Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.emeraldinsight.com/1750-5933.htm
DMIJ
3,3 An experiential, social
network-based approach
to direct marketing
162
Adrian Palmer
School of Business and Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK and
ESC Rennes School of Business, Rennes, France, and
Nicole Koenig-Lewis
School of Business and Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
Abstract
Purpose – Direct marketing faces challenges and opportunities associated with the emergence of
social network media. Companies need to address target audiences both directly and also indirectly
through social media. The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of the changing media
landscape of direct marketing, and proposes a model of direct and indirect targeting of buyers.
Design/methodology/approach – A conceptual model is presented which brings together the
needs of producers, sellers and communities. Customer experience is used as an integrative framework
for reconciling the sometimes differing needs of these groups.
Findings – The literature is reviewed, noting changes in media habits. Previous studies of social
network users provide a picture of the benefits sought by members of online communities.
Originality/value – Assessment of direct marketing has traditionally emphasised cognitive and
behavioural metrics. This paper has proposed an experiential framework which may be more difficult
to measure, but evidence is presented that emotions associated with use of social network web sites
may be more important as a key success factor for direct marketing.
Keywords Social networks, Communities, Direct marketing, Customer satisfaction
Paper type General review
Introduction
Direct marketing became a powerful tool at the time when the cost of communication
was falling rapidly. The subsequent proliferation of low-cost internet access opened up
opportunities for companies to deal directly with thousands or millions of individual
customers in a way that was previously unimaginable, and only manageable through
the use of intermediaries. The cost of communication has continued to fall with new
communication channels emerging, presenting opportunities as well as challenges for
direct marketing. The opportunities derive from the greater choice of low-cost means of
communicating with current and potential customers. But it is a challenge for firms to
evaluate the effectiveness of this proliferation of new channels. A more significant
challenge is the lack of control over communication which this increase of channels
implies, as consumers are increasingly able to communicate among themselves, and in
Direct Marketing: An International this high load communication environment, the direct marketer has to compete for
Journal attention with messages from a wide range of peer group-based media.
Vol. 3 No. 3, 2009
pp. 162-176 The purpose of this paper is to critically review recent developments in social
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1750-5933
network media. While many in the marketing community are scratching their heads
DOI 10.1108/17505930910985116 wondering how the recent generation of web-based social media will generate profits,
this paper takes the perspective of direct marketing by asking why and how a message Direct marketing
sent by a company may be more effective if it is targeted at individuals through social
network media. In particular, the notion is explored that users’ experience of using
social media will predispose them to look more favourably upon a company sponsored
message when it is embedded in social media, rather than targeted directly at the
individual.
There is a dilemma faced by companies planning to interact with social networks. 163
On the one hand, they may seek to control the communication environment within the
network, in an effort to make sure that their brand message comes through clearly.
They may also be attracted by the availability of demographic and lifestyle
information available to improve their targeting to individual members of the network.
But on the other hand, a true social network implies members feeling a sense of
ownership of the community, and there is evidence that individuals may be resentful of
corporate intrusion into what is perceived to be their own community space (Croft,
2008; Hitwise, 2008). Individual online social networks have often gone through very
rapid life cycles of growth, maturity and decline as communities are first seen as
vibrant and attractive, and then lose their appeal to members of the community as they
become dominated by commercial interests (Boyd and Ellison, 2007). It has been
reported that many once widely used web sites such as Friendster and Friends
Reunited have gone into decline, to be replaced by newer sites such as Facebook and
Twitter which were beginning their life cycles.
This paper proposes an experiential-based model to guide direct marketing in the
assessment of online social networks. In Figure 1, three elements of the social network
environment are shown – the seller, the customer and the community. In the figure,
Traditional direct
marketing interface
Producer Customer
Community
Figure 1.
