You are on page 1of 14

SASTRA DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY

(A University under section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956)

BCSCCS708 / BITCIT707 / BICCIC707- MINI PROJECT

Mini Project Guidelines

B. Tech. (CSE / IT / ICT)

School of Computing
SASTRA Deemed to be University
TIRUMALAISAMUDRAM
THANJAVUR — 613 401
TAMIL NADU, INDIA
Project Guidelines

General Instructions

1. Registration Process
a. Registration process starts in the month of July.
b. Project can be carried out either individually or in a group with maximum of
three members.
c. Students have to select the guide based on the area of interest with
consent of faculty and furnish the details in the “Guide form” available
with the faculties.
d. Students have to submit the hardcopy of the “Guide form”, duly signed by
the student(s) and the project guide to the project committee.
e. Abstract of the project has to be drafted as per the guide lines given in
Annexure-A after discussions with the project guide.
f. Hard copy of the abstract and base paper duly signed by the project guide,
need to be submitted to the project committee.

2. Review process for Mini Project


a. There will be two internal reviews conducted for the mini projects by an
expert review panel at SoC for the award of CIA marks.
b. The tentative review dates are given below:
Tentative review dates:
Zeroth Review : July (first week)
First Review Phase I : July (last week)
First review Phase II : August (last week)
Second Review : October (first week)

MARKS ALLOCATION FOR REVIEWS AND PRESENTAION

Review Panel Guide


Evaluation Criteria
Number Mark Mark
Literature survey and work plan for
Review 0 0 0
the existing problem statement
Review 1 - Work plan with detailed algorithm/
10
Phase I methodology of the existing system
5
Review 1 - Partial implementation of the existing
10
Phase II work (at least 50% )
2
Completion of the existing work
Review 2
( 100% ) 15 10

Total Internal mark 50

3. Final viva-voce and Evaluation


a. All students have to bring a project report as per the guidelines given in the
Annexure-B for the final viva-voce.

b. The tentative viva-voce date and mark allocations are given below:

viva-voce date : 18.11.2019

MARKS ALLOCATION FOR VIVA-VOCE

Sl.No Documents for project presentation Max. marks


Viva-voce
1 Objectives and Methodology 15
2 Results and Discussion 15
3 Project report 10
4 Individual performance and contribution 10
Total 50

3
Team No: <available in portal>

Reg.No - Name – Programme

SYNOPSIS

<Title of the Project>

Details about project (one page)

Guide Name with Designation:


Signature with Date:

4
Annexure-B

GUIDELINES TO PREPARE B.Tech. MINI PROJECT REPORT

PARTS OF B.Tech. MINI PROJECT REPORT

1 Cover page Refer Annexure 1.

2 Inside cover page Same as cover page

3. Bonafide Certificate Refer Annexure 2

4 Acknowledgements Not to exceed one page

5 Abstract Refer Annexure 3 (Not to exceed one pages (about


150 words) and should contain no more than six
keywords.)

6 Table of contents Refer Annexure 4

7 References Refer Annexure 5

* No. of report copies to be


No. of students in the group + 1
submitted (soft bound)

5
STYLE NOTES FOR PROJECT REPORT PREPARATION

Use A4 (210 mm x 297 mm) bond unruled paper (80 gsm) for all copies submitted.
Use one side of the page for all printed/typed matter.

Numbering
Pages

Every page in the Project report, except the title page, must be accounted for the page
numbering, starting from acknowledgements and till the beginning of the introductory
Chapter, should be printed in small Roman numbers, i.e., i, ii, iii, iv, etc,

All printed page numbers should be located at the bottom centre of the page, 17 mm
(2/3”) from the bottom edge, using normal print.

Chapter

Use only Arabic numerals. Chapter numbering should be centre on the top of the page
using large bold print.

Example: CHAPTER 1

Sections

Use only Arabic numerals with decimals. Section numbering should be leftjustified
using bold print.

Example:
1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc.

TEXT

Colour: Black print


Font:

Regular text - Times New Roman 12 pts., and normal print.


