2) An offer could be made to the public at large.

 
A offer can be made to an individual, to a particular group of people or to the world at large. 
Only the contract is made with the limited people who accept the offer. we can not deny an offer 
just by the fact that it is made to the public at large. 
The arguments of the defendants are that at all events, the advertisement should be held to 
apply only to persons who bought directly from the defendants. 
While LINDLEY, L.J. said that now that point is common to the words of this advertisement 

and to 
and to the 
the words of 
words of all other 
all other advertisements 
advertisements offering 
offering rewards. 
rewards. They 
They are 
are offers 
offers to 
to anybody 
anybody who 
who 
performs the conditions named in the advertisement, and anybody who does perform the condition 
accepts the offer. 
And BOWEN, L.J. mentioned that it is an offer to become liable to any one who, before it is 
 mentioned that it is an offer to become liable to any one who, before it is 
retracted, performs 
retracted, performs the 
the condition, 
condition, and, 
and, although 
although the 
the offer 
offer is 
is made 
made to 
to the 
the world, 
world, the 
the contract 
contract is 
is 
made with that limited portion of the public who come forward and perform the condition on the 
faith of the advertisement. 
A. L. SMITH, L.J. presented, a person becomes a persona designata and able to sue, when he 
performs the conditions mentioned in the advertisement. 
It can be seen that in the case, the defenses used was that it was not possible to make an offer 
to the whole world since this would enable the whole world to accept the offer, which was clearly 
beyond the commercial reality. The court rejected this defense. Although the offer is made to the 
world, the contract is made with that limited portion of the public who come forward and perform 

the condition on the faith of the advertisement.
So, the offer may be made to a specific person or 
group of persons, also can make to the world at large. 
3) Acceptance could be action (unilateral contract). 
Acceptance need not be communicated in relation to unilateral contracts where performance 
is the 
is the nature 
nature of 
of the 
the acceptance, 
acceptance, and 
and where 
where the 
the offeror 
offeror is 
is assumed 
assumed to 
to have 
have waived 
waived the 
the right 
right to 
to 
receive communication. An offer for a unilateral contract is accepted by full performance of the 
requested act. 
In case of doubt, an offer is interpreted as inviting the offeree to accept either by promising to 
perform what the offer requests or by rendering the performance, as the offeree chooses. 
In this case, the defendants have the reason that in order to make a contract by fulfilment of a 
condition, there must either be a communication of intention to accept the offer, or there must be 
the performance of some overt act. The mere doing an act in private will not be enough. 
There can 
There can be 
be no 
no doubt 
doubt that 
that where 
where a 
a person 
person in 
in an 
an offer 
offer made 
made by 
by him 
him to 
to another 
another person, 
person, 

expressly or impliedly intimates a particular mode of acceptance as sufficient to make the bargain 
binding, it 
binding, it is 
is only 
only necessary 
necessary for 
for the 
the other 
other person 
person to 
to whom 
whom such 
such offer 
offer is 
is made 
made to 
to follow 
follow the 
the 
indicated method 
indicated method of of acceptance
acceptance； ；and if 
and if the 
the person 
person making 
making the 
the offer, 
offer, expressly 
expressly or 
or impliedly 
impliedly 
intimates in 
intimates in his 
his offer 
offer that 
that it 
it will 
will be 
be sufficient 
sufficient to 
to act 
act on 
on the 
the proposal 
proposal without 
without communicating 
communicating 
acceptance of 
acceptance  of it 
it to 
to himself, 
himself, performance 
performance of of the 
the condition 
condition is 
is a 
a sufficient 
sufficient acceptance 
acceptance without 
without 
notification. 
But, still LINDLEY, L.J. opposes it: the performance of the conditions is the acceptance of 
the offer. 
BOWEN, L.J. stated, the 
BOWEN, L.J. stated, the performance 
performance of 
of the 
the condition 
condition is 
is sufficient 
sufficient acceptance 
acceptance without 
without the 
the 

notification of it, and a person who makes an offer in an advertisement of that kind makes an offer 
which must be read by the light of that common sense reflection. 
A. L. SMITH, L.J. „s words are that this first point fails, and this was an offer intended to be 
acted upon, and, when acted upon and the conditions performed, constituted a promise to pay. 
This case is an example of a 'unilateral contract', obligations are only imposed upon one party 
upon acceptance by performance of a condition. 
An offer 
An offer of 
of a unilateral 
a unilateral contract may 
contract may often 
often be 
be made 
made to 
to many 
many people 
people (or 
(or 'to 
'to the 
the world') 
world') by 
by 
means of 
means of an 
an advertisement. 
advertisement. In 
In that 
that situation, 
situation, acceptance 
acceptance will 
will only 
only occur 
occur on 
on satisfaction 
satisfaction of 
of the 
the 
condition. If 
condition. If the 
the condition 
condition is 
is something 
something that 
that only 
only one 
one party 
party can 
can perform, 
perform, both 
both the 
the offeror 
offeror and 
and 