Direct marketing in a
social network context
DMIJ the traditional interface for direct marketing has been between the seller and the
3,3 customer, represented by the hatched area. With the introduction of the community
element, the customer interacts with self-selected communities. Sellers need to interact
with selected communities to achieve a variety of benefits, including spreading positive
word of mouth and gathering information about buyers’ needs and preferences. Of
course, the communities that the seller wants to belong to may not be the same ones
164 that the buyer prefers to be involved with. A community that is dominated by its
individual members may be difficult for the seller to have any influence over, and if it
does seek influence, members of the community may become resentful. If a community
becomes dominated by the seller, it can become similar in nature to traditional
seller-led channels of communication, with fewer opportunities for achieving the
benefits of community involvement.
The challenge for direct marketing – and the focus for this paper – is how to
achieve a position at the centre of Figure 1 that combines the seller, the buyer and the
community. It is argued that the “experience” of using a social network site is an
integrative framework for reconciling the needs and expectations of buyers, so that the
community and firms’ involvement in communities can mutually reinforce buyers’
experience.
Social media can be characterised as: “online applications, platforms and media which
aim to facilitate interactions, collaborations and the sharing of content” (Universal 165
Maccann International, 2008, p. 10). The importance of social network media lies in the
interaction between consumers and the community, and in the facilitation of
“asynchronous, immediate, interactive, low-cost communications” (Miller et al., 2009,
p. 306). Social network sites allow individuals to construct a public or semi-public
profile within a bounded system; to articulate a list of other users with whom they
share a connection, and to “view and traverse their list of connections and those made
by others within the system” (Boyd and Ellison, 2007, p. 211). On larger social network
sites, individuals are typically not looking to meet new people but are more interested
in managing relationships by maintaining contacts with old friends who are already
part of their extended social network (Boyd and Ellison, 2007; Hart et al., 2008). To sum
up, social network sites can be seen as alternative communication tools which support
existing relationships and activities in a fun and colourful way that can enrich the
users’ experiences (Ofcom, 2008). Many social network web sites have emerged;
attracting distinctive groups of users in terms of their demographics, for example the
average age of users of Bebo is lower than for Facebook. Many appeal to communities
with specific shared interests (e.g. the “Dogster” and “Catster” networks are targeted at
pet owners).
In addition to consumer-oriented social network sites, many professional and trade
associations have set up networks to exchange information of particular interest to
members (for example the social networking site “LinkedIn” is particularly aimed at
professionals). This paper is primarily concerned with personal users of social network
sites, rather than situations where there is a business use. It is particularly concerned
with the use of social network media by young people.
There is now a lot of evidence that social network sites have become mainstream
and it has been reported that globally, these sites account for one in every 11 minutes
spent online. In the UK, this figure is even higher – one in every six minutes (Nielsen
Company, 2009a). Over half (54 per cent) of internet users between 16 and 24 have set
up their own page or profile on a social networking site (Ofcom, 2008). In the USA,
67 per cent of online users between 18 and 32 make use of social networking sites and
60 per cent have set up their own profile (Jones, 2009). It is also reported that social
networking and blogging sites are now more popular then e-mail as a means of social
communication – Nielsen said “social networking sites eclipsed e-mail in global reach
at 68.4 % vs 64.8 % in February 2009” (Nielsen Company, 2009b, p. 9). The take up of
online social media has been at the expense of traditional media, and a study by Ofcom
of the media habits of UK 15-24 year olds shows that since using such media for the
first time, the amount of time they spent reading national newspapers declined by
27 per cent; reading local newspapers by 22 per cent; reading magazines by 21 per cent;
listening to radio by 15 per cent and watching TV by 13 per cent (Ofcom, 2006). Online
social media offers opportunities to connect with these hard-to-reach audiences drifting
away from traditional media.
DMIJ Overall, there is evidence that online social network sites are seen by young people
3,3 as an integral part of their life (Constantinides and Fountain, 2008). A number of
studies have shown, that emerging adults use social networking sites to connect with
people from their offline lives, such as friends and family (Ofcom, 2008; Pempeka et al.,
2009; Subrahmanyama et al., 2008). It has even been stated, that young people live their
lives online and in public via these sites (Subrahmanyama and Greenfield, 2008).
