You are on page 1of 31

Republic of the Philippines

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT


National Capital Judicial Region
Branch 46
Manila City

HINATA CORPUS and BORUTO Civil Case No.


CORPUS, Plaintiff, For:Recovery of Ownership
and Possession of Land

- vs -
SAKURA CORPUS, HEIRS OF
SASUKE CORPUS and ITACHI
CORPUS,
Defendants.

x---------------------------------------------x

JOINT ANSWER WITH COUNTERCLAIM

The “Defendants” Sakura Corpus, Heirs of Sasuke A.


Corpus, and Itachi D. Corpus, by counsel ATTY.
_________________, respectfully state that:

I. THE ADMISSIONS AND DENIALS


1. That, the defendant, SAKURA CORPUS, is of legal
age, filipino, widow (married to NARUTO CORPUS)
and with residence at No. 526 España Blvd.,
Manila, Manila, a copy of the marriage certificate is
hereto attached as Annex 1.

2. That, the defendants, heirs are all of legal age,


filipino, single, and with residence at No. 526
España Blvd., Manila, are the illegitimate heirs of
Naruto, a copy of the Birth Certificates are hereto
attached as Annex 2.
3. That, the herein defendants, all are being
represented by ATTY. Christine H. Fresnoza, who
is of legal age, filipino, single and a partner of the
law firm of the CCFV, by virtue of a Special Power of
Attorney (SPA), a copy of which is hereto attached
as Annex 3. Defendants, through their
representative, ,may be served with summons,
orders, notices and other court processes that the
Honorable Court may issue.

4. That, the defendants deny the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 1, that it did not
established the current relationship of HINATA
CORPUS with NARUTO CORPUS.

5. That, the defendants admit the allegations under


paragraph 1 in the complaint as to the age and
residence of BORUTO CORPUS, herein referred to
as “Boruto”.

6. That, the defendants admit the subject matter of the


instant case is the same parcel of land as
mentioned and described in the complaint under
paragraph 2 with Transfer Certificate of Title
(TCT) No. 12345 appearing said name of heirs of
SAKURA CORPUS and NARUTO CORPUS, hereto
attached the TCT of the subject matter parcel of
land, Annex 4.

7. That, the defendants admits the allegations in the


complaint as to the age and residence of defendants
as under paragraph 4.
8. That, the defendants admit the allegations in the
complaint under paragraph 5, that NARUTO
CORPUS was originally married to the plaintiff
HINATA CORPUS, but after several years NARUTO
CORPUS contracted another marriage with
SAKURA CORPUS; after the previous marriage was
dissolved, and hereto attached the declaration of
nullity of marriage between NARUTO CORPUS and
HINATA CORPUS as Annex 5, and the marriage
certificate of spouses NARUTO CORPUS and
SAKURA CORPUS as herein annexed.

9. That, the defendant admits the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 6, that Boruto is a
legitimate son of NARUTO CORPUS in his first
marriage.

10. That, the defendants deny the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 7 that HINATA
CORPUS was not engaged in the business of
NARUTO CORPUS and that KURAMA DELA CRUZ
(herein referred to as “Kurama”) assisted in the
management of the business with NARUTO
CORPUS and not HINATA CORPUS.

11. That, the defendants admit the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 8, that NARUTO
CORPUS had an illicit relationship with Kurama,
bore four (4) children illegitimate children all
surnamed Corpus. Later, HINATA CORPUS
with Boruto left the country and NARUTO
CORPUS after the discovery of said illicit
relationship.
12.That, defendants deny the allegations in the
complaint under paragraph 9, that the subject
parcel of land in the instant case, also described
therein in the complaint was acquired using the
conjugal property/ funds of the original marriage.
It is because as earlier discussed that suchproperty
regime would no longer exist after the declaration
of the nullity of marriage between NARUTO
CORPUS and HINATA CORPUS.

13. That, defendants deny the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 10, that there was a
intended donation inter vivos of a real property
that NARUTO CORPUS had made in favor of
Kurama. Instead, defendants admit that on
1989 there was a sale of the parcel of land, such
parcel of land being the subject matter of the
instant case, made in favor of Kurama such
transactions is with
evidence of a deed of sale attached hereto said
Deed of Absolute Sale as Annex 6.