CHAPTER Time New Roman 14 pts. andbold print and all
HEADINGS capitals.
SECTION Time New Roman 12 pts. and bold print and all
HEADINGS capitals.
Subsection Headings Time New Roman 12 pts. and bold print and
leading capitals, i.e., only first letter in each word
6
to be the capital.
Special Text Italics/Superscript/Subscript/Special symbol, etc,
as per necessity. Special text may include
footnotes, endnotes, physical or chemical
symbols, mathematical notations, etc.

References Same font as regular text. Serial number and all


authors names to be in bold print. Journal names
and book titles in italics. For format see Annexure
5.

Use double spacing between the lines.


Spacing: Use triple spacing between paragraphs.

All paragraphs in the project report should be left justified


completely, from the first line the last line.

Use double spacing between the regular text and quotations.

Provide three spaces between:

(a) Chapter title and first sentence of a Chapter.


(b) Last line of a section / sub-section and the title of the next section/ sub-section.
(c) Paragraphs

Use single spacing:

(a) In footnotes and endnotes for text,


(b) In explanatory notes for tables and figures.
(c) In text corresponding to bullets, listings, and quotations in the main body of the
thesis.
Refer Annexure 8 for examples.
Use single space in references and double space between references.

Justification: The text should be fully justified.

Hyphenation should be avoided as far as possible.

Text corresponding to bullets and listings should be indented.

Quotations from other research work must be indented on the left and theright
if they are longer than two lines. Shorter quotations can be included as a part
of the regular text.

Windows & At the bottom of a page, a paragraph should have atleast two lines.
Orphans: Similarly, at the top of a page, a paragraph should end with atleast two
lines.

MARGINS
7
The margins for the regular text are as follows:

LEFT = 1.25”
RIGHT = 1”
TOP = 1”
BOTTOM = 1”

Please note that the bottom of the page numbers should be 17 mm above the bottom edge of
the numbered pages.

REFERENCES

Use only Arabic numerals. Serial numbering. Alphabetical order of surname or last
name of the first author.

Two or more references by same author(s) in the same year should be indicated by
small case alphabets in italics.
For papers by one author:
<S.No.> P. F. Thomson (2001) Development of microstructure and texture during
high temperature equal channel angular extrusion of aluminium. Journal of Materials
Processing Technology, 117, 169-177

For papers by two authors:


<S.No.>Cockcroft, M., G., D.J. Latham (1968) Ductility and workability of metals
Journal of the Institute of Metals, 96, 33-39.

For papers by more than two authors:


<S.No.> Balyanov, A., J. Kutnyakova and Y.T. Zhu(2004) Corrosion resistance of
ultrafine grained Ti. Scripta Materialia, 51, 225-229.

<S.No> Berbon, P.B., M. Furukawa, Z. Horita, M. Nemoto, and T.G. Langdon


(1999) Influence of pressing speed on microstructural development in equal channel
angular pressing. Metallurgical and Material Transactions A, 30, 1989-1997.

Note: Indicate the names of all authors, if feasible, and avoid the use of et al (to
indicate the presence of two or more co-authors) after the first author’s name.
For books:
<S.No.>Dieter,G. E., (1981) Mechanical metallurgy

For papers presented at Conferences:


<S.No.>Young. E.F. and H.L. Miller (2009) “Old biotechnology to new bio-
technology: Continuum or disjunction?” Proceedings of International Biosymposium
for Advancement of Biotechnology, Tokyo, October, 6-85.

Refer Annexure 5

8
ANNEXURE 1

MINI PROJECT REPORT ON

<TITLE OF THE MINI PROJECT>

Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for


the award of the degree of

BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
Submitted by

<Register Number> - <Name> - <Programme>


<Register Number> - <Name> - <Programme>
<Register Number> - <Name> - <Programme>

Under the Guidance of

<GUIDE NAME>
<Designation>

School of Computing
SASTRA DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY
(A University established under section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956)
Tirumalaisamudram
Thanjavur - 613401

November (2019)

9
ANNEXURE 2

SHANMUGHA
ARTS, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH ACADEMY
(SASTRA DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY)
(A University Established under section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956)
TIRUMALAISAMUDRAM, THANJAVUR – 613401

BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
Certified that this project work entitled “<TITLE OF THE MINI PROJECT>” submitted
to the Shanmugha Arts, Science, Technology & Research Academy (SASTRA Deemed to be
University), Tirumalaisamudram - 613401 by <Student name1 (Reg.no),
Programme>[,<Student name2 (Reg.no), Programme>][,<Student name3 (Reg.No),

Programme>] in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY in their respective programme. This work is an original
and independent work carried out under my guidance, during the period June 2019 -
November 2019.

<SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE>
<NAME OF THE GUIDE> ASSOCIATE DEAN
SCHOOL OF COMPUTING

Submitted for Project Viva Voce held on___________________

Examiner -I Examiner-II
10
ANNEXURE 3

ABSTRACT

More users prefer to post their reviews for the products for sharing their opinions. These
reviews play a vital role in helping other consumers to buy products. There is a higher chance
of getting fake reviews for either promoting or demoting a particular product or brand. Hence
detection of fake reviews is necessary.

In order to detect fake reviews, suspicious time interval of occurrence of fake reviews is
determined using algorithm. The reviews obtained at this time interval is very large. And all
the reviews at this time interval will not be fake as review count may increase due to seasonal
sale. To extract fake reviews among them detection metrics are applied. After detecting the
suspicious time interval, the detection metrics like context similarity, author's activeness,
author's rating behaviour are used. Including these detection metrics review attributes like
reviewer ID, date, product name are used. The spam score value of the reviewer is used for
detecting spammers. This helps in detecting fake reviews with more accuracy and provides
valid reviews for consumers for purchasing a product.

KEY WORDS: Fake Review, Spam, Suspicious interval detection

11
ANNEXURE 4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………….…………………………………...………………. (iii)

ABSTRACT…………………………………………………… ……………..……………(iv)

CHAPTER 1 CONTENTS OF THE BASE PAPER.…………………………….…….…(1)

CHAPTER 2 MERITS AND DEMERITS OF THE BASE PAPER ……………………..(4)

CHAPTER 3 SOURCE CODE…………………………………………………………...(7)

CHAPTER 4 SNAPSHOTS…..…….……………………………………….….…….…(32)

CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PLANS ………..……………….……...(40)

CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES…………………………….…………………………….... (55)

12
CONTENTS OF THE BASE PAPER(Maximum 3 pages) should have:

Title, journal name, publisher, year, indexed in Scopus/SCIE/SCI


 The content, novelty/contribution of the base paper has to be presented
 What research has been addressed and what is the solution proposed by the authors
 Architecture and algorithm proposed and its correctness

These contents have to be written by the student after going through the base paper. Refer
Abstract, Introduction and Proposed methodology)

Merits and Demerits: (Maximum 3 pages)

What are the existing techniques for the same problem or related works? (See literature
review/ related work column of the paper)
What are the merits and demerits over the proposed techniques over the existing
techniques? (Refer the Materials & Methods/ Results and discussion column of the paper that
compares with the existing techniques)

13
ANNEXURE 5

REFERENCES

1. Balyanov, A., J. Kutnyakova, N.A. Amirkhanova, V.V. Stolyarov, R.Z. Valiev, X.Z.
Liao, Y.H. Zhao, Y.B. Jiang, H.F. Xu, T.C. Lowe, and Y.T. Zhu (2004) Corrosion
resistance of ultrafine grained Ti. Scripta Materialia, 51, 225-229.

2. Berbon, P.B., M. Furukawa, Z. Horita, M. Nemoto, and T.G. Langdon (1999)


Influence of pressing speed on microstructural development in equal channel angular
pressing. Metallurgical and Material Transactions A, 30, 1989-1997.

3. Chuvil’deev V N, T. G. Nieh, M. Yu. Gryaznov, V. I. Kopylov and A. N. Sysoev


(2004) Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 378, 253-257.

4. Cockcroft, M., G., D.J. Latham (1968) Ductility and workability of metals Journal of
the Institute of Metals, 96, 33-39.

5. Dieter,G. E., (2003) ASM Handbook of Workability and Process Design, Ohio, USA.

6. Dieter,G. E., (1988) Mechanical metallurgy, McGraw Hill Book Company (UK)
Limited.

14

You might also like