166
Producer-led communities
Companies would generally love their product to be at the heart of a community, and
many companies have developed their own blogs and online forums for this purpose.
Web 2.0 presents a number of opportunities for companies to get close to their markets,
including observing and collecting information; hosting or sponsoring communities;
providing content to communities (such as music, information or entertainment); and
participating as members of online communities (Miller et al., 2009). However, it can be
difficult to reconcile the concept of a community with a company’s desire to manipulate
communication to its advantage.
There have been many examples of companies who have used social network media
to put them at the centre of a community. Starbucks, for example, has a Facebook site
which claimed to have 1,727,314 “fans” in 2009; it is present on Twitter; has its own
YouTube channel and its own online community web pages (MyStarbucksIdeas,
Starbucks V2V and StarbucksRed). The power of social media for brand development is
indicated by the research organisation virtue’s social media index which measures the
volume of conversations for brands on a variety of social media and reported that the
brands of iPhone, CNN, Starbucks, Apple and iPod dominated the social space in
January 2009 (Miller, 2009). It has been suggested that 43 per cent of social networkers
in Europe have visited a personal space of a brand and 16 per cent have already had a
dialogue or sent a message to a brand (Microsoft Digital Advertising Solutions, 2007).
Another study noted that 36 per cent of active internet users thought more positively
about companies that have blogs and 32 per cent trusted bloggers’ opinion on products
and services (Universal Maccann International, 2008).
There has been a lot of discussion of “brand communities”, formed when individuals
become interdependent because of collective identity, shared rituals and moral
responsibility to members (Muniz and O’Guinn, 2001). A brand community is capable
of collective action over time, notably sharing information, perpetuating the history and
culture of the brand, providing assistance to new members and exerting pressure on
members to remain loyal to the collective and to the brand. In one study, 62 per cent
of “Generation Y” users had visited a brand or fan page on a social network, and
48 per cent actually joined such a network, citing reasons that included: getting
news/product updates, view promotions, view/download music/videos, posting
opinions and connecting with other customers (O’Malley, 2009). However, the same
study also noted that although the majority of young consumers (84 per cent) noticed
ads on social networks, only 19 per cent found them relevant and 36 per cent never
clicked on any ads (O’Malley, 2009).
For the brand owner, nurturing brand communities involves a fine balance between
using pressure to steer the community in the direction that would be in the brand owner’s
interests, and relinquishing some degree of control of the brand to the community
(Muniz and O’Guinn, 2001). Successful online brand communities need to include
a variety of interests that have a direct, but non-intrusive connection with the brand in Direct marketing
order to generate a sense of belonging to a group and shared interests (Brown et al., 2007).
For example, the brand community “MyStarbucksIdeas” gives users the opportunity to
share, vote, discuss and see Starbucks ideas.
A company’s involvement in social network sites can also result in a wider range of
strategic and operational benefits. By inviting feedback, or simply observing
conversations, a company can learn about customers’ needs and inform its new 167
product development policy. In the language of “service dominant logic”, a company
can involve members of the community in the co-creation of value through the
generation of ideas (Constantinides and Fountain, 2008).
If online brand communities are perceived by users as not being trust-worthy, open,
interesting, relevant and engaging with the target audience, they can rapidly harm a
company’s reputation. There have been reported cases of companies disguising their
involvement in a community by falsely posting messages that purported to come from
a member of the public, praising some aspect of the company’s actions. While the
company might have thought that it could influence opinion by manipulating the
community, the subsequent uncovering of its covert actions generated bad publicity
that undermined trust in the company. For example, in the case of Cillit Bang, a fake
blogger named Barry Scott was set up as a marketing vehicle and left marketing
messages in blogs and posts on other web sites (Johnson, 2005). One widely reported
example occurred where the retailer Wal-Mart promoted a blog about two apparently
independent travellers in a camper van who were generously treated by the company.
