Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A firm has economic risk (also known as forecast risk) to the degree that its
market value is influenced by unexpected exchange-rate fluctuations, which can
severely affect the firm's market share with regard to its competitors, the firm's
future cash flows, and ultimately the firm's value. Economic risk can affect the
present value of future cash flows. An example of an economic risk would be a shift
in exchange rates that influences the demand for a good sold in a foreign country.
Contingent risk
A firm has contingent risk when bidding for foreign projects, negotiating other
contracts, or handling direct foreign investments. Such a risk arises from the
potential of a firm to suddenly face a transnational or economic foreign-exchange
risk contingent on the outcome of some contract or negotiation. For example, a firm
could be waiting for a project bid to be accepted by a foreign business or
government that, if accepted, would result in an immediate receivable. While
waiting, the firm faces a contingent risk from the uncertainty as to whether or not
that receivable will accrue.
Transaction risk
Companies will often participate in a transaction involving more than one currency.
In order to meet the legal and accounting standards of processing these
transactions, companies have to translate foreign currencies involved into their
domestic currency. A firm has transaction risk whenever it has contractual cash
flows (receivables and payables) whose values are subject to unanticipated changes
in exchange rates due to a contract being denominated in a foreign currency. To
realize the domestic value of its foreign-denominated cash flows, the firm must
exchange, or translate, the foreign currency for domestic.
When firms negotiate contracts with set prices and delivery dates in the face of a
volatile foreign exchange market, with rates constantly fluctuating between
initiating a transaction and its settlement, or payment, those firms face the risk
of significant loss.[11] Businesses have the goal of making all monetary
transactions profitable ones, and the currency markets must thus be carefully
observed.[11][12]
Translation risk
A firm's translation risk is the extent to which its financial reporting is
affected by exchange-rate movements. As all firms generally must prepare
consolidated financial statements for reporting purposes, the consolidation process
for multinationals entails translating foreign assets and liabilities, or the
financial statements of foreign subsidiaries, from foreign to domestic currency.
While translation risk may not affect a firm's cash flows, it could have a
significant impact on a firm's reported earnings and therefore its stock price.
Translation risk deals with the risk to a company's equities, assets, liabilities,
or income, any of which can change in value due to fluctuating foreign exchange
rates when a portion is denominated in a foreign currency. A company doing business
in a foreign country will eventually have to exchange its host country's currency
back into their domestic currency. When exchange rates appreciate or depreciate,
significant, difficult-to-predict changes in the value of the foreign currency can
occur. For example, U.S. companies must translate Euro, Pound, Yen, etc.,
statements into U.S. dollars. A foreign subsidiary's income statement and balance
sheet are the two financial statements that must be translated. A subsidiary doing
business in the host country usually follows that country's prescribed translation
method, which may vary, depending on the subsidiary's business operations.
There are three translation methods: current-rate method, temporal method, and U.S.
translation procedures. Under the current-rate method, all financial statement line
items are translated at the "current" exchange rate. Under the temporal method,
specific assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates consistent with
the timing of the item's creation.[13] The U.S. translation procedures
differentiate foreign subsidiaries by functional currency, not subsidiary
characterization. If a firm translates by the temporal method, a zero net exposed
position is called fiscal balance.[14] The temporal method cannot be achieved by
the current-rate method because total assets will have to be matched by an equal
amount of debt, but the equity section of the balance sheet must be translated at
historical exchange rates.[15]
Measuring risk
If foreign-exchange markets are efficient—such that purchasing power parity,
interest rate parity, and the international Fisher effect hold true—a firm or
investor needn't concern itself with foreign exchange risk. A deviation from one or
more of the three international parity conditions generally needs to occur for
there to be a significant exposure to foreign-exchange risk.[16]
Value at risk
Practitioners have advanced, and regulators have accepted, a financial risk
management technique called value at risk (VaR), which examines the tail end of a
distribution of returns for changes in exchange rates, to highlight the outcomes
with the worst returns. Banks in Europe have been authorized by the Bank for
International Settlements to employ VaR models of their own design in establishing
capital requirements for given levels of market risk. Using the VaR model helps
risk managers determine the amount that could be lost on an investment portfolio
over a certain period of time with a given probability of changes in exchange
rates.
