Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microsoft Corporation and Apple Corporation SFP Case Analysis
Microsoft Corporation and Apple Corporation SFP Case Analysis
2. Based on the SFP, which do you think is performing better, Apple or Microsoft?
Why?
We have reason to believe that the performance of Apple, Inc. is better than that
of Microsoft Corporation based on their recent SFPs.
3. Which do you think is better, having higher current liability, or having higher
non-current liability?
Assuming that a company had invested on debts which it can surely benefit from
in the long run and that it is financially able to settle these, we think that having higher
non-current liability is more favorable than having higher current liability. To give further
justification, we’ll include Leonard’s (2018) statement that current liabilities factor into
the immediate needs of the company while non-current liabilities are considered a
capital investment into the long-term growth of the company. While paying immediate
needs is important, improving the company’s overall quality is something the employees
must consider as well.
REFERENCES
https://witnesseth.typepad.com/blog/current-liabilities.html
https://www.accountingcoach.com/blog/are-liabilities-bad
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/effect-liabilities-share-equity-company-10659.html
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/companies-prefer-longterm-debt-61041.html
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/current-vs-longterm-liabilities-51157.html
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/051315/how-microsoft-apples-balance-sheets-
compare.asp