It only emerged later that the bloggers’ were actually paid by Wal-Mart to plant good
news stories about the company (Gogoi, 2006). Similarly, it is reported that when Sony
covertly implemented a viral marketing campaign for its Play Station, consumers trust
was undermined when they realised that the company had fabricated apparently
independent users’ comments (GamesBlog, 2006; Graft, 2006).
Management implications
There can be little doubt that online social media will become an increasingly
important element of marketing activity. In fact, the term “direct marketing” may
become a misnomer, as companies increasingly have to integrate direct communication
that is aimed at target customers, with indirect communication aimed at their social
network.
The various examples in this paper have demonstrated the new and unique
opportunities that Web 2.0 offers for companies to engage with their markets and to
learn about customers’ needs. The purpose of this paper has been to highlight the
dilemmas that direct marketers face in trying to reconcile their desire to dominate and
control an online community, with the community’s desire to retain autonomy as a
member-driven community. Social network web sites are not controlled for content in
the way that legislation and voluntary codes of conduct influence the content of printed
and broadcast media in many countries. For example, in the UK, the Broadcasting
Standards Authority and Advertising Standards Authority require clear delimitation
between editorial content and paid-for advertising. Viewers of a television drama, for
example, can generally be reassured that the use of a branded product in the drama is
the result of artistic or editorial judgment, rather than payment by the brand owner to
influence the purchase behaviour of the audience.
For social network web sites, some commentators have noted the confusion in users’
minds when commercially provided material is mixed with anonymously submitted
amateur material, sometimes using adaptations of previously published material
(Keegan, 2007; Wilson, 2007). This may give rise to frustration where the viewer is not
able to distinguish between genuine opinions of individuals, and commercially
sponsored messages. Moreover, social media which rely entirely on user-generated
content with only minimal moderation, allow everybody the opportunity to become
DMIJ a self-proclaimed expert and to influence users who may not be able to assess the
3,3 quality of the contribution (Gillin, 2007).
Understanding the experiential values of social network web sites becomes crucial
to effective direct marketing. Measuring users’ perception of experience poses
significant challenges in a sector that is accustomed to extensive use of cognitive and
behavioural metrics. The fact that it is difficult to measure should not undermine its
172 importance as a marketing management framework. As Einstein is reported to have
said “the things that can be counted don’t count, but the things that count can’t be
counted”. A range of qualitative, interpretative and ethnographic approaches is likely
to yield as much insight as conventional behavioural metrics.
Is the area shown in Figure 1 as the confluence of the seller, the buyer and the
community achievable as a positioning strategy? Or is it an unrealistic vision to keep
all parties happy all of the time? Will there be an inevitable life cycle of sites being
launched and developed as genuine community-based networks, but eventually
transform themselves into conventional commercial profit seeking sites, whereupon a
true sense of community is sought in new sites which begin their own life cycle?
This paper concludes with the suggestion that it is possible to reconcile the
apparently competing demands of community and company control. A successful
example of engaging users and providing a relevant, interesting, enriching experience
using social networking sites is provided by the Royal British Legion. It created a
Poppy application that allowed users to display a poppy on their Facebook profiles as a
mark of respect, which attracted mainly younger audiences. Social network sites
generated over one in ten visits to the specially created micro-web site: www.poppy.
org.uk, with 31 per cent of the visitors aged between 18 and 34 (Hitwise, 2008). This
approach opens numerous opportunities for companies to develop and sell unique
branded widgets, applications and other fun stuff which enhances the community’s
social status and experience of the brand, such as in the case of the confectionary brand
Skittles which offered games and widgets on Bebo (Croft, 2008).
