You are on page 1of 88

City/State Expiration Section

Albuquerque 7/16/2015 18.1.4


Albuquerque 7/16/2015 18.1.5
Albuquerque 7/16/2015 20.1.12
Albuquerque 7/16/2015 20.1.3
Albuquerque 7/16/2015 20.1.9
Albuquerque 7/16/2015 20.1.10
Albuquerque 7/16/2015 23.1.1
Albuquerque 7/16/2015 20.1.5.1
Albuquerque 7/16/2015 20.1.6
Albuquerque 7/16/2015 20.1.6
Anaheim 7/7/2011 29.5
Anaheim 7/7/2011 29.6
Anaheim 7/7/2011 29.4
Anaheim 7/7/2011 62.2
Anaheim 7/7/2011 54.1
Anchorage 6/30/2018 5.1.H
Anchorage 6/30/2018 5.1.G.3
Anchorage 6/30/2018 5.1.G.6
Anchorage 6/30/2018 5.2
Anchorage 6/30/2018 5.1.G.2
Anchorage 6/30/2018 5.1.G.4
Anchorage 6/30/2018 5.1.G.4
Anchorage 6/30/2018 5.1.G.8
Austin 9/30/2017 16.11.a lines 19-22
Austin 9/30/2017 18.1.C
Austin 9/30/2017 17.4.f.i lines 5-7
Austin 9/30/2017 17.4.g lines 14-17
Austin 9/30/2017 17.4.b lines 23-27
Austin 9/30/2017 16.1.c lines 16-18
Austin 9/30/2017 16.4.f.4 lines 8-9
Austin 9/30/2017 16.3.d lines 32-35
Austin 9/30/2017 16.4.l.2 lines 3-5
Austin 9/30/2017 16.6.2,3.4.5
Austin 9/30/2017 16.1.d lines 20-26
Austin 9/30/2017 17.3 lines 1-4
Austin 9/30/2017 16.4.i lines 40-43
Austin 9/30/2017 16.4.h.2.c lines 21-25
Austin 9/30/2017 16.6.2 lines 44-3
Austin 9/30/2017 16.4.l.2 lines 5-10
Austin 9/30/2017 18.2
Austin 9/30/2017 18.1.a.1
Austin 9/30/2017 17.4.a lines 13-15
Bakersfield 6/30/2013 09.10.00
Baltimore 9/30/2016 Addendum F
Baltimore 9/30/2016 16.G
Baltimore 9/30/2016 16.C.4
Baltimore 9/30/2016 16.D
Baltimore 9/30/2016 16.C.3
Baltimore 9/30/2016 16.C.2
Baltimore 9/30/2016 15

Baltimore 9/30/2016 16.a.1


Baton Rouge 12/31/2016 VIII.a
Baton Rouge 12/31/2016 IX.b.2
Baton Rouge 12/31/2016 IX.b.3
Baton Rouge 12/31/2016 IX.B.4
Baton Rouge 12/31/2016 IX.A.6
Baton Rouge 12/31/2016 XXI
Baton Rouge 12/31/2016 IX.A.4
Buffalo 6/30/2017 22.12.1 E
Buffalo 6/30/2017 22.2 B
Buffalo 6/30/2017 Page 85
Buffalo 6/30/2017 22.3 D
Buffalo 6/30/2017 22.3 E
California Police Bill of Right None 3303.g
California Police Bill of Right None 3303.a
California Police Bill of Right None 3303.b
California Police Bill of Right None 3303.e
Chandler 6/30/2016 1.4.J
Chandler 6/30/2016 1.4.K
Chandler 6/30/2016 1.4.K
Chandler 6/30/2016 1.4.I
Chandler 6/30/2016 1.4.D
Chandler 6/30/2016 1.4.C
Chandler 6/30/2016 1.4.K.4
Chicago 6/30/2017 8.4
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.1.L
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.1.E
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.2.H
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.2
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.9
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.4
Chicago 6/30/2017 7.1.A
Chicago 6/30/2017 22
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.2.E
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.1.F
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.2.F
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.1.G
Chicago 6/30/2017 6.1.C(2)
Cincinnati 5/21/2016 Article XI
Cincinnati 5/21/2016 Article X
Cincinnati 5/21/2016 Article III
Cincinnati 5/21/2016 Article X2
Cleveland 3/13/2016 8.12.M
Cleveland 3/13/2016 29.74
Cleveland 3/13/2016 7.10.
Cleveland 3/13/2016 8.12.C
Cleveland 3/13/2016 XXII
Cleveland 3/13/2016 8.12.E
Cleveland 3/13/2016 8.12.D
Cleveland 3/13/2016 8.12.C
Columbus 12/8/2017 8.14
Columbus 12/8/2017 17.15
Columbus 12/8/2017 10.12
Columbus 12/8/2017 10.1
Columbus 12/8/2017 10.11
Columbus 12/8/2017 8.16.B
Columbus 12/8/2017 10.4
Columbus 12/8/2017 10.8
Columbus 12/8/2017 8.2.A.2
Columbus 12/8/2017 8.7
Corpus Christi 8/30/2019 A7, pC, s9
Corpus Christi 8/30/2019 A7, pC, s4
Corpus Christi 8/30/2019 A7, pC, s5
Corpus Christi 8/30/2019 A8, D, 4
Corpus Christi 8/30/2019 A14, pB
Corpus Christi 8/30/2019 A7, pC, s4
Corpus Christi 8/30/2019 A7, pC, s5
Corpus Christi 8/30/2019 A7, pC, s6
Delaware Police Bill of Right None 9200.C7
Delaware Police Bill of Right None 9205
Delaware Police Bill of Right None 9200.C3
Delaware Police Bill of Right None 9200.C12
Delaware Police Bill of Right None 9200.C5
Delaware Police Bill of Right None 9200.C3
Delaware Police Bill of Right None 9200.C6
Detroit 12/31/2019 9.I
Detroit 12/31/2019 9.H
Detroit 12/31/2019 16.K
Detroit 12/31/2019 9.E
Detroit 12/31/2019 24.A
Detroit 12/31/2019 16.J.8
Detroit 12/31/2019 16.H
Detroit 12/31/2019 27
Detroit 12/31/2019 16.B
Detroit 12/31/2019 16.J.4
Detroit 12/31/2019 16.J.3
El Paso 8/31/2018 Article 30.2
El Paso 8/31/2018 Article 21.F
El Paso 8/31/2018 Article 30.3.A
El Paso 8/31/2018 Appendix E.3.(f)
El Paso 8/31/2018 Article 26
El Paso 8/31/2018 Article 14.1
El Paso 8/31/2018 Article 30.1.(d)
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.532.6.a
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.532.d
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.533.2.a.2
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.532.g
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.532.2
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.532.2
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.533.4
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.532.d
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.532.e
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.532.c
Florida Police Bill of Rights None Section 112.532.f
Fort Wayne 12/31/2010 7.1
Fort Wayne 12/31/2010 7.5.E
Fort Wayne 12/31/2010 7.5.D
Fort Wayne 12/31/2010 7.5.B(1)
Fort Wayne 12/31/2010 7.5.C
Fort Wayne 12/31/2010 7.5.B(2)
Fort Wayne 12/31/2010 7.5.D
Fort Worth 9/30/2016 Article 7.2.G
Fort Worth 9/30/2016 Article 7.2.F.3
Fort Worth 9/30/2016 Article 7.2.F.6
Glendale 6/30/2016 4.4.2
Glendale 6/30/2016 4.4.1.1
Glendale 6/30/2016 4.4.3(2)
Glendale 6/30/2016 4.4.8
Glendale 6/30/2016 4.4.7
Henderson 6/30/2010 Article 25.5d
Henderson 6/30/2010 Article 25.5c
Henderson 6/30/2010 Article 25.a + b
Henderson 6/30/2010 Article 3.3
Henderson 6/30/2010 Article 25.5.2
Hialeah 9/30/2016 25.2.O
Hialeah 9/30/2016 25.2.N
Hialeah 9/30/2016 25.2.D
Hialeah 9/30/2016 25.3.D
Hialeah 9/30/2016 25.2.L
Hialeah 9/30/2016 25.3.B
Hialeah 9/30/2016 25.3.E
Hialeah 9/30/2016 25.2.E
Hialeah 9/30/2016 25.2.C
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A12, B. 2. c.
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A28, B. 2.
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A28, B. 4.
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A12, B. 2. l.
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A32, M. 2.
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A12, D. 4.
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A12, B. 2. j.
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A12, B. 2. i.
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A12, B. 2. k.
Honolulu 6/30/2017 A12, B. 2. h.
Houston 12/31/2018 31.1.A
Houston 12/31/2018 31.1.B
Houston 12/31/2018 Article 29 3
Houston 12/31/2018 31.11
Houston 12/31/2018 30.4
Houston 12/31/2018 Article 26
Houston 12/31/2018 31.1
Houston 12/31/2018 Article 29 2
Houston 12/31/2018 30.7
Houston 12/31/2018 30.3
Illinois Police Bill of Rights None Sec 3.2
Illinois Police Bill of Rights None Sec 3.7
Illinois Police Bill of Rights None Sec 3.5
Illinois Police Bill of Rights None Sec 3.6
Indianapolis 12/31/2016 4.14
Indianapolis 12/31/2016 4.2.B
Indianapolis 12/31/2016 4.11
Irvine 12/10/2017 Article III
Irvine 12/10/2017 Article VI.B
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 14
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 11.K
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Artile 11.D
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 11.G
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 10.3.B
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 35
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 13
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 11.L
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 11.E
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 11.F
Jacksonville 9/30/2014 Article 11.C(2)
Jersey City 12/31/2016 38.E
Jersey City 12/31/2016 24.4
Jersey City 12/31/2016 13.B
Jersey City 12/31/2016 38.B.3
Jersey City 12/31/2016 38.B.5
Kansas City 4/30/2017 Article 12.1
Kansas City 4/30/2017 Article 23.1
Kansas City 4/30/2017 Article 2
Kansas City 4/30/2017 Article 2
Kansas City 4/30/2017 Article 2
Kansas City 4/30/2017 Article 12.4
Kansas City 4/30/2017 Article 12.2
Kentucky Police Bill of RightsNone 15.520.1H8
Kentucky Police Bill of RightsNone 15.520.1G
Kentucky Police Bill of RightsNone 15.520.1F
Kentucky Police Bill of RightsNone 15.520.1C
Kentucky Police Bill of RightsNone 15.520.1B
Laredo 9/30/2016 Article 26.5
Laredo 9/30/2016 Article 27.3 (D)
Laredo 9/30/2016 Article 26.4
Laredo 9/30/2016 Article 28.1
Laredo 9/30/2016 Article 27.3 (D)
Laredo 9/30/2016 Article 27.3 (E)
Laredo 9/30/2016 Article 27.3 (F)
Las Vegas 6/30/2016 Article 25.3
Las Vegas 6/30/2016 Article 25.3
Las Vegas 6/30/2016 Article 25.3
Las Vegas 6/30/2016 Article 4.4.H
Las Vegas 6/30/2016 Article 12
Las Vegas 6/30/2016 Article 4.4.F
Las Vegas 6/30/2016 Article 4.4.K
Las Vegas 6/30/2016 Article 4.4.D
Lexington 2016 Article 14.3
Lexington 2016 Article 15.6
Lexington 2016 Article 14.6
Lexington 2016 Article 11
Lexington 2016 Article 18.4
Lexington 2016 Article 18.1
Lincoln 8/31/2015 Article 10, section 1(2
Lincoln 8/31/2015 Article 8, section 6
Lincoln 8/31/2015 Article 10, section 1(1
Lincoln 8/31/2015 Article 10, section 6
Lincoln 8/31/2015 Article 10, section 1(2
Los Angeles 6/30/2014 9.7
Los Angeles 6/30/2014 6.7.A
Louisiana Police Bill of RightsNone 2533.C.1-2
Louisiana Police Bill of RightsNone 2533.A
Louisiana Police Bill of RightsNone 2531.B.3
Louisiana Police Bill of RightsNone 2531.B.4.b
Louisiana Police Bill of RightsNone 2531.B.2
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.2.I
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.2.H
Louisville 6/30/2015 18.4.C
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 18.4.C
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.2.B
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.2.E
Louisville 6/30/2015 17.3.C
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.3.D
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.2.N
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 18.2
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.2.M
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 23.5
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.2.A(2)
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.5.C
Louisville 6/30/2015 Article 17.2.K
Madison 12/31/2015 17.A.1
Madison 12/31/2015 17.A.2
Madison 12/31/2015 17.B
Maryland Police Bill of Right None 3-104(c)(2)
Maryland Police Bill of Right None 3-104(c)(1)
Maryland Police Bill of Right None 3-110
Maryland Police Bill of Right None 3-110(b)
Maryland Police Bill of Right None 3-104(j)(2)
Maryland Police Bill of Right None 3-104(h)(2)
Maryland Police Bill of Right None 3-104(h)(1)
Memphis 6/30/2013 14
Memphis 6/30/2013 15.6
Memphis 6/30/2013 15.3.8
Memphis 6/30/2013 12.4
Memphis 6/30/2013 15.3.5
Memphis 6/30/2013 15.3.6
Mesa 6/30/2017 2.Rights of Unit Memb
Miami 9/30/2014 8.3
Miami 9/30/2014 8.1.D
Miami 9/30/2014 8.1.G
Miami 9/30/2014 6.6
Miami 9/30/2014 14.1
Miami 9/30/2014 12.1
Miami 9/30/2014 8.1.H
Miami 9/30/2014 8.1.E
Miami 9/30/2014 8.1.C
Miami 9/30/2014 8.1.F
Milwaukee 12/31/2012 Article 7.I.2
Milwaukee 12/31/2012 Appendix J
Milwaukee 12/31/2012 Article 71
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 4.1
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 5.4
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 4.1
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 16.1.a
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 16.1.e
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 16.2.a
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 16.1.d
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 26.1
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 16.6.g
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 16.2.b
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 4.4a
Minneapolis 12/31/2014 16.6.b
Minnesota Police Bill of RighNone 626.89.Subd 8
Minnesota Police Bill of RighNone 626.89.Subd 17
Minnesota Police Bill of RighNone 626.89.Subd 12
Minnesota Police Bill of RighNone 626.89.Subd 7
Nevada Police Bill of Rights None NRS289.080.7
Nevada Police Bill of Rights None NRS289.025.2
Nevada Police Bill of Rights None NRS289.060.A
Nevada Police Bill of Rights None NRS289.057
Nevada Police Bill of Rights None NRS 289.060.1
Nevada Police Bill of Rights None NRS289.060.D
Nevada Police Bill of Rights None NRS289.060.C
New Mexico Police Bill of RigNone 29-14-7
New Mexico Police Bill of RigNone 29-14-4.C
New Mexico Police Bill of RigNone 29-14-4.F
New Mexico Police Bill of RigNone 29-14-4.D
New Mexico Police Bill of RigNone 29-14-4.D4
New Mexico Police Bill of RigNone 29-14-4.D6
New York 7/31/2010 7.c
New York 7/31/2010 8
Newark 12/31/2012 6.1.D.3
Newark 12/31/2012 XXI.1
North Las Vegas 6/30/2012 22.4.G
North Las Vegas 6/30/2012 23.5
North Las Vegas 6/30/2012 22.4.F(2)
North Las Vegas 6/30/2012 22.4.D
North Las Vegas 6/30/2012 22.4.E
North Las Vegas 6/30/2012 22.4.F(1)
Oakland 6/30/2015 X.B
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 Addendum E.2.A
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 Addendum E.2.H
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 8.D
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 Addendum E.5.4
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 24.1
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 26
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 5.2.b
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 Addendum E.2.F
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 Addendum E.2.G
Oklahoma City 6/30/2015 Addendum E.2.E
Omaha 12/21/2013 6.6
Omaha 12/21/2013 6.2
Omaha 12/21/2013 6.3
Omaha 12/21/2013 7.1
Omaha 12/21/2013 18a.I
Omaha 12/21/2013 6.7
Omaha 12/21/2013 6.7
Omaha 12/21/2013 18a.G
Omaha 12/21/2013 18a.B
Omaha 12/21/2013 18a.F
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.1
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.5.C
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.5.D
Orlando 9/30/2016 6.1
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.6
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.11
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.14
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.5.D
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.5.E
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.5.I
Orlando 9/30/2016 5.5.C
Philadelphia 6/30/2017 III.5
Phoenix 6/30/2016 1.4.E.7
Phoenix 6/30/2016 1.4.B.4(1)
Phoenix 6/30/2016 1.4.G
Phoenix 6/30/2016 1.4.E.6
Phoenix 6/30/2016 1.4.F.8
Phoenix 6/30/2016 1.4.B.2
Phoenix 6/30/2016 1.4.G.4
Phoenix 6/30/2016 1.4.B.4(2)
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 21.B.12
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 19.II.A
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 19.II.B.1
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 5.B
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 21.B.11
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 21.C
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 20.A
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 19.II.G
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 15.A.
