Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Question No. -1
Answer: Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a process and set of tool which understands and
defines the customer requirements to convert them into detailed engineering specification and plan the
process to produce the product which satisfies the customer requirements. Quality function deployment is
a graphical analysis technique that portrays customer needs and expectations, how these needs and
expectations will be satisfied, and tradeoffs between conflicting needs and expectation. It emphasizes on
the needs of maintaining quality in processes as well as in products. It is the quality system which brings
the close linkage between end users with other organizational processes like marketing, designing,
quality, production, manufacturing and engineering.
The concept of QFD was first introduced by Yoji Akao, a Japanese quality planning expert in 1966. The
main aim of this concept is to work out a method which would support the manufacturers in designing
products as per the choice of customers. QFD was first used in the Mistubishi’s Kobe shipyard in 1972.
Later, QFD was adopted by different Japanese firms. The USA automotive and electronic companies
introduced this methodology in 1980s
QFD helps organizations in many ways as to design a design a product well, a design teams needs to
know what it is they are designing, and what the end-users will expect from it. The major advantages of
QFD in which it helps the organsational causes are:
3. Reduced Development Time: As through QFD processes we acknowledge that what is the
requirement of the customer then now it is the time to concentrate on making amendments and
changes of product in the design stage itself. So, there will be no design changes in the preceding
phases of the product development and also the time can be saved which was otherwise to be
used in developing other un-necessary (Not as the needs of customers) systems. This leads to
reduction in development time of the product.
4. Lower Development Cost and Improved Quality: As using QFD we know and develop the
product as per the customer needs it reduces the cost required in warranty claims, support cost,
design changes cost as the alterations are made initially in the product development phase and the
needs of the customers are considered while developing the products. For example Toyota
became successful by implementing QFD in their company worldwide with respect to their
competitors.
The above are the key areas where QFD helps a cause in the organizations, apart from the above given
benefits the implementation of QFD provides organizations a improved level of quality as the quality is
measured and assured during the development phase itself. When QFD is used throughout product and
process development it gives a clear specification of the customer needs and translates these all the way
through to the necessary process and quality controls. QFD increases the communication level between
the organsational function as the needs and requirements are well stated and delivered to the respected
departments. Hence we can say the QFD is not only good for assessing the customer requirements but it
increases the quality of the functional process and product also.
Question No. - 2
Answer:
Sampling is a procedure in which a predetermined numbers of sample/products are selected from a larger
population and testing is done as per requirement to verify that whether the product conforms to
requirement or not. By sampling individual product from larger populations the characteristics of whole
lot are decided. A population can be defined as a whole that includes all items and characteristics of the
research taken into study.
Sampling from a process prospective can be defined as the sample taken from a process which determines
the variation in the product from the actual requirements/ specifications in the current process. Sampling
in process helps us to know that the process is controlled and if the sample taken from the process defers
from the requirement then we came to know the variation in the process which enables us to rectify the
process to get the required results.
1. Select a sample from a lot using various methods such as random sampling or quota sampling.
2. Evaluate the sample on the predefined criteria.
3. If the sample meets the predefined criteria accept the sample else reject it.
4. Record the results of the acceptance sampling for future use.
Double Sampling: This method is used when the singe sampling fails to provide the conclusion that
whether the lot is to be rejected or accepted. For example two samples are taken from a lot and one of the
sample fails to meet the predefined criteria and another sample passes, then it would be difficult to
conclude that whether the lot should be rejected or accepted therefore double sampling method is used.
Following steps are involved in this method:-
Sequential Acceptance Sampling: It is further refinement of double sampling plan. In this sampling
one or more samples are taken randomly from the lot and tested one by one individually. In this sample
size is not set in advance. After selected the samples the hypothesis test is taken that whether the taken
samples attain the predefined characteristics or not. Each time sample is selected a decision is taken to
accept the lot or reject the lot or to continue sampling. For example if in a process of testing headache
medicine, the medicine works ones but it doesn’t work on other time then the medicine get rejected as it
doesn’t get the results as A plan in which the consumer randomly selects items from the lot and inspects
them one by one.
Question No. -3
Answer 3a: The sampling is done to verify that the product conforms to the predefined requirements.
Instead of checking each product samples are taken from the whole production lot as per pre-defined
methods.
As given in the question the 10 samples are taken from a population size of 50 products each one sample
is selected from lot of 5 finished products. Here using p-chart to measure the proportion of defective items
in a sample.
Upper control limit and lower control limits can be calculated by using the following formula
UCL = 𝑃̅ + 𝑧𝜎𝑝
LCL = 𝑃̅ − 𝑧𝜎𝑝
Where,
𝑃̅(1−𝑃̅ )
𝜎𝑃 = Sample deviation of average defective proportion = √ 𝑛
n= Sample Size
23
𝑃̅ = = 0.46
50
̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅)
0.46(1−0.46
𝜎𝑃 = √ 50
= 0.0705
Now as we have the values of 𝑃̅ and 𝜎𝑃 therefore by putting a these values in the above given formulas of
UCL and LCL we will get
𝑈𝑆𝐿−𝐿𝑆𝐿
𝐶𝑝 =
6𝜎
47 25 47.6
1
𝜎 = √𝑁−1 ∑𝑁
𝑖=1(𝑥𝑖 − 𝜇)
2
49+19.4+47.6
𝜇= = 38.667
3
N=3
Now,
∑𝑁
𝑖=1 = (𝑥1 + 𝑥2 + 𝑥3 )
∑𝑁
𝑖=1 = (106.771+371.217+79.798) = 557.786
1
𝜎 = √𝑁−1 𝑥 557.786
1
𝜎 = √3−1 𝑥 557.786
𝜎 = √278.993 = 16.700
47−25
𝐶𝑝 =
6𝑥16.700
𝐶𝑝 = 0.22
𝐶𝑝𝑘 is the process capability indicator which considers the inconsistencies that are observed in 𝐶𝑝
𝑈𝑆𝐿−𝜇 𝜇−𝐿𝑆𝐿
𝐶𝑝𝑘 = min of ( ),( )
3𝜎 3𝜎
& 𝜎= 16.700
47−38.667 38.667−25
𝐶𝑝𝑘 = min of ( 3𝑥 16.7 ) , ( 3𝑥 16.7 )
𝐶𝑝𝑘 = 0.17
The value of Cpk factor (0.17) is lower than the Cp value (0.22). This implies that the LSL is more
difficult to achieve than the USL. Non-conformities exist at both ends.