The New York Simes jeps://nytimns/sasi0/S
Why Science Alone Could Not Tell Us Whether to Reopen Notre
Dame
It isa moral question in which important principles are in tension.
By John I. Jenkins
Father Jenkins isthe president ofthe Universit of Notre Dame.
May 26, 2020, 5:00 am, ET
SOUTH BEND, Ind, — Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
is a distinguished immunologist and an advocate for public health. I have the privilege of sharing with him an
education in Catholic schools laden with the study of classical texts, philosophy and theology.
Dr. Fauci credits such an education with giving him his impressive ability to explain complex medical facts to
general audiences and present cogent arguments.
He consistently says that he speaks as a scientist, offering us the best scientific information available to guide
our response to the coronavirus pandemic. His advice is invaluable, There are, however, questions that a
scientist, speaking strictly as a scientist, cannot answer for us.
For questions about moral value — how we ought to decide and act — science can inform our deliberations, but
it cannot provide the answer.
At the University of Notre Dame, we recently announced our plans to return students to campus for the fall
semester. In order to reduce the chances that students from around the country and the world with multiple
departures and returns will carry pathogens with them, we will bring students back two weeks eatly, forgo a fall
break and finish the semester before Thanksgiving.
‘As soon as students arrive in August, we will conduct orientations to welcome them back in the Covid-19 era. We
will also institute extensive protocols for testing; contact tracing and quarantining; and preventive measures,
such as hand-washing, physical distancing and, in certain settings, the wearing of masks. This is how we can
restore in-person classes safely.
Athletic competition presents another set of challenges. We believe we can, with aggressive testing, hygiene
and careful monitoring, keep student-athletes safe. Indeed, keeping healthy relatively small cadres of student-
athletes, coaches and support staff members is a less daunting challenge than keeping safe the several
thousand other people in the campus community.
Fans in the stadium, however, are a different matter. Fighting Irish fans regularly fill Notre Dame Stadium's
80,000 seats. I see no way currently to allow spectators unless we restrict admissions so that physical
distancing is possible.
Our focus to this point has been on restarting our educational and research efforts, and we will soon turn to
answer the question of how many games we will play, when we will play them and how many fans will be in the
stadium.With these and other steps — informed by the best medical advice we can find — we believe we can keep our
campus environment healthy.
Our decision to return to on-campus classes for the fall semester was guided by three principles that arise from
our core university goals. First, we strive to protect the health of our students, faculty, staff and their loved ones.
Second, we endeavor to offer an education of the whole person — body, mind and spirit — and we believe that
residential life and personal interactions with faculty members and among students are critical to such an
education, Finally, we seek to advance human understanding through research, scholarship and creative
expression.
If we gave the first principle absolute priority, our decision about reopening would be easy. We would keep
everyone away until an effective vaccine was universally available,
However, were we to take that course, we would risk failing to provide the next generation of leaders the
education they need and to do the research and scholarship so valuable to our society. How ought these
competing risks be weighed? No science, simply as science, can answer that question. It is a moral question in
which principles to which we are committed are in tension.
We all hope for an effective vaccine that will put Covid-19 behind us. Yet we cannot and should not assume that a
vaccine will be available soon, nor, indeed, that another pandemic will not follow close behind. We live in a global
society, and it is possible that animal-to-person contact in an open market somewhere may again cause a
pandemic disrupting our society.
‘We may need to reconcile ourselves to the fact that we are facing not simply a passing crisis, but a new normal.
For that and similar challenges, we need moral insight.
‘We are in our society regularly willing to take on ourselves or impose on others risks — even lethal risks — for
the good of society. We send off young men and women to war to defend the security of our nation knowing that
many will not return. We applaud medical professionals who risk their health to provide care to the sick and
suffering. We each accept the risk of a fatal traffic accident when we get in our car,
er
Dr. Anthony Fauet makes remarks as President Trump looks on during the dally White
House Coronavirus briefing at the White House in Apri. Doug Mlls/The New York Times‘The pivotal question for us individually and as a society is not whether we should take risks, but what risks are
acceptable and why. Disagreements among us on that question are deep and vigorous, but I'd hope for wide
agreement that the education of young people — the future leaders of our society — is worth risking a good deal.
Indeed, the mark of a healthy society is its willingness to bear burdens and take risks for the education and well-
being of its young, Also worthy of risk is the research that can enable us to deal with the challenges we do and
will face.
We have availed ourselves of the best medical advice and scientific information available and are assiduously
planning a reopening that will make the campus community as safe as possible. We believe the good of
educating students and continuing vital research is very much worth the remaining risk.
In our classical, humanistic educations, both Dr. Fauci and I came across the texts of Aristotle, who defined
courage not as simple fearlessness, but as the mean between a rashness that is heedless of danger and a
timidity that is paralyzed by it. To possess the virtue of courage is to be able to choose the proper mean between
these extremes — to know what risks are worth taking, and why.
Perhaps what we most need now, alongside science, is that kind of courage and the practical wisdom it requires.
Notre Dame’s recent announcement about reopening is the attempt to find the courageous mean as we face the
threat of the virus and seek to continue our mission of education and inquiry.
‘The Rev. John |. Jenkins is the 17th president of the University of Notre Dame.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of leters tothe editor. Weld like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here
are some tips. And here's our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.