Pittsburgh 12/31/2014 Section 15.C.
Portland 6/30/2017 61.2.4.1
Portland 6/30/2017 61.2.3.2
Portland 6/30/2017 61.2.1.3
Portland 6/30/2017 61.2.2.8
Portland 6/30/2017 22.5
Portland 6/30/2017 61.2.1.3
Portland 6/30/2017 61.2.2.6
Portland 6/30/2017 61.2.2.7
Portland 6/30/2017 61.2.2.5
Reno 12/31/2014 Article 29.g, 1-5
Reno 12/31/2014 Article 29.g.7
Reno 12/31/2014 Article 29.c.2
Reno 12/31/2014 Article 29.b
Reno 12/31/2014 Article 29.g.6
Reno 12/31/2014 Article 29.f
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.6-4b
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.6-2(5)
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.6-2(13)
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.6-2(12)
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.6-13
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.61(2)
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.6-2(9)
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.6-2(6)
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.6-2(3)
Rhode Island Police Bill of Ri None 42-28.6-2(7)
Riverside 6/30/2009 16.4.5.c
Rochester 6/30/2016 20.1.16
Rochester 6/30/2016 20.2.F
Rochester 6/30/2016 20.2.G
Rochester 6/30/2016 20.1.9
Rochester 6/30/2016 27.4.B
Rochester 6/30/2016 20.1.15.1
Rochester 6/30/2016 21.2
Rochester 6/30/2016 21.3
Rochester 6/30/2016 20.1.18
Rochester 6/30/2016 20.1.10
Sacramento 6/18/2010 21.2.b
Sacramento 6/18/2010 3.3.2.a.5
Sacramento 6/18/2010 4.6.D
Sacramento 6/18/2010 3.3.2.a.1
Sacramento 6/18/2010 3.3.2.a.1
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)28.19
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)28.22
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)28.19.E
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)29.2.C(2)
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)29.3.G
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)29.3.F
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)28.18
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)36
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)29.2.C(1)
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)29.2.D
San Antonio 9/30/2014 (9/30/2024)29.2.E
San Diego 6/20/2020 64.3304.D(1)
San Diego 6/20/2020 64.3303.g
San Diego 6/20/2020 41.K.2
San Diego 6/20/2020 41.D.1
San Francisco 6/30/2018 5.66
San Francisco 6/30/2018 3.55
San Francisco 6/30/2018 5.66
San Jose 12/31/2015 43.4
San Jose 12/31/2015 25.8.6
San Jose 12/31/2015 43.1
San Jose 12/31/2015 43.2
San Jose 12/31/2015 27
Santa Ana 6/30/2013 1st 3 side letters (non
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.6.B
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.6.G
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.6.L
Seattle 12/31/2014 4.2.C
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.6.A
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.6.F
Seattle 12/31/2014 H.3
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.5.C
Seattle 12/31/2014 E.1.C
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.5.F
Seattle 12/31/2014 E
Seattle 12/31/2014 4.2.A
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.6.K
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.6.H
Seattle 12/31/2014 3.4
Seattle 12/31/2014 F.2
Seattle 12/31/2014 D.3.D
Seattle 12/31/2014 D.3.E
Spokane 12/31/2016 25.E.12
Spokane 12/31/2016 24.A
Spokane 12/31/2016 5.B
Spokane 12/31/2016 27.4.h
Spokane 12/31/2016 24.A
Spokane 12/31/2016 25.E.11
Spokane 12/31/2016 24.E.7
Spokane 12/31/2016 24.E.9
Spokane 12/31/2016 24.E.8
St. Louis 6/30/2017 11.4
St. Louis 6/30/2017 11.4
St. Louis 6/30/2017 11.5
St. Louis 6/30/2017 9.3
St. Paul 12/31/2015 SPPD 230.00 X
St. Paul 12/31/2015 SPPD 230.00 X
St. Paul 12/31/2015 6.1
St. Paul 12/31/2015 PBR 626.89 subd 17
St. Paul 12/31/2015 SPPD 230.10
St. Paul 12/31/2015 14.1
St. Paul 12/31/2015 PBR 626.89 subd 7
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Section 112.532.6a.
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Section 112.532.6
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Section 112.532.d
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Article 2. Section 5.B
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Article 9. Section 1.E
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Article 21. Section 1.
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Article 21. Section 2.
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Section 112.532.e
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Section 112.532.c.
St. Petersburg 9/30/2016 Section 112.532.f
Stockton 6/30/2014 7.c
Tampa 9/30/2011 6.a
Tampa 9/30/2011 37.6
Tampa 10/1/2011 112.533.2
Tampa 9/30/2011 37.1.c
Tampa 9/30/2011 37.1.c
Tampa 9/30/2011 37.1.f
Tampa 9/30/2011 4.4.2
Tampa 9/30/2011 37.2
Tampa 9/30/2011 37.1.k
Tampa 9/30/2011 37.1.d
Tampa 9/30/2011 37.1.e
Tampa 9/30/2011 37.1.c
Toledo 12/31/2017 2129.19.F
Toledo 12/31/2017 2129.26.D
Toledo 12/31/2017 2129.25
Toledo 12/31/2017 2129.15
Toledo 12/31/2017 2129.19.D
Tucson 6/30/2014 9.5.A
Tucson 6/30/2014 9.5.F
Tucson 6/30/2014 23.2.A
Tucson 6/30/2014 9.1
Tucson 6/30/2014 9.9.D
Tucson 6/30/2014 16.1
Tucson 6/30/2014 9.5.E
Tulsa 6/30/2016 11.4
Tulsa 6/30/2016 B. 30.1.a
Tulsa 6/30/2016 B. 30.1.i
Tulsa 6/30/2016 7.4
Tulsa 6/30/2016 11.3
Tulsa 6/30/2016 11.5
Tulsa 6/30/2016 B. 30.1.e
Tulsa 6/30/2016 B. 30.1.f
Tulsa 6/30/2016 B. 30.1.c
Virginia Police Bill of Rights 7/1/2018 9.1-502.2
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 12.6
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 16.3
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 12.13
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 13.4.2
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 19.E
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 12.4
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 12.4
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 13.11
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 12.12
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 12.14
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 13.6
Washington D.C. 9/30/2008 13.7
West Virginia Police Bill of R None 8-14A-2(2)
West Virginia Police Bill of R None 8-14A-2(3)
Wichita 12/24/2010 14.8
Wichita 12/24/2010 13.2.b
Wichita 12/24/2010 13.2.f.3.d
Wichita 12/24/2010 13.6
Wichita 12/24/2010 13.2.f.3.g
Wichita 12/24/2010 13.2.f.3.h
Policy Language
Derogatory material may be purged within twelve (12) months from the employee
"Human Resources Department files are a permanent record of an employee's per
When available, before an administrative investigator interrogates an officer as a
The name of the charging officer, complaintant, or citizen making the charge shal
The
Records interrogation
are not fully shall be completed
preserved, since as soon as
records ofpossible
suspensions and the actual
(three days or sha
if the questioning
interrogation shall isbemechanically
limited as or stenographically
follows: recorded, the member
Any information released to the
less) are erased and replaced with a written reprimand. Police Oversight Commission shall not contain
On-duty
information
c) Reductions andthatoff-duty
of Suspensions personnel:
identifies sworn maximum
department
of Three (3) Daysof two, (2) two-hour
personnel.
or Less to a Written sessions
Reprimand
within
The twenty-four
parties agree that(24) hour
temporary period with
suspensions a one of(1)1,hour
2, or break
3 days between
that wereout
Should a police officer be sued in a civil action for any allegations arising
sessions.
imposed on In no eventMarch
or after shall the 25,officer's
2001, will tourbeof duty and interrogation
automatically reduced toexceeda written
fourteen
reprimand(14) hours
under theunless
following bothconditions:
parties agree to continuation of the sessions.
(1)
Only Suspensions
two interrogators,of 1, 2, or the3 involved
days, which officerare/were not appealed,
and his/her shall be(up to
representatives
reduced to a written reprimand two (2) years after the date the suspension
The
was officer
served shall
on the notOfficer
be subjected
if: to any offensive language, coercion, or promis
i.If The
the grievance
Officer does/did is thennot appealed
have ato Third Step
sustained to be submitted
complaint to an impartial
for substantially similar
arbitrator
conduct for a final
within two andyears
(2) binding from decision,
the date ANAHEIM
the and thewas
suspension APA agreeon
served to:the
An
The employee
29.5.2.1interview
Develop who
may a has
be been suspended,
recorded,
standing list and
of if it
mutually demoted,
is, the or dismissed
employee
approved shall
arbitrators. may access
have be reinstated
to to
Officer.
the recording,
An employee
29.5.2.1.1
(2) Thismay
Suspensions iflist
any
of 1, further
appeal
shall2, orinclude proceedings
disciplinary
3 days, nowhich
more are contemplated,
actions
than
are/weretaken
five (5)
notunder
mutually
appealed,orARTICLE
this prior
shalltobeany
approved under t
further
arbitrators.
reduced interviews
to a written reprimand three (3) years after the date the suspension
An
at aemployee
subsequent found time. toThebe unfit
employeefor dutythat as a being
resultinterviewed
of a fitness for duty
alsoassessme
29.5.2.1.2ANAHEIM
was served on the and the
Officer if: APA agree toisre-establish the list of shall
arbitratorshave
the
i.once right
Employees
Theeach to
Officer bring
inhas
year his
classifications
inbeen or
January. her own recording
listed disciplined
previously device
in Appendixfor "A" and record
may be placed
substantially any and all
on Administra
similar conduct,
aspects
29.5.2.1.3
and; of ANAHEIM
the interview andand, the APAif themay employee
agree todoes removeso, the employee
arbitrators shallthis
from
provide
All
listThe
ii. the
disciplinary Municipality access to the recording.
Officer does/did not have a sustained complaint for substantiallyfollowing
at anytime. matters will be removed from the No recording
personnel file device
at the may be
similar
used
29.5.2.2
conduct by any
Select
withinpartythe unless
arbitrator the
next threefrom
thenon-criminal Association
(3) and
the standing
years from get the
thelistMunicipality
that has are made
the earliest, aware
Employees under investigation adate
writtenthe suspension
complaint was 4 wo
within
of the fact
reasonable
served on theprior
availableto such
Officer. interview.
hearing date, Employees
unless the partiesshall bemutually
entitled agree
to a transcribed
to select
copy
another
(3) Anyof controversy
any notes made
arbitrator from
overthe by alist.
whetherstenographer.
or not the prior conduct was substantially
29.5.2.3
similar mayStipulate
be to
presented
The decision of the arbitrator will bethe following
to a Hearingsubmission
Examiner
binding language
upon under when
the
all parties othera dismissal
provisions
hereto. is of
submitted
this Article.to an impartial arbitrator. "Was (name of employee) dismissed for
Employees
good
(4) Suspensions shall of
and sufficient be1,compensated
cause?
2, or 3Ifdays if theare/were
not, that
what interview
shall occurs be?"
theappealed
remedy off-duty,
to the Civil at the appropri
Service
Commission
Save when inorthe a Hearing
reasonable Examiner
judgement are not of eligible
the Police forChief
reduction
prior to a written
notice of an int
reprimand under this AGREEMENT.
Interview
(5) Suspensions sessions of 1, shall
2, orbe3for daysa reasonable
that are/were period and under
reduced reasonable
to a written condit
reprimand
shall
Interviewsnot beshall
introduced,
be conducted cited, under
or usedcircumstances
in any mannerdevoid in subsequent
of abuse
disciplinary suspensions or appeals as to that Officer, but the original
The statutory time period for the Chief of Police to take disciplinary action agai
disciplinary decision is not covered by
37 this Section as to contentions of disparate discipline by other Officers.
5 i) The Officer and his representative shall be allowed up to eight hours to rev
14 g) When the Chief of Police is notified that the Panel plans to review a case in
23 b) Before the Officer who is the subject of an investigation provides a stateme
16 c) Except as otherwise provided by this AGREEMENT, the Chief of Police retain
8 (4) By virtue of its purely advisory role, the Panel is not a governmental body
32 ... The final classification of an allegation of misconduct is within the sole
no public release unless police chief says so. Police chief decides eveything. "(2) The final decision as to appropriate
4 Chief of Police, subject to the Officer’s right of appeal of any discipline imposed as provided by 5 Chapter 143 of t
"(2) The final decision as to appropriate discipline is within the sole discretio
20 d) Except as specifically permitted in this Article, the Citizen Oversight pr
There shall be no legal or administrative requirement, including but not limited
If an accused employee declines the option of including an AU on a
Departmental
40 After the Private Hearing Boardthe
Session, as defined
Panel shallin Paragraph
meet in PublicC.3 herein,
Session thetoaccused
receive
employee shall be entitled to three (3) peremptory challenges of persons
21 c. Information
designated in the possession
as members of the Association
of the Departmental Representative
Hearing Board. Only twoas (2)a resul
peremptory
44 2) A Panel recommendation that further investigation by the Department is warr
challenges may be used to strike the Hearing Board Chairperson. No individual
Neither
assignedthe OPM 6may
to Traffic employees nor individual
sit as a member of themembers of the Panel
Traffic Accident Review shall publicly e
Board.
The
If theDepartment
Chief determinesagreesto tosuspend
choose panel members
an Officer on a random
for fifteen (15) daysbasis by the C
or less,
computer from those management and unit members who are in the trial
Suspensions
A unit pool.
board employee thatDepartment
The may have
shall not be theappealed.
option
shall give ofThe
the Officer
a Lodge
Departmentalmay and
notice choose
Hearing toBoard
use vacation
opportunity to be or
conducted
present
13 a) Notwhen by than
less athe
panel composed
panel
forty is chosen
eight (48)ofand
an the
hours Administrative
Lodgethe
before Law
mayOfficer Judge
designate (hereinafter
who either
is Lodge o
the subject
Representative or designee who may observe the random selection of the
"AU")
The
panel.
and mediator
three
Thesworn shall
Department makewill
members, noonepublic
increase recommendations
being the
of number
equal rank. Ifnor
theshall
of officers employee
in thethere betoany
pool
is 50public
and
represented
In themaintain
event thatby
approximately
counsel,
a member the shall
counsel
30 sergeants
shall,and
with20
be investigated thelieutenants
forconsent
an on-duty ofinthe
the
usemember,
pool. The fo
of deadly
have the option
pool shall of selecting
also include command the AU process.
staff under theIf the employee
Deputy is unrepresented,
Commissioner rank
If
theanemployee
accident isshallfoundmaketo have
the been non-preventable,
selection. TheforAUbona
will act all records of the accide
other than those who have been excluded fideasreasons
the Departmental
by the
Hearing
Commissioner Board or Chairperson
his designee. and make evidentiary and legal rulings but will not
For major disciplinary matters, where a three-person Departmental Hearing
be a
Board voting member
is established, of the
such panel during deliberations on verdict or sentencing.
"No civilians other than anhearing shall not
Administrative be scheduled
Law Judge mayany serve sooner than
on a Departmen
In no event shall an AU be appointed to a Departmental
forty-five ( 45) days from the date that counsel for the accused receives Hearing Board without
a copy
the consent of the accused employee or his/her counsel of record.
of the charges and the IAD case book material, unless a shorter period is
If Any Complaint:
mutually agreed upon Results in suspension,
by the Department then
andall records will be destroyed after
counsel.
5 years unless there are similar complaints within that time period.
Legal
Results counsel will bethen
in demotion provided in anywill
all records civilbe
case when the
destroyed plaintiff
after 5 years alleges
unlessthat a
there are similar
"Suspension complaints
without pay maywithin only be that time period.
imposed in accordance with this Section an
Involves sexual misconduct then all records will be destroyed after 5 years
During the term
unless there are of this Agreement
similar complaints all letters
within thatoftime
instruction,
period. letters of caution,
Involves sexualagainst
If a complaint harassment
an officerthenafter
all records will be destroyed
an investigation is found afterto be5"sustaine
years
unless there are similar complaints within that time period.
If a complaint against an officer after investigation is found to be "not sustain
Involves domestic violence then all records will be destroyed after 5 years
unless there are similar complaints within that time period.
All
No interrogations of an Employee
removal or disciplinary in connection
proceeding with any investigation
·shall be commenced more thanshallone be
( 1)r
year afterprovide
City shall the occurrence of theand
legal defense wrong-doing
indemnifycomplained of orisitssued in connec
any officer who
discovery, if later. However, such limitation shall not apply where the
Any interrogation shall be for a reasonable period of time and shall allow for a
wrongdoing complained of would, if proved in a court of appropriate
jurisdiction, constitute a crime.
The member shall be informed of the nature of the investigation before any inter
By law, the City is required to indemnify officers in civil matters
The questioning shall not be overly long. Reasonable respites shall be allowed. T
The member shall not be subjected to offensive language, nor shall he be threat
The public safety officer being interrogated shall have the right to bring his or
her own recording device and record any and all aspects of the interrogation.