14.That, the defendant deny the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 11, that SAKURA
CORPUS had an illicit relationship with NARUTO
CORPUS, it is because the two were married to each
other in 1990, when HINATA CORPUS and
NARUTO CORPUS marriage was already declared
by the court annulled and their property regime as
well was already dissolved, attached hereto the
Marriage Contract Certificate of SAKURA CORPUS
and NARUTO CORPUS herein annexed.
15.That, defendant admit and alleges that Kurama is a
degree holder and that she was employed by
NARUTO CORPUS where she received her salaries
from 1970-2005 as reflected in her Income Tax
Return, attached hereto said Income Tax Return of
Kurama as Annex 7.

16.That, the defendants admit the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 12, that NARUTO
CORPUS died on February 13, 2005. Leaving no will
and debts. And the attachment of the Death
Certificate in the complaint.

17.That, the defendants deny the allegations in


complaint under paragraph 12, that the Special
Power of Attorney executed and granted by
NARUTO CORPUS to his son Boruto, is enforceable
or has force and effect because the principal and
who executed such, NARUTO CORPUS is already
dead.

18.That, the defendants admit the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 13, that upon the death
of NARUTO CORPUS he left several properties
including the subject matter of this case the parcel
of land in España, now held by SAKURA CORPUS
and heirs of NARUTO CORPUS being the true
owner of said parcel of land, attached hereto the
Transfer Certificate Title as evidence, herein
annexed.

19.That, defendants deny the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 14; that Boruto only
discovered that the property was sold to Kurama
when NARUTO CORPUS died, it is because when
HINATA CORPUS and Boruto left the country they
already knew that NARUTO CORPUS and Kurama
had an illicit relationship and by that time they
already occupied the subject property.

20.That, defendants deny the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 15, that the plaintiff is
the true and lawful owner of the subject matter
parcel of land it is because such is already
transferred to Kurama for over 30 years, and has
been transferred to herein defendants.

21.That, defendants admit the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 16 and 17, that plaintiff
made several demands to the defendants to vacate
the said property to their prejudice and
embarrassment.

22.That, defendants admit the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 18 and 19, that the
plaintiff instituted its complaint on said date for the
reason that the Barangay Conciliation advised such
for the resolution of this case.

23.That, defendants admit the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 20, that plaintiffs seeks
to recover the ownership and possession of the
subject real property, nevertheless, deny that said
property is acquired using conjugal funds of
NARUTO CORPUS and HINATA CORPUS.

24.That, defendants deny the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 21, that plaintiffs have
been denied of all beneficial use of the subject
matter parcel of land. Futhermore, defendants
would not pay the said any reasonable rental fees.

25. That, defendants deny the allegations in the


complaint under paragraph 22, 23, and 24, that the
plaintiffs could have suffered those mentioned in
the complaint having no right to the reliefs they
sought to obtain in this case. As well as, they are
not entitled to other kinds of damages they sought
for as a relief.

II. SPECIAL AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES


1. The original marriage between NARUTO CORPUS and
HINATA CORPUS was already dissolved even before
he contracted his marriage with SAKURA CORPUS,
nevertheless, said marriage was contracted after
NARUTO CORPUS had obtained the finality and
declaration of annulment of marriage of NARUTO
CORPUS and HINATA CORPUS. (see Annex 1)

2. Defendants allege that the Special Power is no longer


enforceable since the Special Power of Attorney does
not generally survive death of the principal. Article
1931 of the Civil Code provides that, an act done by
the agent after the death of his principal is valid and
effective only under two conditions, viz: (1) that the
agent acted without knowledge of the death of the
principal and (2) that the third person who contracted
with the agent himself acted in good faith. Good faith
here means that the third person was not aware of the
death of the principal at the time he contracted with
said agent. These two requisites must concur the
absence of one will render the act of the agent invalid
and unenforceable. There was no showing that plaintiff
had no knowledge of the death of Naruto therefore the
Special Power of Attorney no longer enforceable.

3. The title to and ownership over the subject property is


in the name of Defendants SAKURA CORPUS, HEIRS
OF SASUKE CORPUS and ITACHI CORPUS, its
registered owners, and not the plaintiff HINATA
CORPUS. (See Annex 4).

