Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Citations:
-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and
Conditions of the license agreement available at
https://heinonline.org/HOL/License
-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.
-- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your license, please use:
Copyright Information
AcRoss AFRICA, EUROPE, AND LATIN America, a number of women have in recent
times been elected heads of government. More than four decades ago, India's Indira
Gandhi was only the third woman in the world to lead a democratic country. Several
decades earlier, tens of thousands of Indian women had participated in the movement
for independence from imperial rule, many of them going to prison for the cause of
freedom. But in the years following India's independence, it was mainly elite women
who were visible in public life. Even today, there are at least three women leading ma-
jor national political parties. But, for the vast majority of women, the triple burdens 91
of gender, class, caste, and religion, overlaid with the power of patriarchy, make the
constitutional promise of gender equality seem more symbolic than substantive.
The Global Gender Gap Report 2007-a composite index of economic participa-
tion, educational attainment, political empowerment, and health and survival-ranks
India 114th out of 128 countries.' A year earlier, India's ranking on this index was
98th out of 115 countries; even counting only those countries, India's position in 2007
slipped 4 places to 102. This composite ranking places India below its South Asian
neighbors Sri Lanka (at 15th place) and even Bangladesh (at 100th), higher only than
Nepal and Pakistan.
The disaggregated scores in this index are significant. On three of the sub-indexes,
India's ranking is even lower than its ranking of 114th on the composite index. On
economic participation and opportunity for women, for example, Indias ranking is
122th; on educational attainment, it is 116th; and on health and survival, it is positively
abysmal-126th-with only two countries, Azerbaijan and Armenia, below it.
But contrast these with India's ranking on the political empowerment of women:
21st out of 128 countries, higher even than Australia, Canada, and the United States.
NIRAJA GoPAL JAYAL is a professor of law and governance at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi
and is also currently a senior fellow at Nehru Memorial Museum and Library in New Delhi.
Copyright © 2008 by the Brown Journalof Wori Affairs
Granted, India has had its share of female heads of state, and it could be argued that
the index gives too much consideration to countries with female leadership, since
the presence and even the longevity of elite female leadership is no proof of women's
Despite the emergence of India as amajor political participation being either
widespread or robust. Even so, it
economic player on the world stage, its is the case that there is a wide and
poor record of human development reflects puzzling gap between the political
the persistence of pparticipation of Indian women on
fpoverty and inequality, the one hand, and their human
development indicators-that is, the social and economic opportunities available to
them-on the other. It is this gap that this essay seeks to address.
Despite the emergence of India as a major economic player on the world stage, its
poor record of human development reflects the persistence of poverty and inequality.
These inequalities are accentuated in the case of disadvantaged social groups (caste and
tribal), and especially in the situation of women who belong to such groups. The essay
provides some data to illustrate these inequalities before proceeding to a discussion of
state interventions and the political participation of women.
The following are three examples of laws enacted for gender justice and gender equality.
GuaranteedPoliticalRepresentationfor Women
The second example of legal provisions for gender equality is of an enabling law provid-
ing for guaranteed political representation for women. Fifteen years ago, in December
1992, a quite revolutionary constitutional amendment was enacted by India's parliament
that mandated the creation of institutions of rural local governance (three tiers at the
sub-state level), with regularly-elected representatives. The amendment also provided
for one-third guaranteed representation for women at every level of these institutions,
already to recognize it squarely and for the first time. This recognition may presently be
confined to an awareness of powerlessness in the public sphere, but it cannot be long
before their powerlessness within the home also comes to be recognized.
All three cases that we have briefly surveyed testify to the power of patriarchy. The Shah
Bano case and the law enacted in its aftermath suggest a convergence between the state
and the cultural community, which both privilege patriarchal norms. Likewise, the
continuing practice of female feticide-notwithstanding a stringent law to curb it-and
the attempts to undermine the political participation of elected women representatives
in the institutions of local governance testify to the powerful role of patriarchal ideology
and culture. This is why the quota for women in panchayat institutions yields relatively
superior outcomes in regions where patriarchy is less entrenched-for instance, in hill
regions where women-headed households are more common because of male migra-
tion to the plains in search of employment. States in which women are more educated
and have greater autonomy, and are consequently less likely to internalize patriarchal
ideology, would seem to be the areas in which female feticide is less frequently practiced.
For women belonging to disadvantaged social groups, the overlap of class, gender, and
social exclusion places on them multiple burdens that accentuate the gender gap.
We know that the political capacities of states depend, at least partially, on the
support and cooperation of societal forces. Scholarship on state-society relations in
the field of industrial development, for instance, has shown that state interventions are
23 101
more likely to work when there is a synergy between political and economic power.
The ineffectual nature of some state interventions that we have surveyed here points
to structural inequalities in society-supported by the entrenchment and resilience of
patriarchal ideology-which resist the project of gender equality. It is clear that neither
legal nor institutional reform by itself can accomplish greater gender justice or equality.
The undermining of patriarchal values would appear to be a necessary condition for
this, which is a project that can only emanate from society rather than the state. This
is a task for the women's movement-to unify women's interests qua women, rather
than as members of this or that identity-group. V
Nomi
1. Ricardo Hausmann, Laura D. Tyson, and Saadia Zahidi, The Global Gender Gap Report2007(Geneva:
World Economic Forum, 2007).
2. Niraja G. Jayal, RepresentingIndia:Ethnic Diversityand the GovernanceofPublicInstitutions (London:
Palgrave MacMillan with UNRISD, 2006), ch. 2.
3. This figure is from a 2006 survey by the Registrar General of India. If we look at the data in the 2007
UNDP HDR, we find two figures for maternal mortality: the higher figure reported and the lower one
adjusted. In the latter, the MMR for India is 450 per 100,000 live births, while the comparable rates for
the United Kingdom and the United States are 8 and 11, respectively. It is worth remembering that, ac-
cording to the UNFPA, 99 percent of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries. (United Nations
Population Fund, State ofthe World Population Report, 2005).