Another apparently successful integration of company and community is provided
by Bebo’s UK online drama “KateModern” which ran from July 2007 to June 2008 and
attracted around 1.5 millions views per week. This drama was funded by sponsorship
and product placements of brands, such as Orange, MSN, Cadbury Crème Egg and
Toyota, and incorporated community involvement through discussion of what should
happen next in the story of Kate (HitSearch, 2008).
References
Arnould, E. and Price, L. (1993), “River magic: extraordinary experiences and the extended
service encounter”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 24-45.
Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Co-operation, Basic Books, New York, NY.
Banks, S.K. (1979), “Gift-giving: a review and an interactive paradigm”, Advances in Consumer
Research, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 319-24.
Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A. and Wright, P. (2003), Funology: From Usability to
Enjoyment, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Boyd, D.M. and Ellison, N.B. (2007), “Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship”,
Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 210-30.
Brown, J.B., Broderick, A.J. and Lee, N. (2007), “Word of mouth communication within online Direct marketing
communities: conceptualizing the online social network”, Journal of Interactive Marketing,
Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 2-20.
Burnett, G. (2000), “Information exchange in virtual communities: a typology”, Information
Research: An International Electronic Journal, Vol. 5 No. 4, available at: www.shef.ac.
uk/, is/publications/infres/ircont.html (accessed 17 October 2008).
Cardwell, A. (2002), “Viral marketing, subliminal advertising”, ZD Net Inter@ctive Week, 173
available at: www.ennex.com/, Marshall/viral/ref/20020401-Cardwell.asp (accessed
10 July 2008).
Constantinides, E. and Fountain, S.J. (2008), “Web 2.0: conceptual foundations and marketing
issues”, Journal of Direct, Data, and Digital Marketing Practice, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 231-44.
Cova, B. (1997), “Community and consumption: towards a definition of the ‘linking value’ of
product or services”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31 Nos 3/4, pp. 297-316.
Cova, B. and Cova, V. (2002), “Tribal marketing: the tribalisation of society and its impact on the
conduct of marketing”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36 Nos 5/6, pp. 595-620.
Croft, M. (2008), “Consumers in control”, Marketing Week, Vol. 31 No. 14, pp. 29-30.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988), “The flow experience and its significance for human psychology”,
in Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. (Eds), Optimal Experience: Psychological
Studies of Flow in Consciousness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 15-35.
Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dilworth, D. (2009), “Ford debuts social media campaign for new Fiesta”, DM News, available at:
www.dmnews.com/Ford-debuts-social-media-campaign-for-new-Fiesta/article/130445/
(accessed 2 May 2009).
Edelman and Intelliseek (2005), Trust ‘MEdia’: How Real People are Finally Being Heard – The 1.0
Guide to the Blogosphere for Marketers & Company Stakeholders, available at: www.edelman.
com/image/insights/content/ISwp_TrustMEdia_FINAL.pdf (accessed 1 September 2008).
Edgell, S. and Hetherington, K. (1996), “Introduction: consumption matters”, in Edgell, S.,
Hetherington, K. and Warde, A. (Eds), Consumption Matters: The Production and
Experience of Consumption, Wiley, Oxford, pp. 1-8.
Ferguson, R. (2008), “Word of mouth and viral marketing: taking the temperature of the hottest
trends in marketing”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 179-82.
GamesBlog (2006), “New Sony viral marketing ploy angers consumers”, The Guardian, available
at: www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gamesblog/2006/dec/11/newsonyviral (accessed
2 May 2009).
Gillin, P. (2007), The New Influencers: A Marketer’s Guide to the New Social Media, Quill Driver
Books/Word Dancer Press, Sanger, CA.
Gogoi, P. (2006), “Wal-mart vs The Blogosphere”, BusinessWeek, available at: www.businessweek.
com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/oct2006/db20061018_445917.htm (accessed 28 April 2009).
Graft, K. (2006), “Sony screws up: first the hardware woes. Now a viral campaign for the PSP has
backfired”, BusinessWeek, available at: www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/de
c2006/id20061219_590177.htm (accessed 2 May 2009).