4. The plaintiffs are not “the owners” of the subject


property, contrary to their allegation in the Complaint.

5. Defendants allege that the subject land was acquired


by Naruto and Kurama after his marriage with Hinata
was dissolved. (See Annexes 1, 5 and 6).

6. Defendants allege that Kurama acquired the subject


land as rightful with sufficient consideration and
corresponding transfer taxes through a valid sale from
using her accumulated salaries resulting to the
issuance of her title over the land. (See 7).

7. Defendants allege that the previous title over the land


was canceled and has been transferred in the name of
Kurama, since 1989. (See Annex 9)

8. Defendants allege that Kurama possessed the subject


land and paid for the annual property taxes for more
than thirty years. (See Annex 7)

9. Defendants allege that Kurama died intestate without


debts on June 7, 2003, leaving the subject property to
Naruto and other legal heirs. (See Annex 8)
10. Defendants allege that they acquired the subject
property through the execution of an extrajudicial
over Kurama’s property, when Naruto died in 2005.
(See Annexes 8)

11. Defendants allege that plaintiffs have no cause of


action since they did not properly allege and prove that
there was a subsisting marriage between Hinata and
Naruto.

12. Defendants allege that plaintiffs have no cause of


action over the alleged donation due to payment of a
sufficient consideration thereby effecting a valid sale.
Assuming arguendo that there was indeed a
fraudulent donation the plaintiff still has no cause of
action since right to recover the property has already
prescribed. It has been held that an action to annul an
extrajudicial settlement upon the ground of fraud
should be filed within four (4) years from the discovery
of the fraud (Gerona vs. de Guzman, L-19060, May 29,
1964, 11 SCRA 153). An action to annul a contract of
sale for lack of consideration also prescribes in 10
years (Cunanan vs. De Antepasado L-16169, August
31, 1962, 5 SCRA 1028). Either on the ground of fraud
or for lack of consideration (even donation is deemed
to have also cause or consideration), the annulment of
the donation as is sought in the present action is
barred by prescription, on the authority of the
aforecited cases — within 4 years from the discovery of
the fraud, if such is alleged, 10 years, if no fraud is
alleged.

III. COUNTERCLAIM
1. By reason of the abuse of right committed by the
plaintiff and by reason of the instant precipitate
and unfounded suit, the defendants were
constrained to hire the services of a lawyer to
defend their rights and interests for a professional
fee of P60,000.00 plus P9,000.00 per court
appearance.

2. Similarly, the plaintiff’s unfounded suit has caused


defendants mental anguish and suffering and
public humiliation and embarrassment, for which
the defendant claims moral damages of
P300,000.00.

PRAYERS
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is
respectfully prayed that Special Power of Attorney as
stated in Complaint in favor of Boruto be removed for
being immaterial to the case, that the parties be given
ample time to reach an amicable settlement before the
Manila City Mediation Center; and that in case of a
failure thereof, and after trial, the complaint be
dismissed for lack of merit and the defendant’s
compulsory counterclaim be granted, attorney’s fees of
P60,000.00 plus moral damages of P300,000.00, plus
costs of suit.

The defendant respectfully prays for such and other


reliefs as may be deemed just and equitable in the
premises.

City Of Manila, 11th of November 2019.

CCFV LAW OFFICE


Counsel for Defendant
Unit 777 University Mall
Taft Avenue, Manila
   
Sgd. Atty. Christine H. Fresnoza
Roll of Attorneys No. 301884
IBP No. 3349-1788/01/15/19/Manila
PTR No. 2255598/01/13/19/Manila
MCLE Compliance No. V-0734728/25 December 2021

VERIFICATION/CERTIFICATION OF FORUM SHOPPING

Republic of the Philippines)


City of Manila                     ) S.S.