offeree are protected – the offeror is protected because he will only ever be contractually obliged 
to one of the many offerees; and the offeree is protected, because if she does perform the condition, 
the offeror will be contractually obliged to pay her.  In unilateral contracts, the requirement that 
In unilateral contracts, the requirement that 
acceptance be 
acceptance be communicated 
communicated to  to the 
the offeror 
offeror is 
is waived. 
waived. The 
The offeree 
offeree accepts 
accepts by 
by performing 
performing the 
the 
condition, and 
condition, and the 
the offeree's 
offeree's performance 
performance is is also 
also treated 
treated as 
as the 
the price, 
price, or 
or consideration, 
consideration, for 
for the 
the 
offeror's promise. 
The offeror can not impose liability on an offeree by not requiring him to communicate his 
acceptance such 
acceptance such in 
in the 
the case 
case of 
of unilateral 
unilateral contract. 
contract. The 
The offeror 
offeror impliedly 
impliedly waived 
waived the 
the need 
need for 
for 
communication of 
communication of acceptance. 
acceptance. So 
So in 
in this 
this case, 
case, there 
there was 
was no 
no need 
need for 
for Mrs.Carlill 
Mrs.Carlill actively 
actively to 
to 

communicate her acceptance of company‟s offer.
4) Consideration is suffering of Carlill and benifiting of Carbolic 
The definition of "consideration" given in in the case of Laythoarp v. Bryant 3 Scott, 238, 
250, is this：Any act of the plaintiff from which the defendant derives a benefit or advantage, or 
any labour, detriment, or inconvenience sustained by the plaintiff, provided such act is performed 
or such inconvenience suffered by the plaintiff, with the consent, either express or implied, of the 
defendant. 
In a unilateral contract, an agreement by which one party makes a promise in exchange for 
the other's 
the other's performance, 
performance, the 
the performance 
performance is 
is consideration 
consideration for 
for the 
the promise, 
promise, while 
while the 
the promise 
promise is 
is 
consideration for the performance. 
The defendants insist that there is no consideration moving from the plaintiff: The ter ms of 
the advertisement would enable a person who stole the balls to claim the reward, though his using 
them was no possible benefit to the defendants. 

Bue, as 
Bue, as far 
far as 
as LINDLEY, 
LINDLEY, L.J. 
L.J. is 
is concerned, 
concerned, it 
it is 
is quite 
quite obvious 
obvious that 
that in 
in the 
the view 
view of 
of the 
the 
advertisers a use by the public of their remedy, if they can only get the public to have confidence 
enough to use it, will react and produce a sale which is directly beneficial to them. It appears to 
me that there is a distinct inconvenience, not to say a detriment, to any person who so uses the 
smoke ball. 
BOWEN, L.J. thinks the same: it is consideration enough that the plaintiff took the trouble of 
using the smoke ball, and the defendants received a benefit from this user, for the use of the smoke 
ball was contemplated by the defendants as being indirectly a benefit to them, because the use of 
the smoke balls would promote their sale. 
To sum 
To sum up, 
up, the 
the consideration 
consideration in 
in this 
this case 
case is 
is the 
the suffering 
suffering of 
of Carlill 
Carlill and 
and the 
the benifiting 
benifiting of 
of 
Corbolic. Corbolic‟s benefit and Carlill
‟s detriment are in the exchange for the promise, so there is 
consideration. It is quite obvious that in the view of the advertisers a use by the public of their 
remedy will 
remedy  will react 
react and 
and produce 
produce a 
a sale 
sale which 
which is 
is directly 
directly beneficial 
beneficial to 
to them. 
them. Therefore, 
Therefore, the 
the 

advertisers get out of the use an advantage which is enough to constitute a consideration. On the 

下载文档到电脑，使用更方便
 0下载券

下载 加入VIP

享专业文档下载特权 赠共享文档下载特权 赠百度阅读VIP精品版

还剩1页未读， 继续阅读

您的评论

用户评价
写点评论支持下文档贡献者~
暂无评论

240

发布评论