Hamilton, W.D. (1964), “The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II”, Journal of
Theoretical Biology, Vol. 7, pp. 1-16 and 17-52.
Harrison-Walker, L.J. (2001), “The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an
investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents”,
Journal of Service Research, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 60-75.
DMIJ Hart, J., Ridley, C., Taher, F., Sas, C. and Dix, A. (2008), “Exploring the Facebook experience:
a new approach to usability”, paper presented at NordiCHI 2008: Using Bridges, Lund,
3,3 18-22 October.
Havenstein, H. (2008), “Exxon mobil’s brand ‘hijacked’ by impersonator on twitter”, Computer
World, available at: www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command¼viewArticle
Basic&articleId¼9111524 (accessed 2 May 2009).
174 HitSearch (2008), “Bebo’s kateModern averages 1.5 million views per week”, available at: www.
hitsearchlimited.com/news/999655/ (accessed 20 April 2009).
Hitwise (2008), “The impact of social networking in the UK”, available at: www.bergenmediaby.
no/admin/ressurser/QCetFnO$_11_Social_Networking_Report_2008.pdf (accessed 2 April
2009).
Ipsos MORI (2006), “White Paper: European blog influencer barometer with Ipsos MORI”,
HOTWIRE 33, available at: www.hotwirepr.com/pdf/BlogWhitePaperUK.pdf (accessed
2 April 2009).
Jennings, R. (2007), European Online Marketing Tops e16 Billion in 2012, Forrester Research,
Cambridge, MA, available at: www.forrester.com/Research/PDF/0,44739,00.pdf (accessed
20 May 2009).
Johnson, B. (2005), “Cleaner caught playing dirty on the net”, The Guardian, available at: www.
guardian.co.uk/technology/2005/oct/06/newmedia.onlinesupplement (accessed 10 May
2009).
Jones, S. (2009), “Generations online in 2009 (pew internet project data memo)”, Pew Internet &
American Life Project, available at: www.pewinternet.org/,/media/Files/Reports/2009/
PIP_Generations_2009.pdf (accessed 10 May 2009).
Jordan, P.W. (2002), Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors,
Taylor & Francis, London.
Keegan, V. (2007), “Amateurs can be good and bad news”, The Guardian, available at: www.
guardian.co.uk/media/2007/jul/05/digitalmedia.technology (accessed 12 October 2008).
Leskovec, J., Adamic, L.A. and Huberman, B.A. (2008), “The dynamics of viral marketing”,
available at: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0509/0509039v4.pdf (accessed
1 September 2008).
McCarthy, J. and Wright, W. (2004), Technology as Experience, Interactions, MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA.
May, A.M. (1987), “More evolution of cooperation”, Nature, Vol. 327, pp. 15-17.
Microsoft Digital Advertising Solutions (2007), “Word of the web guidelines for advertisers:
understanding trends and monetising social networks”, available at: http://advertising.
microsoft.com/uk/WWDocs/User/en-uk/Advertise/Partner%20Properties/Piczo/Word%
20of%20the%20Web%20Social%20Networking%20Report%20Ad5.pdf (accessed
10 February 2009).
Miller, G. (2009), “Biggest brand movers on the vitrue social media index for January 2009”,
Virtue, available at: http://vitrue.com/blog/2009/02/10/biggest-brand-movers-on-the-
vitrue-social-media-index-for-january-2009/ (accessed 20 May 2009).
Miller, K.D., Fabian, F. and Lin, S.J. (2009), “Strategies for online communities”, Strategic
Management Journal, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 305-22.
Muniz, A.M. and O’Guinn, T.C. (2001), “Brand community”, Journal of Consumer Research,
Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 412-32.
