You are on page 1of 2

news & views

NEMATODE CONTROL

New allies to fight worms


Plant elicitor peptides (Peps) enhance immunity against diverse pathogens. Engineering a naturally occurring
rhizobacterium to deliver Peps to the plant root system offers a new opportunity in integrated pest management.

Clarissa Hiltl and Shahid Siddique

P
lant-parasitic nematodes are among B. subtilis, the authors were able to replicate
the world’s most destructive plant the enhanced resistance to M. chitwoodi4.
pathogens, causing estimated annual The authors used a global transcriptomic
losses of $8 billion to US growers and approach to investigate the root response
of nearly $78 billion worldwide1. Most of potato to StPep1 treatment. They
current control methods rely on chemical identified 765 genes that were differentially
nematicides, but their use is increasingly expressed after treatment with StPep1
limited due to environmental concerns2. solution. Seven StPep1-responsive genes
An alternative pest management strategy that were differentially expressed were
focuses on enhancing the host plant’s chosen as marker genes. Five of these
immune system instead of directly targeting Systemic defence marker genes were also upregulated in roots
the pathogen. Plant elicitor peptides (Peps) following treatment with StPep1-secreting
are endogenous molecules that are released B. subtilis. Thus, treating potato with
following cell damage or pathogenic attack StPep1-secreting B. subtilis triggers changes
and enhance plant immunity against a broad in gene expression in roots similar to those
range of pathogens3. However, a suitable elicited by StPep1 solution, and this defence
delivery system targeting root-dwelling Local response is associated with enhanced
pathogens is currently unavailable. In this defence resistance to M. chitwoodi4.
issue of Nature Plants, Zhang and Gleason Besides chemical nematicides, methods
demonstrate the effective use of Peps to of nematode management include the
Plant perceives
combat root-knot nematodes (RKNs) in elicitor use of crop rotation, microbial biocontrol
potato (Solanum tuberosum) and present a agents, cover crops, trap crops, soil
unique root delivery system based on the Bacteria releases solarization, fumigation and resistant
elicitor (Pep)
rhizobacterium Bacillus subtilis4. plant varieties. However, several of these
The first evidence that Peps could strategies are not effective or available
be used to effectively manage nematode for all crops. Nematicides are highly
infections in plants emerged from a study toxic, and their use is strictly limited due
of soybean (Glycine max). Exogenous to environmental concerns. Resistant
treatment of seeds with GmPeps reduced Fig. 1 | Pep delivery through B. subtilis enhances plants are often ineffective or unavailable.
the reproduction of the RKN Meloidogyne plant immunity against RKN. The engineered Microbial biocontrol agents have produced
incognita and the cyst nematode Heterodera rhizobacterium B. subtilis secretes Peps, which inconsistent results. In this context, the
glycines5. Unlike soybean, potatoes are are recognized through membrane-bound Pep current work provides a new opportunity
not grown from seeds but from small receptors (PEPR) in the roots. Pep perception to manage plant-parasitic nematodes
cubes of potato tubers, known as seed triggers local and systemic responses that by combining two progressive strategies:
potatoes, that were grown in the previous correspond with an enhanced resistance the use of plant elicitors to enhance
season. To explore possible application against RKN. crop resistance to pathogens and the
of Peps in nematode management in use of B. subtilis to deliver these elicitors
potato, Zhang and Gleason analysed the efficiently (Fig. 1).
GmPeps homologue StPep1. Watering B. subtilis is a naturally occurring plant Traditional pest control substances
potato plants with StPep1 solution prior growth-promoting rhizobacterium that is used to expel or eliminate pathogens are
to inoculation with the RKN Meloidogyne classified as ‘generally recognized as safe’ highly toxic and have negative effects on
chitwoodi significantly reduced the RKN’s by the US Food and Drug Administration. the ecosystem that cannot be avoided. By
infection rate. The number of galls and egg Previously, Warnock and colleagues used B. contrast, Peps are naturally occurring in
masses — typical indicators of successful subtilis to secrete nematode neuropeptides plants and are therefore endogenous to the
RKN infection — significantly decreased into the rhizosphere of the tomato (Solanum agricultural system. While Pep elicitors
following StPep1 treatment. However, direct lycopersicum) root system and successfully are widely distributed in angiosperms,
treatment of M. chitwoodi juveniles with targeted nematodes to reduce their infection perception is limited to related species7,
StPep1 did not reduce nematode viability. rate6. Zhang and Gleason were able to reducing the risk of undesirable effects
These results demonstrated that StPep1 engineer B. subtilis in a similar fashion to on non-targeted plants. Strong defence
can be used as a defence elicitor to enhance express and secrete StPep1. By treating reactions in plants are often associated
resistance to RKNs in potato4. potato plants with StPep1-secreting with growth impairment, which would be
Nature Plants | www.nature.com/natureplants
news & views

detrimental in cropping systems. Zhang and natural habitat. Indeed, Zhang and Gleason References
Gleason ruled out this possibility: StPep1 showed that StPep1-secreting B. subtilis 1. Sasser, J. N & Freckman, D. W. In Vistas on Nematology:
a Commemoration of the 25th Anniversary of the Society
treatment did not alter the shoot or root continued to associate with the potato of Nematologists (Ed. Dickinson, D. W.) 7–14 (Society of
biomass of potato4. root for up to 12 days after inoculation4. Nematologists, Inc., 1987).
Although using a microbial vector This unique delivery system could thus 2. Jones, J. et al. Mol. Plant Pathol. 14, 946–961 (2013).
3. Bartels, S. & Boller, T. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 5183–5193 (2015).
to deliver molecules is a relatively new easily be engineered to secrete a variety of 4. Zhang, L. & Gleason, C. Nat. Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/
concept in crop protection, microbial molecules, allowing for diverse applications s41477-020-0689-0 (2020).
drug delivery has been used in medical and rapid deployment9. ❐ 5. Lee, M. W., Huffaker, A., Crippen, S., Robbins, R. T. & Goggin, F. L.
Mol. Plant Pathol. 19, 858–869 (2018).
research. While promising results have 6. Warnock, N. D. et al. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006237 (2017).
been achieved in mice, a major challenge Clarissa Hiltl1,2 and Shahid Siddique   1 ✉ 7. Lori, M. et al. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 5315–5325 (2015).
in successfully applying this approach 1
Department of Entomology and Nematology, 8. Jimenez, M., Langer, R. & Traverso, G. J. Exp. Med. 216,
1005–1009 (2019).
in humans is the absence of an efficient University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. 9. Van Dijl, J. M. & Hecker, M. Microb. Cell Fact. 12, 3 (2013).
system for delivering the proper dosage 2
Department of Molecular Phytomedicine, University
of a molecule based on the longevity and of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Author contributions
self-renewal of the bacteria8. For plant ✉e-mail: ssiddique@ucdavis.edu C.H. drafted the initial version of the manuscript. S.S.
finalized the manuscript and designed the figure.
protection, B. subtilis, on the other hand,
appears to offer a continuous supply of the Published: xx xx xxxx Competing interests
required plant elicitor when employed in its https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0699-y The authors declare no competing interests.

Nature Plants | www.nature.com/natureplants

You might also like