Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Confidentiality notice: The information in this document is only intended for the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are
not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this
document in error, please notify Campden BRI immediately by telephone.
Background
Trends in the market-place are toward more ‘natural’ foods that are nutritionally
balanced, healthy and convenient. At the same time, these products need to be as
close to ‘fresh’ as possible and yet have sufficient shelf-life to be compatible with
modern shopping habits. In addition, it would be advantageous for food
manufacturers (and consumers) if healthy foods could be manufactured that
contained some additional functionality that aided health and well-being.
The diverse and complex requirements for new products present significant technical
challenges for the food industry. These challenges are likely to be addressed by
multi-factorial approaches. Innovations in ingredients and formulation will play a
critical role but these innovations cannot be considered in isolation of manufacturing
and technological developments.
This paper will outline opportunities from technologies that could improve the
nutritional status, quality and functionality of products. It will do this by briefly
reviewing the current state of the art in thermal processing and by giving examples of
innovations in thermal processing (heating only) and innovations in non-thermal
preservation technologies.
Throughout the paper, the various technologies will be termed ‘emerging’ rather than
‘new’ or ‘novel’ technologies. This is to reflect the fact that many of the technologies
described have been in development for many years (and therefore cannot be
thought of as ‘new’) and also to avoid any ambiguity as to whether a technology is,
or is not, ‘novel’ as defined by the novel food regulations (EC 258/97) which is a
piece of legislation that required pre-market approval for novel foods as defined
within the regulation.
Ambient stable ‘canned’ products have an excellent safety record (when applied
correctly), are generally high throughput and can provide convenient, reasonable
quality foods at a low cost (Mintel 2007). However, such products are sometimes
viewed as ‘old fashioned’ and of poor quality compared with chilled alternatives. For
example, a Mintel market intelligence report noted that there was “Scepticism of
consumers regarding the quality and healthiness of frozen and canned fruit and
vegetables” and that “The frozen and canned fruit and vegetable sectors continue to
be plagued by the long-standing image that they are second best to fresh. Some
43% of consumers mainly buy fresh fruit and vegetables thinking that frozen and
canned are less healthy and of poorer quality”. (Mintel 2007).
Chilled heat processed foods such as cook-chilled ready meals (typically having a
shelf-life of under 10 days) and Refrigerated Pasteurised Foods of Extended
Durability (so called ‘REPFEDs’ typically having a chilled shelf life of 10-30 days)
offer improved quality, in part, due to a much reduced thermal input. For example, a
chilled product with less than 10 days shelf-life is typically subjected to a process
equivalent to 70°C for 2 minutes, in order to bring about a 6 log reduction of Listeria
monocytogenes (Betts & Betts 2009). A REPFED typically receives a process
equivalent to 90°C for 10 minutes in order to bring about a 6 log reduction of
psychrotrophic strains of Clostridium botulinum (Betts & Betts 2009). In either case
the thermal input is significantly lower than the minimum process of 121.1°C for 3
minutes (or equivalent) that is normally applied to low acid canned foods
(Department of Health 1994). Please note that the selection of appropriate
conditions for thermal process safety is a complex subject, the processes mentioned
here are examples only and specialist advice so be sought for process selection.
Although the thermal process is less severe in chilled products as described, the
products still suffer from some quality degradation as a result of thermal damage and
they are restricted to a relatively short shelf-life compared with heat sterilised
products.
Improvements in both eating quality and nutritional quality can be achieved through
thermal process optimisation and through an understanding of the underlying
kinetics of quality and nutrient degradation. Although an old document, a review of
the kinetics of quality and nutrient degradation by Holdsworth ( 1997) remains an
excellent resource for this topic.
Ohmic heating
Ohmic heating relies upon the electrical resistance of the food to generate heat,
therefore if the electrical resistances of all components of the product are constant
then the product heats uniformly. Particulate products can therefore be heated
uniformly, overcoming the limitations of heat transfer in conventional HTST systems
such as plate, tubular or scraped surface heat exchangers. Products such as fruit
juices and concentrates, shelf-stable milk, puddings, soups and liquid egg products
can be heated rapidly, uniformly, and with reduced impact on the organoleptic
properties of the product (Christian & Leadley 2006). The process can be difficult to
operate without closely matching the physical properties of the different phases
within the food. It is growing in commercial use; the Italian Company Emmepiemme
has installed at least 30 industrial ohmic heating plants worldwide. Applications
include low and high acid products and even large particulate products such as
peach halves (Municinó 2007).