Nielsen Company (2009a), “Global face and networked places: a Nielsen report on social Direct marketing
networking’s new global footprint”, available at: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-
content/uploads/2009/03/nielsen_globalfaces_mar09.pdf (accessed 20 May 2009).
Nielsen Company (2009b), “The global online media landscape: identifying opportunities in a
challenging market”, available at: http://nielsen-online.com/emc/0904_report/nielsen-
online-global-lanscapefinal1.pdf (accessed 20 May 2009).
Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L. and Yung, Y.F. (2000), “Measuring the customer experience in online 175
environments: a structural modeling approach”, Marketing Science, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 22-42.
Nowak, M.A. and Sigmund, K. (1998), “Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring”,
Nature, Vol. 393, pp. 573-7.
Ofcom (2006), “The communications consumer”, Office of Communications, available at: www.
ofcom.org.uk/research/cm/cm06/cmr06_print/main.pdf (accessed 2 April 2009).
Ofcom (2008), “Social networking: a quantitative and qualitative research report into attitudes,
behaviours and use”, Office of Communications, available at: www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/
media_literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/socialnetworking/report.pdf (accessed 2 April
2009).
O’Malley, G. (2009), “Study: Gen Y notices social net ads, but claim irrelevance”, Online Media
Daily, available at: www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa¼Articles.showArticle&art_
aid¼101409 (accessed 2 May 2009).
Peck, J. and Feldman, M. (1985), “The evolution of helping in large, randomly mixed
populations”, American Nature, Vol. 127, pp. 209-21.
Pempeka, T.A., Yermolayevaa, Y.A. and Calvert, S.L. (2009), “College students’ social
networking experiences on facebook”, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 30
No. 3, pp. 227-38.
Rapoport, A. and Chammah, A.M. (1965), Prisoner’s Dilemma, University of Michigan Press,
Ann Arbor, MI.
Sas, C., Dix, A., Hart, J. and Su, R. (2009), “Emotional experience on Facebook site”, paper
presented at CHI, April 4-9, Boston, MA.
Sherry, J.F. (1998), “The soul of the company store: Nike Town Chicago and the emplaced
brandscape”, in Sherry, J.F. (Ed.), ServiceScapes: The Concept of Place in Contemporary
Markets, NTC Business Books, Chicago, IL, pp. 109-46.
Subrahmanyama, K. and Greenfield, P.M. (2008), “Virtual worlds in development: implications of
social networking sites”, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 29 No. 6,
pp. 417-9.
Subrahmanyama, K., Reich, S.M., Waechter, N. and Espinoza, G. (2008), “Online and offline social
networks: use of social networking sites by emerging adults”, Journal of Applied
Developmental Psychology, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 420-33.
Subramani, M.R. and Rajagopalan, B. (2003), “Knowledge-sharing and influence in online social
networks via viral marketing”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46 No. 12, pp. 300-7.
Susskind, A.M. (2002), “I told you so! Restaurants’ customers word-of-mouth communication
patterns”, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 75-85.
Universal Maccann International (2008), “Power to the people – social media tracker wave 3”,
available at: www.slideshare.net/mickstravellin/universal-mccann-international-social-
media-research-wave-3 (accessed 20 May 2009).
Vogt, P. (2009), “Brands under attack: marketers can learn from domino’s video disaster”, Forbes,
available at: www.forbes.com/2009/04/24/dominos-youtube-twitter-leadership-cmo-
network-marketing.html (accessed 20 May 2009).
DMIJ Wellman, B. and Gulia, M. (1999), “Virtual communities as communities: net surfers don’t ride
alone”, in Smith, M. and Kollock, P. (Eds), Communities in Cyberspace, Routledge,
3,3 New York, NY, pp. 167-94.
Wilson, A.N. (2007), “The internet is destroying the world as we know it”, Daily Mail Online,
available at: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-460901/The-internet-destroying-world-
know-it.html (accessed 9 September 2008).
176
Corresponding author
Adrian Palmer can be contacted at: mail@apalmer.com