Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. The nature of self regulation
a. Self regulation - law formulated by private agencies to govern professional and trading
activities// acting according to one's own volition and not as a response to an external
constraint
i. Not used in the literal sense but rather connotes some degree of collective
constraint, other than directly emanating from government, to engender outcomes
which would not be reached by individual market behavior alone
2. Spontaneous private legal ordering
a. Economic explanation - basis is reciprocity. Individuals recognize the benefits they will
derive from behaving in accordance with others' expectations
i. While originally disputes may be resolved by force, individuals will normally find
non-violent methods to be cheaper; and ostracism from the group will generally be an
adequate sanction
b. Decentralized law making encounters the problem that some individuals will tend to
free ride on the enforcement of others.
c. Self regulation may be an appropriate solution where bargaining at low cost can occur
between risk creators and those affected
2. Self-regulation as delegation of state law-making powers
a. Since SRAs typically command a greater degree of expertise and technical knowledge of
practices and innovatory possibilities, information costs for formulation and interpretation
of standards are lower. Monitoring and enforcement costs are also lower
b. Admin cost of the SRAs are normally internalized in the trade or activity which is subject
to regulation
c. Viable self-regulatory regimes will emerge where monitoring costs for the SRA are low,
the number of local markets is small, and customers are relatively mobile as between
suppliers
d. SRAs may also impose barriers to entry which are good for both industry and public
interest
2. Specific sector studies
3. Competitive self regulation
a. The act of state delegation normally involves conferring on the SRA a monopoly power
to legally constrain supply in the relevant market. However, the threat of state intervention
may, to some extent mitigate the harmful effects of monopolization
b. Alternative solution: if the principal objection to SRAs is that they are able to exploit
their monopolistic control of supply so as to enable practitioners to earn rents, why not
force SRAs to compete with each other sot that rents will be eliminated?
i. Would prevent SRAs from creating barriers to entry but should also constrain
SRAs to formulate standards which meet consumer preferences at lower cost
b. Where the public interest arguments for the state delegating its regulatory powers are
strong, it should not grant monopoly power but rather enable 2 or more SRAs within a given
supplier group to formulate alternative regimes
i. Marginal consumers must be able attribute general quality characteristics to
certificates generated by the self-competing regulatory regimes, otherwise there will
be a race to the bottom
2. Mixed systems
a. In an effort to realize the many benefits of self regulation but controlling the costs which
result from rent-seeking, some jurisdictions had adopted what has been referred to as co-
regulation - SRAs regulate with some oversight or ratification by the government
i. Main problem is information asymmetry
b. Enforced self-regulation
i. Public agency negotiates with individual firms regulations that are
particularized to each firm, with the threat of an imposition of less tailored standards
if it fails to cooperate. While the firm may thus formulate the rules, they are enforced
by the public agency
1. Advantages: rules are tailored to match firm's circumstances and are
less costly to adapt
a. There are incentives to identify least-cost solutions which
should encourage regulatory innovation