Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 Learning Theories
Taken separately, there are more than a dozen of learning theories. However, these
theories can be grouped into three main classification namely,
1. Associative Learning Theory
2. Cognitive Learning Theory
3. Serial Learning Theory
When you are selecting, adapting or writing training exercise, it is important to make
your decision on which method to use based on a model of how people learn. This
learning cycle includes three stages:
Learning
Initially, learners are involved in some activity that you have selected from the many
learning methods and experiences available. This activity might be relatively passive
like reading or observing a demonstration, or very active like solving a case study or
participating in a role play.
The objectives may be very general like “to explore”…..” to examine” or “to read”…
or very specific like “to name the five causes of performance problem”
presentation
Reading
Both
demonstration
Video/film
Both
Note- taking
Both
discussion
Both
Questioners
Both
Fishbowl
Case study
In basket
Card sort
Role play
Role play a
Case study
Games
Clinics
Critical incidents
Structured closure
activities
Now that you are familiar with these seventeen methods, check your expertise
which each of them.
Training Methods Content determined Learner’s role Senses
by trainer learner Passive Active Sight sound hands
on
Structured warmed
up activities
presentation
Reading
demonstration
Video/film
Note- taking
discussion
Questioners
Fishbowl
Case study
In basket
Card sort
Role play
Role play a
Case study
Games
Clinics
Critical incidents
Structured closure
activities
2. Directions
Were directions adequate?
Were to many instructions given at one time?
Was the time allowed for questions?
Were instructions followed immediately by action? Did activities intervene
between the instructions their executions?
3. Sessions
Were the theories or lecturers presented easily understandable?
Was there an organized flow and clear overview?
Were the lecturer appropriate?
Were examples appropriate and clean?
Was these a summary to pull things together?
Was there a smooth transition into and out of each session?
Did the speaker accomplish the stated purpose?
4. Activities
Were they used appropriately? Did they fit into what was happening?
Were they well introduced? Were the instructions clear?
Was there was too much dependence on them?
Did the activities accomplish their goals?
5. Processing
What techniques were used to facilitate processing?
Were reactions solicited? How?
Were questions helpful in focusing on specific areas of discussion?
Was processing adequate? Were important areas covered? Was closure
attained?
Was processing done at appropriate times? Often enough?
was processing geared to on-the-job application of learnings? How was
follow-through implemented?