         We, Sakura Corpus, Heirs of Sasuke Corpus, and Itachi


Corpus, all of legal age, all Filipino citizens, all single and residents
of No. 526 España Blvd., Manila, after having been duly sworn to in
accordance with law do hereby depose and say:
1. That we are the defendants in the above-entitled case;
2. That we have caused the preparation of the foregoing
complaint and have read the allegations contained therein;
3. The allegations in the said complaint are true and correct of
our own knowledge and authentic records;
4. WE hereby certify that we have not commenced any other
action or proceeding involving the same issues in any court,
tribunal or quasi-judicial agency and, to the best of my knowledge,
no such other action or claim is pending therein;
5. That if we should learn thereafter that a similar action or
proceeding has been filed or is pending, we hereby undertake to
report that fact within five (5) days therefrom to the court or agency
where the original pleading and sworn certification contemplated
herein have been filed;
6. WE executed this verification/certification to attest to the
truth of the foregoing facts and to comply with the provisions of
Adm. Circular No. 04-94 of the Honorable Supreme Court.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto affixed my


signature this 11th of November 2019, in the City of Manila.

Sgd. Sakura Corpus Sgd. Heirs of Sasuke Corpus


Affiant Affiant
Sgd. Itachi Corpus
Affiant

                                                                                                 
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 8 th day of April, 2019,
in the City of Manila the following: Sakura Corpus, Heirs of Sasuke
Corpus, and Itachi Corpus exhibiting to me their Passport No.
3356-98-H5, Passport No. 3356-88-H7, and Passport No. 3356-78-
H9 respectively, all issued by the Department of Foreign Affairs on
January 18, 2017 at the City of Manila.

Sgd. ATTY. JUSTINE BLANCHE VERA CRUZ


NOTARY PUBLIC
Roll of Attorneys No. 1234567
IBP No. 045790/1 June 2017/Manila
PTR No. 240999/12 November 2017/Manila
MCLE Compliance No. V-1234567/8 December 2021

Doc. No. 500


Page No. 53
Book No. 8
Series of 2019.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

QUEZON CITY

Registry of Deeds for Manila

OWNER’S DUPLICATE OWNER’S DUPLICATE OWNER’S DUPLICATE OWNER’S DUPLICATE

No. 060-20185678906
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that certain land situated in 526 ESPAÑA
BLVD., MANILA, bounded and described as follows:
A PARCEL OF LAND (LOT 20 BLK 54 OF CONSOLIDATION
SUBDIVISION PLAN (LRC) PCS-13265, BEING A PORTION OF THE
CONSOLIDATION OF LOTS 4751-A AND 4751-B (LRC) PSD-50533, LOT
3, PSD-100703, LOT 1, PSD- 150980, LRC REC. NOS. NOS. N-27024,
51768, 89632, N-11782, N-13466, AND 21071 SITUATED IN THE
ESPAÑA, MANILA. BOUNDED ON NE., POINT 1 TO 2 BY ROAD LOT 22,
ON 4751-A AND 4751-B (LRC) PSD-505333; BOUNDED ON SE., POINT
3 TO 4, ON LOT 3, PSD-100703 AND LOT 1, PSD- 150980, LRC REC.
NOS. 27024, 51768, 89632, N-11782, N-13466 and 21071 TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING AN AREA OF (200) SQUARE METERS
MORE OR LESS...”

is registered in accordance with the provision of the Property Registration


decree in the name of

Owner: KURAMA DELA CRUZ, SINGLE, FILIPINO, OF LEGAL AGE


Address: 819 M. Dela Fuente St., Sampaloc Manila

As owner thereof in fee simple, subject to such of the encumbrances


mentioned in Section 44 of said Decree as may be subsisting.

IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that said land was originally registered as follows:


Case No.: 1678 Record No.: N-45679
Orig. Reg. Date: 03 10 2001 Decree No.: N-09866
Original RD: MANILA OCT No.: OCT-9987
Volume No.: A-53 Page No.: 44
Original Owner:

This certificate is a transfer from TRANSFER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 12345


which is/are cancelled by virtue hereof in so far as the above-described land is
concerned.
Entered at Manila City, Philippines on the 10th day of JULY 2018 at 03:28pm.