Managing risk
See also: Foreign exchange hedge
Transaction hedging
Firms with exposure to foreign-exchange risk may use a number of hedging strategies
to reduce that risk. Transaction exposure can be reduced either with the use of
money markets, foreign exchange derivatives—such as forward contracts, options,
futures contracts, and swaps—or with operational techniques such as currency
invoicing, leading and lagging of receipts and payments, and exposure netting.[17]
Each hedging strategy comes with its own benefits that may make it more suitable
than another, based on the nature of the business and risks it may encounter.
Forward and futures contracts serve similar purposes: they both allow transactions
that take place in the future—for a specified price at a specified rate—that offset
otherwise adverse exchange fluctuations. Forward contracts are more flexible, to an
extent, because they can be customized to specific transactions, whereas futures
come in standard amounts and are based on certain commodities or assets, such as
other currencies. Because futures are only available for certain currencies and
time periods, they cannot entirely mitigate risk, because there is always the
chance that exchange rates will move in your favor. However, the standardization of
futures can be a part of what makes them attractive to some: they are well-
regulated and are traded only on exchanges.[18]
Two popular and inexpensive methods companies can use to minimize potential losses
is hedging with options and forward contracts. If a company decides to purchase an
option, it is able to set a rate that is "at-worst" for the transaction. If the
option expires and it's out-of-the-money, the company is able to execute the
transaction in the open market at a favorable rate. If a company decides to take
out a forward contract, it will set a specific currency rate for a set date in the
future.[19][20]
Another method to reduce exposure transaction risk is natural hedging (or netting
foreign-exchange exposures), which is an efficient form of hedging because it will
reduce the margin that is taken by banks when businesses exchange currencies; and
it is a form of hedging that is easy to understand. To enforce the netting, there
will be a systematic-approach requirement, as well as a real-time look at exposure
and a platform for initiating the process, which, along with the foreign cash flow
uncertainty, can make the procedure seem more difficult. Having a back-up plan,
such as foreign-currency accounts, will be helpful in this process. The companies
that deal with inflows and outflows in the same currency will experience
efficiencies and a reduction in risk by calculating the net of the inflows and
outflows, and using foreign-currency account balances that will pay in part for
some or all of the exposure.[23]
Translation hedging
Translation exposure is largely dependent on the translation methods required by
accounting standards of the home country. For example, the United States Federal
Accounting Standards Board specifies when and where to use certain methods. Firms
can manage translation exposure by performing a balance sheet hedge, since
translation exposure arises from discrepancies between net assets and net
liabilities solely from exchange rate differences. Following this logic, a firm
could acquire an appropriate amount of exposed assets or liabilities to balance any
outstanding discrepancy. Foreign exchange derivatives may also be used to hedge
against translation exposure.[17]
By putting more effort into researching alternative methods for production and
development, it is possible that a firm may discover more ways to produce their
outputs locally rather than relying on export sources that would expose them to the
foreign exchange risk. By paying attention to currency fluctuations around the
world, firms can advantageously relocate their production to other countries. For
this strategy to be effective, the new site must have lower production costs. There
are many factors a firm must consider before relocating, such as a foreign nation's
political and economic stability.[22]
See also
Privatized foreign currency risk
References
Levi, Maurice D. (2005). International Finance, 4th Edition. New York, NY:
Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-30900-4.
Moffett, Michael H.; Stonehill, Arthur I.; Eiteman, David K. (2009). Fundamentals
of Multinational Finance, 3rd Edition. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-
54164-2.
Homaifar, Ghassem A. (2004). Managing Global Financial and Foreign Exchange Risk.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-28115-3.
Moosa, Imad A. (2003). International Financial Operations: Arbitrage, Hedging,
Speculation, Financing and Investment. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-
0-333-99859-5.
Dunn, Robert M., Jr.; Mutti, John H. (2004). International Economics, 6th Edition.
New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-31154-0.
Pilbeam, Keith (2006). International Finance, 3rd Edition. New York, NY: Palgrave
Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-4837-3.
Reszat, Beate (2003). The Japanese Foreign Exchange Market. New Fetter Lane,
London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-22254-6.