If the interrogation does occur during off-duty time of the public safety office
All questions directed to the public safety officer under interrogation shall be
The public safety officer under interrogation shall not be subjected to offensive
Upon written request, a unit member may have written reprimands, suspensions, and lett
At the time of a scheduled interview by the Professional Standards Section, a Police Dep
In addition, the unit member and/ or the Police Department supervisor/Profess
Material purged from a unit member’s files in accordance with the below procedu
to Supervisors
used
Regardingto support or as evidence
Progressive Discipline," of adverse
as set forth employment
in this Agreement,action. The and Department's
is limited finding of
"Sustained
to: — Violation Noted, No Disciplinary Action" is not subject to the grievance procedure.
Reprimands
1. reprimand; and suspensions of one (1) to five (5) days will stay on the Officer’s disciplinary
history for a period of three (3) years
2. excusing a member for a minimum of one day to a maximum of three from the last date of suspension or date of reprimand, or
five
days (5) years
withoutprovidesfrom
pay. the date of the incident, whichever is earlier. Information relating to a preventable traffic accide
If an Officer
and/or considered in adetermining
statement during future the investigation
discipline for a conducted
period of time promptly
not to exceed two (2) years
In all instances,
following a the Summary Punishment shall be satisfied by deducting the
from the
equivalent date of such preventable traffic accident and shall thereafter not be used and/or considered
Any
shooting
in any unit member
incidentwho
employment
andisthen the subject
action
is laterofinterrogated
provided an
thereofficer
is noinvolved
by theshooting
intervening
Employer, investigation
preventable
IPRA or IAD who accident
traffic has involving a
of
as day(s)
part ofoff anwithout pay from the Officer’s accumulated compensatory time
The
or, atinterview
Departmentthe
investigation session
relatedshall
Vehicle and
to suchbe for
if there a reasonable
incident,
is, the period of
two-year
the Officer time,
period
shall betaking
shall
provide intowith
continue consideratio
to run
a copy
from the date of the
most
ofduring recent preventable traffic accident and any prior incidents may be used payand/or considered in
If
Officer’s
the portion
employment the
solecourse of of the above-mentioned
discretion,
actions.
by deducting theinvestigation, equivalent of information
day(s) offiswithout learned concer
from the report
any official thatInpurportedly
no event shall any prior his
summarizes incident
or herfive prior (5)statement
or more years old be used and/or
considered.
Officer’s furlough, personal days, or baby furlough days. In all instances, eight
before the
When
hours a formal statement is being taken, questions directed to the Officer
of
interrogation.
The
An Employer
Arbitrator
Immediately
under shalltobe
designated
prior
interrogation responsible
the
shall by the parties
interrogation
first for, hold anOfficers
shall
of issue a under
Officer harmless
Summary from
Opinion,
investigation, and in payhe orforshe shall be
accumulated
An
I. Officer
All
damages
accordance orunder
disciplinary elective
monies
with penalties
the time,
investigation
which
standard ofincluding
may will
less be be compensatory
than provided
adjudged,
procedures thirty (30) with
days
assessed,
employed time,
abycopy furlough,
of
suspension,
or
theotherwiseany and
parties personal
alltheir
demotion,
levied
and
informed
be
days,asked
and in writing
by of the nature
theordesignated primary of the complaintUnless
interrogator. and the bothnames of all
parties complainants.
agree, no
statements
loss
against
mutual of vacation
any
past he
Officeror she
practices, has
reduction
covered
which made of
by that
pay
this
shall be are
shallfinalaudio
beand recorded
removed
binding from
on orthein writing
the member's
parties within
and there
moreidentity
The
baby than of
furlough days,
an Officer
shall be
under equal investigation
to one day shall
off without
not be pay.
made If available
the Officer
seventy-two
personnel
Agreement,
shall be
(72)
noaservice
subject
further
hours
record
toor
review
of
theIAD the
three time
conditions
of the
the
(3)reprimand
years statement
setafter
forthor the
in was
Section
suspension
made.
date of 22.4. the
under incident
Thethis which is media unless there
Employer
to the
two
does
has
the members
not
been
subject of
criminal IPRA conviction will
or be
a present
decision in
has the
been interview
rendered room by during
the Police Board (or by the
will providematter
Agreement.
questioning. the
A
of the allegation
protections set forthorincharge Sections provided
22.1 and no22.2other suspension
above so longor as
have
demotion sufficient
Superintendent), accumulated
hasanoccurredexcept where compensatory
required
duringinvestigation
the previousshall by time,
law.
three then
However, the days off shall be
period. to the media prior to a the
if the Officer is found innocent,
the
No photoby
secondary
satisfied of Officer under
interrogator may participate inshall be(3)
the interrogation,
yearavailable
made provided that the
Officer
2.
Officer may
All disciplinary
is actingrequest and
penalties
within thethe Department
of thirty
scope (30)
his ordays
of prior orissue a public
more suspension, statement.demotion,
conviction
secondary
means of for aoff
days criminal
without offense
pay, or
unless the toher
Officer
employment
a decision elects being
to
and
use
where
rendered thethe Police Board, except
by
his furlough,
loss
Officer
where of cooperates,
required as defined in Section 22.3, with the City of Chicago in
interrogator
personal
vacation orthe shallbybe
reduction
law.
present
of actions
pay shallfor the be entire
removed interrogation.
fromshall the have The secondary
member's personnel
defense
interrogator of action or or claims. Officers legal
days,
service babywill
orrecord furlough
five days.after the date of the incident which is the subject
(5) years
representation
not ask any by the
questions Employer
until the primaryin any civil cause of action
interrogator brought against an
matter
Officer of the allegation
resulting from or or charge
arising out provided
of the no otherhas
performance
finished
suspension
of duties.
asking
or demotion
questions and
An
has Officer
invites the under
secondary interrogation
interrogator shalltonot be threatened with transfer, dismissal
The
or interview
occurred
disciplinaryduring shall
action
the be postponed
previous
or promised five for
(5)
a aask
reward
year
questions.
reasonable
period.
as an
Generally,
time
inducement [in order to
theforsecondary
the Officer'
provide
The length of interrogation sessions will be reasonable, with reasonable interruptions
interrogator
information
3. All
permittedentries forrelating
and copies
personal to necessities,
the
placedincident in the under
meals,member'sinvestigation
orpersonnel or and
for
service
exercising
recordor any
Records
will
The ask maintained
FOPfollow-up
shall be by
permitted
questions the Police
to
forprovide
clarification and telephone
Department, store
purposes. a any
tape calls
other
The
recorder City
primaryrest.
agency
and interrogator
tapes in
pertaining
rights
department
will
the contained
Internal
not which herein.
allegewillThe Department
misconduct shall
or other not
ofbreach retaliate in
of discipline, any
who isformanner a period
The
to length ofInvestigation
allegations interviews
or charges
Section
which be are for the
reasonable,
determined
usewith any member
toreasonable
be "not sustained"interruptionsbeing permit
against
interrogated,
of
ask more
any any
than Officer
questions three
or the covered
(3)
member
until years
the by
fromthisthe
may
secondary Agreement
date of
interrogator who
the cooperates
alleged
has misconduct
finished in a or
asking or breach
"unfounded"
Department or which result
disciplinary in an exoneration of the accused member shall be
investigation.
provide
of discipline
questions hisand own
or division
recorder knowledge
and tapes.ofThe such FOP misconduct
recorder and or breachtapes of shall
discipline
not be
immediately
utilized
shall not for anyremoved
beprimary
used other from
tointerrogator
support
purpose, the
anyand member's
disciplinary bepersonnel
shallfollow-up exclusive
action service
chargerecord
orproperty theand
ofofmisconduct
FOP. In
invites
Disciplinarythe to ask
actions subject to this grievance and arbitration procedure shall questions
destroyed
brought
the event against
the FOP a sworn
tapeactionsmember
recorder of the
fails to Police Department after the expiration
include
in accordance all disciplinary
with law. except forwork
dischargesand the andCity makes
terminations. its own
of said three
recording, the (3) year
City willperiod.
make This
the provision
original shall notavailable
recordinb apply to to thehte City's use ofo
member
Employees
entries who are
or copies discharged
of prior disciplinary or terminated
actions shall,have
which at hisbeen or her option,
placed in an select
rhis designated representative to copy, but will not provide a copy.
this grievance
employee's and arbitration
personnel service procedure.
records, unless such entries or copies have been
The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding.
or should have been expunged pursuant to any other provisions of this Article
XI of the Labor Agreement
In such of
A copy cases
any where the administrative
tape, transcript or writteninvestigation is initiated
statement made pursuantwithout
to ana citiz
administrative
In the event that investigation
administrative charges are filed against an officer by the Chief
(such as
Discipline a shall fallstatement)
Form-I under shall
theand be provided
grievance to the
procedure andpatrol
shall officer
be based
Verbal disciplinary
Questioning or warnings
interviewing disciplinary
of a bargaining written
unit reprimands
member shall upon
in the course be
ofremoved
an
immediately
internal following
investigation such
within the Department of Public Safety.
internal
questioninginvestigation will beunless
or interviewing conducted
it is aat hours
result ofreasonably related to a shift,
a criminal investigation.
all decisions
unless of arbitrators
operational shallrequire
necessities be final, conclusive,
otherwise. and bindingsessions
Interrogation on the City,
shall
the Union, and the members.
be for reasonable periods of time and time shall be provided for rest periods
and attendance
Complaints to physical
against necessities.
a bargaining A copy when
unit member, of anydesignated
tape, transcript
by theorChief
written
to be
statement made pursuant to an administrative investigation (such as a Form-I
The bargaining member's address and photograph shall not be given to press o
statement) shall be provided to the patrol officer immediately following such
questioning or interviewing unless it is a result of a criminal investigation.
"The
Recordsinvestigation
are ofautomatically
citizen complaints shall be concluded withinwhile
ninetyan(90) d shorter schedule is provided for the
"Records
"Section of adeleted
10.10 positive drugthe
establishes
based
or alcohol
periods test
of
on
orthe
records
schedule
refusal below,
to submit
retention. such
This test as
Section
even
provided
establishes in this
the Article
period 17 shall
of time for be maint
administ
"(B) such
"All Written Reprimands/Fleet
records shall not be Safetyfor
utilized Records.
any Recordafter
purpose of written
four reprimands
(4) years from and
thefleet
date safety
of the records
incidentshall
whichbe gave
mainr
(A) Documented constructive counseling – Not more than nine (9) months following the date of the incident that ga
(C)
(B) Suspension/Forfeiture
Written reprimands of Accrued
– Not more Leave in Lieu of Suspension. Record of a suspension or forfeiture of accrued le
"The computerized disciplinary datathan
basethree (3) years following
and disciplinary trackingthe dateshall
system of the incident that gave rise to the writt
(D) Investigations Held In Abeyance. The specified time period for the maintenance of disciplinary
(C) Suspensions – Not more than four (4) years following the date of the incident that gave rise to the suspension, precords referenc
(E) Demotions/Terminations. Records of demotions or terminations shall be maintained in each member's Division
(D) Demotions
"A grievance and Terminations
resulting - Four Affairs
from an Internal (4) years following
Bureau theEEO
and/or dateinvestigation
of the incident that gave rise to the demotion o
(E) Documented constructive counseling, written reprimand, suspension, demotion or termination records that are
shall begin at Step 2."
"The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on all parties."
"It is the policy of the City that corrective/disciplinary action shall be issued by
appointed
"(C) If a member under is this subsection,
placed on authorized either within the department
leave without pay under or paragraph
under the
auspices
(A) of thisofSection,
the Criminal the memberJustice Council,
may use shall not be liable for
any compensatory civilpersonal
time, damages
from
emergencyany acts or omissions
leave, and/or vacation arising out timeof(but suchnot officer's
sick leave) service which on thethe board
member as
long as the member
has accrued at the time of the board
of the of officers
authorized acted
leave in good
without pay faith
while andawaiting
withoutthe
malice
hearinginand carrying
decision. out Ifthatthemember's
member isresponsibilities
exonerated ofor theduties.
charges, A member
the of
the board of
member's officers
leave bankiswill presumed
be restored. to have acted
If the memberin good faith and
is found without
guilty, any
malice
suspension unless willproven otherwise.and the member's leave bank will not be
be prospective,
restored."
(c) Evidence which possesses probative value commonly accepted by
"To facilitate
reasonable and Lodge
prudent representation of aconduct
memberofwho is affairs
the focus ofbean investig
Expedited Arbitration. Topersons
the extent in thethat a dispute their
regarding a shall
suspension of
admissible
"Any than in evidence
moreinterrogating, and givenor
questioning, probative
interviewing effect. of The
a membertribunalwill conducting
be conducted the i
hearing
three (3) shall
days ofgive effect
or the employee to the
discharge of rules of privilege recognized by law and may
Upon
exclude request or an
theEmployee
employee's cannotattorney,be resolvedsaid employeethroughor theattorn
Chief’s incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial and unduly repetitious evidence.
All
When records
Hearing the and documents
orofficer
mediation receives which
the written
(if applicable), anyanparty
notice desires
Employee,to appear to use
with atthe shall
internal be affairs
approval offered
of the forand
an
made a
Association, part of the record. Documentary evidence may be received in the form
Prior
of to the of interview, orthe
by Officer shall beby allowed to view any and all digital re
willcopies
have the excerpts
right to appeal incorporation
the disciplinary reference.
action to expedited arbitration.
the
The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the aggreived empl
(d) Every
disciplinary party
action shallmust have bethe right oftocross-examination
appealed arbitration by providingof witnesses who
The
testifyCityand willmayprovide
submit a legal
rebuttaldefense to any
evidence. police officer in a civilwritten
lawsuit, notice
on
to the
Except
Department in exigentwithin circumstances,
seven (7) daysthe of officer
the date shall
of thebe informed
decision resulting 48 hoursfrom priorthe to
(e) The
Chief’s tribunal may take notice of judicially cognizable facts and in addition
The
may interview
takeAny notice shall be completed
of general, technical withorreasonable dispatch. Reasonable respites s
Hearing. information requests shall scientific
accompany factsthewithin
request its to
specialized
arbitrate.
knowledge.
The
The employee Parties
shall shall
not be besubjected
notified beforehand
to any offensive of thelanguage,
materialsnor so noticed
shall he by be t
the trial
Department board. will No law-enforcement
provide responsive officer
information may be adjudged
to the extent guilty
required of any
A
Ancomplete
Employee record,
who either written, taped or, ifataped, transcribed of as soonbyas prac
offense
applicable unless
law, the is indicted
hearing or charged
tribunal with
is satisfied felony,
that guiltahas crime been moral
established
turpitude,
by substantial or aevidence.
and within thirty
misdemeanor with (30) days of receipt
a potential of the Association’s
jail sentence may be placed requests.
on unpaid The
arbitration
No formal complaint
administrative leave against a law-enforcement officer seeking dismissal or susp
hearing
without must be
pay but with held medical
within sixty (60) days
benefits pendingof the thedate outcomethe appeal thewas filed by
All
The
the records
City willcompiled
provide legal as a result
counsel of any
and investigation
pay any costssubject and judgments toofthe criminal
provisions
that ariseof
proceeding.
out of lawsuits
Employee,
Interview so long as
sessions an arbitrator on the panel has availability
time. Therewithin shall abesixty
At
filedtheagainst
conclusion Employeesofshall
the be for reasonable
criminal
alleging proceeding,
any
periods
act committed if theofDepartment
while said Employee chooses times
not
was to
in
p
(60)
pursue day
All
the questions
period.good faith directed to the officer shall be asked by and through no more than
disciplinary action, the Employee will be reinstated. If the Department pursues
performance
The Chief of his duties.
ofaction
Police, at
toahis orA her
contrary determination
sole discretion, in aby the City is not final and
Except
disciplinary
binding
upon
as
refusal for answer
matter questions
arising of themay
outpurused same rescind
valid or
set ofinvestigation,
facts and no offic
mitigate
circumstances
completeany disciplinary
asmay conduct
investigative action
interviewat any step of the disciplinary process
The Department
provided
including, by
butthe notMunicipal Code of theofCity
informal theof member,
counseling Detroit including
sessions
but is concerning
subjecta notation minor
to review of allmiscon
those
recess
by an
limited surrounding
periods,
arbitration
to, after shall the be criminal
the conclusionrecorded proceedings,
and there
of an arbitration. the
shall Employee
be no
However, unrecordedwill be
the Chief subject
questions to
of Police fol
All
the written reprimands will be issued and implemented as soon as practicable
or
panel
shallstatements.
under
have the Atgrievance
the request of the member,
arbitration provisions a copy
of thisof Agreement.
the investigative Pending a
An Employee
discipline
interview shallwill
process be be given forty-eight
pursuant
furnished to
tothehim.terms (48)andhours
timewritten
framesnotice set forth prior in to an 9.
