with a TVA pipe reactor installed so
condition, operate the phosphoric acid unit at as that it discharges viscous slurry directly onto the
low an acid temperature as is consistent with good bed of material in the granulator.
operation of this unit, and partially clarify the
acid before it is used.
In the DAP unit the amount of Fe2O3 and F in Acknowledgment
the acid affects the content of citrate-insoluble
P2 Os in the product. If the weight ratio F: Fe2O3 The authors acknowledge the contributions of David G. Salladay
in the product can be kept above 2.3:1, the citrate and Jeffrey L. Greenhill for their input of the engineering aspects of
18-46-0 production and John H. Holmes, Jr., for development of
insoluble P2 Os content of the product will be less analytical methods for determination of 18-46-0 products with
than 0.1%, even at excessive retention times. At argon plasma spectrometry.

18
References Washington, DC, October 30-November 1, 1979.
Frazier, A. W. E. F. Dillard, T. C. Woodis, Jr., and F. P.
1. Achorn, F. P., E. F. Dillard, and A. W. Frazier. “Effect of Achorn. “Precipitated Impurities in 18-46-0. Fertilizers Pre
Impurities in Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid on DAP Grade,” pared From Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid," paper presented
paper presented at the TVA-TFI Granulation Workshop. at the Fifth Annual TVA-TF1 Phosphate Workshop, Atlanta.
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, October 2-3, 1979. Georgia, February 19–20, 1980.
Frazier, A. W., J. P. Smith, and J. R. Lehr. J. Agric. Food Frazier, A. W. J. F. McCullough, and R. M. Scheib. J. Agric
Chem. 14 (5), 522-529 (1966). Food Chem. 19 (2), 213-215 (1971).
Frazier, A. W. J. R. Lehr, and J. P. Smith. J. Agric. Food Achorn, F. P. D. G. Salladay, J. L. Greenhill, and E. F.
Chem. 12 (3), 198-201 (1964). Dillard. “Effects of Process Parameters on Compositions of
Ando, J., T. Akiyama, and M. Morita. Bull Chem. Soc. Jpn. 41 DAP Products,” paper presented at the Fifth Annual TVA-TFI
(7), 1716-1723 (1968). Phosphate Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia, February 19–20, 1980.
Akiyama, T., and J. Ando. Bull Chem. Soc. Jpn. 45 (9), 2915 11. Parker, B. R., M. M. Norton, L. W. McCamy, and D. G. Salladay.
2920 (1972). "Pilot- and Demonstration-Scale Developments in Production
Pechkovskii, V. V., R. Ya Mel'nikova, M. N. Ryer, T. V. of Ammonium Phosphate-Based Fertilizers. Using the Pipe
Chadovich, and N. L. Gavrilyuk, Russ. J. Inorg Chem 24 and Pipe-Cross Reactors," paper presented at the 1978 Inter
(2), 175-179 (1979). national Superphosphate and Compound Manufacturer's
Hebbard, G. M. “Present Day DAP Production,” paper pre Association Limited Technical/Economic Conference, Orlando,
sented at the 1979 Fertilizer Institute Round Table Meeting, Florida, October 22–27, 1978.
TVA is an equal opportunity employer and is committed to ensuring
that the benefits of programs receiving TVA financial assistance
are available to all eligible persons regardless of race, color, national
origin, handicap, or age.
ity
IDE POS ITEM C .
he Oh 8 02 014 6

mill.
3 243 46
º impuritiesºn. 18-46-0 *_

Bulletin Y-162 April 1981


TVA/OACD-35/12

ATIONAL FERTILIZER DEVELOPMENT CENTER TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Muscle SHOALS, ALABAMA assed

You might also like