JOJO A. BAUTISTA
Acting Register of Deeds
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
National Capital Judicial Region
Branch 123, City of Manila

NARUTO CORPUS
Petitioner

-versus- CIVIL CASE NO. R-MNL-84-00305-CV

HINATA CORPUS
Respondent
x---------------------------------------------------------x

CERTIFICATE OF FINALITY

This is to certify that on February 21, 1985, a Decision was rendered in the abovementioned
case, the dispositive portion of which reads as follows:

“WHEREFORE, the petition is hereby GRANTED. Judgment is hereby rendered as


follows:

1. DECLARING the marriage of NARUTO CORPUS and HINATA CORPUS


celebrated in the City of Manila on May 7, 1970, NULL AND VOID ab initio.
2. ORDERING the Office of the Civil Registrar of the City of Manila and the
Philippine Statistics Office to cancel the marriage contract of the parties from
their respective Book of Marriages and Records, upon finality of this Decision,
as the same is void and of no legal effect.

SO ORDERED.
City of Manila. 21 February 1985

HON. PEDRO MORALES


Presiding Judge

and the same has, on March 8, 1985, become FINAL and EXECUTORY.

City of Manila. March 15, 1985

ATTY. MA. LORENA VILLANUEVA


Branch Clerk of Court

DEED OF ABSOLUTE SALE


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

HANAMICHI SAKURAGI, Filipino, of legal age, married to and with


residence MIMIYUUUH SAKURAGI and postal address at Zone 041 Padre
Noval St. Sampaloc, Manila, hereinafter referred to as the SELLER

-AND-

KURAMA DELA CRUZ and NARUTO CORPUS, Filipino and with


residence and postal address at 819 M. Dela Fuente St., Sampaloc Manila,
hereinafter referred to as the BUYER.

WITNESSETH;

WHEREAS, the SELLER is the registered owner of a parcel of land with


improvements located at 526 España Blvd., Manila and covered by Transfer
Certificate of Title No. 12345 containing a total area of TWO HUNDRED (200)
SQUARE METERS, more or less, and more particularly described as follows:

TRANSFER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 12345

“A PARCEL OF LAND (Lot 20 Blk 54 of consolidation subdivision plan


(LRC) Pcs-13265, being a portion of the consolidation of Lots 4751-A and 4751-B
(LRC) Psd-50533, Lot 3, Psd-100703, Lot 1, Psd- 150980, LRC Rec. Nos. Nos. N-
27024, 51768, 89632, N-11782, N-13466, and 21071 situated in the
España,Manila. Bounded on NE., point 1 to 2 by Road Lot 22, on 4751-A and
4751-B (LRC) Psd-505333; Bounded on SE., point 3 to 4, on Lot 3, Psd-100703
and Lot 1, Psd- 150980, LRC Rec. Nos. 27024, 51768, 89632, N-11782, N-13466
and 21071 to the point of beginning; containing an area of (200) square meters
more or less...”;

WHEREAS, the BUYER has offered to buy and the SELLER has agreed
to sell the above-mentioned property for the amount of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY
THOUSAND PESOS (P250,000) Philippine Currency;

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of TWO


HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND PESOS (P250,000.00) Philippine Currency,
hand paid by the vendee to the vendor, the SELLER DO HEREBY SELL,
TRANSFER, and CONVEY by way of Absolute Sale unto the said BUYER, his
heirs and assigns, the certain parcel of land together with all the improvements
found thereon, free from all liens and encumbrances of whatever nature including
real estate taxes as of the date of this sale.

______________________ ______________________
Name of the Seller Name of the Buyer

SIGNED IN THE PRESENCE OF:


______________________________ ___________________________

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES)


CITY OF MANILA ) S.S.

BEFORE ME, this 5th day of July 1989 in the city of Manila, personally
appeared:

Name  Competent Evidence of Identity Place and Date of


Issue

HANAMICHI SAKURAGI Passport No. P98765 Manila/ Jan. 28,


1985
KURAMA DELA CRUZ Passport No. EC78629 Manila/ July 29,
1983
NARUTO CORPUS SSS No. 08937593 Manila/ Sept. 17,
1987

known to me to be the same persons who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that the same are their free act and deed.

This instrument, consisting of two (2) pages, including the page on which
this acknowledgment is written, has been signed on the left margin of each and
every page thereof by the concerned parties and their witnesses, and sealed with
my notarial seal.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand on the date and


place above written.