Article
final
no authority to increase inany disciplinary action afterthan the
investigative
An Employee
Neither
determination the
interview
indicted
home or a non-criminal
charged with investigation,
a crime less aconclusion
except felony, in cases of of
a crime an of
arbitration.
emergency.
moral In non-criminal investigations, the Employee shall be suppliedofwith
of whether
address or
nor notthe the
photograph
Employee of
is any
entitledmember to defense
suspected and
indemnification
any
aturpitude,
copy of any by the thatwith
complaints
or arecords
misdemeanor haveabeen filed
potential against
jail him/her
sentence may andbe all relevant
assigned to
All
City,personnel
the City shall which undertake
promptly include homesuch addresses,
defense phone
on behalf numbers
of such and pictures
wrongdoing
In Disciplinary
information
administrative shall
at the be
Appeals,
duties timegiventhe to theiswith
he/she
consistent press
orderedtheor needs
the
to news
appearof media
theat the without
Departmentinvestigative the
or written
Employee.
Employees
consent
hearing of In required
the
examiner member. to be interviewed
orinstances
arbitrator shall ahave by the
the authority
Professional to: Standard
(a) sustain Bureau will
interview.
suspended those
with pay where command level investigation of an
be
This given
discipline; forty-eight
provision
informal resolution shall
citizen’s complaint, (48)
otherwisehours bewritten
in
as opposed notice
accordance prior
with to the
Section
to those on DPD 512, progresses investigative
13-11-3 of theto
pending
interview. of the criminal proceedings.
Municipal
the
(b) reverse Code
point where of
disciplinea written(except statement
that discipline
is to
ordered,
shall the
notofficer
be increased);
willhours
be provided
(c) modify
Provided,
the City of however,
Detroit that the obligation give forty-eight (48) written
with an inter-office
discipline; and, (d) as memorandum
applicable, award stating back
thepay,complaint
in whole made or inagainst
part. Inhim, cases the
notice
identity
of shallthe
termination notperson
apply: (1) tofiled
individuals who haveandbeen arrested; (2) to that
After an of Employee or indefinite
who
is ordered suspension,
to the
make complaint,
thewritten
any hearing the
examiner
statementspecific inorquestions
arbitrator
response tohas
any al
individuals
discretion to
the investigating who are
reinstate questioned
supervisoran employee
wants under andMiranda;
answered. impose This and
anshall(3) include
unpaid where the
suspension, seriousness
investigations
of the investigation isruling
notwithstanding of such City degree that an immediate 309 interview is required.
delegated to the the commandin to handle of Wacofrom v. Kelley.
other departmental S.W.3dagencies, 536 (Tex.such
2010).
as the Internal Controls Bureau.
The decision of the hearing examiner or arbitrator, if rendered in
Disciplinary action in non-criminal matters must be taken against an officer with
accordance with the provisions of Section F. of this Article, shall be final and
binding upon the Association, all bargaining unit employees, and the City.
"The Chief, and only the Chief, may order or request a polygraph examination.
"(f) The Director or the Director's designee may not release any information conta
"Officers suspended up to a maximum of ten (10) working days may, upon the Offic
"In the event that a civil action is filed against an officer for conduct arising out
"Except in exigent circumstances, an officer involved in an officer­involved shooting, critical incident, and/or custody
The formal interrogation of a law enforcement officer or correctional officer,
including all recess
periods, must be recorded on audio tape, or otherwise preserved in such a
manner as to allow a
transcript to be prepared, and there shall be no unrecorded questions or
statements. Upon the request
Except as provided in
of the interrogated this subsection,
officer, disciplinary
a copy of any recordingaction,
of the suspension, demotion,
interrogation session
must be made available
The law enforcement officer or correctional officer under investigation must be i
to the interrogated officer no later than 72 hours, excluding holidays and
The officer who is the subject of the complaint may review the complaint and a
weekends, following said
interrogation
A complaint review board shall be composed of three members: One member selecte
A complaint review board shall be composed of three members: One member selecte
Any person who is a participant in an internal investigation, including the compl
All identifiable witnesses shall be interviewed, whenever possible, prior to the b
Interrogating sessions shall be for reasonable periods and shall be timed to allo
All questions directed to the officer under interrogation shall be asked by or thr
The law enforcement officer or correctional officer under interrogation may not
Before the questioning of any Employee as a result of a complaint by a citizen, tha
The Employee being questioned shall have the right to bring his/her own recordi
The Employee under investigation shall not be subjected to visits by the press
The Employee under investigation shall be informed of the nature of the investig
The questioning session shall be for a reasonable period taking into consideratio
All questions directed to the Employee under investigation shall be asked by a
However, after reviewing the anonymous complaint, the department may
The Employee
attempt under investigation
to independently corroborateshallthe
notinformation
be subject to offensiveit language
providing can do soor
without
All video recordings, audio recordings, digital files, written statements, other
subjecting the involved member to an interview. If the department is unable to
….an officer shall
corroborate not be required
the information, to submit
the matter willtobeany single interview
dropped. The time for framelonger
to t
Discipline
corroborate served to
anonymous a represented
complaints employee,
is thirty will not
calendar to be used
days; to aggravate
The officer under
discipline investigation shall not be subjected anyexcept
offensiveallegations
language,
that
beyond on the face
the following are criminal. If
time frames: the department
3 years-non independently
punitive, 5 years discovers
punitive athe
All
It iscomplaints
understood filed
thatagainst
purging a member
of Internal ofAffairs
the Employee
files Organization
directly associated willwith
be comp
the
potential
notice of policy
intent violation,
service the department may initiate an internal
disciplinary
Subject actionsinterviews
or witness
investigation. mentionedconducted
above willwith be purged in like memers,
represented fashion. All files
including
date(s)
that thewill be used for the starting/ending time period for the above. Any
Records
fact finding
exception Purging.
to All disciplinary
interviews
this employee
time to determine matters will be
if policy removed,
violations haveupon the member’s
occurred may be
The
CITY represented
request,and DEPARTMENT
from the HPOA shall be
maintain
Members notified
will offile
berecorded,
purged
personnel the
underidentity
atthe the of theschedule.
same
therepresented
following complaining
times and
audio
Records taped. When
Purging.
occur All such interviews
disciplinary are
matters will be removed, upon the employee
frame
Purged
under
will also
shall
documents
have the
only
may atbe
theretained
opportunity
direction
to byof
record thethe
the
Chief
Department
interview.
and apursuant
written tomember’s
explanation
any
request,
will from thetoHPOA
be provided the Members personnel file at the following times and
applicable
the
under following conditions.
affected
statutoryemployee.
document retention schedules; however, such documents
Disciplinary
the followingTransfer-
conditions. two (2) years after the date the employee signsmayor isnot
be
given the opportunity to sign the adjudication.
Major
used bySuspension
the Department (41 or for
more hours) - five
disciplinary (5) years
purposes afterfuture.
in the the date the of
Evidence
employee
purged signs or is given the opportunity to sign the adjudication.
discipline can only be 24
Written Reprimand- raised for rebuttal
months after thepurposes
date the in anemployee
administrativesigns hearing
or is give
if
The arbitrator's decision shall be final and binding
the employee claims he has no disciplinary history or as it pertains to Brady v
Maryland 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
No employee shall serve a suspension without pay until an Arbitrator or the
Any internal
Personnel investigation,
Board has rendered except where criminal
a decision, whichever charges are being
procedure investigated,
is applicable.
Employees
Any employee may appeal suspensions uniteither
who isthrough the Contractual Grievance
Except when anofemployee
this bargaining
has been arrested the subject
or indicted oforan internal
charged byinvestigati
a
Procedure
prosecuting (Article
official,29)
the or through
Department, the Personnel
on its own Board, except
initiative, will for
not Police
release a
The law enforcement officer under investigation shall be informed of the nature o
Officers
photograph in the or Academy
home and Sworn Police Officers serving the initial
probationary period.
address of an employee under investigation without the employee's written
permission and permission of the Chief of Police.
performance requirements of the employee’s position, a Performance Judge
shall
make the final and binding decision in lieu of an Arbitrator. If the Union alleges
that
the adverse action was not due to a failure to meet performance requirements
At
butthe
forwritten request of the employee, a
transcribed copy of the interrogation, if transcribed, shall be furnished to the
disciplinary reasons
employee within fivewithout just cause,
(5) working the Performance
days after the request. IfJudge
a tapeshall first is
recording
proceed
No employee shall serve a suspension without pay until an Arbitrator or the Per
made
with making a determination on the merits of the Employer’s action as
of the interrogation, the
Employees foremployee shall, upon
(40)written request, have access to
provided insuspended
“5” a period of forty hours or less may request forfeit
the
below, and if adverse actionbe taken was based on failing to meet performance
Interrogating sessions
tape. The original tapeshall reasonable
shall remain periods
the property ofand
andshall becustody
in the timed toofallow
the fo
based
Police
The law enforcement
requirements, officer under
the Performance investigation
Judge shall issue shall beand
a final informed
bindingofdecision.
the rank,Ifna
Department.
the Expenses incurred in the reproduction of the tape and/or
No materials concerning a complaint shall be entered in any personnel file of
transcription
Performance
of Judge determines
the interrogation(s) shall be that the
borne adverse
by the actionas
employee was not basedbyonthe
occasioned
Removal of Derogatory Material - An employee may request that
performance requirements, the Performance Judge shall any
thenderogatory material whi
determine,
employee's request. Copies shall be made only by the Employer
based on of Derogatory Material After Four Years - Any derogatory materials and shall be
Destruction more than fo
certified to be
appropriate true. Theofemployee
standards may, at the
review, whether the disciplinary
employee's action
option,was
have theor
with
interrogation session recorded on the employee's personal tape recorder.
without
just cause and render a final and binding decision.
Confidentiality - All matters under this article, including investigations, shall be
Interrogation sessions shall be for reasonable periods and shall be timed to all
Each employee shall answer only those questions specifically, directly, and narro
The employee being interrogated shall not be subjected to offensive language or
All questions directed to the employee being interrogated shall be asked by and
In the case of a Temporary Suspension, the Chief may suspend an officer for dis
In the case of an Indefinite Suspension, the Chief may suspend an officer for dis
Any letter, memorandum, document, notes or other communication (oral or written)
If the disciplinary action is overturned in its entirety on appeal by the Commiss
An officer is entitled to and shall be provided written statements or affidavits r
The Labor Relations Committee (LRC) shall have the sole and exclusive authority t
The Chief, or in his absence from the City or disability, his designee may impose
All
No mediations
officer shallshall be conducted
be subjected as requiredwithout
to interrogation by Departmental
first beingrules and guideline
informed in
writing
"An of the
officer nature
under of the investigation.
investigation for a Class If an administrative
II violation proceeding
investigated is
at the divisio
instituted,
A complete the officer
record of shall be informed shall
any interrogation beforehand
be made,of the names of all
The officer being interrogated shall be provided a copyand a complete
of the statement/complai
complainants. The information shall be sufficient as to reasonably
transcript or copy shall be made available to the officer under investigation apprise the
officer of the nature of the investigation.
without charge and without undue delay. Such record may be electronically
recorded.
Interrogations sessions shall be of reasonable duration and shall permit the offi
The officer being interrogated shall not be subjected to professional or personal
A recommendation of discipline shall be made not later than sixty days after the ti
Once an employee is scheduled for interrogation by the Internal Affairs Office, h
If an officer
"Files has a consecutive
that contain five-year
the following periodwill
information freebeofpurged
discipline, anyfollowing
on the disciplinschedule:
•Employees
Formal Investigations - Cases
shall have the that
right to aredocumented
have unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained
disciplinary actions and ot - one (1) year from the date of ca
• Sustained Formal Investigations cases involving written reprimand without suspension - three (3) years from the d
The City shall have the right to put any employee on immediate paid administrati
• Sustained Formal Investigations - cases involving written reprimand with suspension or loss of pay - five (5) years
• Formal Counseling will be purged one (1) year from the date of issue. Official records of Formal Counseling will be
Any law enforcement officer who is the subject of an investigation or interview
The law enforcement officer under investigation shall be informed in writing the
charges almost never occur following police killings and, as such, this has been
coded as a de facto "Yes".
"The Sheriff, or designee, may impose an immediate suspension without pay
The entire interrogation or interview of a law enforcement officer, including
in
theadvance
times ofofallthe conclusion
recess periods, ofshall
any of
bethe procedures
recorded, set forth
and there shallinbe
thenogrievance
and arbitration article or in the Civil Service and Personnel Rules and
unrecorded
Regulations inquestions or statements.
the following cases: A copy of the recorded interrogation or
interview
1.
NoWhen shall
suspension be
an employee provided
has
with loss upon
ofbeen request
arrested
pay shall within
on 72 hours
a felony
be implemented untilfollowing
charge (other
any the arrests
than
requested civil
interrogation
for or interview.
service or arbitration hearing has been held and an opinion rendered, exceptas
incidents occurring in the "good faith" performance of their duties, such
accidental
as providedshootings)
for in Article 13. (This shall not apply to terminations).
2. When an employee fails a substance abuse test (with confirmation)
In any suit, legal action or proceeding, wherein an employee covered by this Agre
3. When an employee fails to obey a lawful direct order from a superior officer
4. When an employee is a danger to himself/herself or others"
Whenever practical, any officer who is the subject of an investigation will be i
The decision of
Interrogating the arbitrator
sessions shall be
or interviews submitted
shall to the City periods
be for reasonable and the and Association
shall be
and shall be final and binding on both parties.
The law enforcement
No Police Officer shall officer under investigation
be discharged, or interview shall
discilined, reprimanded, reducednot be subjec
in rank,
compensation, position,
All questions directed to or
thedeprived of anyinterrogation
officer under emplyment advantage
or interview or shall
givenbe anas
adverse evaluation of his/her serice without just cause. Any such action
Disciplinary charges must be brought withing 30 days from the date of the alleged
asserted by the City or any agent or representative thereof shall be subject to
Critical Incidents.
the grievance In the event
procedure a BARGAINING
set forth herein, includingUNIT EMPLOYEE is involved in a
inding arbitration.
critical incident and a statement is required to be given to detectives, the
They City willwill
Department provide
endeavorall emploees
to provide withtheallBARGAINING
necessary legal UNITadvice and counsel
EMPLOYEE with ai
reasonable
The questioning period of time,
shall based on in
be reasonable thelength.
circumstances,
Reasonable following
respitesthewillcritical
be allow
incident to provide a formal statement to the investigating element. Generally,
The member of the
the BARGAlNlNG Force
UNIT shall notwill
EMPLOYEE be subjected
be permitted to any offensive
up to language.
forty-eight No p
(48) hours
to complete
Prior such statement,
to any investigatory exceptor
interview asrequest
otherwise for provided
a written herein.
response, Thethe BARG
member may choose to give a statement sooner, but such decision shall be left
With
to thethe exception
individual of Miscellaneous
member and his or her Investigations,
representative.bargaining unit members
Additionally, should shal
the need
Unless arise to obtain
otherwise agreedatoformal statement
in writing, sooner for
it is expressly purposes
agreed of filing
that BOPC shall poss
charges and/or maintaining a subject who is in custody, the member shall
Unless otherwise efforts
make reasonable agreed to to provide
in writing, it is expressly
a statement to theagreed that BOPC
Department shallthe
within po
timeframe necessary
Unless otherwise agreedfor filing charges.itBARGAINING
to in writing, UNIT EMPLOYEES
is expressly agreed that BOPC shall pos
No policeinofficer
involved shallincident,
a critical be subjected
who are to interrogation in a departmental
required to provide a statement,matter will be
After a Personnel
involving alleged Incident Report
misconduct on is or
his prepared,
her part,the Supervisor/Commander
until forty-eight (48) hours shall pr
given a reasonable amount of time to secure representation prior to the
have expired
staiernent from
being the time the request for interrogation is made to the
given.
accused
No
Whenpolice officer,
officer
a police in
aswriting.
officer The interrogation
a condition
has been of continued
charged shall be conducted
with employment
apay
violation ofby thewhile therules
local unit
departmental of
Any police
officer is on officer
duty. suspended
The police with
officer ormay
without
be requiredwhotoissubmit
not given
a a hearing
written as pr
government
or regulations, shall
no be compelled
public to speak
statements shall or
betestify
made or be questioned
concerning the by any
alleged
report
personof orthe
bodyalleged incident if the request
of a nongovernmental nature;is made
and by the department no
violation
later by any person or persons of the local unit of government or the police
officer so charged, until final disposition of the charges;
than the end of the subject officer's next tour of duty after the tour of duty
during which the department initially was made aware of the charges;
No threats, promises, or coercions shall be used at any time against any police of
"Letters of reprimand and suspensions of less than 5 days will be removed from t
"48 hours prior to being interrogated or asked to otherwise respond to and admini
"If an officer is suspended indefinitely, and the officer does not agree with the
The employee shall not be subjected to any offensive language, nor shall he be
"The employer
threatened withshall provide
transfer, each employee
dismissal, or other with legal counsel
disciplinary action.without cost...if
No promise of c
reward
"48 hoursshall be to
prior made as interrogated
being an inducement to answering
or asked questions.
to otherwise Nothing
respond to and admini
herein is to be construed as to prohibit the investigating officer from informing
"The interview shall be completed with reasonable dispatch. Reasonable respites
the employee that his conduct can become the subject of disciplinary action,
which could result in disciplinary punishment.