Leizerson & Shimoni ( 2005) reported that their sensory studies “showed no
difference between fresh and ohmic-heated orange juices” but that vitamin C was
reduced by around 15% as a result of the treatment. Vikram et al ( 2005) compared
quality and nutritional changes in orange juice treated by ohmic, conventional
heating and other rapid heating methods and concluded that the lowest level of
vitamin C degradation was achieved in ohmically heated samples. However Mercali
et al ( 2012) noted that when high voltage gradients were used in processing a fruit
juice it resulted in greater vitamin C reduction than conventional heating so clearly
care needs to be taken with respect to process optimisation.
The major advantage of microwave/RF heating is, as for ohmic heating, the rapid
and volumetric temperature rise that can be achieved in foods. This results from two
primary heating mechanisms, a dielectric effect and an ionic heating effect (IFT
2000). Dielectric heating occurs when the water molecule, the principal constituent
in most food materials, oscillates at the very high frequency of the microwave/RF
field; such oscillations produce rapid heating. Ionic heating occurs when the
oscillatory motion of ions in the food, under the influence of the microwave/RF fields,
produces a heating effect.
Shaka Process
In conventional retorting for in-container heat processed foods, products are heated
to sterilisation temperatures via a heating medium contacting the outside of the
container. Heat is transferred through the product through convection or conduction,
depending on the characteristics of the product. Systems are available to improve
the heat transfer within the container by either axial or end-over-end rotation, but the
beneficial effects on heat transfer of these systems are limited to relatively low
viscosity products. The Shaka™ process is designed to improve product mixing and
hence heat transfer within the container. This is achieved by oscillating the
containers horizontally along their longest axis at accelerations of up to three times
gravity. This aims to reduce both the heating and cooling time of the product, leading
to significant reductions in processing time and associated improvements in product
quality. The idea of using shaking as an alternative to rotation was first developed
by engineers working at Carnaud Metalbox, in the mid 1990’s. Although the process
was patented and several food manufacturers showed an interest in the technique,
the work was not commercialised. Interest in the Shaka process was re-ignited when
Zinetec Ltd bought the patent rights to the process and installed the retort at
Campden BRI. Commercial products are now on sale and Zinetec claims Shaka
sterilised products can approach the quality of pasteurised products and have better
nutritional properties. This latter claim appears to be made quite cautiously as they
claim “Better nutritional qualities, according to currently available evidence”
Because the process often does not involve significant heating, the sensory and
nutritional quality of products can, in the right circumstances, be very similar to their
unprocessed counterparts. The non-thermal nature of high-pressure pasteurisation
makes it an excellent candidate process for preserving the ‘fresh-like’ characteristics
of foods. Products that are currently on the market tend to be chilled and/or contain
additional preservation hurdles such as pH or water activity control or other
combinations of factors that have been demonstrated to prevent the growth of
psychrotophic strains of Clostridium botulinum.
The first commercially HPP products appeared in Japan in the 1990’s (Leadley &
Williams 1996) and a wide range of commercial products are now available. Details
on currently available commercial HPP products can be obtained from equipment
suppliers such as NC Hiperbaric and Avure or from ‘crowd-sourced’ information
resources such as high pressure subject interest groups on the business networking
site www.linkedin.com
As of 2010 there were around 145 full-scale units in operation worldwide with around
half of these being located in the USA and around a quarter being in Europe. Of the
145 vessels, 12% were in use for juice and beverage production, 35% for vegetable
products, 31% for meat products and 14% for shellfish production, the balance being
other speciality applications (personal communication with NC Hyperbaric, 2010).
Quality attributes like colour and texture can be very well maintained with HPP. For
example, the storage stability (at 4, 20 and 30°C) of anthocyanins in raspberries,
strawberries and blackcurrants was similar to fresh juice when processed at 800MPa
for 15min (Zabetakis et al., 2000). Similarly Chlorophylls have been reported to have
a high stability to pressure but not to temperatures higher than 50°C even if only
treated for a short time (tested with broccoli juice in Van Loey et al. 1998 and
Weemaes et al. 1999). It was found that HPP better preserved the texture of carrot
and red radish compared with thermal processing alone (Nguyen et al. 2010).
A number of studies have demonstrated good retention of product quality using PEF.
For example, PEF treatment did not significantly influence the colour of orange juice
(Cortés, 2007; Cserhalmi et al. 2006), blueberry juice (Barba et al., 2010), apple
juice (Charles-Rodriguez, 2007), cranberry juice (Jin and Zhang 1999), carrot juice
(Quitão-Teixeira et al. 2007) lemon or grapefruit juice (Cserhalmi et al. 2006).
Similiarly, studies have shown that carotenoids increased in concentration in an
orange-carrot juice. When intensities lower than 30kV/cm were applied, vitamin A
content was higher than in thermally pasteurised juices (Torregrosa et al, 2005). In
paprika juice, the carotene amount was higher than in enzyme treated juice (60% vs
44%) (Ade-Omowaye, 2001).
