Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An International Journal
Changqiao Yang, Suqin Li, Changquan Zhang, Jiaxing Bai & Zijie Guo
To cite this article: Changqiao Yang, Suqin Li, Changquan Zhang, Jiaxing Bai & Zijie Guo
(2018) Application Of Superconducting High Gradient Magnetic Separation Technology On Silica
Extraction From Iron Ore Beneficiation Tailings, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy
Review, 39:1, 44-49, DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2017.1324439
Changqiao Yang, Suqin Li, Changquan Zhang, Jiaxing Bai, and Zijie Guo
School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
ABSTRACT KEYWORDS
Comprehensive utilization of tailings resources not only solves environmental problems but also creates Iron ore beneficiation
huge economic benefits. In this paper, fine weakly magnetic particles were extracted from iron ore tailidddngs; magnetic flux
beneficiation tailings and silica (SiO2) was separated and purified using a superconducting high gradient density; pulp concentration;
magnetic separator. Based on plenty of contrast experiments, SiO2 content of the magnetic concentrate super conducting high
gradient magnetic
could be increased from 68.67% to 92.57% with the selected optimal parameter combination, i.e., a separation; slurry flow
magnetic flux density of 3.2 T, a pulp concentration of 40 g/L and a slurry flow velocity of 500 mL/min. velocity
The concentrate can be utilized as low-grade normal SiO2 sands for industrial use, or act as the raw
materials for preparing high-purity SiO2 product.
CONTACT Suqin Li lisuqin@metall.ustb.edu.cn School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing
100083, China.
© 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
MINERAL PROCESSING AND EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY REVIEW 45
A higher magnetic flux density normally can bring higher an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (SEM/EDS) and a
separation efficiency (Mishima et al., 2007), so that this super- reflective microscope. The XRF analysis results of the tail-
conducting HGMS technology is recommended for capturing ings samples are presented in Table 1. It is found that the
fine weakly magnetic particles. For instance, it can be samples have high Si, Al, Mg, and Fe contents. Since Si is
deployed for wastewater purification to remove heavy metal the targeted valuable element of this study, those elements
ions from the wastewater produced by steel industry. The first other than Si need to be cleared. The phase analysis results
application of superconducting HGMS in mineral processing of the tailings are presented in Figure 1, Figure 2 and
field was to improve the whiteness of kaolin clay by eliminat- Table 2, as can be seen quartz is the main phase and
ing iron impurities, which achieved good test indices gangue minerals include pyroxene, feldspar, and magnetite.
(Zhu et al., 2013). However, to the best of our knowledge,
the superconducting HGMS technology has rarely been used
for the separation and purification of solid particles, especially Experimental system
in tailings processing. The magnetic separation experiments were performed using a
In order to solve the above problems, many researchers superconducting high gradient magnetic separator designed
have explored the comprehensive utilization of tailings. Dwari by the Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) of Chinese
et al. (2013) employed a wet low-intensity magnetic separator Academy of Sciences (CAS). The experimental schematic
to collect iron resources from iron ore beneficiation tailings. diagram of the separator is shown in Figure 3. It is composed
They obtained a magnetic separation concentrate with 67% of two superconducting magnets and a high gradient reactor.
iron of 200 μm in particle size and achieved a recovery rate of The two superconducting magnets are used to generate a high
90%. Chen et al. (2015) carried out beneficiation experiments intensity magnetic field, while the high gradient reactor is
on hematite with an average particle size of 75 μm to inves- filled with steel wools which can raise the gradient of the
tigate the use of HGMS technology, and the results proved magnetic field and increase the magnetic force acting on
that magnetic flux density was the most significant factor magnetic particles.
affecting the performance of this technology. Li et al. (2009) The prepared slurry was fed into the high gradient reactor
analyzed the effects of high gradient magnetic field on the via the inlet. Magnetic particles were captured by the mag-
distribution of silicon, and confirmed that a high gradient netic matrix (steel wools) and nonmagnetic particles (silica)
magnetic field was capable of separating dissolved silicon were to be exported with the slurry through the outlet. In
and main silicon-containing materials from gangue. order to study the influence of various parameters of super-
This paper investigated the removal of fine weakly mag- conducting HGMS technology on silica extraction and pur-
netic particles from tailings using the superconducting HGMS ification of tailings, several single factor tests focusing on
technology. Besides the detailed characterization of the magnetic flux density, pulp concentration and slurry flow
tailings, single factor experiments were conducted to analyze velocity were conducted, respectively.
the influences of various parameters, such as magnetic flux Based on the analysis of earlier experimental data, the
density, pulp concentration, and slurry flow velocity on the following technological parameters were selected for the mag-
separation performance, and meanwhile to provide some netic separation experiments: magnetic flux density from 2.5
experimental evidences and theoretical basis for application to 4.0 T, pulp concentration from 30 to 100 g/L, slurry flow
of separation technologies in industrial practices. velocity from 500 to 2500 mL/min and a fix filling rate of steel
wools at 20%. The magnetic concentrate was dried in a drying
oven at 105 °C, and then their chemical constituents were
Materials and methods examined. Separation efficiency was evaluated using the SiO2
Tailings samples content in magnetic concentrate. A higher SiO2 content in
concentrate means a higher magnetic separation efficiency.
The tailings samples were provided by Chengde located in
Hebei Province of China. A total of 100 kg samples were
collected from different zones of the lagoon, with an average Results and discussion
particle size of 250 μm.
Influence of magnetic flux density on separation
In the laboratory, these samples were grinded into 45 μm
efficiency
size particles. Afterwards, their chemical constituents and
mineralogical characteristics were analyzed using a series of Magnetic flux density is an influential parameter to separation
detection methods, i.e., chemical analysis (CA), X-ray fluor- efficiency. In the experiments, different magnetic flux densi-
escence (XRF), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu-Kα ties from 2.5 to 4.0 T were attempted with a pulp concentra-
radiation between 10°and 80° (2θ), and a set of instruments tion of 30 g/L and a slurry flow velocity of 500 mL/min. The
including a scanning electron microscope combined with test results are exhibited in Figure 4. It can be seen from
800 1 1. quartz (SiO2) the same time, the contents of P, Ti, Cr, and Mn all dropped
2. pyroxene ((Ca,Mg,Fe,Al)2(Si,Al)2O6)
to 0.10% or below. Since the particles containing these ele-
ments were adhered to or associated with magnetic particles,
3. feldspar (KAlSi3O8)
600 they were then captured by the steel wools together with the
Intensity (Counts)
400
13 24
2
200 23
3 4 13
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Theta (°)
94
92
SiO2 Content (%)
90
88
86
Figure 2. Reflective microscope image of tailings samples 1. pyrite, 2. magnetite,
3. quartz, 4. feldspar, 5. pyroxene.
84
2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8
Figure 4 that magnetic flux density has an appreciable effect
Magnetic flux density (T)
on separation efficiency. The SiO2 content of magnetic con-
centrate firstly increases with the increase of magnetic flux Figure 4. The influence of magnetic flux density on separation efficiency.
density and reaches the maximum value of 92.89% at a mag-
netic flux density of 3.2 T, and then sharply drops with its
further increase. ory, weakly magnetic pyroxene and ferromagnetic magnetite
XRF detection was performed on the concentrate obtained particles should be completely captured by the steel wools.
from magnetic separation process at the magnetic flux density The superconducting HGMS is physical separation method
of 3.2 T. According to the results, the content of SiO2 was based on the difference in magnetic properties of different ore
found to be 92.89%; the contents of Mg, Ca, Al, and Fe minerals (Li et al., 2012). In the magnetic field, particles are
dropped to 0.52%, 1.42%, 2.91%, and 0.84%, respectively; at under a three-way competition: magnetic force, gravitational,
Table 2. Mass percentages (determined by EDS) of the particles shown in Figure 2. (%).
O Si Ca Mg Fe Al K Na Ti S Mineral type
1 47.59 52.43 pyrite
2 11.29 85.26 3.45 magnetite
3 40.64 59.36 quartz
4 38.63 40.05 2.25 1.96 10.47 1.96 4.11 feldspar
5 35.33 20.24 14.02 7.11 16.03 5.36 1.08 0.85 pyroxene
MINERAL PROCESSING AND EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY REVIEW 47
Figure 7. The microscopic pictures of magnetic concentrate at different pulp concentrations: (a) 30 g/L, (b) 40 g/L, (c) 50 g/L, (d) 60 g/L, (e) 70 g/L, and (f) 100 g/L.
MINERAL PROCESSING AND EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY REVIEW 49
viscosity and the load on the steel wools, which intensified the Chen, L. Z., Zeng, J. W., Guan, C. P., Zhang, H. F., and Yang, R. Y., 2015,
nonselective magnetic flocculation phenomenon (Oka et al., “High gradient magnetic separation in centrifugal field.” Minerals
Engineering, 78. pp. 122–127.
2009). As a result, the separation effect became worse.
Das, B., Mishra, B. K., Prakash, S., Das, S. K., Reddy, P. S. R., and Angadi, S.
I., 2010, “Magnetic and flotation studies of banded hematite quartzite
(BHQ) ore for the production of pellet grade concentrate.” International
Journal of Mineral Metallurgy Materials, 17(6), pp. 675–682.
Comprehensive condition experiment da Silva, F. L., Araújo, F. G. S., Teixeira, M. P., Gomes, R. C., and von
Under the optimal parameters, i.e., a magnetic flux density of Krüger, F. L., 2014, “Study of the recovery and recycling of tailings
from the concentration of iron ore for the production of ceramic.”
3.2 T, a slurry flow velocity of 500 mL/min, and a pulp concentra- Ceramics International, 40(10). pp. 16085–16089.
tion of 40 g/L, the SiO2 content was boosted from 68.67% to Dwari, R. K., Rao, D. S., and Reddy, P. S. R., 2013, “Magnetic separation
92.57% after once superconducting HGMS test. Chemical analysis studies for a low grade siliceous iron ore sample.” International
results are shown in Table 3. It can be seen that the impurity Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23(1). pp. 1–5.
elements mainly include Al, K, Ca, etc. These impurities should be Ebner, A. D., Ritter, J. A., and Ploehn, H. J., 1997, “Feasibility and
limitations of nanolevel high gradient magnetic separation.”
feldspar and another kind of calcium-iron-bearing silicate.
Separation and Purification Technology, 11(3). pp. 199–210.
Nevertheless, this kind of impurity had a low content, so that Guo, F., and Li, J., 2011, “Selective separation of silica from a siliceou-
XRD detection did not find them. How to determine its phase secalcareous phosphate rock.” Mining Science and Technology (China),
composition and how to separate the feldspar will be our future 21(1). pp. 135–139.
work. Another work is to improve the yield, since the average yield Katharina, M., Johannes, L., and Hermann, N., 2012, “Removal of mag-
netite particles and lubricant contamination from viscous oil by high-
of concentrate is only 41.78% in the current test.
gradient magnetic separation technique”, Separation and Purification
Technology, 92. pp. 122–128.
Lee, D. J., Han, K. C., Ho, S. Y., Kuk, C., Jin, H. P., and Se, Y. O., 2008,
Conclusions “Production of silica nanopowder from domestic siliceous mudstone.”
The superconducting HGMS technology was proved to be an Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 313–314. pp. 121–125.
Li, C., Sun, H. H., Bai, J., and Li, L. T., 2010, “Innovative methodology
effective way for the separation and purification of SiO2 from for comprehensive utilization of iron ore tailings Part 1. The recovery
iron ore beneficiation tailings. The paramagnetic minerals such of iron from iron ore tailings using magnetic separation after magne-
as pyroxene and magnetite could be removed and SiO2 could tizing roasting.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 174(1–3). pp. 71–77.
be separated effectively from these weakly magnetic particles. Li, S. Q., Wang, M. F., Zhu, Z. A., Wang, Q., Zhang, X., Song, H. Q., and
Three main factors influencing the separation efficiency were Cang, D. Q., 2012, “Application of superconducting HGMS technol-
ogy on turbid wastewater treatment from converter.” Separation and
analyzed. With the increase of magnetic flux density, the SiO2
Purification Technology, 84. pp. 56–62.
content firstly increased and then decreased when magnetic flux Li, X., Ren, Z. M., and Fautrelle, Y., 2009, “Effect of a high gradient
density was beyond 3.2 T, so that the optimal value for magnetic magnetic field on the distribution of the solute Si and the morphology
flux density was 3.2 T. With the increase of slurry flow velocity or of the primary Si phase.” Materials Letters, 63(15). pp. 1235–1238.
pulp concentration, the SiO2 content showed a decreasing trend. Mishima, F., Takeda, S., Fukushima, M., and Nishijima, S., 2007, “A
Under the optimal technological parameters, i.e., a magnetic flux superconducting magnetic separation system of ferromagnetic fine
particles from a viscous fluid.” Physics C, 463–465. pp. 1302–1305.
density of 3.2 T, a slurry flow velocity of 500 mL/min and a pulp Nishijima, S., 2008, “Application of superconductivity for magnetic force
concentration of 40 g/L, the SiO2 content of concentrate was control in medical and industrial fields.” Physica C, 468(15–20).
boosted from 68.67% to 92.57%. This concentrate can meet the pp. 1115–1119.
technical requirements of primary glass manufacturing compa- Oka, T., Kanayama, H., Tanaka, K., Fukui, S., Ogawa, J., Sato, T.,
nies and foundries. Also, it can be used as the raw materials for Ooizumi, M., Terasawa, T., Itoh, Y., and Yabuno, R., 2009, “Waste
water purification by magnetic separation technique using HTS bulk
producing high purity silica product. magnet System”, Physica C, 469(15–20). pp. 1849–1852.
Subrata, R., 2012, “Recovery improvement of fine magnetic particles by
floc magnetic separation.” Mineral Processing & Extractive Metallurgy
Acknowledgments Review, 33. pp. 170–179.
The authors wish to thank Zhu Zian from Institute of High Energy Takeshi, O., Hiroaki, K., and Hitoshi, W., 2001, “Magnetic separation
Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences for his technical assistance. using superconducting magnets.” Physica C, 357–360, part 2.
pp. 1272–1280.
Vadim, V. A., Viktor, A. P., Olga, N. V., Lyudmila, I. L., and Elena, N. D.,
References 2015, “Composite nanoparticles: A new way to siliceous materials and
a model of biosilica synthesis.” Materials Chemistry and Physics, 165.
Arol, A. I. and Aydogan, A., 2004, “Recovery enhancement of magnetite pp. 227–234.
fines in magnetic separation.” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Zhu, Z. A., Wang, M. F., Ning, F. P., Yang, H., Wang, K. X., Zhao, L.,
Engineering Aspects, 232(2–3). pp. 151–154. Zhang, G. Q., Hou, Z. L., Yao, W. C., and Liu, Z. X., 2013, “The
Chen, L. Z., Qian, Z. H., Wen, S. M., and Huang, S. W., 2013, “Highi- development of 5.5 T high gradient superconducting magnetic separa-
gradient magnetic separation of ultrafine particles with rod matrix.” tor.” Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, 26(11).
Mineral Processing & Extractive Metallurgy Review, 34. pp. 340–347. pp. 3187–3191.