All disciplinary matters will be removed from the personnel file at the following
Personnel investigations that result in "exonerated," "unfounded" or "not sustain
No citizen complaint shall be placed in an employee's file.
When the Department possesses infonnation in an electronic, audio, video, or wri
request, within 30 calendar days of receipt of either Labor Relations'
determination that a matter does not meet the definition of a grievance, or the
Sheriff's UOFRB decision for something less than tennination, that the matter
be resolved by an Arbitrator.

If the grievant wishes to appeal a termination the Association may request,


within 30 calendar days of the date on the Notice of Termination, that the
matter be resolved by an Arbitrator.
Employees, whether a witness or subject employee, will receive 48-hours notice o
As a guideline, no interview session will extend more than four (4) hours unles
When the Department possesses infonnation in an electronic, audio, video, or wri
LFUCG shall not take any disciplinary action against any member for any non-crimi
Supervisors may maintain one file on each member under their direct supervision
Coaching and counseling sessions shall be removed from the member’s record tw
Discipline greater than or equal to a written reprimand shall be grievable
LFUCG may refuse to pay a judgment or settlement in any action against a Member
LFUCG shall provide for the defense of a Member in any legal action filed again
Internal Affairs will not investigate any complaint received forty-five (45) calend
C.(1) A law enforcement
FILE MAINTENANCE officer, upon
-- PERSONNEL writtenIfrequest,
ACTIONS. an employeeshall have any record
has received of a formal
Personnel A
complaint made against the officer for any violation of a municipal or parish ordinance or state
Any
criminalemployee
statuteandwho
listedis theParagraph
subject of(2) a complaint filed withinvolving
the Internal Affairsviolence
O
All complaints PSUindirected of this Subsection
investigations begun after domestic
the effective date of expunged
from
When his personnel file, if the complaint was made anonymously
an employee has had a complaint filed against him in Internal Affairs, the c
this Agreement to the police department and the
charges
not are
involving not substantiated
criminal allegations within twelve
shall beAffairs months
completed of the lodging
and forwarded of the complaint.
to the days
The
(2)(a) employee
Any shall contact the Internal Unit within five (5) calendar
Chief or hisviolation
designeeof a municipal or parish ordinance or state statute defining criminal battery
and
All
for interrogations
The assault.
Chief
review of Police
and ofshall
any make
disposition police aemployee
within final
onedecision or law
hundred enforcement
inand
the matter(180)
eighty officer
within days60ofin
days
theof r
connection
(b)
"If Any
an officer with
violation
complaint, initiation is the
of
requiredother tomunicipal
appear foror parish
any of ordinances
the below or state
specified statutes
activities including criminal or unpaid leave, the
while on suspension
investigation
trespass, shall
criminal be
defineddamage recorded in full. The police employee or law enforcement
1.
of Court
the PSU
officer
as
shall investigation
not orto
in Article property,
6.3.A;
a return and,
of theor disturbing
case by thethe peace
Chief if the incident
or designee to PSU,occurred at either the
home
2. An of the
interview
whichever is victim or
related the
to officer
a or
personnel the violation
complaint, was the
grievance result
or of
other an obvious domestic dispute.
investigation."
be
later prohibited
in enforcement from
time. In the event obtaining that a copy
Metro of the recording or transcript of the
No law officer shall haveGovernment
any comment needs
adverseadditional time to enter
to his interest
recording
complete
The policean of his
employee or law enforcement officer shall be granted up to thirty
statements
investigation, upon histowritten request.of the one hundred and eighty (180) days,
days secureprior
MetrotoGovernment such may therefuse
expiration
representation, to pay during which time
a judgment all questioning
or settlement in anyshall
actionbe
Metro
suspended.
against a Member, or if Metro Government pays any claim or judgment against
Government
any shall provide a written explanation to the Member and FOP
Any Member
interrogation of a police employee or law enforcement officer in connection
setting forth the
pursuant to Section 2 of this Article, it may recover from such Member the
specific
amount reasons for the need for additional time.
of such payment
and the costs to defend
The Professional Standards if: Unit (PSU) shall complete its investigation within a r
L the Member acted or failed to act because of fraud, malice, or corruption; or
The
IL the forty-eight
Documents actioncontained
was ( 48) hour
outside written
in supervisory
the actual noticefilesshall
shallinclude
not aretained
behis copy
his of the complaint.
after onethe (1) ye
Upon
Documents request of the
contained Member underor
in supervisory apparent
investigation
files shall scope
not orbe of employment;
representative,
retained after one (1)or
In
111.the event a written complaint does not exist, the forty-eight ( 48) hour
year the
Member fromMember
shall
saidbe willfully failed
provided
documentation. a copyorofrefused to assistofthe
the transcript thedefense
recorded of the cause
notice
of
To action,shall include
preserve
interrogation, if oneother
confidentiality
has been written
andmade, information
protect and the sufficient
privacy
a copy to adviseaccess
of Members,
of the recording. the
TheMemberto a
Member
of the
including
Member's specific
the allegations
failure
personnel to give
records of misconduct.
notice
shall to
be Metro Government
restricted to the pursuant
following: to Section 4
shall provide the Professional Standards Unit (PSU) with an audiotape, or
of
i."Nothis
Secretary/Examiner
previous discipline of
technological equivalent at his expense.against
the Merit
a Member
Board. may be considered by Metro Government or the Chief as the basis for an
n.
Article;
1. AMember or who
previous is thereprimand
written subject ofmay the file or authorized
be considered forrepresentative.
one (1) year following the issuance of the reprimand.
If
111.
1v. after
the reviewing
Member's
Member the complaintorinvestigation,
supervisor.
compromised settled (72) the Chief concludes
the claim the Member i
2.
No Apolice
previous suspension
officer as a of seventy-two
condition of continued hourswithout
employmentor less,byortheanapproval
the involuntary
local unit
of transfer
of may be considered for three (
1v.
Metro
3. AChief
previousor Chiefs designee.
suspension of over seventy-two (72) hours may be considered for five (5) years following the issuance
government
v. Director ofshall
Government; or beGovernment
Metro compelled toHuman speak or testify ororbedesignee.
Resources questioned by any
person
v. or body of a nongovernmental nature.
vi.the
Metro Member obtained
Government private
Mayor or counsel
designee. without the consent of the Jefferson
County
vii. County Attorney or designee
Attorney's office, in which case, Metro Government may also refuse to pay any
When
Only a police officer has been charged with a violation of departmental rules or
legal the Member, Public Integrity Unit detective and I or his supervisor and
Member's
fees incurred counsel
by theshall be present during the Member's interview. Members
Member.
shall not be required to provide a statement concerning the use of deadly
No Member shall be subjected to interrogation in a departmental matter involving
force during a criminal investigation with Professional Standards Unit
detectives present.
(c) (1) A complaint against a law enforcement officer that alleges brutality in
the execution of the law enforcement officer’s duties may not be investigated
unless the complaint is SIGNED AND sworn to, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY,
by:
No threats,
(i) the promises,
aggrieved or coercions shall be used at any time against any police o
individual;
(ii) a member
In the event anofemployee
the aggrieved individual’s
is proceeded immediate
against family;
or is the defendant in an action or
(iii) an individual with firsthand knowledge obtained because the individual:
In the event
1. was present anat
action or specialthe
and observed proceeding is prosecuted
alleged incident; OR by a third party bef
2.
ForHAS A VIDEOtorts
intentional RECORDING
the EmployerOF THEagrees
INCIDENT
to payTHAT,
up toTO THE BEST
$5,000 eachOF THE and $2
person
INDIVIDUAL’S KNOWLEDGE, IS UNALTERED; or
Unless a complaint is filed within 366 days after the alleged brutality, an investi
(iv) the parent or guardian of the minor child, if the alleged incident involves a
minor child.
(2) In
(a) (i) general.-
The interrogation
On written shall be suspended
request, for a periodofficer
a law enforcement not exceeding
may have5expunged
BUSINESS
An days
employeeof until
will representation
be given is
an exactEvidence obtained.
copy of any
Admissibility formal complaint.- of awritten
formalstatement
complaint he may a law
against
(ii) Withinorthat
execute, 5 BUSINESS
if the questioning DAY is period, the chief
mechanically for good cause shown
or stenographically maythe
recorded,
extend the period for obtaining representation.
employee will be given a copy of such recording and/or transcript immediately
upon requestofbyinterrogation
Each session him/her. If there shall:is(i)any
bediscrepancy between
for a reasonable theand
period; recorded
(ii) allow
and transcribed versions of the statement, then the employee shall be
All questions
afforded directed to the
the opportunity law enforcement
to listen officer under
to his/her recorded interrogation
statement to correctshall b
transcription
Disciplinary errors prior
resumes to signing. During departmental
the course of the investigation,
only. to the
If the grievance is notwill contain
resolved in sustained
Step #4, the matter will becharges
submitted
employee will
bindingInternal not
arbitration. show
Withinhis/her statement
fifteenan (15) to any
calendarasdaysother employee.
of receipt Copies of
Before Affairs interviews employee a direct resultofofthe answer
a complaint b
statements
of the Director willofnot be used
Police in anythe
Services, way to compromise
Association the ongoing
will notify the Director of
investigation.
Police Services and the City Director of Human Resources of its desire to
submit the matter to binding arbitration.
The interview will be completed as soon as possible. Reasonable time will be pr
The employee will not be subjected to any offensive language, coercion or prom
Any documented
The entire performance
interrogation or discipline
or interview of a lawresulting in written
enforcement or verbal
officer, counsel
including
Only a bargaining
the timesretained unit
of all recess member
periods, who has
shall shall permanent
be recorded, Civil
and thereService
shall status
be no as a
Records
sworn Police Officer by Internal Affairs
in the Miami be destroyed
Police Department after
may a period
appeal of five ye
a suspension,
unrecorded
demotion, orquestions
dismissal or statements.
through A copy ofprocedure
the recorded interrogation or
All identifiable witnesses shall bethe grievance
interviewed, whenever contained in this
possible, prior to the b
interview shall be provided upon request within 72 hours following
Agreement or in accordance with the appeal procedure of the Civil Service the
interrogation or interview.
Rules, but not both. Such grievances shall be filed at Step 3 within the time
limits set forth in Step 1.
It shall be the sole right of the Chief of Police to transfer bargaining unit mem
All sworn bargaining unit members, prior to the final determination of a monet
The bargaining unit member's interrogation will take place after all other witne
Interrogating sessions shall be for reasonable periods and shall be timed to allo
All questions directed to the officer under interrogation shall be asked by or thr
The bargaining unit member under investigation may not be subjected to abusive
Grievances over discipline shall be initiated at the level of the Grievance Proce
In addition, the member shall also be served with a notice informing them of their
If an employee is required to submit to interrogation by the employer concerning
Investigations into an employee's conduct which do not result in the imposition
The decision and award of the arbitrator shall be final and bidning upon the Cit
The City, through the Chief of the Minneapolis Police Department or his/her des
"Critical Incident - Involved Officers. Invovled Officers, as defined below, shall
Each day of the initial period of administrative leave (up to seven days for an In
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a law enforcement agency
"The
shall,duration
not laterof thanadministrative
48 hours before leaveany forinterrogation
an Involved Officer or hearing shall isbeheldnot less
relating
Pending to an investigation
Investigation conducted
of Allegations of pursuant
Misconduct. to NRSThe289.057, providedesigne
Chief or his/her a
written notice to the peace officer who is the subject of the investigation. If the
The City shall provide
law enforcement agency legal counselthat
believes to defend
any other anypeaceemployee officer against
has any any action o
knowledge
Witness andofInvolved any factOfficers relatingare to the complaint
entitled to consultor allegation
with their against the peace
legal counsel du
officer who is the subject of the investigation, the law enforcement agency
The
shall duration
providerecord
A complete aofwritten
theof administrative
notice to
sessions atthe leave
which peace ashall be statement
officer
formal atadvising
the discretion
the peace
is taken ofmust
the
officerChief
be
that
made heby or she
electronic must appear
recording and or be interviewed
otherwise.
Except where impractical due to the immediacy of the investigation, Upon as a witness
written in
request connection
of the with
officer
summary
the
whose investigation.
statement Any
is peace
taken, a officer who
complete copyservesor as a witness
transcript must during
be an
made
Sessions
Following
interview atmust
which
Critical be aallowed
formal statement
Incident, neither
a reasonable is taken
witness mustnor
officers betoof reasonable
involved officers duration
shall v
available
and must to thethe
give officer
officer without
reasonablechargeperiods oropportunity
undue for delay.
rest and
arrange
The session
personal
for the
may be tape
necessities.
presence
The
recordedpeaceby and theassistance
officer, investigating of a representative
any representative officer and of theby theauthorized
peace officer
officer byor
under NRSthe 289.080.
law
investigation Any
When
peace officer specified in this subsection may waive theornotice required
enforcement
practicable, agency
sessions may
must make a stenographic,
be held during digital
the officer's magnetic
regularly record
scheduled of
A civilian
pursuant
the interview, review
to this board,
section.
interrogation commission,
or hearing. or other oversight
If the agency body shall
records not havework
the proceedings, the a
shift. If the session is not held during the officer's regularly scheduled work
No 2.  The
the agency
law notice
shall
enforcement at provided
the peaceto
agency the
orofficer'speace
governmental officer
request and
unit who is publicly
expense
may the subject
provide of
release the
a copy of
photographs o
shift, the officer
investigation
the: must must be paid by the employing agency at the officer's current
include:
The review board
compensation rateshall for consist of three (3) sworn employees to be chosen as
a) (a) A description
Stenographic
follows: transcriptoftime spent
theofnature attending the session.
of the investigation;
the proceedings; or
prior
b) toboard
(b) A
Recording
a. Each commencement
summary
on theofdigital
member ofor
alleged
shall any
be interrogation
misconduct
magnetic
chosen of the
tape.
at random session:
peace
fromofficer;
among
(1)
those an officer
(c) The shall
date,
employeesofwith be
time informed
and
at leastplace ofof
three the
the name and
interrogation
(3)be years rank
of service ofhearing;
or thea person in charge of
as
The
the photograph
interrogation
(d) The name anda peace
all
rank officer
other
of persons
the may
officer who
in released:
will
charge be if the
present
of the officer
during
investigation authorizes
the and the the r
police officer with the City.
interrogation;
officers
The
b. Any who
lawemployee will conduct
enforcement hasany
who agency interrogation
shall
a direct interviewororhearing;
supervisory interrogate over
relationship the peace office during
(2) an officer
(e) The
theinvestigation
charged employee shall
name ofbe informed
any other
shallofficer of
person the
be disqualified nature
who willof the
be
from serving investigation,
present and the
on any interrogation
at
An
names of a peace may be conducted in response to a complaint o
or
thehearing;
review board. and
of all
c. Any known
(f) A complainants
statement
employee who setting shall
forthbe
is directly thedisclosed
involved provisions
in theto ofthe officer unless
subsection
investigation 1 of the
of NRSchief289.080.
administrator
the violation of the officer's
shall be disqualified employer determines that the identification of
The
the law enforcement agency shallfrom allowserving
the peace on the review
officer who is the subject of th
board.
complainant
The
d. Any lawemployee shallwhose
enforecement not be disclosed
agency
sense shall
of because
limit the
fairness anditscope
is necessary
sound ofjudgment for the protection
the questions during the of int
an informant
is impaired or because
by containing
his/her personal disclosure would
relationship jeopardize or compromise the
No document comments adversewith to a the peace charged
officer shall be entered int
integrity
employee
an accurate shall
copy beofdisqualified
the transcript from or serving
tape on the
shall be review to the officer, upon
provided
During
or security
board. an interrogation
of the investigation; session,and the following requirements shall be adhered to:
his
1) written
Each request, nosession
interrogation later than shall fifteen
notthe working
exceed two days
hours after the investigation
unelss the parties mutually consent to continuation of the
e.
has
The Onebeen (1) board
completed.
notification member
memo that shall
asks be theof person rank to of Lieutenant
schedule an or
appointment with hour period, unless the parties mu
2) There shall not be more than two interrogation sessions within a twenty-four
Captain.
the
3) investigator
The (1) combinedmember will inform that
duration of anbeofficer's person to have
workofshift the Association representative
and any interrogation sessions shall not exceed fourteen hours w
f. One
make the board
appointment, ifshall they want of the rank
a representative. Sergeant. The appointment shall
g.
beOne
Theremade (1)within
shall board
not be member
four more shalltwo
than
(4) working bedaysof the same rank
interrogators
of receipt at
of anyas the
said given
notice. timeThe
charged
interrogation employee. shall be conducted at a time when the peace officer is on duty,
An
h. Ifofficer
there shallno not be subjected to offensive language or illegal coercion by his
unless the are seriousness qualified of the employees
investigation of thedictates
ranks specified
otherwise. However, no
within
The the Newark
Department
administrative Police
will,
interview upon Department,
or written request the remaining
to the Chief board
of Personnel by the indi
vacancies
interrogations, may be filled
in which by police officers who meet these
Where an employee hasthe been officer
charged could withreceive
a Schedulepunitive A"action,
violation shallas be
listed in Pat
eligibility
The arbitrator's
conducted criteria
without, who
award atarewillfrom
least be other
forty-eight
final andDelaware
binding
(48) hours police
on notice.
the Association
If the peace andofficer
its is
departments.
members,
on a the employee or employees involved, and the City. If the arbitrator
shall
non-paid
Whenever award status,
back
any he
wages
civil shallcovering
action receive
is brought call
the backperiod
against pay;of
any if
the under
employee’s
employee administrative
separation
covered byleave
thisfrom
Agreem
The
with
the peace officer
payroll of the shall
City, alsoamount
the have right so to bring his
awarded shallown be recorder
less any and record any
unemployment
The interrogation
and all session shall be for a reasonable period of time, taking into
pay, noaspects
compensation additional of the
received
interrogation.
compensation
orand shall be which
compensation paid unlesstheunder the officers
employee wouldis required
not have to
consideration
The
be City
interviewedshall the
not or gravity
willfully
interrogated complexity
subject the peace
outside of ofhisthe
officerissue beinginvestigation
administratively investigated.
modified to visits
shift
earned
During had the employee not been suspended or terminated.
by the press
hours; is or news media
interrogated nor release
for a period of time thewhich
peacewould officer’s extendhome address
beyond hisor
the interview/interrogation,
photograph to the press or news the officer
mediaand his representative
without his express consent. shall be allowed
assigned
breaks toshift
confer (10withhours); or would require
hisinterrogation
representative or travel
counsel, which would extend
if reasonable and beyond
The peace
his assigned officer
shift (10 under hours). shall not be subjected to offensive
requested
language or threatened with transfer or disciplinary action, or loss of his job.
by the officer. All rights guaranteed by NRS 289.060 and/or 289.080 shall apply.