Conclusions and future perspectives
Innovation is critical to the success of any food business. Many of the emerging
technologies outlined in this short review offer opportunities for food manufacturers
to develop products that have a unique point of difference from the competition
whether this be radically improved product quality or nutritional status.
At the current point in time, it seems unlikely that any emerging technology will
become a complete replacement for a conventional preservation process. What is
more likely is that specific technologies will find niche applications where they
provide a perfect solution to a particular problem.
It is important that these emerging technologies are not rejected too hastily after only
superficial assessment. A frequently observed issue is that companies wish to
evaluate a technology using their existing product formulations and packaging. When
a technology trial yields a negative result, the assumption is made that the
technology is unsuitable for a product. By investing time in product design and
packaging modification, the technology could give radically improved results.
Committing sufficient resource to evaluate a technology at a good level of detail is an
essential component of reaching a balanced decision about its suitability for the
intended application.
A number of technical centres can offer support to help companies through the
technology selection process. Campden BRI can assist but there are also a number
of centres in Scotland with food safety and preservation expertise that can help,
these include Queen Margaret University, the University of Edinburgh, the University
of Strathclyde, the University of Glasgow and Robert Gordon University.
References
Ade-Omowaye, B.I.O.; Angersbach, A.; Taiwo, K.A. and Knorr, D. (2001) The use of
pulsed electric fields in producing juice from paprika (capsicum annuum L.), Journal
of Food Processing Preservation, vol. 25, pp. 353-365
Barba, F.J.; Meneses, N.; Jaeger, H.; Esteve, M.J.; Frigola, A.; and Knorr, D. (2010)
Impact of pulsed electric fields on colour modifications in blueberry juice during
refrigerated storage, Food Innova 2010, 25-29th October, Universidad Politecnica de
Valencia
Cserhalmi, Zs.; Sass-Kiss, Á.; Tóth-Markus, M.; Lechner, N. (2006) Study of pulsed
electric field treated citrus juices, Innovative Food Science and Emerging
Technologies, vol. 7, pp. 49-54
Christian, G. & Leadley, C. E. New Technologies Bulletin 32. June 2006, Campden
& Chorleywood Food Research Association, Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire
GL55 6LD, UK. 2006.
Ref Type: Generic
Cortés, C.; Esteve, M.J.; Frígola, A. (2007) Colour of orange juice treated by high
intensity pulsed electric fields during refrigerated storage and comparison with
pasteurised juice, Food Control, doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.03.001
De Alwis, A. A. P. & Fryer, P. J. 1990, "The use of direct resistance heating in the
food industry", Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3-27.
Department of Health. Guidelines for the safe production of heat preserved foods.
Department of Health, London, HMSO, ISBN 0-11-321801-X. Department of Health.
1994. London, HMSO.
Ref Type: Generic
Fellows, P. J. Dielectric, ohmic and infrared heating. Fellows, P. J. Food Processing
Technology: principles and practice. 3rd Edition[20], 581-609. 2009. Oxford,
Woodhead Publishing.
Ref Type: Generic
Floury, J., Grosset, N., Leconte, N., Pasco, M., Madec, M. N., & Jeantet, R. 2006,
"Continuous raw skim milk processing by pulsed electric field at non-lethal
temperature: effect on microbial inactivation and functional properties", Lait.2006,
vol. 86(1): pp. 43-57.
Hodgins, A. M., Mittal, G. S., & Griffiths, M. W. 2002, "Pasteurization of fresh orange
juice using low-energy pulsed electrical field", Journal of Food Science.2002, vol.
67(6): pp. 2294-2299.
IFT 2000, "Special supplement: Kinetics of microbial inactivation for alternative food
processing technologies - IFT's response to task order #1, US Food and Drug
Administration: How to quantify the destruction kinetics of alternative processing
technologies", Journal of Food Science pp. 4-108.
Kui, Z., Fang, C., Jihong, W., Zhengfu, W., Xiaojun, L., Xiaosong, H., & Zhenhua, Z.
2005, "Kinetics of inactivation of Escherichia coli in carrot juice by pulsed electric
field", Journal of Food Process Engineering.2005, vol. 28(6): pp. 595-609.
Leadley, C. E. & Williams, A. New Technologies Bulletin No. 14. Campden &
Chorleywood Food Research Association, Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire,
GL55 6LD, UK. 1996.
Ref Type: Generic
Marra, F., Zhang, Lu., & Lyng, J. G. 2009, "Radio frequency treatment of foods:
Review of recent advances", Journal of food engineering, vol. 91, pp. 497-508.
