Professional Documents
Culture Documents
– M7
Legal Technique Saturday 8:00-10:00
Homework No. 2
May 30, 2020
Ronald Diez,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL CASE No. 112717
- versus - FOR: Sum of Money with Interest
Arnold Cuatro,
Defendant.
x-----------------------------------x
ANSWER
4. That he DENIES paragraphs 6 and 7, and that he has not received any
demand – oral or written – from the plaintiff to exact payment and that
the former has not refused any such alleged demand.
1. That upon maturity date, without having received any demand, but only
in consideration of the Promissory Note, he went to plaintiff’s house to
pay but nobody was there to receive the payment; and
2. That he, upon trying to contact plaintiff but to no avail, has sent a letter
to the plaintiff that he has decided to consign his payment to the court
and that after the consignation, has notified the plaintiff of such fact.
COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM
2. By reason of this petition, the defendant was forced to hire the services of
a lawyer to defend his rights and interests as a debtor for a professional
fee of Twenty-five Thousand Pesos (PhP 25,000.00) and Two Thousand
Pesos (PhP 2,000.00) per court appearances;
COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM
Other relief and remedies as may be deemed just and equitable under the
premises are likewise prayed for.
Arnold Cuatro
Affiant
TIN 12345-009, Cebu City
Doc No. 5;
Page No. 2;
Book No.1;
Series of 2020.