No promise of award shall be made as an inducement to answering any
question.
Disciplinary action, defined as written reprimand, suspension or termination, i
If known, the officer shall be informed of the name of all complainants.
The interviewing of the officer under investigation may be taped and/or recorded
The arbitrator's award shall be final and binding on the parties to this agreement
Three due process options: a) A Departmental Review Board b) A hearing chaired b
"Chief of Police will make all promotions."
All police officers who are sued for violation of constitutional rights while act
"If resonable suspicion exists, the employee must be prohibited from working or
Interviewing sessions shall be for reasonable periods of time and shall be timed
The officer being interviewed shall not be subjected to any questioning intended
All interviewing shall be specifically, directly and narrowly related to the officer
Any
Any disciplinary
employee whoaction
hasmust be imposed
satisfactorily and received
completed twelveby(12)
themonths
officer within
of 100 ca
employment
An employee with
may the CITY that
request shallany
have the right that
reprimand to appeal to either
is greater thanthe
one year old b
Personnel Board or arbitration, but not both, from a suspension,
An employee may request that any suspension that is greater than five (5) years
termination of employment, or reduction in classification or pay not
later than ten (10) working days after receiving notice of such action.
Unless agreed to by the employee, the CITY shall not divulge the reason for any
An accused officer shall be informed of the nature of the investigation and shall
An accused officer shall be informed of the nature of the investigation and shall
The interview session shall be for a reasonable period taking into consideration
An employee shall not be subjected to any offensive language, nor shall he be t
All questions directed to the employee during the interview shall be asked by on
Any "sustained" findings inserted in an employee's Civil Service personnel File sh
The employee under investigation will be allowed to read the l.N.O.l. before the
The formal interrogation/interview of an employee, or any issuance of orders in
The purpose of this article is to establish a mechanism for the sole, expeditiou
The City may establish a Citizen's Police Review Board as provided for in Chapte
For the purposes of recommending discipline for a sustained violation, the emplo
An employee who is arrested or charged with a felony or designated misdemeanor
The
A unitlength
memberof questioning periods must
under investigation be reasonable,
by Professional with rest
Standards periods
Bureau or abeing ca
Police Department
The employee supervisor
will not for a disciplinary
be threatened matter
with transfer or anythatdisciplinary
may lead to a
action a
written
During
reprimand,internal investigations
suspension, or interrogations,
demotion, or discharge, questions
and who ismust be limited
interviewed or to th
At
interrogated,
Nohis request,
more thanor a requested
oneunit member
person to produce
shallmay
ask have any
documents
questionsdocumentation,
relatedshall
at any time. to disciplinary
be given aactions which are over ten (10) years old
written Notice Ofgiven
a. Any discipline Investigation (Form 80-58DB)
a unit member informing
that resulted him of theofspecific
in a suspension eighty (80) hours or less and,
If the
nature
In employee
recognition
of the does
the not recieve
investigation,
of mutual his anytoformal
benefit
status inboth
the discipline
investigation,
the city and during
the
and the
unit
all twelve (12) mo
member,
known
b. For an infraction which did not result in a criminal charge or actions which did not include violent or assaultive be
allegations
suspensions ofMAY
c. Any infraction misconduct
BE served
that is noinvolved
underconsidered
longer the
in the
following
interviewtime
to be aofdisciplinary
limits,
the unitat member.
the unit under
matter In current contemporary department s
member’s
addition, the option. Unit members
unit member and/ormaythe serve
Policesuspensions
Departmentof more than 40
At the on
hours timeanof the scheduled
alternating weeklyinterview
schedule. by Unit
Professional
membersStandards
will Bureau, a Polic
supervisor/Professional Standard Bureau representative mayalso be allowed
mechanically
to exchange
record up to 40 hours of vacation or comp time in exchange for serving
such interview/interrogation
a suspension. The city retains the option to deviate from this provision for
Material purged, or meeting all criteria for purging, from a unit member's divi
suspensions involving sexual harassment, violence in the work place,
felonies, and drugs/alcohol.
The interview/interrogation session shall be a reasonable period of time,
taking into consideration the gravity and complexity of the misconduct being
investigated.
If during the course of the above mentioned investigation, information is lear
During the course of the administrative investigation the investigator will not i
When a police officer is accused of misconduct on either a Bureau charge or on a
A sustained Disciplinary Action Report ("DAR") disciplinary action shall be considered against an officer in any forma
3. Disciplinary action in the form of a suspension may be considered in determining the penalty for any subsequen
The City will remove DAR's from an officer's PAR's system and file at the conclus
Any disciplinary action resulting in discharge, suspension, written reprimand or d
Upon completion of the investigation, OMI findings and conclusions will be given
No police officer shall be compelled by the City to be interviewed by and/or to t
Employees' home addresses, phone numbers, and pictures shall be kept confidenti
If an officer is charged with a criminal offense requiring suspension under the
The City shall provide legal counsel to any employee in connection with any civil
The parties agree to no more than $600.00 in Legal Defense Fund money maybe exp
The complete interview of the officer, noting all recess periods, shall be
When
recordedtheand
investigation
the officerresults in a determination
upon request of a sustained
will be provided a copy of complaint and dis
the recording,
or
Thethe officer
officer willmay also recordwith
be furnished thethe
interview
namesat ofthe officer’s own
all witnesses andexpense. If the w
complainants
interviewed officer is subsequently charged and any part of any recording of
Whenever delay in conducting the interview will not jeopardize the successful acc
the
The interview
arbitrator’s is transcribed bybe
decision shall thefinal
Bureau, the officer
and binding, butshall be given ashall have
the arbitrator
complimentary copy thereof.
no power to alter, modify, amend, add to or detract from the terms of the
contract.
Whenever delay in conducting the interview will not jeopardize the successful acc
Interviews shall not be overly long. The officer shall be entitled to such reasona
All interviews shall be limited in scope to activities, circumstances, events, cond
Interviews shall be done under circumstances devoid of intimidation or coercion
(1) Disciplinary actions other than letters of reprimand shall be sealed upon wr
unless the employee requests such unsealing -- and then only for examination by
Disciplinary
Letters action forwill
of reprimand violation(s) of departmental
be effective for a period ofrules and/or
twelve (12) regulations
months followi
shall
No not be instituted against a law enforcement officer under
public statement shall be made prior to a decision being rendered this chapter
by
That
more"just cause" for any discipline as defined hereinafter, including discharge,
the hearing
thansealed committee
three (3) years and
after no public statement shall be made if the involvesisa
officer
The action
found innocent shall
unless notsuch
the
incident,
be held
officer
except where
to discriminate
requests
suchthe
a public against
incident
statement; employee
provided, in any
potential
however, criminal offense, in which caseapply
disciplinary actionmakes
under athis chapter
Discharge.thatAnythis subdivision
regular employeeshallofnot if the officer
the bargaining unit being public
discharged shall re
may
statement. The foregoing shall not preclude a law enforcement agency,for
be instituted at any time within the statutory period of limitations in asuch
offense
criminal matter, from releasing information pertaining to criminal charges
which
The lawhave been filedofficer
enforcement againstunder
a lawinvestigation
enforcementshall,
officer, thetoofficer's
prior status of
any interrogating
employment and the identity of any administrative charges brought against
No law enforcement officer shall be compelled to speak or testify before, or b
said
officer as a result of said criminal charges.
Summary: The chief or the highest ranking sworn officer of the law enforcement
The law enforcement agency and the law enforcement officer under investigation s
The interrogation shall be suspensed for a reasonable amount of time until repr
Interrogatin sessions shall be for reasonable periods and shall be timed to allow
Except as provided
All questions directedin Section 2 of this
to the officer Article,
under discipline shall be covered
interrogation asked bybyand t
Civil Service Law Section 75 and 76. The Hearing Board shall be selected in the
Any law enforcement
following manner: officer under interrogation shall not be threatened with tran
A. The disciplinary
Other Appointing grievances
Authority willfor submit
employeesto the member
who receivea discipline
list of 3 command
other than th
officers of the rank of Lieutenant or higher from which the member must
No removal
select at leastor2disciplinary proceeding
who shall serve on the·shall
Hearingbe commenced
Board. more than eighteen (
B.
NoThe member
command may submit
discipline shalltobethe Appointingunder
commenced Authority a list of more
this Section 3 other
than ninety
members holding a rank higher than his rank from which the Appointing
The recordshall
Authority of any command
select discipline
one member shall
of the be removed
Hearing Board.from a member's personne
C. If a civilian
A member of is
the named to serve
bargaining unitonshall
thehave
Hearingthe Board
right toupon the request
electronically orof the
otherw
complainant, the civilian will serve in place of one of the Appointing Authority's
Decisions of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the Club, the City and an
designees. The member will decide which command officer will be replaced by
the civilian.
The City agrees not to release the Police identification photograph of any memb
Upon receipt by the City of a request for the employment records of a member o
Unless the nature of the investigation requires immediate attention, the member
Shall not be subject to any offensive language nor shall he be threatened with tr
Upon execution of this Agreement, suspensions of three (3) days or less that
Such
were letter will be withdrawn
not appealed fromshall
by the Officer an employee's officialreduced
be automatically personnel
to afile two (2)
written
reprimand
When two (2) years
an employee
Documented after
is notified
disciplinary the date
thator
actions, the related
he/she
other suspension
shall was documented
beadverse
subject served
to an IAon thecomments
interview,
Officer
he/she ifshall
the be
Officer did not
informed have ahe/she
whether sustainedis acomplaint for the same rule
It is understood
within that from
the arbitrator will suspension
only interpret this Agreement and will i
witnesstwoor a(2) years
principal. Thethe date the
employee shall normallywas served
be notified on
of the
the officer.
nature of
Suspensions that no
the investigation were appealed
later than thetoday
thebefore
Commission or Arbitrator by the Officer
the interview.
are not eligible to be reduced to a written reprimand under this Section. The
The length
original of employee investigative interviews shall be of a reasonable duration. Furthermore, the employee shal
suspension
paperwork sent to the
Except as provided Commission
in this section ofwill
thisreflect
Article,the
theconditions
Chief andof this
City Section
are precl to
reduce the applicable suspension to a written reprimand. The reduction of any
The Chief or his counsel and the Officer and his counsel may mutually agree in wri
suspension contained within this subsection does not qualify for any form of
reimbursement to the employee.
The Officer shall be allowed to review but not copy verbatim or photocopy any c
Each board shall make independent recommendations and forward these recommend
The Chairperson of the CAAB (the Deputy Chief), on recommendation from any mem
police officer may use holiday, vacation, or bonus days as compensation for sus
The city will defend any police officer, in and out of court, who acted in lawfully
The Officer under investigation shall be informed 48 hours prior to being interr
The interview shall be completed with reasonable dispatch. Reasonable respites s
The officer shall not be subjected to any offensive language, nor shall he be th
"Except as provided in this subdivision and subdivision (g), no punitive action, nor denial of promotion on grounds o
The public
"If the act, safety officer
omission, beingallegation
or other interrogated shall have the
of misconduct rightthe
is also tosubject
bring his
ofor
a criminal investigation or criminal pros
her own recording device and record any and all aspects of the interrogation.
Formal reprimands without further penalty more than two (2) years old, and those
Any officer or officers under investigation will receive at least three (3) worki
In the event an OCC investigative hearing is determined to be appropriate and i
Only persons authorized by the Commanding Officer of the Personnel Division m
In the event an OCC investigative hearing is determined to be appropriate and i
or other unavailability
disciplinary transfer(i.e.
of a critical witness shall- the
havecomplainant,
the option ofthe choosing between
officer being the
investigated), or
dispute-resolution
necessary delays in the provisions of this Agreement, or appeal to the Civil
Service
processing Commission.
of forensicAny employee
evidence who wishes
by other agencies) to preserve
the Chief themust right
contact the
of appeal to
Guild prior to the the Commission must comply with the time requirements
for filing such
expiration appeal
of the 180 asdaysspecified
seekingintothe Civil Service
extend the timeRules. Within
period. Any request for
twenty
extension (20) days
based on of the date of a Notice of Discipline, the employee
The
may Department shall
file an appealofwith undertake investigations
the Civilshall
Service of possible
Commission orthat misconduct
pursue the and
the unavailability
dispose of them within witnesses
a reasonable include
period aofshowing
time. the witness is
grievance
expected to procedure
become or both. The grievance procedure shall begin at
Step IV Arbitration
available in a reasonablefor thisperiod
process.of time. A request for extension based upon
the
The above criteria
City agrees thatwill
an Officer suspected of misconduct may be ordered to answer
not be unreasonably denied. The period of investigation may also be extended
No photo of an Officer under investigation for criminal violations or disciplinary
by mutual
agreement betweeninthe
An officer involved anyGuild President
on-duty incident and in the
which Chief.
the officer causes serious bo
The 180 day period shall be suspended when a complaint involving alleged
The City conduct
criminal will pay for PORAC Legal Defense Fund for each employee during the t
No
is disciplinary
beinginreviewed action
by awill result from
prosecuting a complaint
authority or is orof misconduct
being prosecuted where
at thethecity,
complaint is made to the Internal Inves
Except cases where the employee is physically medically unavailable to parti
2. where
state the named
or federal level,employee conceals acts of misconduct, or
3. for a period of
or if the alleged conduct thirty (30) days following
occurred in another a final adverseand
jurisdiction disposition
is being in civil litigation alleging intentional miscondu
criminally
investigated or
Internal investigation files shall not be retained longer than the current year pl
prosecuted in that jurisdiction. In cases of an officer involved fatal incident, the
After
180 day three years
period from the date of a written reprimand, an employee who is not
will
commence
The Department whenshallthe completed
furnish thecriminal
employee fileand
is provided
the Guildtowiththe aProsecuting
classification rep
Attorney, and will only be
If the interview
tolled in the event is tape recorded
criminal charges by the
are Department,
filed. the employee and/or the Gu
In
The the
DRB event
shallanbeoutside
comprised agency conducts
of three a criminal
(3) voting investigation
members. of a matter
One member of the DRB s
within the
All due process
jurisdiction hearings
of the City, and shall
thebeDepartment
held by thereceives
Chief of the Police.
completed criminal
file
"Onlywith theless
Chiefthan
of sixty
Police, or his/her designee under the circumstances set fort
(60) days remaining for the administrative investigation, the Department will
Unless
have upfurther investigation is deemed necessary, the Chief shall make the final
to an additional
sixty
NOTHING (60) days
IN THEto complete
AGREEMENT its administrative
BETWEEN THEinvestigation;
CITY AND THEinGUILD no event,
SHALL shall
BE CON
the investigation last
It is further
more than 240 agreed
days. that (personnel file) shall not be released to outside group
Compliance
Records of allwith this provision
sustained is required
complaints, includingif findings are to be entered
the punishment imposed,orshould b
discipline is to be
Unless
imposed. pursuant
Issuance to of
a court order ornotice
a Loudermill by operation
of intentoftolaw, access will
discipline to internal invest
constitute
conclusion
An employee of will
the be precluded from using accrued time balances to satisfy a di
administrative investigation for purposes of this section.
