Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Executive Summary
The project is thorough analysis of Pleass Global Limited, which is compared to Waterco
Ltd, both are listed firms on the South Pacific Stock Exchange. Comparison is made through
risk profiles, stock prices, liquidity ratios, leverage ratios, profitability ratios and market
value ratios. As such, a group of 5 undergraduates were randomly chosen to research on the
nature, investors and management of PGL. The risks profiles of PGL is examined and stock
prices of PGL are seen to be increasing as a value of a dollar decreases annually. The
performance of both companies are thoroughly compared with calculations and
recommendations are provided based on calculated ratios, some points are suggested for
betterment of the company’s performance ratios. Moreover, in the valuation section, the final
dividend and earnings per share of PGL is presented. Both the companies are performing well
and are meeting its benchmarks. Thus the problems agency and principal may arise in near
future. The directors need to set their decisions for the prosperity of Pleass Global LIMITED
and Waterco Ltd.
Keywords: Firms, Ratios, Risks, Business, Shareholders, Interest rates, Liquidity and Finance
Figure 1.2 shows that there are 20 shareholders at PGL. These shareholders have been
categorized and it includes 11 companies, 8 individuals and 1 pension fund. The chart also
shows that there is only 1 foreign investor included in individuals.
The figure 1.3 shows the stock price of the Pleass Global Limited from the years 2014 to
2018. As stated above the prices in 2014 was $1, in 2015 $1.25, in 2016 $1.48, in 2017 $1.90
and in 2018 was $2.45. There is an increase in the stock price which shows that the company
have performed well over the past years which is a very positive growth for the company.
The company’s stock price might have rose as the demand for the stocks were high so that’s
why it led increase in the price. In addition, the company is also making a lot of profit and
also have less risk profile which might have attracted the customers to buy the stock which
led increase in demand and price of stock.
Leverage:
Debt/Equity (%)
170.19% 102.85%
Interest Coverage
(Times)
9.50 45.99
Liquidity
Current Ratio
1.39 1.40
Profitability:
3.12% 20.37%
Return on Equity
(%)
8.44% 41.31%
Market Value:
Price/Book Value
Price/Earnings
(Times)
0.17 Times 0.03 Times
Leverage:
Liquidity
Profitability:
101.82% 103.27%
5.33% 5.76%
Market Value:
Comments
Leverage
1. Debt/Equity:
For PBP there is a significant fall in the ratio showing a less proportion of debt compared to the
previous years. On the other hand, for WAT the debt/equity ratio is better for both the years but it is
lower in 2017 which states that the business can cover its debts in case of liquidity
2. Interest Coverage:
For PBP there is a massive increase in the figure in 2018 when compared to 2017, thus showing that
it had become less burdened by debt. On the other hand, the interest coverage for WAT in 2017 is
slightly higher when compared to 2018.
Liquidity
1. Current Ratio:
For PBP the current ratio has increased slightly showing a small increase in the ability to meet short
term debts. On the other hand, for WAT the current ratio has increased showing a greater ability to
meet short term debts
Profitability
1. Profit Margin:
For PBP. On the other hand,
2. Return on Assets
For PBP. On the other hand,
3. Return on Equity
For PBP. On the other hand,
Market Value
1. Price/Book Value:
For PBP. On the other hand, the book value for WAT in 2018 was better when it’s compared to
2017’s price which states that shareholders will sell their shares in 2018
2. Price/Earnings
For PBP. On the other hand, the earning per share is slightly faster for WAT in 2018 when compared
to 2017
3. Dividend Yield
For PBP. On the other hand, Dividend yield for WAT in 2017 was better than 2018 which means that
there were high dividend given out in 2017.
5.0 VALUATION
The line graph above shows Earnings per ratio for year’s 2014 to 2018 for PLEASS Global
Limited. In 2014, the ratio was 11% which continued to increase till date. Thus, in 2018 the
earnings per ratio grew largely to 92% which made a great impact in company’s overall
performance. The positive growth in earnings ratio is very significant for overall growth of
the company as it largely contributes towards the revenue of the company. According to the
company, the growth in earnings per ratio will repeatedly grow in the future and will earn a
significant profit in the coming years.
6.0 Conclusion
All in all, from the above research work we got to know about the Pleass Global Limited
(PBP) in the terms of firm’s analysis, risk and performance, comparison with Waterco Ltd
and valuation. Firm analysis enabled to understand about what type of business and nature of
operations that the company adopts, who are the average investors that invest in the company
and what conflicts that arise in the company due to separation of ownership. Risk and
performance enabled us to figure out the risk profile of the company as how it is arising and
changing overtime and the stock price which have increased over the years which is very
beneficial for the company. Comparison with a company from Australian securities exchange
which is Waterco Ltd also enabled us to distinguish the difference between the two countries
and know where the Pleass Global Limited is lacking. Finally, valuation allowed us to find
out the companies final dividend and earnings per share as how the company indulge in
growth. Thus, this things assisted in better understanding about the company in order to make
decision whether to invest or not.
7.0 Recommendation
As a financial analyst for Royal Investment Ltd, the company Pleass Global Limited was
analyzed and based on the analysis I recommend that I will invest in the company as the
company has low risk profile and risks are well managed by the company. The people who
invest in the company will be confident as they will get the return for what they pay for. The
company also have an increasing stock price which is also good for the company as its doing
well. The final divided of the company is constant for the past four years which again good to
invest in the company. The earnings per share is increasing which enables growth in the
company and better for investment. Furthermore, the only disadvantage is that there is the
separation of ownership which led to conflict in the company as the managers give
themselves the first priority. I insists that the company should give first priority to the
shareholders of the company.