NOTARY PUBLIC

Doc. No. ____ 
Page No. ____
Book No. ____
Series of 1989.
EXTRAJUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

This Deed of Extrajudicial Settlement of Estate (“Deed”), made and


entered into by and between:

SAKURA LIM-CORPUS and SASUKE CORPUS, ITACHI CORPUS


CARAM CORPUS AND DAICHI CORPUS all of legal age, Filipino and resident
of No. 526 España Blvd., Manila , herein referred to as the HEIRS;

WITNESSETH :

That the above-named HEIRS are the only surviving and lawful heirs of
KURAMA DELA CRUZ, who died intestate on January 9, 2003;

That the deceased at the time of her death left certain personal
properties and one real property (“Estate”) hereto attached as Annex “A” and
made an integral part of this Deed;

That there are no known debts or obligations due against the estate of
the said decedent;

That, it is to the very best interest of the parties hereto to adjudicate


unto themselves the entire estate extrajudicially in the form and manner
hereinafter set forth;

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises


and invoking the provision of Sec. 1 Rule 74 of the Rules of Court, the said
HEIRS above named have agreed to settle the estate extrajudicially and to this
effect do hereby partition and adjudicate the same unto themselves and the
foregoing inheritance, subject however to the liabilities imposed by Sec. 4, Rule
74 of the Rules of Court for a period of two years in favor of any other possible
heirs, creditors or any other person deprived of the lawful participation over the
said estate of the deceased and encumbrances;

The parties agree to publish this instrument in a newspaper of general


circulation in the City of Manila once a week for three consecutive weeks.

In the remote event that any other property of the decedent should ever
be found which is not included hereinabove, the HEIRS hereto further agree as
they do so agree to settle and distribute the same in like manner and
proportion as herein established and disposed.

That the HEIRS hereby covenant and further warrant that should there
be preterition or omission of one, some, or all of the compulsory heirs in the
direct line, whether living or not at the time of the execution of this Deed, will
not invalidate/nullify the terms and conditions of this Deed. Instead, the
HEIRS shall proportionately oblige themselves to pay to the omitted Heirs or
the latters’ heir(s) the share which belongs to him/them, in accordance with
the rules of succession under the Civil Code of the Philippines.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affix my signature this April 1


day of 2003, at City the of Manila, Metro, Manila, Philippines.
SAKURA LIM-CORPUS SASUKE CORPUS
Affiant-Heir Affiant-Heir

ITACHI CORPUS CARAM CORPUS


Affiant-Heir Affiant-Heir

DAICHI CORPUS
Affiant-Heir

SIGNED IN THE PRESENCE OF:

__________________________ _________________________

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Republic of the Philippines}


City of Manila }

BEFORE ME this 12th day of April 2003 at Manila City, Philippines,


personally appeared the following persons, who are identified by me through
competent evidence of identity:

Sakura Corpus, Sasuke Corpus, Daichi Corpus, Caram Corpus and Itachi
Corpus exhibiting to me their Passport No. 3356-98-H5, Passport No. 3356-88-
H7, and Passport No. 3356-78-H9, Passport No.3342-45-H6, Passport No.
5564-54-H8 , respectively, all issued by the Department of Foreign Affairs on
January 18, 2017 at the City of Manila.

known to me and to me made known to be the same persons who executed the
foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the same is their own free
voluntary act and deed.

This instrument refers to a Deed of Extrajudicial Settlement of Estate of


consisting of three (3) pages including this page on which the acknowledgment
is written and duly signed by the parties and their instrumental witnesses.

WITNESS MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL on the date and place first
above written.

Sgd. Florena M. Cayunda


Notary Public
My Commission Expires Dec. 31, 2020
Roll of Attorney No. 10101-1111
IBP No. 273456-798/Manila/03/05/19
PTR No. 3062456-798/Manila/03/05/19
MCLE No. 6956-798/Manila/05/05/17

DOC NO. 56;


PAGE NO. 3;
BOOK NO. 1;
SERIES of 2003.

ANNEX A

SCHEDULE OF PROPERTIES

A. Personal Properties:

Stockholder’s Name Stock Cert. Nos. of Name of Company


# Shares

B. Other Properties
1. Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. 12345

You might also like