At least five
Nothing calendar
in this articledays and no
prohibits themore than thirty
City from days prior
disciplining to thejust
(provided interview,
cause
exists) an
The questioning shall not be overly long and the employee shall be entitled to su
officer convicted of a crime, or laying off an employee pursuant to Civil Service
The employee shall not be subjected to any offensive language, nor shall the em
Rule IX, Section
6 (d).
Employees may request (to the Chief of Police) that written reprimands be expung
The decision and award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon both par
All disciplinary decisions will be made by the Chief
Both parties agree that the carrying out of departmental Policy and Procedures is
Internal investigation files that do not result in an advanced finding shall not,
Interviewing shall be completed within a reasonable time and, in all internal inv
The employee will not be threatened with dismissal or other disciplinary punish
All interviewing shall be limited in scope to activities, circumstances ,or events
"Discipline of less than sixteen (16) days disciplinary suspension or disciplinary
Discipline of sixteen (16) days or more of disciplinary suspension or disciplinar
In the case of any disciplinary suspension or disciplinary leave, the officer may
Disciplinary grievances that resulted from an Assistant Chief Chain of
Command
Board shall be submitted at Step 1 within twenty (20) calendar days of the
A Police Officer shall have the right to appeal an administrative suspension to
decision.
the Civil Service
Disciplinary Commission
grievances thatand within ten
resulted from (10) days of
a Chain ofreceiving
Command notice
Board ofshall be
A. Internal affairs
placement on case files reports may be destroyed and/or expunged after
submitted at Step 2 within twenty (20) calendar days of the decision. If
C. Sustained complaints
administrative
discipline suspension case
to files and reports
determine whetherwithgood
a discipline
cause exists disposition
for (as d
placement
from
Disciplinary on
the Chain administrative
of Command
actions leave and
Board followed
may be appealed may
to either utilize earned
allegations discretionary
initiated
the Civil Service by an
Commission or to
holidays,
individualaccrued vacation
or individuals leave,ofaccrued
outside the PolicesickDepartment,
bonus time or compensatory
the aggrieved
A civilian
time,
employee review
for some
may or board,
alsoallrequest
of thecommission,
suspension
a Complaint orperiod.
other
Reviewoversight
Board, body
beforeshall filingnot have2the a
a Step
If an employee
grievance,
The commission is placed on administrative suspension and
withinmakes a recommendation for disposition and discipline to the chief the Police Chief
thereafter
twenty (20)determines
calendar days thatofdisciplinary
the Chain of suspension
CommandorBoard'sdisciplinary leaveAfter
decision. is the
Except
warranted,in cases of malfeasance in office or willful or
decision is rendered by the Complaint Review Board, the aggrieved employeeon
the disciplinary suspension or disciplinary wanton
leave neglect
shall of
commence duty,
the
may effective
submit
Sessions date
the
at which Stepaofformal
the administrative
2 grievance
statementwithin is suspension
twentymust
taken (20)and ofif reasonable
calendar
be the days
employee thehas and
of duration
been
Board's on paid leave, such paid leave will not be restored. If the length of time of
the disciplinary
decision. suspension or disciplinary leave is less
Disciplinary action, suspension, demotion, or dismissal may not be undertaken than the length of time by
of
The decision of the arbitrator made within the scope of his authority as the
the administrative suspension, the employee will be compensated for
Any
lengthdiscplinary
outlined ofin
time on
Sectionaction2(A)resulting
administrative from anshall
suspension
of this Article, investigation
beyond
be final and that
the is reopened
period
binding of
upontimethepursuant
of the
disciplinary
aggrieved suspension or disciplinary leave, by receiving
The law enforcement officer or correctional officer under investigation must be i back pay, if docked,
or by having
employee or paid
the PBAleave and restored, if such but
the Employer paidneither
leave was partytaken.
waives If the Police
its rights
It will determines
Chief be an employee'sthat a right to record
demotion is his own Internal
warranted, the Affairs shall
employee investigation
be int
under
returned
state law. to duty
immediately and receive back pay for the period of administrative suspension,
The
if
Such Employer
docked during
provisions shall,
such
allow upon
the the
time, orrequest of an paid
have his/her
employee suspended,employee
leave
demoted covered
restored, byif this
suchAgreement
or discharged to file a
paid
leave
an
Theappealwas
Employertaken.
to the Civilupon
shall, Servicethe Commission.
request of anThe employee
employee may take
covered by thisanyAgreement
one (1) a
of the following actions:
Interrogating
c) File a grievancesessions shall be for
as provided for in
reasonable
Section 8 periods
startingof at time
step and
two shall
(2) withbe timed
the
Director of Human
All questions directed resources withinunder
to the officer ten (1 interrogation
0) business days shallofbewritten
asked by or thr
notification of the action, or fourteen (14) business days following the mailing
The law enforcement officer or correctional officer under interrogation may not
of a written notice by first class mail to the employee's address contained in
his/her official personnel records.
Except as provided in this subsection, disciplinary action, suspension, demotion,
If the investigation of such allegations is not completed within 180 days after
The officer who is the subject of the complaint may review the complaint and al
The employee under investigation shall be informed of the identity of the indiv
The employee under investigation shall be informed of the identity of the indiv
The formal interrogation of the employee, including all recess periods, shall be
The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon both parties.
In cases where it is decided to relieve an employee from duty pending an investig
In any matter where an employee is required to submit a written statement justify
Interrogation sessions shall be for reasonable periods and shall be timed to allo
The employee under interrogation shall not be subjected to offensive language
All questions directed to the employee under interrogation shall be asked by and
When a single anonymous complaint is made against an employee and there is no
(D) Suspensions, as set forth in (B) and (C) above, may be removed after two (2)
The City shall only retain disciplinary records (including but not limited to recor
The decision rendered by the Arbitrator shall not be precedent setting, but will b
Interrogation sessions shall be for reasonable periods of time,
It is agreed that reduction of accrued vacation is an effective means of
The Department
corrective willwhich
discipline strive does
to complete the investigation
not impose of a non-criminal
financial hardship on the matter
The TPOA
Employee (on behalf of its member) may take suspensions of 80 hours or less
in addition,and an does not who is a subject of a non-criminal investigation may rec
employee
and
create nota appealable to the Civil
manning problem Service Commission,
for Employer. An Employee to binding arbitration.
who commits an
offense for which the
Interviews
Employee of employees
could be will bemay,
at a reasonable
sole hour, preferably
the when
Any
the investigation
employee is orsuspended,
on review
duty. Interviews
at
anthe
involvingwill employee
be
discretion
completed be of
shallwithin Chief,only
conducted
a
be by the
offered a vacation leave
reasonable
Subject time
to the
accrual reduction and
approval shall
in lieu ofbe
of the conducted in a professional
Chief of Police,
suspension, which, if accepted,manner
permanent employees facing disc
shall be considered
using
aThe standard
City agrees
suspension investigative and interviewing techniques. The
forto defend and hold harmless all employees covered by this Agreemen
employee
purposes of shall be given discipline.
progressive reasonableAn breaks for personal
Employee necessities,
so disciplined cannot receive
meals, telephone
additional calls, and rest periods upon request.
discipline
Complaints forthat
thewere
sameinvestigated
incident. Reduction of accrued
and determined vacation
to be shall be
unfounded, limited or
exonerated
to two (2) shifts
The
for aOfficer may be informed
single incident. of the of
The reduction name of allvacation
accrued complainants, if known
shall not if it is
be subject tode
any grievance
Officers under investigation may record the proceedings with his own equipment
procedure. An Employee who is to be disciplined may elect to receive a
A written appeal involving suspension, promotion, demotion or dismissal shall s
suspension without pay
in lieu of such reduction of accrued vacation.
Disciplinary actions listed below may not be considered, utilized, or be the bas
Interrogating sessions shall be for reasonable periods and shall be timed to allo
The Officer under interrogation shall not be subjected to offensive language or
All questions directed to the Officer under interrogation shall be asked by and
The law-enforcement officer shall be given an opportunity, within a reasonable ti
The employee shall be given a written decision and the reasons therefore no later
The Department, upon written request of an employee, will remove from the Pers
A District or Division Commander shall attempt to resolve a disciplinary matter a
Prior to the commencement of any administrative interview, criminal interview,
The parties agree that arbitration is the method of resolving grievances which h
“The Chief of Police or his/her designee shall take adverse action after providi
“In cases in which a timely appeal is filed, the adverse action shall not be taken u
No photo of a member under investigation shall be made available to the media prio
An employee shall be given administrative leave of up to: ten hours to prepare f
"When a member is placed in a non-contact status pending investigation of the use of deadly force, the member m
According to DC Metropolitan Police Department Policy, in non-contact status," a member has been assigned to an
Interview and interrogation sessions will not consume unreasonable periods of ti
During
No moreinterviews,
than threemembers shall not
interrogators be subjected
at one to scurrilous
time shall question the language.
officer or
fireman under investigation.
No poilce officer or fireman under interrogation shall be subjected to offensiv
Any letter of disciplinary action to be placed in an employee’s personnel file sh
When an employee
The employee is charged
and the with
FOP shall misconduct
be entitled whichthe
to record does or reasonably may result i
interview
electronically or in writing.
Employees receiving discipline shall have the option of forfeiting the appropria
The interview shall be completed as soon as possible. Time may be provided for p
No offensive language, coercion or promise of reward as an
inducement to answering questions shall be directed at the employee.
Nothing herein is to be construed as to prohibit the investigating officer
from informing the employee that his conduct can become the subject of
disciplinary action.
Category
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Gives officers unfair access to info
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Gives officers unfair access to info
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Erases misconduct records
Requires city pay for misconduct
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Disqualifies complaints
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Limits oversight/discipline
Disqualifies complaints
Disqualifies complaints
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Erases misconduct records
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Disqualifies complaints
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Limits oversight/discipline
Requires city pay for misconduct
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Erases misconduct records
Gives officers unfair access to info
Gives officers unfair access to info
Requires city pay for misconduct
Restricts/delays interrogations
Restricts/delays interrogations
Specific Impact of Policy
Erases records at department head's discretion
Erases records if charges are dropped
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers access to the names of complainants prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Prevents the identity of the officer or information about the investigation from being released to the oversight com
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
Limits interrogations to two 2-hour sessions within 24 hour time period, and fourteen hours when combined with o
Limits the number of interrogators to two
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Officers have paid leave or disability if unfit for duty, including due to substances
Paid leave for officers involved in police killing, at discretion of Police Chief
Erases sustained violations after 1 year (reprimand) or 2 years (suspension/transfer/demotion)
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
City pays officers while being interrogated off-duty
24 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time'
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
180 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
Erases records of 1-3 day suspension, replaces with written reprimand
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Limits civilian power to conduct misconduct investigations
meetings can be held in secret, don't have to abide by sunshine law
No civilian discipline power
No civilian discipline power
No civilian discipline power
No civilian subpoena power
No civilian subpoena power
panel not allowed to hear any data in public session
PBA knows what everyone said even in private, cannot disclose publicly
police chief, if doing nothing, keeps info from getting out
Prevents civilian oversight from criticizing Police Chief
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
48 hours for the police officer to prepare before giving statement
Prevents the public from accessing information about mediation results and processes
Limits drug testing after police shootings
Erases records if accidents are found to be non-preventable, erases records in accordance with officer's bill of right
Allows officers to remove three members of the disciplinary hearing board, ensuring a board of officers that are mo
Limits civilian discipline power, prevents civilians other than Admin Law Judge from serving on a disciplinary hearin
Limits civilian discipline power, prevents the Admin Law Judge (the only civilian on the disciplinary hearing board) f
Prevents officers from being disciplined until a departmental hearing board in many cases, delays the hearing board
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
paid leave for officers involved in misconduct, except when charged with a felony which almost never happens
Depends on "public records law" but worth investigating
Erases complaints that were "sustained" after 18 months if no similar complaints are filed within that amount of tim
Erases complaints that were not "sustained" after 18 months
Erases sustained violations after 5 years
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time', gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
1 year statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
City indemnifies officers for civil matters, but not criminal ones
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time', gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
City pays officers while being interrogated off-duty
Limits the number of interrogators to two
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Erases sustained violations after 3 years
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Material purged or allegations which are not sustained are not used to inform the future disciplinary decisions
48 hour delay in cases of police shootings, can be denied by Chief
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time'
Limits questions that can be asked to involve only one alleged violation
Erases sustained violations after 1-7 years, depending on status of the case and its findings
Gives officers a copy of their prior statements after a police shooting
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration, except for dismissal.
Prevents identification of officers unless they are found to have committed misconduct by the board or courts
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media unless they are found to have committ
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
48 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time'
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time', gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Limits type and order of questions asked during interrogation, limits the number of interrogators to two and limits
Erases disciplinary records after 3-5 years
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Prevents prior misconduct from being considerered in new cases against an officer
1 year statute of limitations on self-initiated investigations or no discipline can be imposed
90 day statute of limitations on imposing discipline after charges are filed
Erases sustained violations after 6 months to 2 years
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Prevents prior misconduct from being considerered in new cases against an officer
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians, limits inter
180 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed. After an initial 90 days the consent
Erases drug or alcohol test records after 6 years.
Erases records
Erases records after three years.
Erases records after three/four years
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Limits civilian discipline power, puts discipline power in the hand of police supervisors
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
24 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians, limits inter
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to a hearing
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers access to video/audio evidence prior to an interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
City pays full cost of legal defense
48 hour delay
Limits interrogations to be completed within 'reasonable dispatch', gives officers breaks that are not given to civilia
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Limits civilian discipline power, allows officers to appeal discipline to a hearing of all law enforcement, which can ov
Limits civilian power to conduct misconduct investigations
Prevents the public from accessing information about internal investigations
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the number of interrogators to two
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Erases records of counseling for misconduct after one year
Erases records of written reprimands for misconduct after two years
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
Allows officers to be paid while suspended for criminal charges in some cases
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
48 hour delay
48 hour delay
48 hour delay in non-criminal investigations
180 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed, 2 year statute of limitations on crim
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
No civilian power to issue a lie detector test
Prevents personnel files from being released without a court order or permission of the officer involved
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
City pays full cost of legal defense
48 hour delay for police killings
180 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Limits civilian participation on complaint review boards
No civilian participation on complaint review boards
Prevents the identity of the officer or information about the investigation from being released to the public/media
Delays interrogation until all witnesses have been interviewed
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods,' gives officers breaks that civilians don’t get
Limits the number of interrogators to one
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Gives officers access to the complaint prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
48 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods'
Limits the number of interrogators to two
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Limits civilian access to evidence needed to conduct misconduct investigations
Limits interrogations to 6 hour sessions max
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
120 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
30 day statute of limitations on verifying anonymous complaints, unless they allege criminal activity, or the compla
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Prevents consideration of past discipline in current investigations after 3-5 years
Erases records of disciplinary transfers after 2 years
Erases records of suspensions after 5 years
Minor suspension purged after 3 years
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Even if retained, disciplinary records that are supposed to be purged cannot be considered in subsequent investiga
60 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline, criminal investigations exempted from this rule
Erases exonerated/unsubstantiated violations
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
paid leave for officers involved in police killing
paid leave for officers involved in police killing
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods,' gives officers breaks that civilians don’t get
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Complaints not entered into personnel file if they aren't proven, so important patterns can be lost
Erases 'derogatory material' after 2 years if requested
Erases 'derogatory material' after 4 years no matter what
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Prevents the public from accessing information about internal investigations
Limits interrogations to 30 minute intervals, total interrogation limited to 'reasonable period', and gives officers bre
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Only one interrogator can ask questions at a time
180 day period after departement is made aware of incident for temporary suspensions to be imposed, which are l
180 day period for an indefinite suspension to be imposed after an incident occurs
All records of mediation are not made public nor included in the officer's file
Erases records for any complaint that has been expunged
Gives officers access to all witness statements prior to interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
No civilian discipline power
Prevents the public from accessing information about mediation results and processes
48 hour delay
48 hour delay
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
60 day statute of limitations on imposing discipline after an incident has occurred, 30 day statute of limitations on i
Gives officers access to information about the nature of the investigation prior to an interrogation
Prevents consideration of past discipline in current investigations after 5 years
Erases disciplinary records after a period of time pursuant to department policy
paid leave for officers involved in misconduct
Erases formal investigations after 1-5 years
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
City pays full cost of legal defense
paid leave for officers involved in police killing, except when charged with a felony which almost never happens
Delays interrogation until all witnesses have been interviewed
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time'
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Only one interrogator can ask questions at a time
30 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense, except for paying punitive judgements
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time'
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
No civilian discipline power
No civilian discipline power
No civilian power to influence training practices
48 hour delay
48 hour delay in cases of police killings
60 day period to convene hearing after charges are filed or no discipline can be imposed
Prevents officers from being compelled to testify in civilian non-governmental forum or structure
Prevents public statements regarding an investigation until it is concluded
48 hour delay
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Erases reprimands after 5 years, suspensions after 10 years.