Martin, O., Qin, B. L., Chang, F. J., Barbosa-Canovas, G. V., & Swanson, B. G.
1997, "Inactivation of Escherichia coli in skim milk by high intensity pulsed electric
fields", Journal of Food Process Engineering.1997, vol. 20(4): pp. 317-336.
McDonald, C. J., Lloyd, S. W., Vitale, M. A., Petersson, K., & Innings, F. 2000,
"Effects of pulsed electric fields on microorganisms in orange juice using electric field
strengths of 30 and 50 kV/cm", Journal of Food Science.2000, vol. 65(6): pp. 984-
989.
Mercali, G. D., Jaeschke, D. P., Tessaro, I. C., & Marczak, L. D. F. 2012, "Study of
vitamin C degradation in acerola pulp during ohmic and conventional heat
treatment", LWT -- Food Science and Technology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 91-95.
Michalac, S., Alvarez, V., Ji, T., & Zhang, Q. H. 2003, "Inactivation of selected
microorganisms and properties of pulsed electric field processed milk", Journal of
Food Processing and Preservation.2003, vol. 27(2): pp. 137-151.
Min, S., Jin, Z. T., Min, S. K., Yeom, H., & Zhang, Q. H. 2003, "Commercial-scale
pulsed electric field processing of orange juice", Journal of Food Science.2003, vol.
68(4): pp. 1265-1271.
Min, S., Jin, Z. T., & Zhang, Q. H. 2003, "Commercial scale pulsed electric field
processing of tomato juice", Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.2003, vol.
51(11): pp. 3338-3344.
Mintel 2007, Frozen and Canned Fruit and Vegetables, Market Intelligence, June
2007, Mintel International Group, London.
Nguyen, L.T.; Tay, A.; Balasubramaniam, V.M.; Legan, J.D.; Turek, E.J.; Gupta, R.;
(2010) Evaluating the impact of thermal and pressure treatment in preserving
textural quality of selected foods, Food Science and Technology, vol. 43, pp.525-534
Patterson, M., Linton, M., & Doona, C. J. 2007, "Introduction to high pressure
processing of foods," in High Pressure Processing of Foods, 1st edn, C. J. Doona &
F. E. Feeherry, eds., Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, pp. 1-15.
Rendueles, E., Omer, M. K., Alvseike, O., Alonso-Calleja, C., Capita, R., & Prieto, M.
Microbiological food safety assessment of high hydrostatic pressure processing: a
review. LWT -- Food Science and Technology 44[5], 1251-1260. 2011.
Ref Type: Generic
Ruan, R., Ye, X., & Chen, P. 2004, "Developments in ohmic heating in: Improving
the thermal processing of foods. Richardson P. (Ed) Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
Cambridge UK,".
Simpson, R. K. & Gilmour, A. 1997, "The effect of high hydrostatic pressure on the
activity of intracellular enzymes of Listeria monocytogenes", Letters in Applied
Microbiology.1997, vol. 25(1): pp. 48-53.
Sumnu, G., Sahin, S., & Sevimli, M. 2005, "Microwave, infrared and infrared-
microwave combination baking of cakes", Journal of food engineering, vol. 71, no. 2,
pp. 150-155.
Torregrosa, F.; Cortéz, C.; Esteve, M.J.; Frigola, A. (2005) Effect of high-intensity
pulsed electric fields processing and conventional heat treatment on orange-carrot
juice carotenoids, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 53, pp. 9519-9525
Vikram, V. B., Ramesh, M. N., & Prapulla, S. G. 2005, "Thermal degradation kinetics
of nutrients in orange juice heated by electromagnetic and conventional methods",
Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 31-40.
Van Loey, A.; Ooms, V.; Weemaes, C.; Van den Broeck, I.; Ludikhuyze, L.;
Indrawati; Denys, S.; and Hendrickx, M. (1998) Thermal and pressure-temperature
degradation of chlorophyll in broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. Italica) juice: A kinetic
study, Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, vol. 46, pp. 5289-5294
Weemaes, C.; Ooms, V.; Indrawati, L.; Ludikhuyze,I.; Van den Broeck, I.; Van Loey,
A.; Hendrickx, M. (1999) Pressure-temperature degradation of green colour in
broccoli juice, Journal of Food Science, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 504-508
Wu, Y., Mittal, G. S., & Griffiths, M. W. 2005, "Effects of pulsed electric field on the
inactivation of microorganisms in grape juices with and without antimicrobials",
Biosystems Engineering, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 1-7.
Zabetakis, I.; Leclerc, D.; Kajda, P.; (2000) The effect of high hydrostatic pressure on
the strawberry anthocyanins, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 48, pp. 2749-2754