Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inglés Técnico 2
Inglés Técnico 2
Contextualización:
Se busca la identificación, el afianzamiento y la aplicación de las temáticas vistas en clase de Ingles.
INSTRUCCIONES DE ACTIVIDAD
Ver el video, leer el texto del mismo video y desarrollar las actividades
large enough to be visible to the naked eye, but also molecules, atoms, and even electrons and most
of the other subatomic particles we’ve discovered. If we do discover a tiny unit in space-time or a
shifting constant in a natural law, would that prove the universe is a simulation? No— it would only
be the first of many steps. There could be other explanations for each of those findings. And a lot
more evidence would be needed to establish the simulation hypothesis as a working theory of
nature. However many tests we design, we’re limited by some assumptions they all share. Our
current understanding of the natural world on the quantum level breaks down at what’s known as
the planck scale. If the unit of space-time is on this scale, we wouldn’t be able to look for it with our
current scientific understanding. There’s still a wide range of things that are smaller than what’s
currently observable but larger than the planck scale to investigate. Similarly, shifts in the constants
of natural laws could occur so slowly that they would only be observable over the lifetime of the
universe. So they could exist even if we don’t detect them over centuries or millennia of
measurements. We're also biased towards thinking that our universe’s simulator, if it exists, makes
calculations the same way we do, with similar computational limitations. Really, we have no way of
knowing what an alien civilization’s constraints and methods would be—but we have to start
somewhere. It may never be possible to prove conclusively that the universe either is, or isn’t, a
simulation, but we’ll always be pushing science and technology forward in pursuit of the question:
what is the nature of reality?
1. According to the lesson, which observation would not be a signature for the simulation
hypothesis?
2. Under which assumption a unit in space and time can be interpreted as a signature for a
simulated Universe?
A The larger its rest mass (its mass in a nonmoving frame) is.
B The bigger in size the particle is.
C The more abundant the particle is in nature.
D The finer the distances in space and time it can resolve.
A The Universe simulation is similar to the mini simulations scientists currently perform using the
laws of nature.
B With the next generation of supercomputers, we can test whether we live in a simulation.
C The constants in laws of physics are drifting over time.
D The proposed experimental tests of the simulation hypothesis are based upon the assumption that
the simulation of the Universe goes as the mini simulations of nature scientists have performed so
far.
5. If we do discover a tiny unit in space and time or a shifting constant in the natural laws, what
would that mean?
1. Based on your knowledge of the laws of physics, how possibly do you think the ultra-high
energy cosmic rays can point to a granularity in spacetime? What should experimentalists
look for?
They should be looking for phenomena that affect the granularity of space-time like ultra-high-
temperature rays do.
2. It is believed that the next generation of computers use the laws of quantum mechanics to
perform ultrafast and massively parallel operations. What would be the impact of quantum
computers on our approach to the simulation hypothesis?
These would help improve the speed at which experiments are carried out to reinforce this
hypothesis.
3. What are the requirements for any hypothesis, such as the simulation hypothesis, to be
approved as a working theory of nature?
For a hypothesis to be accepted as scientific, it must be something that can be supported or refuted
through the gathering of information through methodologically validated research techniques, and
its subsequent analysis. That is why the hypothesis in its approach must consider meeting certain
minimum qualities, which are: having a probable answer, having conceptual clarity, making
reference to the empirical and the theoretical body of the investigation, in addition, it must be able
ti be operationalized and/or be categorized methodologically.
Evaluación: