There is an alternate method to the equilibrium method for constructing influence lines called the Müller-Breslau Principle, which allows influence lines to be drawn faster without having to first find the reaction influence lines. This method, also known as qualitative influence lines, uses the concept of similar triangles to construct influence lines in a quicker manner compared to using equilibrium calculations.
There is an alternate method to the equilibrium method for constructing influence lines called the Müller-Breslau Principle, which allows influence lines to be drawn faster without having to first find the reaction influence lines. This method, also known as qualitative influence lines, uses the concept of similar triangles to construct influence lines in a quicker manner compared to using equilibrium calculations.
There is an alternate method to the equilibrium method for constructing influence lines called the Müller-Breslau Principle, which allows influence lines to be drawn faster without having to first find the reaction influence lines. This method, also known as qualitative influence lines, uses the concept of similar triangles to construct influence lines in a quicker manner compared to using equilibrium calculations.
using the Muller-Breslau Principle There is an alternate to the equilibrium method for constructing influence lines. This method is based on the Müller-Breslau Principle, and may also be called qualitative influence lines. This method allows us to draw influence lines faster than if we used the equilibrium calculations described in the previous section. In fact, it is likely that if we wanted to construct a shear or moment influence line using the method, then we would not have to find the reaction influence lines for the structure first. Similar Triangles Before explaining the Müller-Breslau Principle, it is useful to review the concept of similar triangles, which you will likely have studied previously at the high-school level. The concept of similar triangles is illustrated in Figure 6.6.