"Economic Risk Definition & Example | InvestingAnswers". investinganswers.com.
Retrieved 2018-12-13.
"Economic Risk". www.readyratios.com. Retrieved 2018-12-13.
"Assessing Economic Risk Factors". International Banker. 2017-01-02. Retrieved
2018-12-13.
"Transaction Risk Definition & Example | InvestingAnswers". investinganswers.com.
Retrieved 2018-12-13.
"Transaction risk". Kantox. Retrieved 2018-12-13.
Wang, Peijie (2005). The Economics of Foreign Exchange and Global Finance.
Springer Berlin.
Kenton, Will. "Temporal Method". Investopedia.
Kennon, Joshua. "Capital Surplus and Reserves on the Balance Sheet". the balance.
Wang, Peijie (2005). The Economics of Foreign Exchange and Global Finance. Berlin,
Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-21237-9.
Eun, Cheol S.; Resnick, Bruce G. (2011). International Financial Management, 6th
Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. ISBN 978-0-07-803465-7.
Hull, John (2003). Options, futures & other derivatives (5th ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0130090560. OCLC 49355599.
Chen, James. "Transaction Risk". Investopedia. Retrieved 2018-12-13.
"How To Minimize Your Foreign Exchange Risk - Business FX | International Money
Transfers". Retrieved 2018-12-13.
Siddaiah, Thummuluri (2010). International financial management. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson. ISBN 9788131717202. OCLC 430736596.
Levi, Maurice D. (2005). International finance (4th ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN
978-0415309004. OCLC 55801025.
"FX hedging – Understanding Transaction vs. Translation Risk – CurrencyVue".
Retrieved 2018-12-13.
Bhasin, Gaurav. "Accounting for Foreign Currency Loss". ProFormative.
Further reading
Bartram, Söhnke M.; Burns, Natasha; Helwege, Jean (September 2013). "Foreign
Currency Exposure and Hedging: Evidence from Foreign Acquisitions". Quarterly
Journal of Finance. forthcoming. SSRN 1116409.
Bartram, Söhnke M.; Bodnar, Gordon M. (June 2012). "Crossing the Lines: The
Relation between Exchange Rate Exposure and Stock Returns in Emerging and Developed
Markets" (PDF). Journal of International Money and Finance. 31 (4): 766–792.
doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.01.011. SSRN 1983215.
Bartram, Söhnke M.; Brown, Gregory W.; Minton, Bernadette (February 2010).
"Resolving the Exposure Puzzle: The Many Facets of Exchange Rate Exposure" (PDF).
Journal of Financial Economics. 95 (2): 148–173. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.09.002.
SSRN 1429286.
Bartram, Söhnke M. (August 2008). "What Lies Beneath: Foreign Exchange Rate
Exposure, Hedging and Cash Flows" (PDF). Journal of Banking and Finance. 32 (8):
1508–1521. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.07.013. SSRN 905087.
Bartram, Söhnke M. (December 2007). "Corporate Cash Flow and Stock Price Exposures
to Foreign Exchange Rate Risk". Journal of Corporate Finance. 13 (5): 981–994.
doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.05.002. SSRN 985413.
Bartram, Söhnke M.; Bodnar, Gordon M. (September 2007). "The Foreign Exchange
Exposure Puzzle". Managerial Finance. 33 (9): 642–666.
doi:10.1108/03074350710776226. SSRN 891887.
Bartram, Söhnke M.; Karolyi, G. Andrew (October 2006). "The Impact of the
Introduction of the Euro on Foreign Exchange Rate Risk Exposures". Journal of
Empirical Finance. 13 (4–5): 519–549. doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2006.01.002. SSRN
299641.
Bartram, Söhnke M. (June 2004). "Linear and Nonlinear Foreign Exchange Rate
Exposures of German Nonfinancial Corporations". Journal of International Money and
Finance. 23 (4): 673–699. doi:10.1016/s0261-5606(04)00018-x. SSRN 327660.
Bartram, Söhnke M. (2002). "The Interest Rate Exposure of Nonfinancial
Corporations". European Finance Review. 6 (1): 101–125.
doi:10.1023/a:1015024825914. SSRN 327660.