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
City pays full cost of legal defense
48 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods'
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
No history of officer misconduct in files
No record of investigations or complaints that have been dismissed
No recording complaints of officer misconduct in employee files
Gives officers access to all evidence during an interrogation as a means to correct inconsistencies in their explanatio
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
48 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 4 hour sessions
Limits questions that can be asked to involve only one alleged violation
30 day statute of limitations, initiating when an offense occurs, or no discipline can be imposed (for non-criminal off
supervisory files are erased in one year
timetable for erasure of disciplinary records
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
City pays costs of misconduct settlements unless the officer violates scope of employment or otherwise acts neglige
City pays full cost of legal defense
No investigating complaints submitted 45+ days after incident
Erases (sustained/unsubstantiated/etc.) records from supervisory file after 2 years
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Prevents internal affairs records from being considered in subsequent investigations after 18 months
10 day delay
No civilian discipline power
City pays officers while being interrogated
Erases exonerated/unsubstantiated violations
LEO must sign off on any negative comment about them in their personnel file
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
30 day delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time', gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
180 day limit on investigations (that don't allege criminal activity), can be extended if written explanation for delay
Limits investigations to a "reasonable period of time"
Erases supervisory files after 1 year
Erases supervisory files after 1 year
Gives officers access to the complaint prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
No civilian discipline power
Prevents consideration of past misconduct in deciding discipline
Prevents officers from being compelled to testify in civilian non-governmental forum or structure
Prevents personnel files from being released to the public
Prevents the identity of the officer or information about the investigation from being released to the public/media
City pays costs of misconduct settlements unless the officer violates scope of employment or otherwise acts neglige
48 hour delay
Limits the number and types of interrogators in cases of police killings
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
City pays full cost of legal defense
City pays full cost of legal defense unless officer found to have acted outside scope of employment
City pays up to $5k for individual and $25k per case for misconduct settlements
1 year statute of limitations on submitting complaints or no discipline can result
Disqualifies complaints unless they are submitted by someone involved in the incident, their family member, some
Erases exonerated or old records
Formal complaints which have been exonerated are inadmissible in court or administrative proceedings that determ
5 business day delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time', gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the number of interrogators to one
Erases unsustained violations
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Limits interrogations to be completed 'as soon as possible,' gives officers breaks civilians don't get
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Any discipline that took place more than 3 years ago is not accounted for when being promoted or transferred.
Erases records after officer no longer employed for 5 years
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Limits civilian discipline power
No civilian discipline power
Delays interrogation until all witnesses have been interviewed
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods'
Limits the number of interrogators to one
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
Limits interrogations to work hours, except in exigent circumstances or cases of police deadly force
Erases exonerated/unsubstantiated violations
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
No civilian discipline power
3-7 days paid leave for officers involved in police killing
3-7 days paid leave for officers involved in police killing
3-7 days paid leave for officers involved in police killing
Allows paid leave for officers involved in any alleged misconduct
City pays full cost of legal defense
City pays full cost of legal defense
paid leave for officers involved can last up to 30 days
48 hour delay
Limits the type of questions that can be asked
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
No civilian discipline power
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians, limits inter
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media unless officer is arrested or gives perm
City pays officers while being interrogated
Officers cannot be suspended without pay during an investigation
48 hour delay
Gives officers the right to explain an answer or deny an accusation at any time during interrogation
Limits questions that can be asked to involve only one alleged violation
Prevents adverse comments from being entered into an officer's personnel file without consent
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint, and names of their interrogators, prior
Gives officers access to the recorded interrogation within 15 days
Limits interrogations to two 2-hour sessions within 24 hour time period, and fourteen hours when combined with o
Limits the number of interrogators to two
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Expunges "unfounded/exonerated" investigations
Expunges Schedule A violations after 2 years if "not guilty" found
Limits civilian participation on disciplinary hearing board. Gives an all-police review board power to review cases w
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
48 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable period,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Gives officers access to the names of complainants prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Limits civilian participation on disciplinary hearing board
No civilian power to promote officers
City pays full cost of legal defense
Leave with pay if suspected of being on drugs
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable period'
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Limits the type of questions that can be asked
100 days to impose discipline from when an offense occurs, or no discipline can be imposed (except when disciplin
An employee may request that any reprimand that is greater than one year old be removed from his personnel file
An employee may request that any suspension that is greater than five (5) years old be removed from his personne
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
24 hour delay
Gives officers access to information about the nature of the investigation prior to an interrogation
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods,' gives officers breaks that civilians don’t get
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Only one interrogator can ask questions at a time
Erases sustained violations after 1 year
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
No civilian discipline power
Prevents consideration of past unsubstantiated allegations in deciding discipline
Allows officers charged with serious crimes to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on suspension
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods,' gives officers breaks that civilians don’t get
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Limits the type of questions that can be asked
Only one interrogator can ask questions at a time
Expunges any discipline record after 1 year if the Commissioner places it in abeyance
Removes certain disciplinary records from officer personnel files
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Prevents consideration of past misconduct in deciding discipline
Allows officers to use vacation time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable period'
Limits questions that can be asked to involve only one alleged violation
Limits the type of questions that can be asked
Erases unfounded complaints after 1 year
History of disciplinary actions are erased after specified number of years.
History of disciplinary actions are erased after specified number of years.
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
No civilian discipline power
No civilian subpoena power, diciplinary findings do not need to be released to Civilian Oversight Board
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
Allows officers to be paid while suspended for criminal charges in some cases
City pays full cost of legal defense
City pays up to $600-1200 legal fees following a police killing
Limits information about misconduct entered into personnel files
Gives officers access to the names of all complainants and witnesses prior to an interrogation
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
48 hour delay
Limits interrogations to not be 'overly long'
Limits questions that can be asked to involve only one alleged violation
Limits the type of questions that can be asked
Discipline documents are "sealed" and can't be opened without officer's request
Only Office of Chief of Police may unseal records
Reprimands destroyed after one year.
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Prevents consideration of sealed records of misconduct in deciding discipline
Officers continue to be paid until the outcome of a pre-termination hearing
3 year statute of limitations on imposing discipline after an incident occurs, except for criminal offenses
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Prevents officers from being compelled to testify in civilian non-governmental forum or structure
Prevents the public from accessing infromation about internal investigations
Allows officers to be paid while suspended for criminal charges in some cases
City pays 50% of legal defense
Delays interrogations for a 'reasonable amount of time' for the officer to obtain counsel
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the number of interrogators to one
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration, except for suspensions over 10 days, termination
18-month statue of limitation on investigations (except where offense constitutes a crime)
90 day statute of limitations for imposing command discipline after misconduct has been alleged
Erases records of command discipline after 1 year if no further incident has occurred
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Limits the number of civilians serving on disciplinary hearing boards to one, allows officers to play a role in selecting
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media without officer's permission
Prevents the public from accessing information about past investigations against officers that were unustained or e
48 hour delay
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Erases "letter of reprimand" after 2 years
Erases sustained violations after 1 year
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
24 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable period,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
180 day statute of limitations on investigations, 180 day period for investigation to be initiated into criminal offense
180 day statute of limitations on investigations, 30 day extension with consent of officer
Erases records of suspensions after 2 years, replaces them with written reprimands
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
No civilian discipline power
No civilian subpoena power
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
City pays full cost of legal defense unless officer found guilty
48 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 6 hour sessions max, limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods'
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
1 year statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Dept shall ignore formal reprimands after 2-5 yrs for purposes of promotions, etc.
72 hour delay
Gives officers access to all (non-confidential) evidence prior to being brought before the civilain oversight structure
Prevents personnel files from being released without approval of the Commanding Officer of the Personnel Division
72 hour delay
Limits investigations to a "reasonable period of time"
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
No civilian subpoena power
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
40 hours paid leave after police killings
City pays into a fund for legal defense for LEO
180 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
3 year statute of limitations on imposing discipline after an incident occurs
Erases internal investigatory files after 3 years
Erases records of written reprimands after 3 years
Gives officers access to the complaint prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Limits civilian discipline power, creates a disciplinary appeal process where the City and police union each select on
Limits civilian participation on disciplinary hearing board
No civilian discipline power
No civilian discipline power
Prevents legislation from being passed that conflicts with contract, including giving civilian oversight disicpline pow
Prevents personnel files from being released without approval of Chief and officer involved
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media who've had complaints sustained again
Prevents the public from accessing information about internal investigations
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension under 8 days
5 day delay, with the option of having a 1 day delay in exigent circumstances
Limits interrogations to not be 'overly long'
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
180 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed, unless the City is granted an extens
Erases sustained violations after 3 years
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
No civilian discipline power
No civilian power to determine police policy or procedure
Prior investigations with no findings are not notated in officer personnel files nor can they be considered when adm
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Limits the type of questions that can be asked
Limits civilian participation on disciplinary hearing board
No civilian discipline power
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves half of the time while on suspension
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on administrative leave
Erases exonerated/unsubstantiated violations
Erases sustained violations after 6 months after an officer transfers out of the department
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
No civilian discipline power
No civilian discipline power
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time'
180 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
90 day statute of limitations for reopened cases based on newly discovered evidence
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the number of interrogators to one
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
180 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
180 day statute of limitations on investigations or no discipline can be imposed
Gives officers access to all evidence prior to an interrogation
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and all statements prior to an interrogation
Gives officers access to the names of complainants and nature of complaint before interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Employee is paid regardless of being relieved during an investigation or administrative action
24 hour delay
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable periods,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Only one interrogator can ask questions at a time
Disqualifies anonymous complaints unless corroborated.
Erases sustained violations after 2-5 years
Erases sustained violations after 4-5 years
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time'
Limits investigations to 30 days, doesn't specify the consequences of going beyond this time limit
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Limits civilian power to conduct misconduct investigations
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
City pays costs of misconduct settlements and full cost of legal defense
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time,' gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians, limits inter
Unsustained/unfounded allegations removed from employees file after statute of limitations expires, provided no s
Gives officers access to the names of complainants prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
Allows officers to use vacation time to avoid serving suspensions, at the discretion of the police chief
Counseling documentation, letters of reprimand, suspensions, vacation reduction, and orders or demotion purged
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable amount of time', gives officers breaks that are not given to civilians
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Only one interrogator can ask questions at a time
5 day delay
55 days after an officer is charged to provide a decision on discipline
Erases exonerated/unsubstantiated violations
Gives officers access to the investigative report prior to interrogation
Gives officers access to the names of complainants prior to an interrogation
Allows officers to overturn discipline through binding arbitration
No civilian discipline power
No civilian discipline power
Prevents the identity of the officer from being released to the public/media
Paid administrative leave to prepare a defense regarding charges of misconduct
paid leave for officers involved in police killing
Limits interrogations to 'reasonable period,' gives officers breaks that civilians don’t get
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Limits the number of interrogators to three
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Provides for the erasure of disciplinary action letters
Gives officers access to the names and addresses of complainants prior to an interrogation
Gives officers immediate access to the recorded interrogation
Allows officers to use discretionary time to pay themselves while on unpaid suspension
Limits interrogations to be completed 'as soon as possible'
Limits the type of language and incentives used during interrogation
Unique identifier
43
46
180
174
516
404
337
250
261
275
534
535
536
352
361
57
150
518
537
348
120
212
274
100
47
194
195
196
432
389
436
437
445
461
462
390
391
392
421
371
377
149
413
471
45
479
424
526
482
333
376
23
30
31
63
521
334
219
472
181
319
220
276
519
349
262
277
60
197
522
14
141
207
251
58
165
179
523
538
417
416
364
539
126
206
221
278
317
28
520
540
4
113
94
53
524
541
5
415
216
107
32
40
41
42
542
428
373
121
217
487
190
489
543
341
127
246
279
525
426
431
409
226
263
280
48
50
490
544
400
414
374
545
128
129
142
473
546
459
393
381
346
139
101
162
198
491
423
102
405
161
229
260
281
168
492
419
148
233
264
282
435
242
283
97
475
182
493
2
16
17
79
547
9
93
34
183
548
531
384
385
227
285
22
24
25
494
549
402
241
286
287
267
111
110
19
44
166
550
457
420
130
145
184
495
213
309
477
167
1
29
378
38
199
185
496
551
331
382
159
208
288
268
89
552
332
209
289
200
186
446
447
458
131
140
92
469
410
132
290
74
144
553
347
143
234
291
67
86
68
486
554
476
527
529
90
73
75
555
322
344
154
27
187
11
153
455
372
35
66
497
474
222
98
119
51
52
169
498
448
12
470
401
408
320
133
255
292
328
326
321
533
532
33
15
156
223
256
64
189
499
556
245
293
8
18
201
500
557
425
438
160
235
257
294
558
363
528
82
559
449
355
357
358
356
327
329
383
134
311
501
439
412
224
502
388
324
323
135
318
252
69
191
488
249
265
295
77
78
422
335
503
560
407
138
237
284
561
175
504
562
429
460
563
351
239
296
312
96
20
21
564
403
123
124
230
297
273
55
271
505
565
440
3
362
231
298
313
272
65
71
202
506
7
481
240
253
314
88
83
84
566
456
464
396
368
342
343
85
193
147
507
567
146
247
254
315
81
87
72
568
80
375
116
188
434
418
379
325
163
225
258
299
569
114
478
484
508
570
530
397
395
136
300
26
56
571
125
238
108
109
485
203
441
463
386
345
137
243
301
112
509
6
155
158
387
157
118
572
467
406
360
338
103
115
39
49
170
510
427
430
450
451
468
399
398
394
380
152
248
302
106
61
573
442
466
13
232
303
316
465
452
366
367
36
54
574
443
444
336
210
104
95
204
511
575
339
340
215
259
304
576
99
105
205
164
178
512
577
353
122
228
305
269
483
59
62
578
211
117
513
579
433
370
330
214
76
176
514
580
480
10
218
306
270
151
91
37
171
172
581
453
454
411
354
369
236
310
266
307
70
192
515
365
244
308
City Contract Coded?
Albuquerque yes
Anaheim yes
Anchorage yes
Arlington This City does not have a police union contract
Atlanta This City does not have a police union contract
Aurora yes
Austin yes
Bakersfield yes
Baltimore yes
Baton Rouge yes
Birmingham No contract received
Boston yes
Buffalo yes
Chandler yes
Charlotte This City does not have a police union contract
Chesepeake No contract received
Chicago yes
Chula Vista yes
Cincinnati yes
Cleveland yes
Colorado Springs This City does not have a police union contract
Columbus yes
Corpus Christi yes
Dallas yes
Denver yes
Detroit yes
Durham This City does not have a police union contract
El Paso yes
Fort Wayne yes
Fort Worth yes
Fremont yes
Fresno yes
Garland This City does not have a police union contract
Glendale yes
Greensboro This City does not have a police union contract
Henderson yes
Hialeah yes
Honolulu yes
Houston yes
Indianapolis yes
Irvine yes
Irving This City does not have a police union contract
Jacksonville yes
Jersey City yes
Kansas City yes
Laredo yes
Las Vegas yes
Lexington yes
Lincoln yes
Long Beach yes
Los Angeles yes
Louisville yes
Lubbock This City does not have a police union contract
Madison yes
Memphis yes
Mesa yes
Miami yes
Milwaukee yes
Minneapolis yes
Nashville yes
New Orleans This City does not have a police union contract
New York City yes
Newark yes
Norfolk This City does not have a police union contract
North Las Vegas yes
Oakland yes
Oklahoma City yes
Omaha yes
Orlando yes
Philadelphia yes
Phoenix yes
Pittsburgh yes
Plano This City does not have a police union contract
Portland yes
Raleigh This City does not have a police union contract
Reno yes
Riverside yes
Rochester yes
Sacramento yes
San Antonio yes
San Bernardino No contract received
San Diego yes
San Francisco yes
San Jose yes
Santa Ana yes
Scottsdale This City does not have a police union contract
Seattle yes
Spokane yes
St. Louis yes
St. Paul yes
St. Petersburg yes
Stockton yes
Tampa yes
Toledo yes
Tucson yes
Tulsa yes
Virginia Beach This City does not have a police union contract
Washington D.C. yes
Wichita yes
Winston Salem This City does not have a police union contract

California Police Bill of Rights yes


Delaware Police Bill of Rights yes
Florida Police Bill of Rights yes
Illinois Police Bill of Rights yes
Kentucky Police Bill of Rights yes
Louisiana Police Bill of Rights yes
Maryland Police Bill of Rights yes
Minnesota Police Bill of Rights yes
Nevada Police Bill of Rights yes
New Mexico Police Bill of Rights yes
Rhode Island Police Bill of Rights yes
Virginia Police Bill of Rights yes
West Virginia Police Bill of Rights yes
Wisconsin Police Bill of Rights yes

You might also like